How About Repudiating Obama's National Emergency Decrees?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

I watched President Trump's national address about the situation on our Southern border this evening (January 8, 2019) and I must admit I was somewhat disappointed. Obama had this country under national emergency from 2012-2016 and unless Mr. Trump declares a new national emergency over our border situation that will super-cede and therefore replace Obama's national emergency decrees then we will continue to be under a national emergency decree handed to us by Comrade Obama.

I had hoped Mr. Trump would do this in this evening's speech but he did not. He is going to give Congress yet one more golden opportunity to vote money for his border wall. I think he's kidding himself. This current socialist-dominated House of Representatives has already told him to go fish as far as funding his border wall and yet here he comes, back to them with the same identical request and he hopes that, somehow, this time their reaction will be different.

You've all seen the comment about the man who keeps doing the same failed thing over and over and over and yet each time he redoes it he thinks the result will be somehow different than it was the last time--and it never is--and he can't quite figure out why. I don't know if that's where Mr. Trump is or not, but you have to wonder.

I tried to update this once and it wouldn't take it so lets try again. Check out www.infowars.com for 1/9 and see the article about Trump no longer effectively being the President because  the Deep State flunkies in Washington are countermanding all the directives he puts out there. Soft coup???

Update:  Check out www.infowars.com for 1/9,  specifically the article on Trump no longer being effectively the President because the Deep State flunkies in the Swamp are countermanding every order he puts out there.        #Alex Jones

It has taken him two years to get some of the Deep State operatives out of his administration and he has by no means gotten rid of all of them. They infest his administration and they pass up no chance whatever to countermand his agenda on important issues. He decides to pull troops out of Syria and Afghanistan and bring them home and almost the very next day someone in the Pentagon decides he can't do that and so they walk back his directives.  We can only wait and see what he does with that situation. I hope he doesn't just ignore it and hope it goes away--because it won't.

If too much of this sort of thing continues then the electorate that voted for Trump will begin to wonder just what is going on and why and that will make it more difficult for him in 2020. If Mr. Trump thinks he is going to placate his adversaries by "being nice" then he is dreaming. That will never happen. When he defeated Saint Hillary in 2016 he erased all possibilities of that for ever. If he got down on his knees before them and groveled they would still spit in his  eye. Those people don't know how to forgive and the word "charity" was never in their vocabulary. They have one agenda--to turn this country into a third world socialist paradise and if they have to shaft the American people to do that, why that's just great by them. Seeing that so many of us failed to vote for "Madame President" it's only what we deserve, right? Of course if we had voted for her we'd have gotten the same thing!

Obama worked mightily at that but couldn't quite bring it off and so he was forced to pass the baton along to Madame President, except she wasn't quite up to the task of catching it so Trump got it instead. He has done some good things, but I get the feeling that when it comes to indicting Hillary and Company for the whole Uranium One scam he just doesn't have the heart for it. In fact, I get the impression that Hillary and Company are going to end up walking and never have to pay for their crimes in this life. Her  payment for her political "indiscretions" will come in the next life, after she departs from this life and her final Judge will be one she cannot bribe or scare--and then she will pay the full price.

In the meantime I am not sure what Mr. Trump will do about his border wall and our national security, but whatever it is, it would appear he is not quite ready to do it yet.

A Government Shutdown Solves Lots of Problems for the Democrats

by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Well, looks like we may have another government shutdown, compliments of the socialist members of Congress who are still cheeky enough to refer to themselves as Democrats.  But then, I guess you can still fool some of the people some of the time, though it is getting a bit more difficult.

Seems to me I recall that "honest" Chucky Schumer moaned back in 2013 what a tragedy a government shutdown would be. But now he seems to be okay with it. All depends on whose ox is being gored doesn't it?

The reason for this potential shutdown seems to be the DACA program for letting lots of younger illegals stay in this country. The Republicans claim to want to get rid of some of them while the Demoncrats want to keep them all and import even more. After all, importing lots of folks that won't assimilate is a great culture changer and that's what this is really all about.

But I submit that, right now, the Demoncrats have an even bigger concern than the DACA program. They are concerned about the ongoing revelations starting to be brought out about the Uranium One sale to Russia and the Clinton Foundation and their ongoing (and probably illegal) efforts to undue the results of the 2016 election.

On January 19th an article by Kyle Becker appeared on http://www.bizpacreview.com the headline for which was 'Worse Than Watergate': Republicans uncover FISA memo they say changes everything on Trump investigation.

Becker writes: "If a FISA document uncovered by House investigators  proves to be as bad as all appearances, the prior administration will stand accused of abusing federal law enforcement and intelligence assets in order to sabotage Donald Trump's presidential campaign." According to Rep. Ron DeSantis: "The facts contained in this memo are jaw-dropping and demand full transparency There is no higher priority than the release of this information to preserve our democracy." Outside of this supposedly being a republic instead of a democracy, I would agree with DeSantis. Other congressmen have said the same thing. Rep. Jim Jordan says "It is so alarming the American people have to see this," And Rep. Matt Gaetz states" "I think this will not end just with firings. I believe there are people who will go to jail." After all the crap the Klintons and their cronies have pulled on America over the decades, let us fervently pray that will be the case. But I still won't believe it until I see it.

Right now, however, it would seem that this is one situation the Demoncrats would like to see go away. They are in deep do-do up to their necks and they'd rather the public not be aware of all this for any prolonged period of time. Might hurt their chances to steal the 2018 mid-term elections. So a government shutdown right now would do them a world of good--and if it lasted long enough they could work to distract the voting public with more of Trump's "Russian collusion-delusion." After all, they tried to steal the 2016 election, which is what some of this is all about, so why wouldn't they continue this year in their usual habits? Problem is, you have some Republicans that are more than willing to help them (collude with them) in such an effort. The Deep State in both parties, and beyond, wants to put Trump down. He won't play the game by their Establishment rules (helping to keep America and its people last) so he's got to go.

So in light of whatever new revelations the honest Republicans in Congress want to put out there for the public, it would be much better for the devious Demoncrats right now to have a government shutdown to give folks a chance to forget about what absolute scumbags they have been.

If you want to keep up on this situation go to Fox News and InfoWars.com because these are two places you will get the truth about this situation. Forget about the mainstream media. They have lied about so much to so many for so long that they would not recognize the truth if they met it in their soup at supper!

The Obama Coup Against Trump

by Al Benson Jr.

Over the whole of this past weekend and the previous week I have been watching all the seemingly weird developments having to do with Comrade Obama's (as well as his bosses behind him) attempt to remove Donald Trump from the presidency. To say that this is a highly organized and planned coup is to put it mildly. Obama never really wanted to relinquish the presidency. He fondly wished (had his puppet masters allowed it) to continue on as president so he could complete the task of culturally and socially dismantling the country--the fond dream of all cultural Marxists in America. His puppet masters, for reasons of their own, didn't allow that, much to his chagrin. But they did the next best thing.  They set him up so he could conduct a "guerrilla presidency" less than two miles from the White House, with over 30,000 "volunteers" across the country, to carry out whatever mayhem he directed them to.

