by Daniel Benson
Today's news media might as well be witches. They have hunted (and haunted) the President since he was elected. Yet did they ever do this to Obama? No not once! The media is as far left as the old Soviet Union was--wait--maybe even further left. The Soviet Union might actually have been right of today's media. The "Doctor Feelgood" media can't tell a truth to save themselves. Local news people might be decent, or even trying, yet the national news media is so biased toward the leftist agenda they would fall into the Grand Canyon trying to promote it. If they told you the Atlantic Ocean had dried up and the water there was an illusion they would believe it and call you a liar from pointing out their error.
Most "newspapers" are rubbish now. A handful of people own all the newspapers in the country so you can't get a straight answer from those either. Again, the media is so biased you couldn't swim through it. Even the local paper here is controlled by them, though there is one local weekly here that is not (it's the only paper in the area worth reading). These few people want you to follow their lead blindly until you cease to exist. They tell you every lie you can imagine, and sometimes they fool themselves and actually put some truth out there (not much). How rare it is to see something politically incorrect in their papers. What you and I call politically correct (the truth) is completely taboo for these guys. They are so far left they probably couldn't see the left rearview mirror on a car.
How many times a day are things misrepresented to you? The internet is slowly getting to be more and more controlled now and the reins are tightening because they don't intend to let you hear any view but theirs.
Take a leftist rally vs. a rally on the right. They will report throngs of people at the leftist rally and a smattering of people at the one on the right, when the left didn't have one quarter of the 150k they said was there, and the rally on the right had three times more than the 25k they said was there. In sports events, attendance is announced by the ticket counts. Too bad you couldn't make the media use that method to tell us how many were really there. Google is slowly becoming the search engine of the left, taking down right-leaning things everywhere. Twitter and Facebook are tools for the anti-Trump and pro-left agenda as well, while anything someone might deem even slightly right of Stalin is removed.
Soon you won't be able to watch tv without them knowing exactly what you are doing and watching--oh wait--they already know! Your internet traffic is watched, your tv is monitored, your telephones, cell or landlines, are listened to. Ever hear of smart phones? Big Brother, Trump notwithstanding, has his nose into everything you see, hear, or think. And the media can't be bothered to even try to say "hey, we see what's going on" because they are part of it all. They will vilify anyone not following their plan, fire anyone who speaks out against them, and make sure they never work again. But, as for you low-level "useful idiots" they just want you to be a good stooge and do exactly what they say because, after all, they can't lie can they?
Showing posts with label Government propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government propaganda. Show all posts
Saturday, September 08, 2018
Monday, May 07, 2018
Monopoly Capitalists & Communists Are Second Cousins
By Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society
of America
The prevailing (and partly false) theory is
that capitalism and communism are totally adverse one to another and that
capitalists will always be opposed to communists and vice versa.
In most cases you will find that most free
enterprise capitalists are opposed to communism and leftism in general.
However, monopoly capitalists are a different animal and their worldview is
much closer to that of communism than it is to true free enterprise. Your
“history” books don’t much deal with this because you are not supposed to be
aware of it and many of your teachers and professors will take great pains to
make sure you do not become aware of it. It’s what they get paid for.
I don’t know if you can still get this book or
not—the copy I have was printed in 1974.
It is by Antony C. Sutton (now deceased) who was a research fellow at the
Hoover Institution at Stanford University from
1968-73. The book is Wall Street and the Bolshevik
Revolution.
Sutton noted, on page 17, that:”Consequently,
one barrier to mature understanding of recent history is the notion that all capitalists are the
bitter and unswerving enemies of all Marxists and socialists. This erroneous
idea originated with Karl Marx and was undoubtedly useful to his purposes. In
fact, the idea is nonsense. There has been a continuing, albeit concealed, alliance between international political capitalists and
international revolutionary socialists—to their mutual benefit. This alliance
has gone unobserved largely because historians—with a few notable exceptions—have
an unconscious Marxian bias and are thus locked into the impossibility of any
such alliance existing. The open-minded
reader should bear two clues in mind: monopoly capitalists are the bitter
enemies of laissez-faire entrepreneurs; and, given the weakness of socialist
central planning, the totalitarian socialist state is a perfect captive market
for monopoly capitalists., if an alliance can be made with the socialist powerbrokers.”
Quoted by Sutton is oil magnate E. H. Doheny,
in 1919, where he talks about what went on at college campuses, and mind you,
this was in 1919, not during the Viet Nam War.
Doheny said, in part, “…you will see that a
majority of the college professors in the United States are teaching socialism
and Bolshevism…The worst Bolshevists in the United States are not only college
professors, of whom President Wilson is one,
but capitalists and the wives of capitalists and neither seem to know
what they are talking about.
Sutton sums all this up on page 19 where he
says: “Our story postulates a partnership
between international monopoly capitalism and international
revolutionary socialism for their mutual benefit. And on page 21 Sutton gives
us a key quote from Leon Trotsky where Trotsky says, in 1938: “You will have a
revolution, a terrible revolution. What course it takes will depend much on
what Mr. Rockefeller tells Mr. Hague to do. Mr. Rockefeller is a symbol of the
American Ruling class and Mr. Hague is a symbol of its political tools.” Sounds
just like today, doesn’t it? You will discover, as you go along, that certain
capitalists in this country continually fund and finance Leftist causes.
In his book The Naked Capitalist W. Cleon Skousen noted a comment made by Dr.
Bella Dodd, a former member of the National Committee of the U. S. Communist
Party where Dodd said: “I think the Communist conspiracy is merely a branch of
a much bigger conspiracy.” Dodd, as a Communist, had wondered where her orders
came from. After World War 2 she had contacts that, basically, gave her
marching orders. And Skousen noted that: “What
puzzled Dr. Dodd was the fact that not one of these three contacts was a
Russian. Nor were any of them Communists. In fact, all three were extremely
wealthy American capitalists!” Skousen’s book was privately printed in 1970.
See if you can find it on Amazon. Skousen goes into an organization called The
Council on Foreign Relations. Some of you have no doubt heard of this. Others may
not have. You need to be aware of this group because they affect how this
country is governed and who gets appointed or chosen to specific positions that will, whether you
believe it or not, will affect all of our lives.
Another one you should check out, and I believe
it has been posted on the internet,
is The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen.
If you want to know how the Deep State operated in the late 1970s you need to
read this one. Some things haven’t changed much.
More as the Lord allows, but this will give you
a start. Check out The Rockefeller File and an earlier one by Gary Allen, None
Dare Call It Conspiracy on the
internet. That way you can read them for nothing and begin to learn about what
you have been taught to believe doesn’t exist. It does exist and you need to
wake up to it, for your childrens’ sake.
Also of interest---Check out the latest article on https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com--Karl Marx--Deadbeat Daddy. It noted that Marx was so busy fomenting revolution he couldn't even be bothered trying to support his own family.
Also of interest---Check out the latest article on https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com--Karl Marx--Deadbeat Daddy. It noted that Marx was so busy fomenting revolution he couldn't even be bothered trying to support his own family.
Friday, November 24, 2017
"Journalists" Here and Abroad, Yesterday and Today
by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America
Thoughts about journalists in our day tend to be somewhat tainted and jaded--and for that you have to blame the journalists themselves. Let's face it, bastions of truth and accuracy the journalists have not been. I, with others, have labeled them as "the prostitute press" and in the main, I don't think that's too far off.
In my library I have some books for enjoyable reading. One of those is one called The Red Fox, written by Anthony Hyde. It's fiction, but in it Mr. Hyde makes several observations that are worth some reflection. For instance, on page 53, one of the characters in the story asks the question "Who rules the rulers?" That's something many of us have asked for a long time, and in some instances where we could, tried to answer it. It's a question worth considering, although most people won't.
On page 233 he discusses Soviet "journalists" and seeks to compare them to western journalists to point out the differences. I don't doubt, when he got this book published (1985) he thought it was an honest question. Today I'm not so sure. The Red Fox is an excellent story and it does hold your interest. You can tell that Mr. Hyde did a lot of research to come up with all the detail in the book. I have heard that this is the way he usually writes, though I have not ever been able to come up with any of his other books, and I have looked. To me that means that people hang onto them like I do and they seldom make their way into used book stores. This is the mark of an entertaining and engaging writer. I've read my copy of The Red Fox fully half a dozen times over the years.
Having said that, I'm not sure Mr. Hyde recognized how similar Soviet and American "journalists" really are. In the Soviet Union the "journalists" were expected to hew the Party line, and if they didn't, in short order, they were no longer journalists. Sad to say it has not been much different here. Many of the journalists or reporters I have run across in this country do exactly the same thing. I did an article before the last election about how the media was nothing more than Hillary's water carrier. And everything I have seen since the last election has only reinforced that view, except they don't only carry water for Hillary, they also carry it for what we call "The Deep State" or the Establishment, or whatever you want to call those that really "rule the rulers."
