Thursday, December 29, 2016

Is Obama's Last Chore To Start A War With Russia?

by Al Benson Jr.

A friend called me tonight after watching the TV "news" and told me that Comrade Obama was imposing more sanctions on Russia to their alleged plot to influence the US elections. Knowing Obama, such an action comes as no real surprise.

Having watched his actions in the past month I am convinced that he is in the process of trying to throw a monkey wrench into whatever gears of normal government may still remain in Washington. He wants, as do his bosses in the Ruling Establishment, to hand Trump the proverbial "hell in a hand basket" when he takes office. And part of that hell may be starting a war with the Russians. After all, it's what Hillary wanted to do and now that she seems to have been put aside, at least temporarily, Obama has got to do the whole chore on his own. Of course he will have plenty of guidance in the effort from those above him. A war with Russia that he could pass along to Trump would be his last great coup--sort of a "I'll spit in your eye" kind of departure. Somewhat akin to "dancing on your grave!"

He has ordered that thirty five Russian diplomats be ejected from this country and he has, according to reports, closed down two Russian compounds, one in New York and one in Maryland, supposedly in response to "Russian harassment of American diplomats in Moscow." Now I don't know if American diplomats in Moscow have been harassed or not, If so it would not be the first time.

Now I'm not in love with the Russian government, and Putin is an ex-KGB personality and I have never believed that the KGB just disappeared after the Berlin Wall came down as so many naive souls have stated. True, the name was changed but the apparatus to operate it remained. However, as much as I dislike Putin, I believe the US Establishment is using him as an excuse to attack the credibility of a new Trump administration by planting the rumors that all the "fake news" the "alt-right" supposedly planted out there has been coming from Russia. It's interesting that all those who now have a big problem with Russian seemed to have no problem with it when it was officially a part of the Soviet Union. Anti-Communists they were not and they still aren't.

According to an article from Business Insider by Pamela Engel: "The CIA has said the Russians had been working toward a specific goal when they hacked into the inboxes of Democratic National Committee staffers and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta: 'to help get (Donald) Trump elected'  president."

At first the FBI and the NSA, if I recall correctly, both disagreed with the CIA that the Russians had had anything to do with all the hacking that went on. They continued in their disagreement with the CIA until, at one point one day, we were treated to a media story about how, suddenly, the FBI and the NSA seemed to have a prophetic revelation and all of a sudden they totally agreed with the CIA that the Russians had been doing all this stuff. Both agencies suddenly caved in, I think per instruction from someone above them, and admitted that it was all the Russians' fault and that, without the Russians, somehow, Trump would not have made it to the White House and we would have been blessed with the autocratic rule of Queen Hillary instead. And don't think that, even at this late date, if they could find a way to pull such a stunt off they wouldn't do it in a New York heartbeat!

But if they can't accomplish that, then the least Obama can do is to start a war with the Russians before he leaves office and hand Trump a fait accompli when he gets sworn in. After all, if you had the bosses that Obama has, wouldn't you do it--or else???

There is an article on for December 30th by Daisy Luther dealing with this same situation that is worth reading.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

So Who Is Prompting "Faithless Electors" To Dump Trump?

by Al Benson Jr.

Back during the presidential debates someone asked Donald Trump if he would accept the results of the election.  It wasn't the first time he'd been asked that but I think he must have been getting tired of the question because he said "I think I'll keep you in suspense."  To which Hillary Clinton replied in her most appropriately shocked voice, that if Trump was not willing to accept the results of the election, why that would be "a threat to our democracy." All these slimy politicians love that word "democracy" when referring to our form of government. They know it's a republic, not a democracy, but they don't want you to realize that, or to realize the vast difference between the two.

Well, now that the election is history and Trump won it by a landslide, guess who isn't accepting the results of the election? Hillary and her surrogates have decided that the election did not turn out as they had expected and so they have not only decided to not accept the results but their minions are eagerly working to change the results. You see, to Hillary, the saying "be reasonable and do it MY way" is not a mere suggestion--it is a command! And she's going to make sure the country does it HER WAY no matter what! If us peons were all too stupid to vote for Hillary then she plans to make sure our vote is nullified. Of course she has lots of leftist assistance here.

Part of her leftist assistance (and I mean far left, really far left) is an outfit called Megaphone Strategies. This is a public relations firm working behind the scenes with the faithless electors to enable them to not cast their electoral votes for Trump as they are pledged to do. In other words, Megaphone Strategies is helping them weasel out of their electoral pledge--and if it can help enough of them to weasel out then that will throw the decision of who gets to be president into Congress.

Do I even need to mention that Megaphone Strategies has ties to prominent Democrats like Clinton and Obama? I didn't think so.

There was an article on on 12/13/16 by Peter Hasson that dealt with this. I would encourage folks to check that out if possible.

Seems like Megaphone Strategies was co-founded by Van Jones, former green jobs czar in the Obama administration, and Molly Haigh, who worked for Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. Sounds like a real middle-of-the-road outfit doesn't it? Megaphone's communications manager, Diane May, worked for Bernie Sanders'  2016 campaign. Their website advertises that May worked on both of the Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012. In fact, only two of the employees of Megaphone Strategies that are listed have not worked for some Democratic politician, though both have worked for "liberal" causes.

Vieu Truong, one of the firm's four listed board members headlined a Hillary Clinton fundraiser last September by the pro-Clinton environmentalist organization CleanTech Party and serves as the director of another Van Jones project, Green For All. There was also an article on World Net Daily recently noting Jones and this group.

Megaphone Statistics has other clients, some of the most notable of which are Black Lives Matter, the National Center for Transgender Equality and Netroots Nation You also might want to check out the site which mentions Van Jones as a "self-declared communist." I believe Jones is also a commentator on CNN, or at least he was at one point. Does that give you a subtle hint as to why many have labeled CNN as the Communist News Network?