This is not something that he thought up on his own. It was all planned well ahead of the election in case Hillary was not able to bring that off. When she couldn't, they swung into action and they have continued every day since. Trump will "tear down their meat house" of One World Government and they can't afford to let that happen. In typical cultural Marxist fashion they have to get rid of him--and they will use any method it takes.

So here comes the next stage of the game. The vote recounts didn't do it so we move on to this. Now it comes out that Trump was wiretapped  while the presidential campaign was in progress, which Obama claims is totally false, but Hillary admits it. Honestly now, who can believe anything this man says? When it comes to prevarication, he and Slick Willie fight for first place, no matter what the definition of "is" is.

According to www.eheadlines.com The Gateway Pundit "reported earlier that the first FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) request came right after AG Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016." And remember, this was a "chance" meeting to discuss photos of their grandchildren! No collusion here. These honest souls wouldn't even think of it! Hillary later tweeted: "Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based bank." Evidence? Who needs evidence? Isn't Hillary's word enough? And the article, written by Kristie McDonald, was headlined: So Hillary Knew About the Trump Wiretap--Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election.

Ms. McDonald wrote yet another short article about this on March 5th in which she said: "'This is Spying,' Conservative radio host Mark Levin made the case that former President Obama and his operatives have actively worked to spy on and undermine President Donald Trump and his administration. Levin spoke to ';Fox & Friends' on Sunday and used liberal news sources to essentially prove that the Obama administration was behind spying on President Trump and others in his campaign during the election season. Newt Gingrich also weighed in on the accusations. 'Smells to high heavens'." As much as I hate to agree with Newt Gingrich (the penultimate One Worlder) about much of anything, his comments in this one instance were pretty accurate. Makes you wonder what he's up to!

Not only are they trying to bring Trump down, but also all the people in his inner circle, so that there will be no one left to help him in defending himself from whatever cock and bull story the Leftists dream up and the prostitute press promotes. Michael Flynn is already gone and now they are attacking Jeff Sessions. Will Steve Bannon be next?

An article on http://www.wnd.com by Greg Corombos on March 5th observed: "A former U.S. Justice Department official says the liberal outrage over Attorney General Jeff Sessions having contact with the Russian ambassador during the 2016 campaign is much ado about nothing and Democrats are doing whatever they can to thwart the Trump agenda...Former Justice Department official Hans von Spakovsky told WND and Radio America the controversy is way overblown...He said the Democrats are still in shock over losing the election and are lashing out in every possible direction." He said "They did not want Jeff Sessions to become attorney general because he's a conservative, rule-of-law type of guy. They're seizing on this, even though there's nothing really to it when you dig down into it, because they want to oppose anything the attorney general might do, such as actually start enforcing our immigration laws. That's the real goal here." And we all realize that you can't water our culture down even more if you can't get those illegals in here by the thousands. American cultural adulteration is a big part of the game here.American culture has to go. Christianity and Western civilization have to go--and we need to understand this!

Some of Trump's advisors are calling for a purge of those Obama appointees that are infesting the federal government. That sounds like a capital idea and they need to get started immediately, if not sooner, on that project. They could name it Operation Boot Obama Clones. You can't expect the people that Obama appointed will do anything except continue their loyalty to their Marxist-in Chief, while opposing and hindering every effort Trump makes to help the American people.

Realize this--Obama and his minions (as well as those who fund them) don't want things to improve for the American public and so they will do whatever it takes to prevent that from happening. They are, after all, cultural Marxists, and they are bent on our destruction as a people and a culture. That's their agenda--and Obama's too.

Those confused folk who would love Obama to get a third term don't get it. Unfortunately, they have mush for brains because they don't realize yet, if they ever will,  that Obama hates their guts every bit as much as he hates the rest of us. He and those who hire him and his "volunteers" are trying to overthrow a legitimately elected government. There used to be jail sentences handed out for that kind of thing. Anymore, who knows??? 

Update:  An article on www.lewrockwell.com   for Monday, March 6th has stated the situation very clearly. It was written by Joachim Hagopian, a West Point graduate and former U.S. Army officer. He said: "The United States federal government in Washington is under attack today. Our nation's capital is presently under siege, not from military bombs or rockets fired by any foreign enemy but from powerful means within. With Obama-Hillary-Soros ostensibly maneuvering outside official government channels, against America's legitimately elected President Trump, and their loyalist foot soldiers--loyalists within the CIA/NSA/FBI still operating inside deep state, criminally conspiring...with Mainstream Media, this sinister alliance is also organizing legions of clueless young Leftist protesters to be at the ready for deployment in the streets to wreak havoc violently rioting as paid insurgents." What Mr. Hagopian is describing here, what is going on at this moment, is civil war and the clueless public probably won't wake up to that until it is all over and the Deep State wins--and then they will howl and moan "why didn't someone tell us?" The Lord gave us one more chance with Trump--and most are sleeping through it. They may well end up being the most rested people in the concentration camps! 
 

Is Obama's Last Chore To Start A War With Russia?

by Al Benson Jr.

A friend called me tonight after watching the TV "news" and told me that Comrade Obama was imposing more sanctions on Russia to their alleged plot to influence the US elections. Knowing Obama, such an action comes as no real surprise.

Having watched his actions in the past month I am convinced that he is in the process of trying to throw a monkey wrench into whatever gears of normal government may still remain in Washington. He wants, as do his bosses in the Ruling Establishment, to hand Trump the proverbial "hell in a hand basket" when he takes office. And part of that hell may be starting a war with the Russians. After all, it's what Hillary wanted to do and now that she seems to have been put aside, at least temporarily, Obama has got to do the whole chore on his own. Of course he will have plenty of guidance in the effort from those above him. A war with Russia that he could pass along to Trump would be his last great coup--sort of a "I'll spit in your eye" kind of departure. Somewhat akin to "dancing on your grave!"

He has ordered that thirty five Russian diplomats be ejected from this country and he has, according to reports, closed down two Russian compounds, one in New York and one in Maryland, supposedly in response to "Russian harassment of American diplomats in Moscow." Now I don't know if American diplomats in Moscow have been harassed or not, If so it would not be the first time.

Now I'm not in love with the Russian government, and Putin is an ex-KGB personality and I have never believed that the KGB just disappeared after the Berlin Wall came down as so many naive souls have stated. True, the name was changed but the apparatus to operate it remained. However, as much as I dislike Putin, I believe the US Establishment is using him as an excuse to attack the credibility of a new Trump administration by planting the rumors that all the "fake news" the "alt-right" supposedly planted out there has been coming from Russia. It's interesting that all those who now have a big problem with Russian seemed to have no problem with it when it was officially a part of the Soviet Union. Anti-Communists they were not and they still aren't.

According to an article from Business Insider by Pamela Engel: "The CIA has said the Russians had been working toward a specific goal when they hacked into the inboxes of Democratic National Committee staffers and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta: 'to help get (Donald) Trump elected'  president."

At first the FBI and the NSA, if I recall correctly, both disagreed with the CIA that the Russians had had anything to do with all the hacking that went on. They continued in their disagreement with the CIA until, at one point one day, we were treated to a media story about how, suddenly, the FBI and the NSA seemed to have a prophetic revelation and all of a sudden they totally agreed with the CIA that the Russians had been doing all this stuff. Both agencies suddenly caved in, I think per instruction from someone above them, and admitted that it was all the Russians' fault and that, without the Russians, somehow, Trump would not have made it to the White House and we would have been blessed with the autocratic rule of Queen Hillary instead. And don't think that, even at this late date, if they could find a way to pull such a stunt off they wouldn't do it in a New York heartbeat!