The idea that the "news media" exists to give the public the unbiased, objective truth about what really goes on has long since gone by the boards. It disappeared with the Tooth Fairy and the Man in the Moon, at least for most normal people. Nowadays the media gives us what "those who rule the rulers" think is pertinent for their well-being, not ours. True, there are exceptions. The alternative media, The Drudge Report, InfoWars, LewRockwell, World Net Daily and a handful of others out there are able to give concerned people enough truth that they are beginning to have some idea of what really goes down. That hasn't always been the case. If you want real news, these are the sources you have to turn to turn to because what we refer to as the "Main Stream Media" has dissolved into nothing more than "fake news" and pure propaganda--Soviet style! If you follow only them you will have a completely skewed view of world events, and particularly what goes on in the White House during the Trump administration. The regular media gets it wrong so much of the time that you have to realize they are doing it on purpose. Were it only accidental, they would err on the side of accuracy now and again, but this never happens.
Sadly, this is not an especially new development. It has gone on for many years, though sometimes a little less spectacularly than at present. Back before the War of Northern Aggression the "journalists" in the North were making such an icon out of John Brown, the abolitionist/terrorist, that he was literally being compared to Jesus Christ and the gallows he hung on was being compared to Jesus' cross. Talk about an exercise in blasphemy! This, and the propaganda being dished out by writers of the ilk of Harriet Beecher Stowe, helped to fuel the fires of war in the late 1850s and painted the entire South with a wholly unrealistic brush.
So let us not kid ourselves--"journalists" in America, at least in the last 150 years, have not stood for "truth, justice, and the American way." They have stood for pushing the agenda, whatever it may have been at the time, of those that "rule the rulers" and the real truth be hanged!
If you want to find out who "rules the rulers" than I suggest you do a little homework. (About 7% of those that read this will follow through). Get on the internet and check out the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, and while you are at it check out the Clinton Foundation. If you are willing to do at least this much then you will come away with a whole different concept of who really runs things in this country and the world. And then you can ask the other question one of Mr. Hyde's characters in his book puts forth; "What the hell will they do to us next?"
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America
Thoughts about journalists in our day tend to be somewhat tainted and jaded--and for that you have to blame the journalists themselves. Let's face it, bastions of truth and accuracy the journalists have not been. I, with others, have labeled them as "the prostitute press" and in the main, I don't think that's too far off.
In my library I have some books for enjoyable reading. One of those is one called The Red Fox, written by Anthony Hyde. It's fiction, but in it Mr. Hyde makes several observations that are worth some reflection. For instance, on page 53, one of the characters in the story asks the question "Who rules the rulers?" That's something many of us have asked for a long time, and in some instances where we could, tried to answer it. It's a question worth considering, although most people won't.
On page 233 he discusses Soviet "journalists" and seeks to compare them to western journalists to point out the differences. I don't doubt, when he got this book published (1985) he thought it was an honest question. Today I'm not so sure. The Red Fox is an excellent story and it does hold your interest. You can tell that Mr. Hyde did a lot of research to come up with all the detail in the book. I have heard that this is the way he usually writes, though I have not ever been able to come up with any of his other books, and I have looked. To me that means that people hang onto them like I do and they seldom make their way into used book stores. This is the mark of an entertaining and engaging writer. I've read my copy of The Red Fox fully half a dozen times over the years.
Having said that, I'm not sure Mr. Hyde recognized how similar Soviet and American "journalists" really are. In the Soviet Union the "journalists" were expected to hew the Party line, and if they didn't, in short order, they were no longer journalists. Sad to say it has not been much different here. Many of the journalists or reporters I have run across in this country do exactly the same thing. I did an article before the last election about how the media was nothing more than Hillary's water carrier. And everything I have seen since the last election has only reinforced that view, except they don't only carry water for Hillary, they also carry it for what we call "The Deep State" or the Establishment, or whatever you want to call those that really "rule the rulers."
The idea that the "news media" exists to give the public the unbiased, objective truth about what really goes on has long since gone by the boards. It disappeared with the Tooth Fairy and the Man in the Moon, at least for most normal people. Nowadays the media gives us what "those who rule the rulers" think is pertinent for their well-being, not ours. True, there are exceptions. The alternative media, The Drudge Report, InfoWars, LewRockwell, World Net Daily and a handful of others out there are able to give concerned people enough truth that they are beginning to have some idea of what really goes down. That hasn't always been the case. If you want real news, these are the sources you have to turn to turn to because what we refer to as the "Main Stream Media" has dissolved into nothing more than "fake news" and pure propaganda--Soviet style! If you follow only them you will have a completely skewed view of world events, and particularly what goes on in the White House during the Trump administration. The regular media gets it wrong so much of the time that you have to realize they are doing it on purpose. Were it only accidental, they would err on the side of accuracy now and again, but this never happens.
Sadly, this is not an especially new development. It has gone on for many years, though sometimes a little less spectacularly than at present. Back before the War of Northern Aggression the "journalists" in the North were making such an icon out of John Brown, the abolitionist/terrorist, that he was literally being compared to Jesus Christ and the gallows he hung on was being compared to Jesus' cross. Talk about an exercise in blasphemy! This, and the propaganda being dished out by writers of the ilk of Harriet Beecher Stowe, helped to fuel the fires of war in the late 1850s and painted the entire South with a wholly unrealistic brush.
So let us not kid ourselves--"journalists" in America, at least in the last 150 years, have not stood for "truth, justice, and the American way." They have stood for pushing the agenda, whatever it may have been at the time, of those that "rule the rulers" and the real truth be hanged!
If you want to find out who "rules the rulers" than I suggest you do a little homework. (About 7% of those that read this will follow through). Get on the internet and check out the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, and while you are at it check out the Clinton Foundation. If you are willing to do at least this much then you will come away with a whole different concept of who really runs things in this country and the world. And then you can ask the other question one of Mr. Hyde's characters in his book puts forth; "What the hell will they do to us next?"
Thursday, June 29, 2017
The Big Picture? Or Just the Cartoons?
In light of all the fake news coming out of late, our two seasoned political commentators offer their take on all this.
Al Benson Jr.
The Big Picture? Or Just the Cartoons?
by Schwartz & Viscount
As we view what the Establishment Media is trying to peddle to us today (they think we are too stupid to figure out what they are doing) we are forced to ask ourselves--are they really trying to give us the 'big picture" regarding national and world events? Or are they just feeding us the cartoon version of it all in the hope that we never progress beyond the point where we think Bugs Bunny and the Roadrunner are real? The answer should be obvious.
They are seeking to distract us with piddling little side issues, many of them of their own creation. A shining example: Trump's "Russian collusion theory" which just recently one of their own people was caught on video admitting was "mostly b------t." They have been howling about this for months now, but evidence? Hey, who needs evidence. We are supposed to take their word for it. After all, they are the "news" media aren't they? Well, aren't they? All their little mind games are supposed to keep us occupied while the Deep State boys work behind the scenes to destroy the Trump presidency with skillful innuendo made to sound factual (as long as you don't look too close). We must learn not to focus on their improvised rabbit trails and keep our eye on what really goes on. To do that you need to keep up with the alternative media.
Most Americans, when the learn the truth, do not want t focus on the Communist News Network's fables prevarications. Most Americans do not want to be part of a World Government-controlled agenda. That's why they voted for Trump. They would much rather have America remain sovereign, the way it was originally created (Original intent).
We are becoming rather fatigued listening to the "squeaky wheels" (thinking they are the big wheels) getting way too much of the oil (money, etc.) simply because of their big mouths. We read a story just yesterday that noted that one of the big "reporters" for a major "news" network was complaining because too many conservative groups are now getting into White House press conferences. He didn't like that because it changes the whole agenda away from what he and his prostitute press buddies like to be able to do--control the news that comes out of these conferences. If there are too many conservative voices in there asking the wrong questions then the socialist "newscasters" can't do that and it just grates on their fragile egos. Isn't that a pity? Don't you just "feel the pain" of this poor socialist pretending he is a real journalist? Why it's almost enough to ruin your whole day! Almost, but not quite!
These Leftist "whineocrats don't want their agendas in news conferences changed because that makes it much more difficult for them to do what they are being paid to do--spin the news in the direction their Deep State employers want it to go in. And if they can't continue to do their required quota of spinning, they might find themselves out of a job. Wouldn't that be horrendous? That situation might leave some room for honest journalists who would try to give the public the truth. Horror of horrors!
So they have a vested (self) interest in making sure the American public never gets the "big picture" (the truth). If such ever happens and a large enough segment of the public found out how these spinmeisters have been lying to them over the decades, why some might be tempted to hunt for ropes and tall trees. Mind you, we are not advocating that sort of thing, just pointing out the possibilities.
What we would really like to see instead is that these willful purveyors of fake news end up being thoroughly exposed and discredited and have to live with the fact that most people have finally realized what intellectual and journalistic frauds and paupers they really are.
That would be the ultimate humiliation for them, plus the fact that once this happened, their Deep State employers would have no more use for them and so they would be dropped like hot potatoes. They might even have to go and find honest work--and that would be the greatest humiliation of all!
Al Benson Jr.