These are the people that are trying to help Hillary Clinton destroy "our democracy" by helping her to find ways that the election results can be questioned. You see it's not alright for Trump to do that, but you must understand that a different standard prevails for Hillary--the untouchable and the unindicted.

Her surrogates are going to make sure that the American public does not have to put up with a day of a Trump presidency by overthrowing the legal results of the election by whatever means necessary, in true cultural Marxist fashion, and making sure that we will now learn to be truly thankful to the Establishment as they bestow Queen Hillary upon us. What was it that George Orwell said as the end of his prescient book 1984-- "He loved Big Brother." Or was that Big Sister???

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Deplorable--and Beyond

This article has been submitted by two gentlemen who have been astute observers of the political scene for several decades. Their names may or may not be recognizable to many and because of this they have chosen to provide this article with pseudonyms rather than actual identities. Given that we seem to be entering an era where the truth is being condemned as "fake news" while baldfaced cultural Marxist fabrications are being  parroted as eternal verity they felt that might be the best policy. In a time when telling the truth has become a revolutionary act these two have chosen the path of journalistic revolution. I think many will agree with their assessment. Quite naturally the Left will call them liars, but then, in the movie Braveheart the narrator paints a similar situation when he says The English will call me a liar--but history is written by those who have hanged heroes."

Al Benson Jr.

Deplorable--and Beyond

by Sammy Schwartz, with Vance Viscount

It seems that Hillary thoroughly understands DEPLORABLE. It really does "take one to know one." Pointing the finger at any opposition is easy when she knows how to intimidate people. And there is an old Marxist trick she has learned to employ called "Condemn others (for what you yourself are doing) and elevate yourself." 

The fact is: The way she has treated people who have gotten in her & Bill's) way is, not just deplorable, but especially, despicable and inexcusable.  We've seen lists (50+) of those who have gotten in her and his way and have met their demise.

That goes back to the "Mena (AR) Connection" from where arms shipments were being delivered to Nicaragua for "the Contra Rebels" who were fighting a vile regime.

Each delivery of munitions too two full planes to complete a full order; however, upon each return trip, a third plane was being escorted back, delivering drugs to Arkansas. When the airport fuel supply attendant stayed to witness the reason for missing quantities of petrol is when he discovered an extra plane. He had security detain that pilot, who claimed his legal right to one phone call. Within 30 minutes this happened...

The governor of Arkansas came and said, "You cannot hold this man; you must release him to me." That governor was none other than: "Slick Willie" William Jefferson Clinton. And, many surrounding that particular incident met their demise to make sure it was 'covered up" as best possible...some of those other witnesses "permanently," including two boys who happened to be walking the railroad tracks nearby.

That may not have been the beginning of the long string of so-called "carpet-sweeping,"  but the killings went to and through the two terms of the Clinton Presidency, which also included military bodyguards, pilots, and on-and-on.

Deplorable is a minor term for what Hillary was definitely "a party to." As Rodney Dangerfield used to say. "I get NO respect!" That is exactly what the Clintons have displayed for human beings, including Bill's continual and constant string of women who, (may or may not have) received injections or ingestions of drugs and/or sperm for their willing, or unwilling, receptions of sexual play from "Slick Willie."

It is a fact that too many people who unluckily happened  to "get in the way" of both Bill and Hillary (and their agenda), didn't make it to see the light of another day. Can anyone spell VINCE FOSTER? For a little background information, read the book Hell To Pay by Barbara Olson, published by Regnery Publishing in 1999.

"Deplorable" is a minor term for those types of atrocities. Complicity, condoning and "Enabling" might be better words for what Hillary seems to have NO problem allowing. SO WHY in the world would she think that good people in the United States would be willing to tolerate even more of the same from her? 

We are not done with this subject.

And, in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, we have had "cry-ins" and all other sorts of denials, including what appears to be George Soros' funded vote recounts,  with mysterious overnight bank deposits at 3:00 a.m. (E.S.T.). It goes without saying that the majority of Americans in the millions have awakened and spoken greatly through efforts of honesty. The Alternative Media, the so-called "fake news" (which is really the truth) have played a major part in this. You see, Separation of "Church and State" as currently portrayed, never really existed. Thoroughly tired of "crooks and liars," Christians brought forth their voice to shout "Thy Will Be Done!" Pray it stands!

Liberals (socialists) have gotten away with "Fudging the Truth" for far too long! So, frankly, to correct their previously docile attitudes, the "no-longer" silent majority spoke loudly and clearly  at the ballot box. We "deplorable" (meaning 'sad") folks have arisen, and reacted strongly for what America stands for. And, we have gotten on our feet and used our truly God-Given "Freedom of Speech"  to pass the word through direct communications, the internet & "Face-book"  to express to liberals & the rest of the world, that the Heartland of America is "fed up" with the phony Political-INcorrectness  that has plagued our nation for far too long.

We are tired of being intimidated by the Network Media, who have continued to lie and who try to justify their bias and their most-unjust reporting. We are more than tired of those Hollywood moguls who use their stardom and "pseudo-prestigious"  positions trying to sway others to their liberal line of thinking. We heard that several of these people threatened to leave the country if Trump was elected? Are they still here, and if so, why? Well, we don't buy what they sell. We don't wish to follow "fads" like ignorant sheep, admiring those who should really be frowned upon for their many abominable behaviors. Many of those so-called "stars" (in their own minds) are just that are not really themselves;  so, really, they are "phony-balonies" in many facets of their lives. There are some who have maintained their standards and principles. But many actors, trying to influence youth and young adults to act and misbehave like some do, have distorted what real moral foundations previous American Christian family generations have long conveyed.

Frankly, we are "fed up" with the cheating, lying to our faces, and hearing other liberal socialists condoning those lies; we are really tired of the crooked smiling and lying, straight to our faces. Living in lie-after-lie seems to be the liberal socialist way of existing. We are exhausted from being intimidated for valued truths. 