But if they can't accomplish that, then the least Obama can do is to start a war with the Russians before he leaves office and hand Trump a fait accompli when he gets sworn in. After all, if you had the bosses that Obama has, wouldn't you do it--or else???

There is an article on LewRockwell.com for December 30th by Daisy Luther dealing with this same situation that is worth reading.

So Who Is Prompting "Faithless Electors" To Dump Trump?

by Al Benson Jr.

Back during the presidential debates someone asked Donald Trump if he would accept the results of the election.  It wasn't the first time he'd been asked that but I think he must have been getting tired of the question because he said "I think I'll keep you in suspense."  To which Hillary Clinton replied in her most appropriately shocked voice, that if Trump was not willing to accept the results of the election, why that would be "a threat to our democracy." All these slimy politicians love that word "democracy" when referring to our form of government. They know it's a republic, not a democracy, but they don't want you to realize that, or to realize the vast difference between the two.

Well, now that the election is history and Trump won it by a landslide, guess who isn't accepting the results of the election? Hillary and her surrogates have decided that the election did not turn out as they had expected and so they have not only decided to not accept the results but their minions are eagerly working to change the results. You see, to Hillary, the saying "be reasonable and do it MY way" is not a mere suggestion--it is a command! And she's going to make sure the country does it HER WAY no matter what! If us peons were all too stupid to vote for Hillary then she plans to make sure our vote is nullified. Of course she has lots of leftist assistance here.

Part of her leftist assistance (and I mean far left, really far left) is an outfit called Megaphone Strategies. This is a public relations firm working behind the scenes with the faithless electors to enable them to not cast their electoral votes for Trump as they are pledged to do. In other words, Megaphone Strategies is helping them weasel out of their electoral pledge--and if it can help enough of them to weasel out then that will throw the decision of who gets to be president into Congress.

Do I even need to mention that Megaphone Strategies has ties to prominent Democrats like Clinton and Obama? I didn't think so.

There was an article on www.dailycaller.com on 12/13/16 by Peter Hasson that dealt with this. I would encourage folks to check that out if possible.

Seems like Megaphone Strategies was co-founded by Van Jones, former green jobs czar in the Obama administration, and Molly Haigh, who worked for Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. Sounds like a real middle-of-the-road outfit doesn't it? Megaphone's communications manager, Diane May, worked for Bernie Sanders'  2016 campaign. Their website advertises that May worked on both of the Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012. In fact, only two of the employees of Megaphone Strategies that are listed have not worked for some Democratic politician, though both have worked for "liberal" causes.

Vieu Truong, one of the firm's four listed board members headlined a Hillary Clinton fundraiser last September by the pro-Clinton environmentalist organization CleanTech Party and serves as the director of another Van Jones project, Green For All. There was also an article on World Net Daily recently noting Jones and this group.

Megaphone Statistics has other clients, some of the most notable of which are Black Lives Matter, the National Center for Transgender Equality and Netroots Nation You also might want to check out the site www.conservapedia.com which mentions Van Jones as a "self-declared communist." I believe Jones is also a commentator on CNN, or at least he was at one point. Does that give you a subtle hint as to why many have labeled CNN as the Communist News Network?

These are the people that are trying to help Hillary Clinton destroy "our democracy" by helping her to find ways that the election results can be questioned. You see it's not alright for Trump to do that, but you must understand that a different standard prevails for Hillary--the untouchable and the unindicted.

Her surrogates are going to make sure that the American public does not have to put up with a day of a Trump presidency by overthrowing the legal results of the election by whatever means necessary, in true cultural Marxist fashion, and making sure that we will now learn to be truly thankful to the Establishment as they bestow Queen Hillary upon us. What was it that George Orwell said as the end of his prescient book 1984-- "He loved Big Brother." Or was that Big Sister???

A Little Update on the Jillary and Jill Recount

by Al Benson Jr.

After yesterday's post showing that InfoWars.com had demonstrated that most of the money to finance Jillary's vote recount was coming from one source and not an outraged American public, I thought this little update might be appropriate.

According to an article in the Washington Times for 11/27/16, Wisconsin elections officials can see no proof of a hack. They said they: "...can't find evidence that any of its voting machines were hacked." And the article I took this from, http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com asked the question "Do you have a plan B or are you going to let it go finally?"

I'll answer that one myself. If they don't yet have a plan B in the backroom you can bet the farm they are working on it as I write this. These are cultural Marxists we are talking about here and they never quit. They may fail with plans A, B, C, D, and E but not to worry. They will be back with plan F as soon as they tear it off the drawing board and they will keep trying until they find some round peg they can jam into a square hole hard enough that they will get at least some of what they want. I am reminded of how many times the cultural Marxists came back to Congress with their petitions for a holiday for their good buddy Martin Luther King Jr. Most people forget, but they came back every year for fourteen years until they finally got what they wanted and we've been stuck with that "holiday" and the opportunities for the leftist propaganda that goes with it ever since. I loathe what the cultural Marxists stand for. It is anti-Christian to the core, but you have to give them credit--they possess a tenacity that most Christians can only daydream about!

The Washington Times asked commission spokesman Reid Magney in Wisconsin if any evidence or indication of hacking had put in an appearance. He replied in an email "No evidence of hacking."

This was confirmed by yet another article from the same source listed above. I will quote: "CNN's New Day interviewed Jill Stein about her recount effort on Friday.  'Do you think this election was stolen' CNN's host John Berman asked Stein point-blank. Um, we don't know...And I think the forensic computer experts have raised serious questions. What we do know is that this was a hack-riddled election...Wait! It gets better. Remember that Hillary was found to alter polls? Well, Stein blamed her suspicions in part on the fake polls!  Those are Hillary's, Jill, not Trump's... And when Berman asked if she has evidence that a hack took place. No,. We do not have a smoking gun."

So after all this fuss and all the millions of dollars raised, most of it seemingly from one central source, we have to ask ourselves what the deuce is going on here? We're going to do all these vote recounts with no evidence of any wrongdoing--or it is now the plan to manufacture "evidence" as we go along? Will they find someone, somewhere down the line in this process that will be willing to "help" them out with revised vote totals or what?

And why did Ms. Stein end up doing something here that could not possibly benefit her or her party? Did someone make her an offer she couldn't (or didn't dare) to refuse? And was her doing this initially nothing more than a ploy to allow Hillary to get back into the game to "help her out?"

The great Christian statesman, Patrick Henry, when invited to take part in the Constitutional Convention back in 1787, refused to be a part of it. Mr. Henry said "I smell a rat." Mr. Henry was a wise man. I wonder how many "rats" he'd be able to smell in this current game were we fortunate enough to still have him around.   

Update: An article that appeared on http://www.thegatewaypundit.com at 8:19 this evening stated: "As reported earlier the election steal was put into motion when a group of 'experts'  reviewed the election results and reported that there appeared to be election fraud. However, a member of the group of 'experts' happens to be voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz. Bonifaz also happens to be connected with George Soros when he launched the National Voting Rights Institute in 1994. Bonifaz was the Institute's President. This is certainly shocking but no surprise. Hillary and Soros are in this for the steal."