The Big Picture? Or Just the Cartoons?
by Schwartz & Viscount
As we view what the Establishment Media is trying to peddle to us today (they think we are too stupid to figure out what they are doing) we are forced to ask ourselves--are they really trying to give us the 'big picture" regarding national and world events? Or are they just feeding us the cartoon version of it all in the hope that we never progress beyond the point where we think Bugs Bunny and the Roadrunner are real? The answer should be obvious.
They are seeking to distract us with piddling little side issues, many of them of their own creation. A shining example: Trump's "Russian collusion theory" which just recently one of their own people was caught on video admitting was "mostly b------t." They have been howling about this for months now, but evidence? Hey, who needs evidence. We are supposed to take their word for it. After all, they are the "news" media aren't they? Well, aren't they? All their little mind games are supposed to keep us occupied while the Deep State boys work behind the scenes to destroy the Trump presidency with skillful innuendo made to sound factual (as long as you don't look too close). We must learn not to focus on their improvised rabbit trails and keep our eye on what really goes on. To do that you need to keep up with the alternative media.
Most Americans, when the learn the truth, do not want t focus on the Communist News Network's fables prevarications. Most Americans do not want to be part of a World Government-controlled agenda. That's why they voted for Trump. They would much rather have America remain sovereign, the way it was originally created (Original intent).
We are becoming rather fatigued listening to the "squeaky wheels" (thinking they are the big wheels) getting way too much of the oil (money, etc.) simply because of their big mouths. We read a story just yesterday that noted that one of the big "reporters" for a major "news" network was complaining because too many conservative groups are now getting into White House press conferences. He didn't like that because it changes the whole agenda away from what he and his prostitute press buddies like to be able to do--control the news that comes out of these conferences. If there are too many conservative voices in there asking the wrong questions then the socialist "newscasters" can't do that and it just grates on their fragile egos. Isn't that a pity? Don't you just "feel the pain" of this poor socialist pretending he is a real journalist? Why it's almost enough to ruin your whole day! Almost, but not quite!
These Leftist "whineocrats don't want their agendas in news conferences changed because that makes it much more difficult for them to do what they are being paid to do--spin the news in the direction their Deep State employers want it to go in. And if they can't continue to do their required quota of spinning, they might find themselves out of a job. Wouldn't that be horrendous? That situation might leave some room for honest journalists who would try to give the public the truth. Horror of horrors!
So they have a vested (self) interest in making sure the American public never gets the "big picture" (the truth). If such ever happens and a large enough segment of the public found out how these spinmeisters have been lying to them over the decades, why some might be tempted to hunt for ropes and tall trees. Mind you, we are not advocating that sort of thing, just pointing out the possibilities.
What we would really like to see instead is that these willful purveyors of fake news end up being thoroughly exposed and discredited and have to live with the fact that most people have finally realized what intellectual and journalistic frauds and paupers they really are.
That would be the ultimate humiliation for them, plus the fact that once this happened, their Deep State employers would have no more use for them and so they would be dropped like hot potatoes. They might even have to go and find honest work--and that would be the greatest humiliation of all!
Sunday, January 15, 2017
The Deadly (for the country) Art of Compromise
Our two observers of the political scene give us a little more of what they have seen in action for decades--especially in the vaunted "Halls of Congress." Read their biting commentary and see if you have noted the same things they have.
Al Benson Jr.
The Deadly (for the country) Art of Compromise
By Schwartz and Viscount
How often have we heard the familiar dictum in regard to Congress about "reaching across the isle?" Or the one about "working together in the spirit of compromise?" This all sounds so good to people who fail to understand what it really means. Well, we are here to tell you what it means in this country, and in "our" Congress; and it behooves us to say that it doesn't work they way you think it does, or that you have been told it does.
According to our Mainstream Media, (those professional prevaricators who still insist that we call them journalists), it is those conservative and patriotic legislators on the right that need to do the reaching across the isle. Should they fail to do that, then the media will label them as racists, homophobes, Islamaphonbes, chauvinists, or whatever other libelous label comes into their febrile brains.
The legislators over on the left do precious little reaching across, as their expectation is that those nasty people over on the right should do all the reaching--in the name of bipartisanship and compromise. If those on the right display a willingness to compromise, then they will end up compromising whatever truth they have with the leftist lies on the other side of the isle, and thereby create a "synthesis" of truth and lies, which amounts to watered-down truth at best. No matter what you have been told, that's the way it works in Washington these days.
In other words the "spirit of compromise" has become a One Way, Dead End Street for naive conservatives who fail to recognize that they must sacrifice their truth to accept leftist lies. The leftist motto in Congress, as in most other places is "Be reasonable and do it MY way." Those on the left with a socialist worldview, do not compromise their agendas or beliefs in order to get along with others. Rather they expect those others to compromise their beliefs in order to get along with the leftists. And, although the leftists may appear to take a step back, in the "spirit of compromise" it is always so they can arrange to take TWO steps forward. Liberal and leftist policies always promote their adversaries giving in at some crucial point(s) and if their adversaries do not realize that they will, inevitably, come out on the short end of the stick. This has been happening for decades.
The left gets what it wants, or almost all of it, while the right compromises its standards and principles, in the name of "reaching across the isle." And while the right reaches across the isle, the left laughs all the way to the bank. And the left has learned how to do this as a psychological operation. It usually works because their opposition has no concept of what is really going on or how they are being "played for suckers."
Or, as Saul Alinsky said in his Twelve Rules for Radicals in Rule 8 "Keep the pressure on, Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. *Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never give the reeling organization (or opposition Congressmen) (emphasis ours) a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize)." And don't think there are not people in Congress that are not familiar with and use this strategy.
Ephesians 2:10 in the Holy Scriptures says: "For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do Good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." Reaching "across the isle" and compromising the truth is not a "good work." Truth should not be compromised with those who serve Satan, the Father of Lies. This applies not only in Congress, but everywhere else also.
Reaching "across the Isle"almost never involves two sincere people or groups coming together to honestly try to work out their differences. It almost always involves the sacrificing of truth, and the acceptance of untruth, in the Halls of Congress every bit as much as anywhere else. Something to think about.
Al Benson Jr.
The Deadly (for the country) Art of Compromise
By Schwartz and Viscount
How often have we heard the familiar dictum in regard to Congress about "reaching across the isle?" Or the one about "working together in the spirit of compromise?" This all sounds so good to people who fail to understand what it really means. Well, we are here to tell you what it means in this country, and in "our" Congress; and it behooves us to say that it doesn't work they way you think it does, or that you have been told it does.
According to our Mainstream Media, (those professional prevaricators who still insist that we call them journalists), it is those conservative and patriotic legislators on the right that need to do the reaching across the isle. Should they fail to do that, then the media will label them as racists, homophobes, Islamaphonbes, chauvinists, or whatever other libelous label comes into their febrile brains.
The legislators over on the left do precious little reaching across, as their expectation is that those nasty people over on the right should do all the reaching--in the name of bipartisanship and compromise. If those on the right display a willingness to compromise, then they will end up compromising whatever truth they have with the leftist lies on the other side of the isle, and thereby create a "synthesis" of truth and lies, which amounts to watered-down truth at best. No matter what you have been told, that's the way it works in Washington these days.
In other words the "spirit of compromise" has become a One Way, Dead End Street for naive conservatives who fail to recognize that they must sacrifice their truth to accept leftist lies. The leftist motto in Congress, as in most other places is "Be reasonable and do it MY way." Those on the left with a socialist worldview, do not compromise their agendas or beliefs in order to get along with others. Rather they expect those others to compromise their beliefs in order to get along with the leftists. And, although the leftists may appear to take a step back, in the "spirit of compromise" it is always so they can arrange to take TWO steps forward. Liberal and leftist policies always promote their adversaries giving in at some crucial point(s) and if their adversaries do not realize that they will, inevitably, come out on the short end of the stick. This has been happening for decades.
The left gets what it wants, or almost all of it, while the right compromises its standards and principles, in the name of "reaching across the isle." And while the right reaches across the isle, the left laughs all the way to the bank. And the left has learned how to do this as a psychological operation. It usually works because their opposition has no concept of what is really going on or how they are being "played for suckers."
Or, as Saul Alinsky said in his Twelve Rules for Radicals in Rule 8 "Keep the pressure on, Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. *Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never give the reeling organization (or opposition Congressmen) (emphasis ours) a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize)." And don't think there are not people in Congress that are not familiar with and use this strategy.
Ephesians 2:10 in the Holy Scriptures says: "For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do Good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." Reaching "across the isle" and compromising the truth is not a "good work." Truth should not be compromised with those who serve Satan, the Father of Lies. This applies not only in Congress, but everywhere else also.
Reaching "across the Isle"almost never involves two sincere people or groups coming together to honestly try to work out their differences. It almost always involves the sacrificing of truth, and the acceptance of untruth, in the Halls of Congress every bit as much as anywhere else. Something to think about.
Thursday, December 29, 2016
Is Obama's Last Chore To Start A War With Russia?
by Al Benson Jr.