So you conservatives, QUIT allowing yourselves to feel that YOU are the ones who are wrong, when you know, deep down in your heart-of-hearts those esteemed truths are right.

No longer accept cheating and lying. Continue to stay "fighting mad." And do NOT allow yourselves to become "intimidated" by liberal socialists.  To describe what liberals really are, we must say that they are: bitter, beastly, depraved, despicable, dreadful, evil, hateful, heinous, hurtful, pitiful, sinister, venomous, wretched, wicked, ungodly, vile and yes: "deplorable" souls. i.e. (that is) means: sad and regrettable. 

Also, every liberal continues to be a P.I.T.A. to us. 
That means: 
    P= Pain

Sunday, November 27, 2016

A Little Update on the Jillary and Jill Recount

by Al Benson Jr.

After yesterday's post showing that had demonstrated that most of the money to finance Jillary's vote recount was coming from one source and not an outraged American public, I thought this little update might be appropriate.

According to an article in the Washington Times for 11/27/16, Wisconsin elections officials can see no proof of a hack. They said they: "...can't find evidence that any of its voting machines were hacked." And the article I took this from, asked the question "Do you have a plan B or are you going to let it go finally?"

I'll answer that one myself. If they don't yet have a plan B in the backroom you can bet the farm they are working on it as I write this. These are cultural Marxists we are talking about here and they never quit. They may fail with plans A, B, C, D, and E but not to worry. They will be back with plan F as soon as they tear it off the drawing board and they will keep trying until they find some round peg they can jam into a square hole hard enough that they will get at least some of what they want. I am reminded of how many times the cultural Marxists came back to Congress with their petitions for a holiday for their good buddy Martin Luther King Jr. Most people forget, but they came back every year for fourteen years until they finally got what they wanted and we've been stuck with that "holiday" and the opportunities for the leftist propaganda that goes with it ever since. I loathe what the cultural Marxists stand for. It is anti-Christian to the core, but you have to give them credit--they possess a tenacity that most Christians can only daydream about!

The Washington Times asked commission spokesman Reid Magney in Wisconsin if any evidence or indication of hacking had put in an appearance. He replied in an email "No evidence of hacking."

This was confirmed by yet another article from the same source listed above. I will quote: "CNN's New Day interviewed Jill Stein about her recount effort on Friday.  'Do you think this election was stolen' CNN's host John Berman asked Stein point-blank. Um, we don't know...And I think the forensic computer experts have raised serious questions. What we do know is that this was a hack-riddled election...Wait! It gets better. Remember that Hillary was found to alter polls? Well, Stein blamed her suspicions in part on the fake polls!  Those are Hillary's, Jill, not Trump's... And when Berman asked if she has evidence that a hack took place. No,. We do not have a smoking gun."

So after all this fuss and all the millions of dollars raised, most of it seemingly from one central source, we have to ask ourselves what the deuce is going on here? We're going to do all these vote recounts with no evidence of any wrongdoing--or it is now the plan to manufacture "evidence" as we go along? Will they find someone, somewhere down the line in this process that will be willing to "help" them out with revised vote totals or what?

And why did Ms. Stein end up doing something here that could not possibly benefit her or her party? Did someone make her an offer she couldn't (or didn't dare) to refuse? And was her doing this initially nothing more than a ploy to allow Hillary to get back into the game to "help her out?"

The great Christian statesman, Patrick Henry, when invited to take part in the Constitutional Convention back in 1787, refused to be a part of it. Mr. Henry said "I smell a rat." Mr. Henry was a wise man. I wonder how many "rats" he'd be able to smell in this current game were we fortunate enough to still have him around.   

Update: An article that appeared on at 8:19 this evening stated: "As reported earlier the election steal was put into motion when a group of 'experts'  reviewed the election results and reported that there appeared to be election fraud. However, a member of the group of 'experts' happens to be voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz. Bonifaz also happens to be connected with George Soros when he launched the National Voting Rights Institute in 1994. Bonifaz was the Institute's President. This is certainly shocking but no surprise. Hillary and Soros are in this for the steal."

So Bonifaz helped Soros back in 1994 and now he represents Jill Stein. My what an amazing coincidence!

Gateway Pundit also pointed out that Stein cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania. She has to go through the courts to do this and she has to present evidence that shows voter fraud. Seeing that Trump won Pennsylvania by around 70,000 votes, Ms. Stein would have to be able to prove that fraud was "probable."  Of course knowing  Soros and the Clintons, that thorny little problem may already be in the process of being "worked on."

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Where Is Jill Stein's Money Coming From For Vote Recount?

by Al Benson Jr.

On my other blog spot I posted an article earlier this afternoon (11/26) that dealt with Jill Stein's raising of millions of dollars to have votes recounted in 3 states where Hillary lost in an effort to shift the electoral vote just enough so that Hillary could, indeed, be enthroned in the White House, in the position she feels she so richly deserves, but which that  mean old Donald Trump deprived her of when he had the audacity to win the election. Nasty man that he is--but not to worry, she has found a way to get back at him and give herself the presidency at the same time.

We read that Jill Stein's great concern for an accurate vote count led her to file petitions in 3 states to have the votes recounted.For those who may not know who Ms. Stein is, she was the Green Party candidate for president in this past election. She claims she is not doing this to benefit Hillary in any way--she just wants to see truth, justice, and the American way prevail. Believe that and I have a bridge built with golden bricks in Tucson, Arizona I will sell you at bargain basement rates! Doing this is an expensive proposition. You don't get it done for peanuts, so Ms. Stein started fundraising online on November 24th with a goal of $2.5 million. According to Paul Joseph Watson of "Overnight on the hour, her fund received $160,000 every hour. These were not random people donating at 3 am to her campaign but rather some 'bot' that increased her amount by this amount on the hour."