So Bonifaz helped Soros back in 1994 and now he represents Jill Stein. My what an amazing coincidence!

Gateway Pundit also pointed out that Stein cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania. She has to go through the courts to do this and she has to present evidence that shows voter fraud. Seeing that Trump won Pennsylvania by around 70,000 votes, Ms. Stein would have to be able to prove that fraud was "probable."  Of course knowing  Soros and the Clintons, that thorny little problem may already be in the process of being "worked on."

"Whitelash" And the Cultural Marxists

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, a representative of the cultural Marxist class has come up with a new word in a pathetic attempt to define the reasons Trump won the presidential election when he really knew, in his heart of hearts, that Hitlery should have won it. The new term he came up with is "Whitelash." This representative of the cultural Marxist class is presently a commentator for CNN. Some have labeled that "news" network the "Communist News Network" because the Communists seem to get a better shake in their "news" broadcasts than anyone else does.

This CNN commentator is a man named Van Jones. Anyone remember good ol' Van? He was a special adviser for "Green Jobs" in the outgoing Obama Regime. He was Obama's "Green Jobs Czar." You can find Van mentioned in various sites on the Internet. One site noted of him that "There's little question that Jones was an avowed communist." The site www.politifact.com noted that, in 1994 Mr. Jones was one of the founders o STORM, a Marxist-Leninist group whose hero was Chinese Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung. That's what Obama had for a "Green Jobs Czar." Anyone surprised? Jones made such a fuss in certain areas that he eventually had to resign. I don't know when CNN picked him up but they sure didn't get any bargain when they did.

The cultural Marxists had planned on Hitlery winning the election. They thought she was a shoo-in. They made the mistake of believing their own polls. Of course some even went so far as to try to implement her victory by "assisting" the vote totals in several states. If you doubt that then read some of the WikiLeaks material that has been posted on the Internet, or some of the other stuff captured on hidden cameras by the Veritas organization showing Democratic operatives talking about how they planned to "influence" the vote.

So Comrade Jones came up with the new culturally Marxist term to define why the evil Donald Trump won the election when the virtuous Hitlery should have. Remember the word "whitelash" because you will see more of it in days to come as other commentators in the prostitute mainstream media try to blame us evil white folks for the victory of that evil Donald Trump.

Everyone knows we should all have voted for Hitlery to show we have no prejudice against women, just like we all should have voted for Obama in the last two elections to show we had no prejudice against blacks. The fact that many of us didn't swallow that bit of race-baiting shows that we must all be prejudiced and must, therefore, assume our assigned places on "stools of everlasting repentance."

Had we not been guilty of "whitelash" we would all have voted for Hitlery so she could have been enthroned in the White House, have eviscerated the Second Amendment, have promoted her open borders scheme to end our national sovereignty  and have promoted a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child when that child became "inconvenient." Just look at all the golden opportunities we missed by not electing her! The fact that us evil white folks couldn't find it in our hearts to do all this shows that we are not only "deplorable" but totally "irredeemable."  Problem with this new cultural Marxist pet theory is that there were also black folks and Hispanic folks that voted the same way us evil whites did--against Hitlery. Of course all the blacks that voted for Trump must have been "Uncle Toms." That would explain why they failed in their bounden duty to elect Hitlery, the most compassionate candidate ever. As for the Hispanic folks that voted for Trump, I don't know what the Hispanic term for their "treason" might be. Maybe we could just call them people that displayed an unusual amount of common sense in this instance. But somehow I don't think that definition will appease those of a cultural Marxist persuasion.

But whatever happened, it was, as always, "whitey's fault." It always is. I also noted that a batch of Hollyweird people and various other "celebrities" all said that if Trump was elected they would leave the country.  From what I can tell, most of them haven't gone anywhere and don't really plan on making the trip. More's the pity! If the thought of a Trump presidency is so horrendous, then what's keeping them here?  They should be packing their bags by now and heading out for socialist gardens of Eden like Zimbabwe or Cuba--and making sure the door doesn't hit their backsides on the way out! As a prejudiced white guy, I won't shed any tears when you all are gone--and I don't care what color you are, or what your sexual preference is.

I guess all of us evil whites need to start attending sensitivity training class that will teach us to hate and loathe ourselves so we don't all fall prey to "whitelash." Blacklash is okay. That's politically correct--and besides, George Soros may fund some of that. Black prejudice is okay and the black "racists" that are prejudiced against us white folks are okay. It's just that we are not permitted to feel the same way toward them. The darker animals in this barnyard are always "more equal" than the lighter animals and us evil whites need to remember that.

What we really need to start doing is taking a good look behind the scenes at who is promoting and paying for this Marxist drivel--and then we need to start exposing them (Ephesians 5:11).

Comey Puppet Continues To Howl "Not Guilty, Not Guilty, Not Guilty!

by Al Benson Jr.

Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.

So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.

On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.

Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.

I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails  in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as  pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous!  An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/  noted  that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."

So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration  had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.

So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?

So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be. 

Justice at Last--or Yet Another Federal Distraction From WikiLeaks?

by Al Benson Jr.

According to http://constitution.com the FBI has found "Tens of Thousands of new emails" and the Department of Defense has found at least  1K more. All this plus rumors of revolt over this issue in the FBI itself has caused that august agency to reopen the case with Hillary's emails that the director prematurely closed down last July, asserting that he saw nothing there they could prosecute Hillary for. He may not have looked too hard, especially in light of Slick Willy's "visit" to Loretta Lynch previous to that at the airport in Phoenix so they could talk about their grandchildren. We can only assume Slick Willy's visit to her on the tarmac was to ensure that she didn't press Mr. Comey to look real hard, but now he seems to be getting flack from the folks in his own organization that don't like some of what they see. There may be a handful of honest folks in there yet.

Even http://www.bloomberg.com was forced to comment on this when it noted, on October 28th that: "The FBI is reopening its inquiry into Hillary Clinton's use of private e-mail while secretary of state, after investigators unearthed new e-mails through a separate probe of Clinton aide Huma Abedin's estranged husband, former Representative Anthony Weiner...The bureau is investigating illicit messages Weinter allegedly sent to a 15-year old girl in North Carolina,an inquiry that gave it access to devices used by Weiner and Abedin, according to the New York Times." Of course Hillary has pretended to want the FBI to clear this all up quickly and let the American people know what is going on. Sounds good, but the American people are absolutely the LAST people she wants to be aware of what really goes on. Especially this close to election day!

I think Info Wars,  http://www.inforwars.com has got it pretty well figured out as to what really goes on here. In a brief article on their website on October 30th they noted the following: "The FBI has reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton after discovering new information on the electronic devices of Anthony Weiner. Could this be the end of Hillary's campaign or is it a distraction to draw attention away from more serious crimes and corruption within our government?  On Monday thousands of new emails from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta were published by WikiLeaks.  Within that new data dump was smoking gun proof that the White House was colluding with Hillary to cover up the fact that Obama had lied to Congress and the American people when he said he'd learned about the email scandal from the news..."