A friend called me tonight after watching the TV "news" and told me that Comrade Obama was imposing more sanctions on Russia to their alleged plot to influence the US elections. Knowing Obama, such an action comes as no real surprise.
Having watched his actions in the past month I am convinced that he is in the process of trying to throw a monkey wrench into whatever gears of normal government may still remain in Washington. He wants, as do his bosses in the Ruling Establishment, to hand Trump the proverbial "hell in a hand basket" when he takes office. And part of that hell may be starting a war with the Russians. After all, it's what Hillary wanted to do and now that she seems to have been put aside, at least temporarily, Obama has got to do the whole chore on his own. Of course he will have plenty of guidance in the effort from those above him. A war with Russia that he could pass along to Trump would be his last great coup--sort of a "I'll spit in your eye" kind of departure. Somewhat akin to "dancing on your grave!"
He has ordered that thirty five Russian diplomats be ejected from this country and he has, according to reports, closed down two Russian compounds, one in New York and one in Maryland, supposedly in response to "Russian harassment of American diplomats in Moscow." Now I don't know if American diplomats in Moscow have been harassed or not, If so it would not be the first time.
Now I'm not in love with the Russian government, and Putin is an ex-KGB personality and I have never believed that the KGB just disappeared after the Berlin Wall came down as so many naive souls have stated. True, the name was changed but the apparatus to operate it remained. However, as much as I dislike Putin, I believe the US Establishment is using him as an excuse to attack the credibility of a new Trump administration by planting the rumors that all the "fake news" the "alt-right" supposedly planted out there has been coming from Russia. It's interesting that all those who now have a big problem with Russian seemed to have no problem with it when it was officially a part of the Soviet Union. Anti-Communists they were not and they still aren't.
According to an article from Business Insider by Pamela Engel: "The CIA has said the Russians had been working toward a specific goal when they hacked into the inboxes of Democratic National Committee staffers and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta: 'to help get (Donald) Trump elected' president."
At first the FBI and the NSA, if I recall correctly, both disagreed with the CIA that the Russians had had anything to do with all the hacking that went on. They continued in their disagreement with the CIA until, at one point one day, we were treated to a media story about how, suddenly, the FBI and the NSA seemed to have a prophetic revelation and all of a sudden they totally agreed with the CIA that the Russians had been doing all this stuff. Both agencies suddenly caved in, I think per instruction from someone above them, and admitted that it was all the Russians' fault and that, without the Russians, somehow, Trump would not have made it to the White House and we would have been blessed with the autocratic rule of Queen Hillary instead. And don't think that, even at this late date, if they could find a way to pull such a stunt off they wouldn't do it in a New York heartbeat!
But if they can't accomplish that, then the least Obama can do is to start a war with the Russians before he leaves office and hand Trump a fait accompli when he gets sworn in. After all, if you had the bosses that Obama has, wouldn't you do it--or else???
There is an article on LewRockwell.com for December 30th by Daisy Luther dealing with this same situation that is worth reading.
A friend called me tonight after watching the TV "news" and told me that Comrade Obama was imposing more sanctions on Russia to their alleged plot to influence the US elections. Knowing Obama, such an action comes as no real surprise.
Having watched his actions in the past month I am convinced that he is in the process of trying to throw a monkey wrench into whatever gears of normal government may still remain in Washington. He wants, as do his bosses in the Ruling Establishment, to hand Trump the proverbial "hell in a hand basket" when he takes office. And part of that hell may be starting a war with the Russians. After all, it's what Hillary wanted to do and now that she seems to have been put aside, at least temporarily, Obama has got to do the whole chore on his own. Of course he will have plenty of guidance in the effort from those above him. A war with Russia that he could pass along to Trump would be his last great coup--sort of a "I'll spit in your eye" kind of departure. Somewhat akin to "dancing on your grave!"
He has ordered that thirty five Russian diplomats be ejected from this country and he has, according to reports, closed down two Russian compounds, one in New York and one in Maryland, supposedly in response to "Russian harassment of American diplomats in Moscow." Now I don't know if American diplomats in Moscow have been harassed or not, If so it would not be the first time.
Now I'm not in love with the Russian government, and Putin is an ex-KGB personality and I have never believed that the KGB just disappeared after the Berlin Wall came down as so many naive souls have stated. True, the name was changed but the apparatus to operate it remained. However, as much as I dislike Putin, I believe the US Establishment is using him as an excuse to attack the credibility of a new Trump administration by planting the rumors that all the "fake news" the "alt-right" supposedly planted out there has been coming from Russia. It's interesting that all those who now have a big problem with Russian seemed to have no problem with it when it was officially a part of the Soviet Union. Anti-Communists they were not and they still aren't.
According to an article from Business Insider by Pamela Engel: "The CIA has said the Russians had been working toward a specific goal when they hacked into the inboxes of Democratic National Committee staffers and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta: 'to help get (Donald) Trump elected' president."
At first the FBI and the NSA, if I recall correctly, both disagreed with the CIA that the Russians had had anything to do with all the hacking that went on. They continued in their disagreement with the CIA until, at one point one day, we were treated to a media story about how, suddenly, the FBI and the NSA seemed to have a prophetic revelation and all of a sudden they totally agreed with the CIA that the Russians had been doing all this stuff. Both agencies suddenly caved in, I think per instruction from someone above them, and admitted that it was all the Russians' fault and that, without the Russians, somehow, Trump would not have made it to the White House and we would have been blessed with the autocratic rule of Queen Hillary instead. And don't think that, even at this late date, if they could find a way to pull such a stunt off they wouldn't do it in a New York heartbeat!
But if they can't accomplish that, then the least Obama can do is to start a war with the Russians before he leaves office and hand Trump a fait accompli when he gets sworn in. After all, if you had the bosses that Obama has, wouldn't you do it--or else???
There is an article on LewRockwell.com for December 30th by Daisy Luther dealing with this same situation that is worth reading.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Deplorable--and Beyond
This article has been submitted by two gentlemen who have been astute observers of the political scene for several decades. Their names may or may not be recognizable to many and because of this they have chosen to provide this article with pseudonyms rather than actual identities. Given that we seem to be entering an era where the truth is being condemned as "fake news" while baldfaced cultural Marxist fabrications are being parroted as eternal verity they felt that might be the best policy. In a time when telling the truth has become a revolutionary act these two have chosen the path of journalistic revolution. I think many will agree with their assessment. Quite naturally the Left will call them liars, but then, in the movie Braveheart the narrator paints a similar situation when he says The English will call me a liar--but history is written by those who have hanged heroes."
Al Benson Jr.
Deplorable--and Beyond
by Sammy Schwartz, with Vance Viscount
It seems that Hillary thoroughly understands DEPLORABLE. It really does "take one to know one." Pointing the finger at any opposition is easy when she knows how to intimidate people. And there is an old Marxist trick she has learned to employ called "Condemn others (for what you yourself are doing) and elevate yourself."
The fact is: The way she has treated people who have gotten in her & Bill's) way is, not just deplorable, but especially, despicable and inexcusable. We've seen lists (50+) of those who have gotten in her and his way and have met their demise.
That goes back to the "Mena (AR) Connection" from where arms shipments were being delivered to Nicaragua for "the Contra Rebels" who were fighting a vile regime.
Each delivery of munitions too two full planes to complete a full order; however, upon each return trip, a third plane was being escorted back, delivering drugs to Arkansas. When the airport fuel supply attendant stayed to witness the reason for missing quantities of petrol is when he discovered an extra plane. He had security detain that pilot, who claimed his legal right to one phone call. Within 30 minutes this happened...
The governor of Arkansas came and said, "You cannot hold this man; you must release him to me." That governor was none other than: "Slick Willie" William Jefferson Clinton. And, many surrounding that particular incident met their demise to make sure it was 'covered up" as best possible...some of those other witnesses "permanently," including two boys who happened to be walking the railroad tracks nearby.
That may not have been the beginning of the long string of so-called "carpet-sweeping," but the killings went to and through the two terms of the Clinton Presidency, which also included military bodyguards, pilots, and on-and-on.
Deplorable is a minor term for what Hillary was definitely "a party to." As Rodney Dangerfield used to say. "I get NO respect!" That is exactly what the Clintons have displayed for human beings, including Bill's continual and constant string of women who, (may or may not have) received injections or ingestions of drugs and/or sperm for their willing, or unwilling, receptions of sexual play from "Slick Willie."
It is a fact that too many people who unluckily happened to "get in the way" of both Bill and Hillary (and their agenda), didn't make it to see the light of another day. Can anyone spell VINCE FOSTER? For a little background information, read the book Hell To Pay by Barbara Olson, published by Regnery Publishing in 1999.
"Deplorable" is a minor term for those types of atrocities. Complicity, condoning and "Enabling" might be better words for what Hillary seems to have NO problem allowing. SO WHY in the world would she think that good people in the United States would be willing to tolerate even more of the same from her?
We are not done with this subject.