If you are wondering what a "bot" is, so did I. I'd not heard this term before so I looked it up and found that it's kind of an Internet robot that performs an automated task every hour or every how-often-you-set-it-up to do this particular task. Up until this point Stein has raised more than $4.5 million, more than enough to take care of the recounts in those critical states Hillary needs to shift the electoral vote.

Watson has noted that:  "Go to Jill Stein's fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a perfectly consistent 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully.and noted that at night when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, the donations for this came in like clockwork with no deviation from the steady pace whatever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America and practically everyone is asleep at 3 am. Last night it should have slowed down. It did not. It just marched toward the finish line like an obedient soldier...Don't be fooled by the slick language on the donation page. If these donations  did not virtually stop at night THEY ARE NOT COMING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Yes, folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens..."

What Mr. Watson is saying is that all this so-called "contribution" money from concerned Americans who are supposedly worried about Trump being president IS COMING FROM ONE SOURCE!  Now stop and think about that for a minute. If it all comes from one source that means it is being used by that one source to change the election results. Supposedly this was Ms. Stein's project in her crusade for truth in the voting booth but, surprise of all surprises, now the Clinton Campaign had decided to enter the fray and help Ms. Stein out with her noteworthy project. Kinds of really makes you wonder whose project it really was to begin with doesn't it. Seems like Stein was a willing foil to get Hillary into the game to me.

So folks, if this scam works you will see the American people's will again thwarted by the Establishment and we will be expected to be stupid enough to go along with this--only some of us won't, so there will be problems. So watch the elections being stolen from you unless you all are willing to make a big fuss!

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

So Who Is Advising Trump To Soften Up?

by Al Benson Jr.

I have to admit, that unless Mr. Trump changes the direction he is starting to go in it is going to look to a lot of his supporters as if he is in the process of selling out to the Ruling Establishment he told us all he despised. I have to wonder who is working to move him in this direction. I also have to wonder who is giving him the advice he seems to be taking, whereby he is being "nice" to those that tried to stab him in the back and, in the process, forgetting his pledge to "drain the swamp." It seems he is hanging around with a whole bunch of the folks that filled up the swamp to begin with and his association with them will be a major preventative factor in the swamp being drained. I'd hate to think that all that talk was just talk. I thought better of him than that.

He is touting Mitt Romney, one of the instigators of the "Never Trump" movement for his Secretary of State. If ever anyone had "One World Government" credentials it is Mitt Romney. The only other hanger on in the Trump camp that could outdo Romney there is Newt Gingrich and now I am beginning to what what political plus Mr. Gingrich is waiting to be awarded. Pastor Chuck Baldwin recently stated in an article on  that Newt Gingrich " the quintessential insider, globalist,  and establishment hack."

Mr. Trump just nominated Nikki Haley, the South Carolina turncoat governor as his UN ambassador. That move ain't going over real well in the deep South where Ms. Haley was responsible for starting last year's cultural genocide campaign against all things Confederate. I wouldn't appoint this lady as dog catcher. I'm afraid she's try to "Yankeeize" my dog.

Trump made a good appointment with Jess Sessions and I have no problem with Stephen Bannon. His former association with Breitbart would indicate that he has knowledge of the world situation. I don't know enough about this lady he just tapped for the Education Department except that she is supposed to be in favor of charter schools and education vouchers to let parents send their kids to whatever schools they want, religious or otherwise. But I do question that if Christian parents go that route, how long will it be before the feds start telling them what they can teach their kids because, after all, the feds are helping to fund their education? Better if Christian parents would just reject the vouchers.

When we home schooled our kids it was a sacrifice and we were always short of money and we did get scholarship help on several occasions, but never from the feds! The idea of taking federal money did not occur to us at any point. Having seen what the feds did, indirectly, to textbook protesters in West Virginia, the thought of tainted, controlling federal bucks to help educate our kids was anathema to us.

And as long as I am analyzing what Mr. Trump is doing, I might as well put my two cents in regarding his new position on the Clintons. He told us in one of the presidential debates that if he were president Hillary would be in jail. So what happened to change his mind? Now he's telling us that he doesn't want to hurt the Clintons because "they are good people." He's got to be kidding, right? The Clintons would cut his throat for a quarter any day of the week and hand him the change and if he lives in the real world he has to know that. So what's all this "they are good people" stuff? He's starting to sound like a politician--God forbid!

The people that voted for Trump voted for him because they were sick and tired of the corruption and the public getting shafted by the Establishment and Trump sounded like that's what he was all about. What happens if the public finds out they've been shafted yet again?

It's beginning to sound like if Mr. Trump is going to "drain the swamp" he will probably end up doing it a thimble-full at a time--the same principle as someone dumping a cupful of water in the Gulf of Mexico to raise the water level.

Pastor Chuck Baldwin has urged Trump supporters that they cannot go to sleep, that they need to hold his feet to the fire on those promises he made. If his candidacy awakened the electorate, they need to stay awake and alert and watch what he does just like they would watch what any other candidate did. Pastor Baldwin said: "I tell you, again: this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change the course of a nation. Frankly, if this opportunity is squandered, there likely will not be another one in most of our lifetimes." This is sound advice and we better heed it because the lives and culture we help to preserve will be our grandchildren's.  

Update! According to a World News Daily article I just read it seems that the Republican Establishment has conned Mr. Trump into taking the position that climate change may now be a "man-made" issue, therefore their agenda and that of the other socialists on this issue will be preserved in a Trump administration. Bit by bit we see Mr. Trump backing off the issues he campaigned on and going the route the Establishment wants him to. SOMEONE HAS GOTTEN TO HIM  and is in the process of neutralizing what he claimed he wanted to do.