So Info Wars is wondering if this new rabbit trail to Weiner's computer is a diversion away from the material WikiLeaks has brought out. And while the stuff on Weiner's computer is probably worth checking out, this should not be done to the exclusion of the material WikiLeaks continues to bring out. Those that are able to check out the WikiLeaks material should not get off that target and baited and switched over to only what's on Weiner's computer.

If Hillary's campaign is to be sunk it will come from what WikiLeaks puts out there, not from what's on Weiner's computer for the most part. So those that can check this stuff out should not let their priorities be changed.

The Republican Establishment Is Still Marxist

by Al Benson Jr.

The Republican Establishment people are still Marxists, just like they were back in 1856. The only difference is that, today, they have found a more devious way of doing it, one that makes them look like conservatives and makes the Democrats look like the only Marxist game in town. Not true! Oh, the Democrats are Marxists alright, but hardly the only ones in the national game--they are just the ones that come closest to admitting it. After all, the Communist Party endorsed Hillary so that fact has to tell you something.

Understand, when I use the term "Marxist" I am not saying that one has to be a card carrying member of some Marxist group. Rather, I am describing their worldview, what, as Hillary would say, is in "the darkness of their heart."

That the Republican Party had leftist origins is something that has been well documented. Donnie Kennedy and I, in our book Lincoln's Marxists, dealt with the Republican Party and its leftist origins and agenda on pages 125-27 and pages 142-43, as well as other places. We wrote about John Charles Fremont, the so-called "pathfinder" who was the first presidential candidate for the new Republican Party in 1856. Fremont had an affinity for socialism and socialists and had many in his command during the War of Northern Aggression. If you want something more than our book, then read Arthur R. Thompson's book To The Victor Go The Myths & Monuments. It's a long book, around 460 pages, but you will learn about the Republican Party and other conspiratorial groups as well. It's good background if you want to understand what is going on in the country today. Check out what Thompson has to say about Alvan E. Bovay and the Republican Party on pages 221 and 422.

The Republican Establishment has one goal, furthering the agenda of those who promote One World Government. And believe it or not, in order to do this without being detected, they often have to appear to be bumbling idiots. And they are really good at it. I can recall that Sam Francis, whose insightful articles many of you have read over the years, called the Democrats "the evil party" and the Republicans "the stupid party." And while I loved some of the stuff Sam wrote, I had to disagree with him on this one point. The Republican Party was not stupid--it was as evil as he thought the Democrats were, only it hid it better. And it's still doing it.

Just yesterday I read an article by Sally Zelikovsky on http://www.americanthinker.com for October 18th. She said, in part, "While imbecilic Republicans bicker and snicker about Trump, Democrats will, once again, gather around Hillary despite their competing coalitions. Republicans are stuck in the quagmire of who killed the GOP and who is a more principled conservative, while the Democrats work with their media comrades and perfect their ground game. How do they do it? By dangling distractions with the one hand that Republicans fall for every time, while working their election magic with the other." And let me say here that Republican Establishment people that really want Hillary to win have to be pretty intelligent to appear that stupid. So why do they do it?  Because it fools their conservative core constituency  into thinking they have merely blundered with good intentions, when, in reality, they have been working to make sure the agenda of the Democrats slides on through without their being blamed for it.

And about now, I can hear some irate person asking the question: "Why would they do that?" They would do it because, at heart, they have the same worldview and agenda that the Democrats have, but they have to create the illusion of us having two "competing" parties so we don't ever catch on to the fact, as Donald Trump has so often stated, that "the system is rigged."

Pat Buchanan had an informative article on http://www.lewrockwell.com for October 19th, the title of which was: Is the System Rigged? You Betcha. And then Pat went on to explain how the system is rigged. He mentioned "Big Media--the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer's lifetime has there been such a blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party...Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down." While I have known for decades now, after watching and listening to them, that our "news" (what a laugh) media were Far Left in their thinking, I have watched them go after Trump with what could be labeled a blood lust. And Pat made a comment we should all stop and think about when he said: "Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism." Look at what he is saying there--and then burn your subscription blank to the New York Times or the Washington Post.

He mentioned several other things in the article, most of which I cannot cover here. He mentioned the Supreme Court, the 11 million illegal immigrants we now have here with the current rogue Regime, and Hillary, wanting to bring in many more. He noted Hillary's now famous speech to the Brazilian bankers in which she touted open borders for this country, essentially doing away with national sovereignty. How much have you heard about that from Big Media? They won't tell you about that because you are not supposed to know that Hillary, for all intents and purposes, wants to do away with the United States as a separate country. The moderator had the courage to bring up that question in the presidential debate last evening and Hillary tried to sluff it off by giving a lame answer about how she was really talking about electronic open borders. Bull! She was talking about doing away with our borders--because that's part of the One World Government agenda and she has been primed to push that.  And if she manages, with the help of Big Media, to worm her way into office there will be Republicans in Congress that will be more than willing to help her remove our borders and contribute their part toward the creation of an inter-continental mega-state in the Americas.  I realize I sound dubious as to her intentions. You'll have to pardon me if I don't quite trust her. Eight years of Slick Willy and her in the White House already have really tarnished their halos.

Pat looks at the real possibility that we may get St. Hillary, one way or another, in this upcoming election when he says "Big Money and media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail." And he asked the question: "Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?"  And he noted that Hillary's "opposition" (again, what a laugh) would be headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.

So look for these "stupid" and "distracted" Republicans to fully cooperate with Hillary in everything they can that won't get them tossed out of office in the next upcoming election--if there is one. No, the Republican Establishment is not stupid, bumbling or inept--it is treacherous--because it has the same agenda as the One World Government crowd but conceals that fact under a cloak of pseudo-conservatism.

We better start waking up and realizing what a total sham the rigged system has become.

"The Fix Is In"

by Al Benson Jr.

Back in January of 2015 I did an article for my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com entitled "Has the Next President Already Been Chosen?" It went into the fact that the One World Government group, the Bilderbergers, had already chosen Hillary Clinton to be the next president of this country, no matter what the voters said. Their sentiments were/are not important and so the culturally Marxist agenda is for Hillary to be enthroned in the White House--no matter what. That article has gotten more viewership than any other article in the last year and a half so it must have resonated with somebody out there. If it turns out that I am wrong and Trump wins by some fluke no one will be happier than I am and in this one case I won't mind having been wrong, in fact I will be quite satisfied at having been wrong.

That's not to say that I think Mr. Trump is the perfect candidate. I am not really crazy about his vice-presidential choice, though I have to admit it's better than Newt Gingrich who was simply awful, but it's better only by degrees.

Today someone sent me a short message to the extent that Reuters had changed the numbers on a recent poll to indicate a loss of 17 points for Trump, and naturally the "news" ( I laugh whenever I use that term) media has shown a 7 point jump for Hillary. I can't verify the Reuters info at this point, so for me it's just a report, not fact yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out to be accurate. If Hillary is slated to win, no matter what, then us boobs out here in flyover country have to be psychologically prepared to accept that without too much fuss and what better way to do that than fudging on poll numbers?