And, in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, we have had "cry-ins" and all other sorts of denials, including what appears to be George Soros' funded vote recounts, with mysterious overnight bank deposits at 3:00 a.m. (E.S.T.). It goes without saying that the majority of Americans in the millions have awakened and spoken greatly through efforts of honesty. The Alternative Media, the so-called "fake news" (which is really the truth) have played a major part in this. You see, Separation of "Church and State" as currently portrayed, never really existed. Thoroughly tired of "crooks and liars," Christians brought forth their voice to shout "Thy Will Be Done!" Pray it stands!
Liberals (socialists) have gotten away with "Fudging the Truth" for far too long! So, frankly, to correct their previously docile attitudes, the "no-longer" silent majority spoke loudly and clearly at the ballot box. We "deplorable" (meaning 'sad") folks have arisen, and reacted strongly for what America stands for. And, we have gotten on our feet and used our truly God-Given "Freedom of Speech" to pass the word through direct communications, the internet & "Face-book" to express to liberals & the rest of the world, that the Heartland of America is "fed up" with the phony Political-INcorrectness that has plagued our nation for far too long.
We are tired of being intimidated by the Network Media, who have continued to lie and who try to justify their bias and their most-unjust reporting. We are more than tired of those Hollywood moguls who use their stardom and "pseudo-prestigious" positions trying to sway others to their liberal line of thinking. We heard that several of these people threatened to leave the country if Trump was elected? Are they still here, and if so, why? Well, we don't buy what they sell. We don't wish to follow "fads" like ignorant sheep, admiring those who should really be frowned upon for their many abominable behaviors. Many of those so-called "stars" (in their own minds) are just acting...parts that are not really themselves; so, really, they are "phony-balonies" in many facets of their lives. There are some who have maintained their standards and principles. But many actors, trying to influence youth and young adults to act and misbehave like some do, have distorted what real moral foundations previous American Christian family generations have long conveyed.
Frankly, we are "fed up" with the cheating, lying to our faces, and hearing other liberal socialists condoning those lies; we are really tired of the crooked smiling and lying, straight to our faces. Living in lie-after-lie seems to be the liberal socialist way of existing. We are exhausted from being intimidated for valued truths.
So you conservatives, QUIT allowing yourselves to feel that YOU are the ones who are wrong, when you know, deep down in your heart-of-hearts those esteemed truths are right.
No longer accept cheating and lying. Continue to stay "fighting mad." And do NOT allow yourselves to become "intimidated" by liberal socialists. To describe what liberals really are, we must say that they are: bitter, beastly, depraved, despicable, dreadful, evil, hateful, heinous, hurtful, pitiful, sinister, venomous, wretched, wicked, ungodly, vile and yes: "deplorable" souls. i.e. (that is) means: sad and regrettable.
Also, every liberal continues to be a P.I.T.A. to us.
That means:
P= Pain
I=In
T=The
A=Ass
Al Benson Jr.
Deplorable--and Beyond
by Sammy Schwartz, with Vance Viscount
It seems that Hillary thoroughly understands DEPLORABLE. It really does "take one to know one." Pointing the finger at any opposition is easy when she knows how to intimidate people. And there is an old Marxist trick she has learned to employ called "Condemn others (for what you yourself are doing) and elevate yourself."
The fact is: The way she has treated people who have gotten in her & Bill's) way is, not just deplorable, but especially, despicable and inexcusable. We've seen lists (50+) of those who have gotten in her and his way and have met their demise.
That goes back to the "Mena (AR) Connection" from where arms shipments were being delivered to Nicaragua for "the Contra Rebels" who were fighting a vile regime.
Each delivery of munitions too two full planes to complete a full order; however, upon each return trip, a third plane was being escorted back, delivering drugs to Arkansas. When the airport fuel supply attendant stayed to witness the reason for missing quantities of petrol is when he discovered an extra plane. He had security detain that pilot, who claimed his legal right to one phone call. Within 30 minutes this happened...
The governor of Arkansas came and said, "You cannot hold this man; you must release him to me." That governor was none other than: "Slick Willie" William Jefferson Clinton. And, many surrounding that particular incident met their demise to make sure it was 'covered up" as best possible...some of those other witnesses "permanently," including two boys who happened to be walking the railroad tracks nearby.
That may not have been the beginning of the long string of so-called "carpet-sweeping," but the killings went to and through the two terms of the Clinton Presidency, which also included military bodyguards, pilots, and on-and-on.
Deplorable is a minor term for what Hillary was definitely "a party to." As Rodney Dangerfield used to say. "I get NO respect!" That is exactly what the Clintons have displayed for human beings, including Bill's continual and constant string of women who, (may or may not have) received injections or ingestions of drugs and/or sperm for their willing, or unwilling, receptions of sexual play from "Slick Willie."
It is a fact that too many people who unluckily happened to "get in the way" of both Bill and Hillary (and their agenda), didn't make it to see the light of another day. Can anyone spell VINCE FOSTER? For a little background information, read the book Hell To Pay by Barbara Olson, published by Regnery Publishing in 1999.
"Deplorable" is a minor term for those types of atrocities. Complicity, condoning and "Enabling" might be better words for what Hillary seems to have NO problem allowing. SO WHY in the world would she think that good people in the United States would be willing to tolerate even more of the same from her?
We are not done with this subject.
And, in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, we have had "cry-ins" and all other sorts of denials, including what appears to be George Soros' funded vote recounts, with mysterious overnight bank deposits at 3:00 a.m. (E.S.T.). It goes without saying that the majority of Americans in the millions have awakened and spoken greatly through efforts of honesty. The Alternative Media, the so-called "fake news" (which is really the truth) have played a major part in this. You see, Separation of "Church and State" as currently portrayed, never really existed. Thoroughly tired of "crooks and liars," Christians brought forth their voice to shout "Thy Will Be Done!" Pray it stands!
Liberals (socialists) have gotten away with "Fudging the Truth" for far too long! So, frankly, to correct their previously docile attitudes, the "no-longer" silent majority spoke loudly and clearly at the ballot box. We "deplorable" (meaning 'sad") folks have arisen, and reacted strongly for what America stands for. And, we have gotten on our feet and used our truly God-Given "Freedom of Speech" to pass the word through direct communications, the internet & "Face-book" to express to liberals & the rest of the world, that the Heartland of America is "fed up" with the phony Political-INcorrectness that has plagued our nation for far too long.
We are tired of being intimidated by the Network Media, who have continued to lie and who try to justify their bias and their most-unjust reporting. We are more than tired of those Hollywood moguls who use their stardom and "pseudo-prestigious" positions trying to sway others to their liberal line of thinking. We heard that several of these people threatened to leave the country if Trump was elected? Are they still here, and if so, why? Well, we don't buy what they sell. We don't wish to follow "fads" like ignorant sheep, admiring those who should really be frowned upon for their many abominable behaviors. Many of those so-called "stars" (in their own minds) are just acting...parts that are not really themselves; so, really, they are "phony-balonies" in many facets of their lives. There are some who have maintained their standards and principles. But many actors, trying to influence youth and young adults to act and misbehave like some do, have distorted what real moral foundations previous American Christian family generations have long conveyed.
Frankly, we are "fed up" with the cheating, lying to our faces, and hearing other liberal socialists condoning those lies; we are really tired of the crooked smiling and lying, straight to our faces. Living in lie-after-lie seems to be the liberal socialist way of existing. We are exhausted from being intimidated for valued truths.
So you conservatives, QUIT allowing yourselves to feel that YOU are the ones who are wrong, when you know, deep down in your heart-of-hearts those esteemed truths are right.
No longer accept cheating and lying. Continue to stay "fighting mad." And do NOT allow yourselves to become "intimidated" by liberal socialists. To describe what liberals really are, we must say that they are: bitter, beastly, depraved, despicable, dreadful, evil, hateful, heinous, hurtful, pitiful, sinister, venomous, wretched, wicked, ungodly, vile and yes: "deplorable" souls. i.e. (that is) means: sad and regrettable.
Also, every liberal continues to be a P.I.T.A. to us.
That means:
P= Pain
I=In
T=The
A=Ass
Thursday, September 01, 2016
Insurance For Hillary To Win (even if she doesn't)
by Al Benson Jr.
To anyone with the ability to think it has to be obvious that the Ruling CFR/Trilateral Establishment is concerned over the possibility that Trump might really win this next presidential election and so they are busy putting into place all the contingencies possible to make sure that will not happen (even if he wins). If fact the federal scenario might well read "even if he wins he loses."
I noted yesterday an article from The Washington Examiner http://www.washingtonexaminer.com that told us that the Dept. of Homeland Security is eying a "special declaration to take charge of the elections."
Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson smirked as he said: "There's a vital interest in our election process, so I do think we need to consider whether it should be considered by my department and others critical infrastructure." Critical for who--Hillary?