Saturday, November 12, 2016

"Whitelash" And the Cultural Marxists

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, a representative of the cultural Marxist class has come up with a new word in a pathetic attempt to define the reasons Trump won the presidential election when he really knew, in his heart of hearts, that Hitlery should have won it. The new term he came up with is "Whitelash." This representative of the cultural Marxist class is presently a commentator for CNN. Some have labeled that "news" network the "Communist News Network" because the Communists seem to get a better shake in their "news" broadcasts than anyone else does.

This CNN commentator is a man named Van Jones. Anyone remember good ol' Van? He was a special adviser for "Green Jobs" in the outgoing Obama Regime. He was Obama's "Green Jobs Czar." You can find Van mentioned in various sites on the Internet. One site noted of him that "There's little question that Jones was an avowed communist." The site noted that, in 1994 Mr. Jones was one of the founders o STORM, a Marxist-Leninist group whose hero was Chinese Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung. That's what Obama had for a "Green Jobs Czar." Anyone surprised? Jones made such a fuss in certain areas that he eventually had to resign. I don't know when CNN picked him up but they sure didn't get any bargain when they did.

The cultural Marxists had planned on Hitlery winning the election. They thought she was a shoo-in. They made the mistake of believing their own polls. Of course some even went so far as to try to implement her victory by "assisting" the vote totals in several states. If you doubt that then read some of the WikiLeaks material that has been posted on the Internet, or some of the other stuff captured on hidden cameras by the Veritas organization showing Democratic operatives talking about how they planned to "influence" the vote.

So Comrade Jones came up with the new culturally Marxist term to define why the evil Donald Trump won the election when the virtuous Hitlery should have. Remember the word "whitelash" because you will see more of it in days to come as other commentators in the prostitute mainstream media try to blame us evil white folks for the victory of that evil Donald Trump.

Everyone knows we should all have voted for Hitlery to show we have no prejudice against women, just like we all should have voted for Obama in the last two elections to show we had no prejudice against blacks. The fact that many of us didn't swallow that bit of race-baiting shows that we must all be prejudiced and must, therefore, assume our assigned places on "stools of everlasting repentance."

Had we not been guilty of "whitelash" we would all have voted for Hitlery so she could have been enthroned in the White House, have eviscerated the Second Amendment, have promoted her open borders scheme to end our national sovereignty  and have promoted a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child when that child became "inconvenient." Just look at all the golden opportunities we missed by not electing her! The fact that us evil white folks couldn't find it in our hearts to do all this shows that we are not only "deplorable" but totally "irredeemable."  Problem with this new cultural Marxist pet theory is that there were also black folks and Hispanic folks that voted the same way us evil whites did--against Hitlery. Of course all the blacks that voted for Trump must have been "Uncle Toms." That would explain why they failed in their bounden duty to elect Hitlery, the most compassionate candidate ever. As for the Hispanic folks that voted for Trump, I don't know what the Hispanic term for their "treason" might be. Maybe we could just call them people that displayed an unusual amount of common sense in this instance. But somehow I don't think that definition will appease those of a cultural Marxist persuasion.

But whatever happened, it was, as always, "whitey's fault." It always is. I also noted that a batch of Hollyweird people and various other "celebrities" all said that if Trump was elected they would leave the country.  From what I can tell, most of them haven't gone anywhere and don't really plan on making the trip. More's the pity! If the thought of a Trump presidency is so horrendous, then what's keeping them here?  They should be packing their bags by now and heading out for socialist gardens of Eden like Zimbabwe or Cuba--and making sure the door doesn't hit their backsides on the way out! As a prejudiced white guy, I won't shed any tears when you all are gone--and I don't care what color you are, or what your sexual preference is.

I guess all of us evil whites need to start attending sensitivity training class that will teach us to hate and loathe ourselves so we don't all fall prey to "whitelash." Blacklash is okay. That's politically correct--and besides, George Soros may fund some of that. Black prejudice is okay and the black "racists" that are prejudiced against us white folks are okay. It's just that we are not permitted to feel the same way toward them. The darker animals in this barnyard are always "more equal" than the lighter animals and us evil whites need to remember that.

What we really need to start doing is taking a good look behind the scenes at who is promoting and paying for this Marxist drivel--and then we need to start exposing them (Ephesians 5:11).

Tuesday, November 08, 2016

The "News" Media Is Nothing But Hillary's Water Carrier

by Al Benson Jr.

Just yesterday I read an article on  which carried a headline that stated: "RIGGED! Email PROVES media totally corrupt" Now there's a headline I could agree with. After watching the news media (so called) cover events I have been a partaker of for over forty years, I have to totally agree with the headline on the Horn News article. I long ago came to the conclusion that the absolute last thing the "news" media was all about was real news. Lots of folks couldn't quite see that, but the media's performance in prostituting itself before the Alter of St. Hillary in this current election cycle has opened lots of eyes.

The Horn News article continued: "The most recent batch of emails released by WikiLeaks reveals that CNN and The Washington Post were communicating with the Democratic National Convention during the election primaries, filtering them information to use in their reporting. In fact, Democrat insiders were actually writing the questions for interviews and doing newspaper reaearch! These allegedly non-partisan publications clearly had an alternative agenda outside from honest and respectable journalism." The article then shows part of one of the leaked emails that shows this.

And the article noted that: "It's clear the mainstream media has been working with the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and Clinton campaign to shape the political discourse throughout the entire election, focusing on Trump controversies." So, with the Democrats and the "lamestream media" working hand in glove to make Trump look bad, who can honestly say the system wasn't rigged?

What we have finally seen, right out in the open for those who have eyes to see, is "journalists' are are not really journalists at all, but rather  are a group of people on a political mission to help elect Hillary--anyway they have to. They have proven themselves to be nothing more than culturally Marxist political shills--something many of us figured out decades ago. But now it's out in the open!

One commentator on a Fox News interview either yesterday or today accused the media of helping to "drag the old hag staggering across the finish line."