At first I felt that I was almost the only one that considered that the upcoming election might be won with "creative voting" techniques. But then, it wouldn't be the first time, would it? How many voting precincts in Pennsylvania and Ohio in 2012 had their votes tallied and showed that Romney never got a single vote in their precincts? And the Republican establishment never once complained? You'd have thought in some of these precincts that there would have been at least one grumpy old man that would have voted for Romney, but, no, it didn't happen--so they tell us. Do I believe it? Do pigs fly? I wonder how many names on the voting rolls you could have found duplicated at local cemeteries. Obama was supposed to win, no matter what--and the Republican establishment went right along with it. They were, indeed, the "loyal"opposition!

Turns out, however, that I am not the only one with a suspicious mind. Today someone sent me an article from SHTFplan.com  written by Mac Slavo and entitled No One Can Stop Her...And She Knows It: "This Election Won't Be Fair"

Mr. Slavo noted, quite accurately I think,  that: "In a fair election, my best estimate is that Donald Trump would win in a landslide. But this election will not be fair, few of them are." Can't argue with him there, either. Slavo referred to the Democratic Convention and its results as "Hillary's coronation" and he said the entire dog and pony show had been "stage managed to downplay the overwhelming noise from Bernie supporters who are outraged and feel betrayed by Hillary. The entire convention  has had a certain air to it,  a quality that reveals the desperation for power,..." I guess that's as good a way of saying it as any--"a desperation for power." Hillary was told to stand down in 2008 so Obama could assume the mantle of "transparency" and now she feels it's her turn and she means to have it irregardless of anything else.

So Hillary must be allowed to win at all costs (and there will be costs). Slavo noted that even Americans who don't pay much attention to what goes on in Washington or much of anything else beyond the ball scores, have started to notice what GATT, the WTO, and NAFTA have done to their job situation and how these programs have created "...an entire shift into pseudo-governing structures of globalism that have eaten away at the sovereignty of the United States and devoured the prosperity of its people...And we have all been programmed to take it lying down."

And Slavo then askes: "Can anyone else see that the most rigged and stolen election of all time is shaping up? If the Democratic Party doesn't want Hillary, what makes anyone think the entire country wants anything to do with her. Before you answer that openly, make a strong educated guess about who the next president s going to be...and how many bodies she will have to climb over to get there."

Like I said, I would love to be wrong, but the Establishment has had control of all the presidential candidates since I have been alive, (and probably several before) and so they are not about to allow a maverick to get in there and upset the culturally Marxist agenda at this late point.

You have to know that, with a Hillary presidency, Christians and real patriots are going to face a time of persecution unlike anything this country has seen since the War of Northern Aggression. So get ready.  And don't sit there and think that "the rapture" will get you out of this sticky mess, because I don't believe that will happen. Christians have way too much apathy and complacency to answer for to get off that easy.

The Black Panthers--no hate crime here folks, just move along

by Al Benson Jr.

Just read an "interesting" article on http://anongalactic.com  about comments made by the former header of the New Black Panther Party, Malik Shabazz, where he told a crowd in Charleston, South Carolina that it was time to "finish the mission of killing 'slave masters' and their families.'  He made these comments  at a Save the Black Church rally there. Shabazz was referring to an 1822 slave revolt started by Denmark Vessey where it was planned to kill all the whites in their beds, regardless of age or sex. Shabazz said, quite plainly that it was time to "finish" Vessey's crusade to kill whites.

I thought, as I read his inflammatory comments that, if some KKK leader in this country had advocated the killing of all blacks it would be portrayed in the media nationwide and worldwide as the hate crime of the century. Whether they actually got to do it or not would not have made any difference. The mere suggestion of it would constitute a hate crime that Washington and their prostitute press would never let us forget.

But here is this black Marxist advocating the killing of whites and the media hardly has a whimper about it. It would appear that, instead of being charged with a hate crime, Comrade Shabazz will end up getting a copy of Hillary's "Get out of jail free" card. With a Marxist administration in control of the White (Red) House does that really surprise anyone. It's all part of the Marxist class struggle program now being implemented in this country and when Hillary assumes the royal throne next year it will continue in spades!

If Sabazz said this at a Save the Black Church rally, one has to wonder exactly what kind of black churches he is endeavoring to "save." Black Liberation churches no doubt, churches that already preach Marxist dogma as Sunday morning sermons.

But the Marxists, cultural and otherwise, are nothing if not tenacious and consistent.  In Baton Rouge this past weekend New Black Panther Party leader Babu Omowale was busy urging blacks to all migrate south so they could "form their own country away from racist whitey." From the context of his remarks one would almost get the idea that "racism" existed in the North. Now wherever would he have come up with that idea? He'd better be careful he doesn't deviate from the approved script too far because we've been told for years that all the "racism" existed in the South and now here's Omowale telling his devoted followers to come south to escape from "racist whitey."

And Omowale said his followers should claim five states that should belong to the "black nation" which states are Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. He figures that if enough blacks move in then whites will start to move out. He says "the end game is land ownership." Only problem there is that when a country is Marxist, ordinary folks are not able to own private property, only the powers that be are allowed that, and they own their property in the name of "the people." He never said who would end up owning the land, but then he probably doesn't want to deal too much with that part of it. That conversation might get a bit sticky for him so just leave it a vague generality.

I said the Marxists were consistent, and they are. This idea of a black nation in our Deep South is one that was floated by the Marxists around forty or fifty years ago now. It didn't go anywhere then, but with national conditions seeming moving to the left maybe they figure it's a good time to try again. No doubt Hillary would love it! Keep your eyes open because in today's volatile situation you just never know what's going to happen. All you can be sure of at this point is that most of it won't be real good.

Reflections on the Looney Left and a Possible Sellout or Co-option

by Al Benson Jr.

Last week was a pretty fair country week. The Brits seceded from the EU and our beloved ruler in Sodom on the Potomac had a couple reversals he's rather not have had. This week has not been so good. Should have known we couldn't have two like that in a row.

The activity of those we refer to as leftists (socialists and communists and various other One World Government types) continues to defy common sense, but then they don't seem to care, as they realize our intrepid and valorous "news" media will continue to cover for them, making sure the public learns as little as possible of what they need to know.

We have been informed that, coincidentally of course, Slick Willie and Comrade Loretta Lynch met in the airport at Phoenix and sat and talked. Now folks with a little common sense might consider this as a conflict of interest, but the "news" media rushed in to assure a hopefully gullible public that all the two talked about were Clinton's grandchildren and his golf game while in Phoenix. Undoubtedly they also discussed current weather conditions in Zimbabwe and who might win the 2028 World Series, but absolutely nothing beyond that mind you! Believe that and you will look for purple cows to jump over the moon at least once a month!

I also ran across an article on http://www.teaparty.org  informing us that 67% of Democrats would love to see Obama stick around for a third term--something he'd love to do if he could just find a way to get by with it--but then Hillary might squawk that "it's her turn to shaft the American people and get rich doing it now" and there might be a slight rift in the Democratic Party. I find it hard to believe that even a majority of Democrats would be willing to put up with another four years of what we've had for the past eight years. The thought boggles the mind. If that's really the case, then the public schools in this country have been successful beyond their wildest dreams. They have successfully propagandized a whole generation. The problem here is that, unfortunately, many in the Republican Establishment don't feel too much different. Oh they might not want Obama around, but they're willing to take Hillary in his place--and honestly folks, what's the difference? Same shell game with different players that's all.