I mean, let's don't kid ourselves, do we really think, in light of all the federal foolishness regarding Hillary's emails, the Clinton Foundation and all the rest, that a Dept. of Homeland Security that is stuffed full of Obama appointees is going to labor to give us an honest, unbiased election result? If we honestly think that we are beyond gullible--and probably beyond any reasonable help. The FBI couldn't find it in their hearts to indict Hillary despite all the evidence, the leaks and all the rest--and we expect an "unbiased" election return from Homeland Security??? C'mon folks, get real! I fear that all we will get from these people is an agenda to ensure that Hillary's coronation will take place officially no matter who gets how many votes. If you wonder why I take such a negative view of all this, try over 150 years of government lies to the public that I know about, and others know even more than me.
And to make sure they are able to continue to lie to us, with no competition from any truthful source, they plan to sign away control of the Internet at the end of this month. And, according to some arcane law, they have to assign it to some "governing body" which will most likely be the United Nations or some derivitive thereof. Notice all this takes place before the election so that whatever source feeds us our election returns will be under the control of some international body. Once the Internet is gone where do you go for independent and alternative news? Most likely you don't, and we will be right back where we were before the Internet, looking to the prostitute press controlled by the Establishment to get whatever news they feel is in our (and their) "best interests."
So what happens to all those web sites and blog spots that have proliferated in recent years that tell us all the stuff that the government would rather we be ignorant of? Do you need to ask? Down the "memory hole" folks, because you don't need to know this stuff. And the Establishment is going to make darned sure you don't.
To anyone with the ability to think it has to be obvious that the Ruling CFR/Trilateral Establishment is concerned over the possibility that Trump might really win this next presidential election and so they are busy putting into place all the contingencies possible to make sure that will not happen (even if he wins). If fact the federal scenario might well read "even if he wins he loses."
I noted yesterday an article from The Washington Examiner http://www.washingtonexaminer.com that told us that the Dept. of Homeland Security is eying a "special declaration to take charge of the elections."
Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson smirked as he said: "There's a vital interest in our election process, so I do think we need to consider whether it should be considered by my department and others critical infrastructure." Critical for who--Hillary?
I mean, let's don't kid ourselves, do we really think, in light of all the federal foolishness regarding Hillary's emails, the Clinton Foundation and all the rest, that a Dept. of Homeland Security that is stuffed full of Obama appointees is going to labor to give us an honest, unbiased election result? If we honestly think that we are beyond gullible--and probably beyond any reasonable help. The FBI couldn't find it in their hearts to indict Hillary despite all the evidence, the leaks and all the rest--and we expect an "unbiased" election return from Homeland Security??? C'mon folks, get real! I fear that all we will get from these people is an agenda to ensure that Hillary's coronation will take place officially no matter who gets how many votes. If you wonder why I take such a negative view of all this, try over 150 years of government lies to the public that I know about, and others know even more than me.
And to make sure they are able to continue to lie to us, with no competition from any truthful source, they plan to sign away control of the Internet at the end of this month. And, according to some arcane law, they have to assign it to some "governing body" which will most likely be the United Nations or some derivitive thereof. Notice all this takes place before the election so that whatever source feeds us our election returns will be under the control of some international body. Once the Internet is gone where do you go for independent and alternative news? Most likely you don't, and we will be right back where we were before the Internet, looking to the prostitute press controlled by the Establishment to get whatever news they feel is in our (and their) "best interests."
So what happens to all those web sites and blog spots that have proliferated in recent years that tell us all the stuff that the government would rather we be ignorant of? Do you need to ask? Down the "memory hole" folks, because you don't need to know this stuff. And the Establishment is going to make darned sure you don't.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
No Wonder the Left Usually Wins--the Right is Nothing But a Hollow Shell
by Al Benson Jr.
I have been watching, this weekend, all the fuss over the Communist groups that managed to break up Trump's rally in Chicago. From Communist groups you expect this sort of thing. Since they can't intelligently debate their corrupt points their only alternative is to shout down their adversaries and try to shut them down and them blame their adversaries for it. This is the standard bill of fare for the lefties, proving that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute and can get by with blaming the opposition for that fact.
What surprised me, though, was the people over on the right who spouted the exact same line the lefties did. Communist groups broke up Trump's rally and it was all Trump's fault according to many that are supposed to be "right-wingers." Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were among the headliners in this dog and pony show and when you begin to see "conservative" candidates pushing the same line at Hillary and Bernie you have to know something is wrong, dreadfully wrong.
I can come up with no other conclusion than this; that much of what we consider to be the conservative, patriotic movement is really nothing more than a hollow shell, geared to fool honest, patriotic Americans with its blather about "small government" when what they are really doing is providing cover for the left without appearing to do so. And they do fool lots of folks who lack the discernment to figure out what they are doing.
It's a given than both Republican and Democratic Parties are nothing more than two wings on the same socialist, One World vulture and anyone who really trusts the Republicans to deliver the country from the clutches of the "liberal Democrats" is whistling Yankee/Marxist Doodle because that's all the Republicans will ever give him--doodle!
I'm thinking of going through my email list and deleting a batch of those sites I have been getting mail from for years so because, as I watch what they say more and more, I find many of them seem to be nothing more than foils for the Marxists. Now I will admit that Donald Trump is far from the perfect candidate. He has issues I don't agree with, such as his position on eminent domain. But on the other hand, I can't disagree with him on the Second Amendment--as long as he sticks to what he's said so far. What amazes me is that he draws fire from both left and right and, on some reflection, that says to me that left and right really agree on many things when push comes to shove and they only let us know about it when someone like Trump comes along that they are forced to say something about because his positions attack the left/right coalition they are really part of.
So, it seems to me that lots of folks who have claimed to be on the right and to be patriotic with their "America first" messages have really been lying to us, which probably siphons money and support away from those groups that are genuinely conservative and patriotic. That would be a Marxist goal too.
I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for us to start reassessing some of these "patriotic" groups to see what they really are doing for us, if anything, and how much of their supposed effort in our behalf amounts to little more than meaningless blather that directs real opposition away from the left. When Cruz and Rubio reach the point where they become indistinguishable from Hillary and Bernie then we better start realizing we have homework to do. A good start might be to check the Internet and find a membership list for the Council on Foreign Relations and check out any members of Congress who might be members or have family members who belong or have belonged. Then check out "news" media people who belong. Once you have done that you will know why you get the slanted media coverage so prevalent on the six o' clock news and in the daily fishwrapper you still refer to as a newspaper.
Unfortunately the advocates of One World Government are alive and well on both the left and the right. It should be our bounden duty to expose the ones on the right.
I have been watching, this weekend, all the fuss over the Communist groups that managed to break up Trump's rally in Chicago. From Communist groups you expect this sort of thing. Since they can't intelligently debate their corrupt points their only alternative is to shout down their adversaries and try to shut them down and them blame their adversaries for it. This is the standard bill of fare for the lefties, proving that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute and can get by with blaming the opposition for that fact.
What surprised me, though, was the people over on the right who spouted the exact same line the lefties did. Communist groups broke up Trump's rally and it was all Trump's fault according to many that are supposed to be "right-wingers." Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were among the headliners in this dog and pony show and when you begin to see "conservative" candidates pushing the same line at Hillary and Bernie you have to know something is wrong, dreadfully wrong.
I can come up with no other conclusion than this; that much of what we consider to be the conservative, patriotic movement is really nothing more than a hollow shell, geared to fool honest, patriotic Americans with its blather about "small government" when what they are really doing is providing cover for the left without appearing to do so. And they do fool lots of folks who lack the discernment to figure out what they are doing.
It's a given than both Republican and Democratic Parties are nothing more than two wings on the same socialist, One World vulture and anyone who really trusts the Republicans to deliver the country from the clutches of the "liberal Democrats" is whistling Yankee/Marxist Doodle because that's all the Republicans will ever give him--doodle!
I'm thinking of going through my email list and deleting a batch of those sites I have been getting mail from for years so because, as I watch what they say more and more, I find many of them seem to be nothing more than foils for the Marxists. Now I will admit that Donald Trump is far from the perfect candidate. He has issues I don't agree with, such as his position on eminent domain. But on the other hand, I can't disagree with him on the Second Amendment--as long as he sticks to what he's said so far. What amazes me is that he draws fire from both left and right and, on some reflection, that says to me that left and right really agree on many things when push comes to shove and they only let us know about it when someone like Trump comes along that they are forced to say something about because his positions attack the left/right coalition they are really part of.
So, it seems to me that lots of folks who have claimed to be on the right and to be patriotic with their "America first" messages have really been lying to us, which probably siphons money and support away from those groups that are genuinely conservative and patriotic. That would be a Marxist goal too.
I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for us to start reassessing some of these "patriotic" groups to see what they really are doing for us, if anything, and how much of their supposed effort in our behalf amounts to little more than meaningless blather that directs real opposition away from the left. When Cruz and Rubio reach the point where they become indistinguishable from Hillary and Bernie then we better start realizing we have homework to do. A good start might be to check the Internet and find a membership list for the Council on Foreign Relations and check out any members of Congress who might be members or have family members who belong or have belonged. Then check out "news" media people who belong. Once you have done that you will know why you get the slanted media coverage so prevalent on the six o' clock news and in the daily fishwrapper you still refer to as a newspaper.
Unfortunately the advocates of One World Government are alive and well on both the left and the right. It should be our bounden duty to expose the ones on the right.