For anyone that doesn't have mush for brains it should be more than obvious that the mainstream media has lost all credibility with ordinary folks. The only ones they may remotely still have credibility with is ultra-liberals, socialists, and communists, and the only reason they have any standing yet, even in such sordid company, is that these groups realize the media can be useful to them in their efforts to destroy the culture of ordinary Americans.

Someone told me in the last couple days that the readership of mainstream propaganda sheets like the New York Times and the Washington Post are way, way down. No one is paying them any attention anymore. The alternative media seems to be where much of the action is because you can still get real news there without the constant leftist slant.

So we have finally reached election day--and the general consensus among many is that Trump will win the election by a landslide but Hillary will end up in the White House because she is the "candidate of choice" of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the other One World Government groups. If the Democrats manage to steal the election and enthrone Hillary it will be interesting to see how the mainstream media reports, or spins, that because, in the final analysis, spin is what they are really about, not news.

Sunday, November 06, 2016

Comey Puppet Continues To Howl "Not Guilty, Not Guilty, Not Guilty!

by Al Benson Jr.

Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.

So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.

On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.

Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.

I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails  in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as  pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous!  An article on  noted  that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."

So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration  had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.

So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?

So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be. 

Thursday, November 03, 2016


See if you can get into

I asked people to try to get into my blog because on the morning of November 3rd I had tried to open it via Firefox and it would not open. When I went to check, I found out that, on Firefox, my blog was not even listed anymore. Guess I must have offended someone somehow. Didn't think my material was THAT controversial!

When I went to Google and put up the same search pages I found that my blog was still listed on Google's search pages, so if you want to check out my articles you may have to get into them by some other source than Firefox.

In following the odd trends in the present election cycle I note that the Clinton Camp has indulged in all manner of claims against both Trump and Wikileaks, claiming that both are being heavily influenced by Putin and the Russians. Now I am no fan of Putin's by any stretch of the imagination, but let's don't start blaming him for things he probably had no hand in.

And speaking of Hillary's loathing for Putin, didn't she have some kind of deal with him awhile back whereby they managed to sell Putin 20% of the Uranium in this country? Wonder if any of that Uranium was on land that was anyplace close to the Bundy Ranch in Nevada?

Watched a video a couple nights ago that had been on in which Mr. Piecznik noted that the material that came from Wikileaks was not passed to them by the Russians but, in reality, came from somewhere in the intelligence community, what Mr. Piecznik referred to as "deep state officials." Mr. Piecznik is a former assistant secretary of state and has been around the intelligence community for decades.

He warned of a "Clinton coup' etat" in which the Clintons had "co-opted" the FBI, CIA, and other groups but he said that there were those in these groups that were sincere patriots and they had initiated a counter-coup, part of which was the turning over to Julian Assange all these Clinton emails that he has been putting out there. The FBI's reopening of the Clinton email situation is part of this. So it will be interesting to see how all of this turns out. Whatever one may think of Trump, electing his opposite number in the Democratic Establishment is unthinkable for the future of this country. If such happens, we will, in fact, end up having no country at all. Trump seems to understand this and, for good reason, is opposed to Hillary's "open borders" approach to dismantling the country in favor of merging it into some kind of continental mega-state.

So stay alert to all this--and pray that the Lord will throw a monkey wrench into the gears of the One World Government boys' plans for us--and I mean pray seriously about this. 

Wednesday, November 02, 2016

K. I. S. S.

                                                  This election is NOT about Hillary
                                                   or Donald
                                                 Let Us All
                             Keep It Simple Stupid!
                                   It Is About
                              THE SOVEREIGNTY
                                                        OF   OUR 
                                          UNITED STATES OF
                     Sovereignty means: OUR INDEPENDENCE
                                              (Declared in 1776)
                              We DO NOT want to be ruled by:
                  ONE-WORLD-controlled Government!
                     (That is what this election is all about)
                                        The vision that
                        Hillary AND the MAIN-STREAM MEDIA
                                              have for  America 
                                    THAT of
                          An America Controlled by a WORLD
                          COURT, under the control of the
                                             United Nations
                 which will tell us what we can & can NOT DO
                 as opposed to our sovereignty under God.
                  Below is an outline/list of what that means and how it is intended to affect us:
       1. The Second Amendment--Our right to bear arms as                   guaranteed in the Constitution--no matter what government 
     2. Illegal immigration--A country without borders is no country
         at all. If you want a place in the United States come in legally
         and earn the right to vote and participate.
     3. The Supreme Court--We need a  Supreme Court that will 
          interpret the Constitution according to its original intent
          and not invent new interpretations as it goes along. We
          need justices that will protect the human rights of the
          unborn and not destroy them through "choice."
      4. Sovereignty and dominion (under God)--as opposed to rule
          by the United Nations or some other World Government
      5. The income tax and employment--Our present income tax
          was taken from the pages of The Communist Manifesto.               We need a fairer method of taxation and a business climate              that will guarantee that jobs will stay in this country and 
           not be relocated overseas.
       6. Freedom of religion--Which means not only the freedom to          worship according to the dictates of our consciences but               also freedom to practice our faith in the marketplace of our
           everyday lives.  We do NOT need freedom FROM religion,
           which is what is being forced on us nowadays.
       7. We need family values as opposed to "community values."
            It does not "take a village to raise a child"--it takes a caring
            and loving parents and family--a family as defined in the 
            Holy Bible.
        8. We need freedom and personal responsibility--as opposed
             to Hollywood's values and attitudes. 

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Justice at Last--or Yet Another Federal Distraction From WikiLeaks?

by Al Benson Jr.

According to the FBI has found "Tens of Thousands of new emails" and the Department of Defense has found at least  1K more. All this plus rumors of revolt over this issue in the FBI itself has caused that august agency to reopen the case with Hillary's emails that the director prematurely closed down last July, asserting that he saw nothing there they could prosecute Hillary for. He may not have looked too hard, especially in light of Slick Willy's "visit" to Loretta Lynch previous to that at the airport in Phoenix so they could talk about their grandchildren. We can only assume Slick Willy's visit to her on the tarmac was to ensure that she didn't press Mr. Comey to look real hard, but now he seems to be getting flack from the folks in his own organization that don't like some of what they see. There may be a handful of honest folks in there yet.