But something that bothered me even worse was a couple articles I checked out just today (7/1) that noted that Trump has got his possible VP list down to just two names--Newt Gingrich and Chris Christie. Now Christie wouldn't be my all time favorite by any means but Gingrich is an absolute no-no. If Trump picks him (and I did an article on this previously if you want to check back) then Trump will be picking a man that is the total antithesis of everything Trump says he stands for. Newt Gingrich is the penultimate Internationalist and One World Government advocate and Trump has to know that. He's not stupid. So what goes here? Another sell out of the frustrated and angry public who is now beginning to wake up and realize how they have been shafted by corporate fascism and its friends in Washington? Sadly, it's beginning to  look that way to me, and if that is so then after the election, no matter who wins, it will go back to "business as usual."

And another question--even if Trump is honest (and I always felt he was) what happens if something should happen to him once he gets into office that incapacitates him? Gingrich will end up being president and I  honestly wonder if that has been the plan all along, whether Trump realizes it or not. We might be able to get by with Christie for VP though it would hardly be the best of all possible worlds, but with Gingrich you know you are going to get stiffed. It's not a matter of "if" but "when."

So if Gingrich ends up as Trump's VP choice then you can kiss all the rhetoric about making America great again goodbye because that's just what it was--but maybe Trump was right--it will be great again--for the corporate fascists, just not for the folks that deserve a break. Oh Lord,   how long???

The Republican Party--Can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit?

by Al Benson Jr.

By no stretch of the wildest imagination can the Republican Party be considered truly conservative and/or patriotic. I realize such a statement will shock some folks who grew up with the myth that the Republican Party was the "party of small government."

If you doubt, just go back and look at the history of the GOP. Who was its first presidential candidate back in 1856? Anyone know? It was John Charles (Pathfinder) Fremont. Actually Fremont didn't find too many of the paths--Kit Carson, his scout found most of them, but Fremont got the credit. Fremont was, by any accurate definition, a radical that leaned hard left in his political views. When the War of Northern Aggression broke out Fremont, who had a command in Missouri, ended up with a whole cadre of socialist Forty-eighters (Lincoln's Marxists) in his command.

When Fremont had run for president in 1856, Frederick Hassaurek, one of the socialist Forty-eighters campaigned all over the Midwest for him. That fact established a relationship between Fremont and the Forty-eighters. And when Fremont didn't make the cut in 1856 the Forty-eighters had to wait another four years until Abraham Lincoln came along and, as they had done for Fremont, so they did for Lincoln. They worked for his election and when the war started they thronged to serve in his armies, and some of them served in the early Republican Party. A couple of Forty-eighters even helped to write the Republican Party platform in 1860--hardly what you would call an auspicious "conservative" beginning for the party.

Real conservatism has seldom been part of the Republican Party agenda.  Perceived conservatism has though. Perceived conservatism is great for getting conservative support from people who have not done the homework, and they serve as good window dressing to make others think conservatism thrives where it really doesn't. For some background material on the early Republican Party and the Forty-eighters, read the book Lincoln's Marxists.  

So, over the years, the Republican Party has worked to fool the voting public into thinking it is something it is not--patriotic and conservative! You might be tempted to say "well that was then but this is now." Okay--show me the difference between what they did then and what they are doing now. In 2012 you had Ron Paul running for president, and he had won several states, one of them Louisiana where I live. I went to the party caucus in Monroe in 2012 and Ron Paul got 80% of the vote there. Romney got 20%. It was the same in most other Louisiana cities that we checked. However, when the state caucus was held in Shreveport shortly after, with Ron Paul having 80% of the delegates statewide, the state Republican Establishment decided it was not going to seat Ron Paul's 80%--it was going to seat and recognize Romney's 20%. When the 80% of legitimate delegates complained the Republican Establishment called the police in and they made sure the illegitimate 20% were the delegates that were recognized. Lots of folks have forgotten this. I haven't. The Republican Establishment in Louisiana (and several other states) stole their state from Ron Paul and handed it to Mitt Romney. Why? Because they realized that Romney was not going to beat Obama and Obama was supposed to get a second term. Romney was the weakest Republican they could have nominated--same as in 2008 when McCain got the nod. Everyone knew he wasn't going to beat Obama, wasn't supposed to beat Obama. If I had a suspicious mind I'd be tempted to say "the fix was in." But far be it from me to think such thoughts. The Republicans are noted for putting up weak candidates in years the Democrats are supposed to win.

And 2016 is no different. One of the stable of Establishment candidates was supposed to win and then lose to Hillary in the general election. So far it hasn't worked out that way, but it will eventually if the "conservative" Republicans can figure out a way to deep six Donald Trump. He was the real spoiler in their plan and he has hung on to the bitter end. If he gets enough delegates to take the nomination then the Republican Establishment will have to find a way to deny him the nomination--because he is not supposed to win--Hillary is! And you can tell the way the Republican Establishment is acting that this is the game plan. They are bending over backwards to smear Trump. Conservatives--so called--are stating openly that if Trump wins the nomination they will not support him. They are howling that Trump is not a real conservative. The question then arises--are they??? Not hardly.

One thing you have to realize--at the national level and most state levels, the Republican and Democratic parties share the same socialist worldview and so they scratch one another's backs because they promote identical socialist agendas and they don't want some rank outsider coming along to upset the apple cart they have worked at filling for the last several decades.. Both parties, working together, have moved this country a long way down the road to One World government. That's their real agenda.

Doug Parris wrote an interesting article that appeared on http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com on April 8th. Mr. Parris noted some of the less-than-conservative actions of the "party of small government" in recent years. He said: "...from 1988 to 2012 the Party elites successfully rebuffed the candidacies and enormous grassroots movements of Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan, and Ron Paul, all of whom were treated as hostile invaders and their millions of supporters as vermin, despised and rejected. And the odd candidates the Party occasionally elected in their stead loyally compromised away the principles that animated their supporters." In other words, they sold out!

So Mr. Parris feels that the Republican Party is on its last legs, that  it's almost finished whether they end up  stopping Trump or not. Parris describes the GOP bosses as "flexible." Is that a good description or what? So we end up with a Republican Party that tries to convince people it is conservative when all it is at this point is irrelevant. And as long as they can fool the voters they don't really care. It's all a game, a charade, a political scam if you will to make people think you have two different parties with two different worldviews when all you really have is one internationalist, socialist party with two names.

Refugee Doublemindedness?

by Al Benson Jr.

It seems that the current Syrian "refugee" crisis has produced a strangely doubleminded attitude in both Europe and this country.

For months now we have been hearing about how Muslim immigrants have been gaining strength in Europe and how Europeans have finally begun to get concerned about this unassimilable group in their midst.It almost seems as if Muslims are literally taking over in some European cities as the native populations cringe in fear.

And we definitely  had and have a problem with illegal immigrants at our Southern border, some of whom are from locales more closely akin to Cairo or Baghdad than to Mexico City.