Thursday, March 03, 2016
The Republican Establishment--Is It Really a Criminal Conspiracy?
by Al Benson Jr.
After having watched the political gyrations the Republican Party is going through in their efforts to reject the candidacy of Donald Trump I have to come to the conclusion that all that many have said about them over the years is correct. They really are no different than the Democrats. The Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission really does give them their marching orders and the only difference between them and the Democrats is that they have been directed to hide their socialist proclivities where the Democrats have been allowed to let them all hang out. The two political parties really are nothing more than two different wings on the same socialist turkey and, as usual, and by design, it is flying in the wrong direction.
The American people are being stiffed by the Internationalists and it is on purpose and with the consent of all three branches of the government. As I have said before, the Constitution is no protection whatever for the public when all three branches of government are in collusion to ignore it and are aided and abetted by a prostitute media.
If the Republicans were really "conservative" they would not be having the problem they are with Donald Trump. If the other Republican candidates were really as conservative as they claim they would not all be looking for ways to dump him. You have to come to the conclusion with Trump, that if the left and the so-called right both hate his guts then he must be doing something right! And the fact that both left and "right" are so anxious to deep six him tells you that, at root, they have the same socialist agenda. The left is left. The "right" is really left and the American public has no one in government to defend it. All they want to do is to make sure they get your guns before you start to realize this.
I think all this talk about "indicting" Hillary is a big joke. Does anyone honestly think the Loretta Lynch's "Just Us Department" of which the FBI is a part will ever have her indicted? Come on folks, you have to be kidding! The only way she will ever get indicted is if, for some reason, the CFR/Trilateralist/Bilderburger group decides she is too much of a liability to become president and they decide to throw her under the bus. Other than that, she's a shoo-in, no matter how many votes she does or doesn't get. After all, we all know it's who counts them, not who votes that makes the difference.
And the Republicans are heartily trying to resurrect that tired old retread, Mitt Romney so he can take support away from Trump. They are also looking for another weak Republican candidate that will not be able to beat Hillary and if Romney couldn't beat Obama then Hillary will have him for lunch--and it's all according to plan.
The Ruling Establishment knows the public is fed up. They couldn't care less! They figure whatever they shove down our throats we'll take it. We're too stupid to do anything else! One of these days they may be in for a rude awakening and when that happens it may get messy--but they don't realize that yet so they will keep on pushing.
If the Republican Party were going to stand up for conservative and patriotic values they would have done it when they got a majority in Congress. Instead they just continued to cave in to Obama. When conservatives arose in protest over John Boehner's caving in they finally, reluctantly, removed him and gave us Paul Ryan who is nothing more than Boehner-Lite, so nothing changed. And nothing will change no matter who we get for president either. They will find some way to sidetrack Trump and we will get the weakest possible Republican candidate to run against Hillary and it will be business as usual in the "District of Corruption."
After having watched the political gyrations the Republican Party is going through in their efforts to reject the candidacy of Donald Trump I have to come to the conclusion that all that many have said about them over the years is correct. They really are no different than the Democrats. The Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission really does give them their marching orders and the only difference between them and the Democrats is that they have been directed to hide their socialist proclivities where the Democrats have been allowed to let them all hang out. The two political parties really are nothing more than two different wings on the same socialist turkey and, as usual, and by design, it is flying in the wrong direction.
The American people are being stiffed by the Internationalists and it is on purpose and with the consent of all three branches of the government. As I have said before, the Constitution is no protection whatever for the public when all three branches of government are in collusion to ignore it and are aided and abetted by a prostitute media.
If the Republicans were really "conservative" they would not be having the problem they are with Donald Trump. If the other Republican candidates were really as conservative as they claim they would not all be looking for ways to dump him. You have to come to the conclusion with Trump, that if the left and the so-called right both hate his guts then he must be doing something right! And the fact that both left and "right" are so anxious to deep six him tells you that, at root, they have the same socialist agenda. The left is left. The "right" is really left and the American public has no one in government to defend it. All they want to do is to make sure they get your guns before you start to realize this.
I think all this talk about "indicting" Hillary is a big joke. Does anyone honestly think the Loretta Lynch's "Just Us Department" of which the FBI is a part will ever have her indicted? Come on folks, you have to be kidding! The only way she will ever get indicted is if, for some reason, the CFR/Trilateralist/Bilderburger group decides she is too much of a liability to become president and they decide to throw her under the bus. Other than that, she's a shoo-in, no matter how many votes she does or doesn't get. After all, we all know it's who counts them, not who votes that makes the difference.
And the Republicans are heartily trying to resurrect that tired old retread, Mitt Romney so he can take support away from Trump. They are also looking for another weak Republican candidate that will not be able to beat Hillary and if Romney couldn't beat Obama then Hillary will have him for lunch--and it's all according to plan.
The Ruling Establishment knows the public is fed up. They couldn't care less! They figure whatever they shove down our throats we'll take it. We're too stupid to do anything else! One of these days they may be in for a rude awakening and when that happens it may get messy--but they don't realize that yet so they will keep on pushing.
If the Republican Party were going to stand up for conservative and patriotic values they would have done it when they got a majority in Congress. Instead they just continued to cave in to Obama. When conservatives arose in protest over John Boehner's caving in they finally, reluctantly, removed him and gave us Paul Ryan who is nothing more than Boehner-Lite, so nothing changed. And nothing will change no matter who we get for president either. They will find some way to sidetrack Trump and we will get the weakest possible Republican candidate to run against Hillary and it will be business as usual in the "District of Corruption."
Thursday, February 11, 2016
Our "Pre-Revolutionary" Mood
by Al Benson Jr.
In my "huntin' and peckin' on the Internet this week I came across an interesting article on www.zerohedge.com which observed that the vast majority of Americans now believe that both political parties are so hopelessly corrupt that they are unable to change anything for the better. The article, published on 2/8/16 stated that "This, in fact, is a revolution."
The article continued: "We've previously noted that polls show that Americans are in a 'pre-revolutionary' mood, that less than 1 in 5 Americans think that the government has the 'consent of the governed,' that government corruption tops the list of American fears (gee, we wonder why), and that 3 times as many Americans supported King George during the Revolutionary War than support our OWN Congress today." That statement, in itself, speaks volumes as to where the country is as I write this. As for King George looking better than Congress today--why not. At present Congress is busy stiffing the American public who pays their fat salaries and thanks to groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission the Republican and Democratic parties are in bed with each other committing political fornication.
Republican and Democratic pollsters as well as independent political strategists have been reviewing polling date recently and they came up with some interesting results.
The zerohedge articled noted: "84% of all Americans believe political leaders are more interested in protecting their power and privilege than doing what is right. 81% believe the power of ordinary people to control our country is getting weaker every day as politicians of both parties fight to protect their own power and privilege...78% believe that the Democratic and Republican Parties are essentially useless in changing anything because both political parties are too beholden to special interests to create any meaningful change...74% see the biased and slanted coverage of the media as part of the problem...70% believe the government in Washington does not govern with the consent of the people...They concluded: The country is in a pre-revolutionary moment. This election could mark the beginning of the end two-party duopoly in the United States." This is not the entire list by any means. There was more but I cannot reproduce all of it here. Check out the zerohedge article for yourselves.
I am not sure most folks totally grasp the truth that their government and both political parties, the media, many universities and other organizations, including some church denominations have all been infiltrated by the minions of One World Government. I would encourage folks to get on the Internet and check out the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Check out their origins, who is part and parcel of them, what connections they have to the United Nations. In that regard, check out Alger Hiss who was part of Roosevelt's State Department as well as a Communist Party member, all of which bothered Roosevelt not one little bit. There is a wealth of information out there IF you are willing to make the effort to check it out. It will begin to show you why we are in the mess we are in. There is an old book out there (old being 1962) by Dan Smoot called The Invisible Government. I believe it's on the Internet. Check it out. If it's on there you can read it for free, along with Gary Allen's book None Dare Call It Conspiracy which is also on the Internet.
These books will give you insight into why neither political party will ever do anything to change the status quo. The American public is finally beginning to wake up, stretch and yawn, and wonder why they are being taken by those they elect to office to represent them and which don't, but rather represent those in favor of One World Government, which means, for Americans, the destruction of their God-given liberty. If we are not willing, or just too lazy, to defend and protect what God has given us then we deserve to lose it. And because we've been too lazy up to now all this has been happening. Maybe the "pre-revolutionary moment" we are experiencing right now is by the grace of God, giving us yet one more chance to repent of our national as well as our personal sins and seeking His guidance as to how we turn this situation around. And make no mistake, we will NOT do it in our own strength, but only with His help and guidance.
I know today many Christians will tell you because the Lord is in control just sit back and don't worry about it. Respectfully, I disagree with the part about sitting back and not worrying. The Lord is in control and quite probably He wants to exercise some of that control using us to do it. But if we won't have any of that, then He will find someone else to do it and we may not like the results.