Even was forced to comment on this when it noted, on October 28th that: "The FBI is reopening its inquiry into Hillary Clinton's use of private e-mail while secretary of state, after investigators unearthed new e-mails through a separate probe of Clinton aide Huma Abedin's estranged husband, former Representative Anthony Weiner...The bureau is investigating illicit messages Weinter allegedly sent to a 15-year old girl in North Carolina,an inquiry that gave it access to devices used by Weiner and Abedin, according to the New York Times." Of course Hillary has pretended to want the FBI to clear this all up quickly and let the American people know what is going on. Sounds good, but the American people are absolutely the LAST people she wants to be aware of what really goes on. Especially this close to election day!

I think Info Wars, has got it pretty well figured out as to what really goes on here. In a brief article on their website on October 30th they noted the following: "The FBI has reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton after discovering new information on the electronic devices of Anthony Weiner. Could this be the end of Hillary's campaign or is it a distraction to draw attention away from more serious crimes and corruption within our government?  On Monday thousands of new emails from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta were published by WikiLeaks.  Within that new data dump was smoking gun proof that the White House was colluding with Hillary to cover up the fact that Obama had lied to Congress and the American people when he said he'd learned about the email scandal from the news..."

So Info Wars is wondering if this new rabbit trail to Weiner's computer is a diversion away from the material WikiLeaks has brought out. And while the stuff on Weiner's computer is probably worth checking out, this should not be done to the exclusion of the material WikiLeaks continues to bring out. Those that are able to check out the WikiLeaks material should not get off that target and baited and switched over to only what's on Weiner's computer.

If Hillary's campaign is to be sunk it will come from what WikiLeaks puts out there, not from what's on Weiner's computer for the most part. So those that can check this stuff out should not let their priorities be changed.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

The Republican Establishment Is Still Marxist

by Al Benson Jr.

The Republican Establishment people are still Marxists, just like they were back in 1856. The only difference is that, today, they have found a more devious way of doing it, one that makes them look like conservatives and makes the Democrats look like the only Marxist game in town. Not true! Oh, the Democrats are Marxists alright, but hardly the only ones in the national game--they are just the ones that come closest to admitting it. After all, the Communist Party endorsed Hillary so that fact has to tell you something.

Understand, when I use the term "Marxist" I am not saying that one has to be a card carrying member of some Marxist group. Rather, I am describing their worldview, what, as Hillary would say, is in "the darkness of their heart."

That the Republican Party had leftist origins is something that has been well documented. Donnie Kennedy and I, in our book Lincoln's Marxists, dealt with the Republican Party and its leftist origins and agenda on pages 125-27 and pages 142-43, as well as other places. We wrote about John Charles Fremont, the so-called "pathfinder" who was the first presidential candidate for the new Republican Party in 1856. Fremont had an affinity for socialism and socialists and had many in his command during the War of Northern Aggression. If you want something more than our book, then read Arthur R. Thompson's book To The Victor Go The Myths & Monuments. It's a long book, around 460 pages, but you will learn about the Republican Party and other conspiratorial groups as well. It's good background if you want to understand what is going on in the country today. Check out what Thompson has to say about Alvan E. Bovay and the Republican Party on pages 221 and 422.

The Republican Establishment has one goal, furthering the agenda of those who promote One World Government. And believe it or not, in order to do this without being detected, they often have to appear to be bumbling idiots. And they are really good at it. I can recall that Sam Francis, whose insightful articles many of you have read over the years, called the Democrats "the evil party" and the Republicans "the stupid party." And while I loved some of the stuff Sam wrote, I had to disagree with him on this one point. The Republican Party was not stupid--it was as evil as he thought the Democrats were, only it hid it better. And it's still doing it.

Just yesterday I read an article by Sally Zelikovsky on for October 18th. She said, in part, "While imbecilic Republicans bicker and snicker about Trump, Democrats will, once again, gather around Hillary despite their competing coalitions. Republicans are stuck in the quagmire of who killed the GOP and who is a more principled conservative, while the Democrats work with their media comrades and perfect their ground game. How do they do it? By dangling distractions with the one hand that Republicans fall for every time, while working their election magic with the other." And let me say here that Republican Establishment people that really want Hillary to win have to be pretty intelligent to appear that stupid. So why do they do it?  Because it fools their conservative core constituency  into thinking they have merely blundered with good intentions, when, in reality, they have been working to make sure the agenda of the Democrats slides on through without their being blamed for it.

And about now, I can hear some irate person asking the question: "Why would they do that?" They would do it because, at heart, they have the same worldview and agenda that the Democrats have, but they have to create the illusion of us having two "competing" parties so we don't ever catch on to the fact, as Donald Trump has so often stated, that "the system is rigged."

Pat Buchanan had an informative article on for October 19th, the title of which was: Is the System Rigged? You Betcha. And then Pat went on to explain how the system is rigged. He mentioned "Big Media--the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer's lifetime has there been such a blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party...Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down." While I have known for decades now, after watching and listening to them, that our "news" (what a laugh) media were Far Left in their thinking, I have watched them go after Trump with what could be labeled a blood lust. And Pat made a comment we should all stop and think about when he said: "Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism." Look at what he is saying there--and then burn your subscription blank to the New York Times or the Washington Post.