Just about the time people in this country are getting fed up with illegals overwhelming our Southern border and the Europeans are finally beginning to awaken to the Muslim threat in their countries, along comes this Syrian "refugee" problem and all of a sudden, thousands need to leave Syria, immediately if not sooner, and "resettle" in Europe--and now the Europeans are welcoming them with open arms!  Knowing the way the current rogue regime in Washington operates can there be any doubt that it will not be overly long before the invitation to the "refugees" to come here will be extended by Washington, at least officially. Unofficially it has probably already been planned out to bring as many here as the traffic will bear. Even some of the Republican presidential candidates are saying we need to open the doors to them. And these guys are conservatives?

Some are saying that among the refugees are many ISIS militants who are not really refugees at all, but terrorists. Not everyone agrees with this, but you have to admit it is a definite possibility. After all, what better way to get terrorists into your country than to admit them as "refugees?" Tyler Durden, writing on www.zerohedge.com  has commented on this and said: "...Because just like the US Patriot Act which allowed a massive expansion of the US government apparatus while obliterating civil and privacy rights...confirmed a decade later by Edward Snowden, was a regulation in search of a terrorist event, so Europe's next superstate expansion will require a comparable anti-terrorism ;'rush' in which the population voluntarily hands Europe's supra-government even more rights to centrally plan as it sees fit."  Durden feels it's only a matter of time before terrorists are "discovered" among the refugees and this will lead to an expansion of Europe's version of our Patriot Act. He could have a point. I wouldn't put it past the scions of big government, whether here or in Europe, to pull such a stunt.

Supposedly most of these refugees are fleeing the havoc of a civil war in Syria--and neither side in that war is wearing any halos.

However, knowing the One World Government mindset and how it works it wouldn't surprise me if they played both ends against the middle--the middle being the middle class. Recently an article on www.infowars.com  noted that the United Nations figures show that 72% of these "refugees" are men, with only 13% being women and 15% being children. The infowars article stated: "Many of these people have nothing whatsoever to do with the Syrian refugee crisis. Once they reach the safety of countries that refuse to shower them with free cash, they head straight for welfare havens like Sweden and Germany." If 72% of these "refugees" are men it sure doesn't sound like a family affair to me. And infowars noted: "Why is the media ordering us to accept these people in the name of 'feelings' and humanitarianism when most of them aren't even fleeing war, they're fleeing to a higher standard of living--which will be funded by European taxpayers." Sound familiar? I wonder how many of these folks have any sort of documentation to even prove they are Syrians. Fifty per cent, ninety per cent?

The more you look at this situation the more it starts to look like the classic Marxist "pressure from above and pressure from below" approach, where the Ruling Elite (the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers or whoever) create a situation that will allow them to grab more power than they presently have (eventually they want it all) while looking like they have no control over the situation.  Then, the people in the middle (the middle class) get squeezed by the "refugees" and by some of the atrocities they commit and they go to the government to get some relief--and the government will gladly give it--at the price of more regulations and the loss of more liberties, which was the real name of the game to begin with. This game works the same in Europe as it does in this country, and don't kid yourselves--the game will soon be played on us here, with some of the "conservative" Republicans already calling for more "humanitarian" aid. This pathetic Republican Congress might as well rename itself the "Cheerleaders for Obama" section because they are little more than that

It seems that almost any excuse will do to import more people with cultures alien to our own so they can arrive here and, intentionally or not, begin to dilute our culture into something we will not even recognize in a decade or two. And it is working. i can no longer identify what we now have as the country I grew up in.

As long as we continue to elect Marxists and other One World mentalities to high offices this is what we will get. It's long past time the voting public woke up and started checking out what runs for political offices nowadays. With the Internet it can now be done. For far too long we have voted for someone mindlessly because they belong to the right ethnic group or have the right skin color, or belong to the right party. Oh I realize that having to do some research on these candidates will cut into your Tuesday night poker sessions or your reality show time--but, what these people are doing to you just may cut into the liberties remaining for you and your children. Think about that.

C'mon Joe, Wake Up and Smell the Coffee

by Al Benson Jr.

No wonder the American electorate is so dumbed down, between what they don't get in public school and what they do get from "conservative" political commentators, it's small wonder they don't have a clue. Years ago someone said that the conservatives really don't conserve anything and, unfortunately, that seems to be right. Often what they end up "conserving" is what the liberals threw out last week.

I read an article on the Newsmax web site just today which was a perfect illustration. The article started out: "Talk show host Joe Scarborough expressed exasperation with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her continued teasing about whether or not she's running for president in 2016...If you're going to run, run, and give us new ideas that help us face the next 25 years..." He's got to be really naive if he expects any "new" ideas from Hillary, but then he turned around and said the same thing to Jeb Bush, his "favorite politician." He said to Jeb Bush "Hey, Jeb, if you're going to run, run,...Come on Mr. Savior of the Republican Party. If you're the savior of the Republican Party, then get out there..."

This is the kind of electoral balderdash that is supposed to bamboozle the electorate. I don't pretend to know if Mr. Scarborough is genuinely naive or if he's part of the ongoing problem. Either way the electorate is ill served and that may be the name of the game.

Both Hillary and Jeb Bush are out there promoting the charade that this is really a genuine election and they they might really be running against each other and that they might actually have some independent ideas that would help the country--if only they'd get out there and spread them around. That's the absolute last thing that will happen. All of these potential "candidates" in both parties are nothing more than political shills and their handlers ultimately will decide which of them get "nominated" to get out there and fool the public. And fooling the public is what it's really all about. It's a great big electoral dog and pony show and the public is guaranteed to get stiffed no matter who wins because, at heart, both parties are controlled by the same Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission/Bilderberger triad and so you will be fed their agenda whether you get it with Republican rhetoric or socialist Democratic rhetoric.

Hillary and Jeb, or whoever ends up running, will not present "new, original" ideas--they will do what they are told to do to further the One World Government agenda and that's all they will do--same as the Marxist playboy you presently have in there. He's only doing what he's been told to do, as were Bush, Clinton, Carter, Ford, and Reagan before him, with few exceptions, all the way back to Woodrow Wilson. All of these presidents have had "alter-egos" behind the throne giving them their marching orders. I,m not sure some of these presidents we've had are capable of coming up with an original thought. But, then, they don't have to. All they have to do is exhibit enough chutzpah to fool the public and then follow the agenda that has been laid out for them.

And with a single One World Government consortium controlling both parties the agenda is always the same no matter which party gets into office. This election will be no different, and if Mr. Scarborough really expects independent and new ideas from either candidate then I have a bridge in the Arizona desert I'd love to sell him.

If you don't think one group control both political parties then you need to get online and read None Dare Call It Conspiracy and The Rockefeller File and see if you can find The Naked Capitalist or Dan Smoot's book The Invisible Government. All of these will give you an overview of who really controls both major political parties in this country, and it sure ain't "we the people." And it's long past time that "we the people" woke up and realized that. There are lots of "conservative" pundits out there that will willingly take us 30 miles when we need to go 100, but they're not willing to admit that the last 70 miles even exists. We need to start being able to discern these fakirs from the real thing.

As far as Jeb or Hillary running for president, they will run if they are told to, and they won't if they're not. It's as simple as that. And if they don't end up running then two other puppets will be put up to woo the public into participating in another electoral charade where the outcome is already determined no matter which party "sits" in the White House.