In my "huntin' and peckin' on the Internet this week I came across an interesting article on www.zerohedge.com which observed that the vast majority of Americans now believe that both political parties are so hopelessly corrupt that they are unable to change anything for the better. The article, published on 2/8/16 stated that "This, in fact, is a revolution."
The article continued: "We've previously noted that polls show that Americans are in a 'pre-revolutionary' mood, that less than 1 in 5 Americans think that the government has the 'consent of the governed,' that government corruption tops the list of American fears (gee, we wonder why), and that 3 times as many Americans supported King George during the Revolutionary War than support our OWN Congress today." That statement, in itself, speaks volumes as to where the country is as I write this. As for King George looking better than Congress today--why not. At present Congress is busy stiffing the American public who pays their fat salaries and thanks to groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission the Republican and Democratic parties are in bed with each other committing political fornication.
Republican and Democratic pollsters as well as independent political strategists have been reviewing polling date recently and they came up with some interesting results.
The zerohedge articled noted: "84% of all Americans believe political leaders are more interested in protecting their power and privilege than doing what is right. 81% believe the power of ordinary people to control our country is getting weaker every day as politicians of both parties fight to protect their own power and privilege...78% believe that the Democratic and Republican Parties are essentially useless in changing anything because both political parties are too beholden to special interests to create any meaningful change...74% see the biased and slanted coverage of the media as part of the problem...70% believe the government in Washington does not govern with the consent of the people...They concluded: The country is in a pre-revolutionary moment. This election could mark the beginning of the end two-party duopoly in the United States." This is not the entire list by any means. There was more but I cannot reproduce all of it here. Check out the zerohedge article for yourselves.
I am not sure most folks totally grasp the truth that their government and both political parties, the media, many universities and other organizations, including some church denominations have all been infiltrated by the minions of One World Government. I would encourage folks to get on the Internet and check out the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Check out their origins, who is part and parcel of them, what connections they have to the United Nations. In that regard, check out Alger Hiss who was part of Roosevelt's State Department as well as a Communist Party member, all of which bothered Roosevelt not one little bit. There is a wealth of information out there IF you are willing to make the effort to check it out. It will begin to show you why we are in the mess we are in. There is an old book out there (old being 1962) by Dan Smoot called The Invisible Government. I believe it's on the Internet. Check it out. If it's on there you can read it for free, along with Gary Allen's book None Dare Call It Conspiracy which is also on the Internet.
These books will give you insight into why neither political party will ever do anything to change the status quo. The American public is finally beginning to wake up, stretch and yawn, and wonder why they are being taken by those they elect to office to represent them and which don't, but rather represent those in favor of One World Government, which means, for Americans, the destruction of their God-given liberty. If we are not willing, or just too lazy, to defend and protect what God has given us then we deserve to lose it. And because we've been too lazy up to now all this has been happening. Maybe the "pre-revolutionary moment" we are experiencing right now is by the grace of God, giving us yet one more chance to repent of our national as well as our personal sins and seeking His guidance as to how we turn this situation around. And make no mistake, we will NOT do it in our own strength, but only with His help and guidance.
I know today many Christians will tell you because the Lord is in control just sit back and don't worry about it. Respectfully, I disagree with the part about sitting back and not worrying. The Lord is in control and quite probably He wants to exercise some of that control using us to do it. But if we won't have any of that, then He will find someone else to do it and we may not like the results.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Colder is Really Warmer
by Al Benson Jr.
I have followed what I refer to as the "global warming scam" for quite some time now and have seen nothing to convince me that it is not a scam. Most other folks I talk to feel the same way. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to discern that the whole game is a collectivist fraud designed to make some of the government's friends even more wealthy than they are now as well as restricting our liberties in the name of "environmentalism." And restricting our liberties is a goal deal to the heart of all collectivist types. It's what they live for.
And so the global warming propaganda continues to flow from the mouth of big government, telling us how we have destroyed the environment with our huge "carbon footprints." Their ultimate solution--shut down most of the industry in this country and go back to cooking over campfires and living in caves. Interestingly they never discuss the carbon footprints left by countries like Red China. I know, that's something we are not supposed to talk about and once they have "neutralized" the Internet such discussion will be verboten.
I just find the propaganda to be, not even humorous, but rather ludicrous. I read an article at the end of January that stated that this January had been the second warmest on record. Where? Near the Equator? It surely wasn't warmer in the South and from what I read of other parts of the country it was colder than usual. As I write this, the usual temperature for this time of year in North Louisiana is a little over 60 degrees. Today the temperature here is 29 and we had an ice storm yesterday. It's not supposed to get out of the low 40s all this week.
In fact, its so bad, even the weather services have had to admit that February has been just plain cold this year. AccuWeather.com had an article on the Internet for February 23 in which it stated: "Additional waves of frigid air will continue to flow southward out of Canada and into the central and eastern United States this week, but there are indications the cold will ease up next week...While the air masses moving through this week are not quite as extreme as that of last week, daily record low temperatures will continue to be challenged. Once again, record lows dating as far back as the late 1800s will be on the table...Multiple locations including Boston, New York City, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Chicago are likely to finish the month within the top three coldest Februaries on record. In some cases, temperatures for the remainder of the month may deliver the coldest February on record and could rank as one of the coldest months ever."
Doesn't sound to me like global warming is having much of an effect on the weather in this country. At least not as much as it will have in July! So, with even the weather bureau being forced to admit that this is one of the coldest Februaries on record, you have to wonder how these people in Washington have to gall to keep telling us this has been one of the warmest years on record so far.
If you follow the Yankee/Marxist "logic" flowing out of Sodom on the Potomac you will be forced to conclude that warmer is really colder, that slavery is really freedom, that if we just spend enough money we can spend ourselves into riches, and that war is really peace. And in amongst all of this political malarkey will be buried the fact that, according to Isaiah the prophet in the Scriptures, there are some who call evil good and good evil, some that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. And it occurs to me that what Isaiah described is exactly what is going on right now. Government is telling us that colder is really warmer and that (our) slavery is really freedom--and they hope we are too stupid to know the difference. In fact, their fondest wish is that we are too stupid to know the difference.
And, while global warming is a hot (pardon the pun) topic right now, the thought, hopefully, will occur to some of us that if they have lied to us about this--the what else have they lied to us about?
I have followed what I refer to as the "global warming scam" for quite some time now and have seen nothing to convince me that it is not a scam. Most other folks I talk to feel the same way. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to discern that the whole game is a collectivist fraud designed to make some of the government's friends even more wealthy than they are now as well as restricting our liberties in the name of "environmentalism." And restricting our liberties is a goal deal to the heart of all collectivist types. It's what they live for.
And so the global warming propaganda continues to flow from the mouth of big government, telling us how we have destroyed the environment with our huge "carbon footprints." Their ultimate solution--shut down most of the industry in this country and go back to cooking over campfires and living in caves. Interestingly they never discuss the carbon footprints left by countries like Red China. I know, that's something we are not supposed to talk about and once they have "neutralized" the Internet such discussion will be verboten.
I just find the propaganda to be, not even humorous, but rather ludicrous. I read an article at the end of January that stated that this January had been the second warmest on record. Where? Near the Equator? It surely wasn't warmer in the South and from what I read of other parts of the country it was colder than usual. As I write this, the usual temperature for this time of year in North Louisiana is a little over 60 degrees. Today the temperature here is 29 and we had an ice storm yesterday. It's not supposed to get out of the low 40s all this week.
In fact, its so bad, even the weather services have had to admit that February has been just plain cold this year. AccuWeather.com had an article on the Internet for February 23 in which it stated: "Additional waves of frigid air will continue to flow southward out of Canada and into the central and eastern United States this week, but there are indications the cold will ease up next week...While the air masses moving through this week are not quite as extreme as that of last week, daily record low temperatures will continue to be challenged. Once again, record lows dating as far back as the late 1800s will be on the table...Multiple locations including Boston, New York City, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Chicago are likely to finish the month within the top three coldest Februaries on record. In some cases, temperatures for the remainder of the month may deliver the coldest February on record and could rank as one of the coldest months ever."
Doesn't sound to me like global warming is having much of an effect on the weather in this country. At least not as much as it will have in July! So, with even the weather bureau being forced to admit that this is one of the coldest Februaries on record, you have to wonder how these people in Washington have to gall to keep telling us this has been one of the warmest years on record so far.
If you follow the Yankee/Marxist "logic" flowing out of Sodom on the Potomac you will be forced to conclude that warmer is really colder, that slavery is really freedom, that if we just spend enough money we can spend ourselves into riches, and that war is really peace. And in amongst all of this political malarkey will be buried the fact that, according to Isaiah the prophet in the Scriptures, there are some who call evil good and good evil, some that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. And it occurs to me that what Isaiah described is exactly what is going on right now. Government is telling us that colder is really warmer and that (our) slavery is really freedom--and they hope we are too stupid to know the difference. In fact, their fondest wish is that we are too stupid to know the difference.
And, while global warming is a hot (pardon the pun) topic right now, the thought, hopefully, will occur to some of us that if they have lied to us about this--the what else have they lied to us about?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)