He mentioned several other things in the article, most of which I cannot cover here. He mentioned the Supreme Court, the 11 million illegal immigrants we now have here with the current rogue Regime, and Hillary, wanting to bring in many more. He noted Hillary's now famous speech to the Brazilian bankers in which she touted open borders for this country, essentially doing away with national sovereignty. How much have you heard about that from Big Media? They won't tell you about that because you are not supposed to know that Hillary, for all intents and purposes, wants to do away with the United States as a separate country. The moderator had the courage to bring up that question in the presidential debate last evening and Hillary tried to sluff it off by giving a lame answer about how she was really talking about electronic open borders. Bull! She was talking about doing away with our borders--because that's part of the One World Government agenda and she has been primed to push thatAnd if she manages, with the help of Big Media, to worm her way into office there will be Republicans in Congress that will be more than willing to help her remove our borders and contribute their part toward the creation of an inter-continental mega-state in the Americas.  I realize I sound dubious as to her intentions. You'll have to pardon me if I don't quite trust her. Eight years of Slick Willy and her in the White House already have really tarnished their halos.

Pat looks at the real possibility that we may get St. Hillary, one way or another, in this upcoming election when he says "Big Money and media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail." And he asked the question: "Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?"  And he noted that Hillary's "opposition" (again, what a laugh) would be headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.

So look for these "stupid" and "distracted" Republicans to fully cooperate with Hillary in everything they can that won't get them tossed out of office in the next upcoming election--if there is one. No, the Republican Establishment is not stupid, bumbling or inept--it is treacherous--because it has the same agenda as the One World Government crowd but conceals that fact under a cloak of pseudo-conservatism.

We better start waking up and realizing what a total sham the rigged system has become.

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Hillary's "Vision" For Amerika and "Republicans for Hillary"

by Al Benson Jr.

Pat Buchanan had an interesting article on for October 12th in which he discussed the recent second presidential debate and the "moderators" (read that surrogate debaters for Hillary) failure to ask the right questions. Of course, if the truth were known, they were questions they would shy away from dealing with because they would draw attention to Hillary's One World Government mindset and that is the last thing they want to bring to the public's attention. Why is that, the naive might ask? Because they share Hillary's worldview in that area, that's why.

Pat made some cogent observations when he asked: "How could the moderators have ignored that other leak of last week, of Clinton's speech to Brazilian bankers where she confessed she 'dreams' of a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders." He continued: "If the quote is accurate, and Clinton has not denied it, then she was saying she dreams of a future when the United States ceases to exist as a separate, sovereign  and independent nation.  She envisions not just a North American Union evolving out of NAFTA but a merger of all the nations, North, South and Central America, with all borders erased and people moving freely from one place to another within a hemispheric super-state." This is yet one more story the major media and the bosses that control it have deemed that the average American does not need to be aware of. So just ignore it.

All the moderators really wanted to deal with for the evening was Trump and that eleven year old tape and all other subjects were supposed to pale into insignificance. And Hillary would have been quite content to remain there also. This was supposed to be the evening that Trump was destroyed and his presidential possibilities probably handed over to one of the Council on Foreign Relations political hacks that he defeated in the primaries. Trump's bringing out for the audience four of the women that William Jefferson Clinton was accused of raping, one of which he paid a huge settlement to in order to keep it out of court, sort of put a little damper on that. But Trump's destruction was something the Republican Establishment really looked forward to because they never wanted Trump in the beginning. What they had really planned on was for one of the CFR-controlled hacks that he beat out to, somehow, be reinstated as a possible candidate again, didn't make any difference which one because they were all prepared to play the One World Government game, with the possible exception of Rand Paul. Albeit the rhetoric would have been a little different from one to the other, but the results for America would have been the same with any or all of them. But, then, I still think the initial plan was for Hillary to trounce whichever one was chosen to be the "loyal opposition."

After all the planned fuss over Trump's old tape broke, a whole bunch of gutless wonders calling themselves Republicans jumped ship and loudly asserted that for moral reasons they could not support Trump any longer--all the way from the Speaker of the House to the august (and I use the word loosely) Senator from Arizona. One thing folks, especially in the South and West need to start realizing--the Republican Party is utterly corrupt. It has been, like the Democratic Party, thoroughly co-opted by the CFR/Trilateralist cabal and those that run it are high in the echelons of the One World Government crowd. Their vision for "Amerika" is the same as Hillary's vision, and no matter how much they prattle about being "the party of small government" it is all a sham. I trust most of them about as far as I trust Bill Clinton and his presidentially-minded spouse.

The Republican Establishment never wanted Trump and they were almost to the point of choking when they had to pretend they did. They would have jumped at any possible means of scuttling Trump's candidacy so they could support Hillary (covertly of course). All I can say is that if this is the "best" the Republicans can do, who even needs the Democrats? There is no real difference between the two parties except the labels put there to confuse a slow-minded electorate.

As for that eleven year old Trump tape, the man he said all this stuff to, and who egged him on to say it, was Billy Bush. That surname ring any bells? It should. George Bush 1 is Billy's uncle and George Bush 2 and Jeb Bush are his cousins. The Bush Dynasty long ago stated up front that there was no way they could support Trump. He didn't have "New World Order" credentials.

Do you begin to see the possibility of connecting just a few dots here?

Interesting that one of the Bush Clan just happened to get this tape leaked at this critical time. Coincidence, just pure coincidence, right??? I notice that Billy has now been suspended from NBC for his part in this. Is he on the way out because his job there was done or has he been thrown under the bus after it was done?

I've said this before but it bears repeating. If most folks knew the real history of the Republican Party they would realize that its foundations are anything but conservative. To learn about the true history of the Republican Party read two books, Lincoln's Marxists, by Donnie Kennedy and myself, and To The Victor Go the Myths and Monuments by Arthur R. Thompson. These will give you a pretty good idea of the origins of the Republican Party. What goes on today is of the same caliber as what Lincoln and his friends did back in the 1860s. So please, stop looking at the Republican Party as our "national savior"--an office only Jesus Christ can fulfill.

The Republican Establishment will work to sell you out just as quick as Hillary will--because their loyalty to the New World Order is exactly the same as Hillary's