by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America
Most of us have read about the reparations scam over the years. It seems as though it resurfaces every three or four years and some socialist or group of socialists pushes it for awhile, but can't quite get enough traction for it and so it goes the way of the Dodo Bird for awhile and resides in political limbo until the next bunch of socialists comes along and tries again.
Let's be honest here, folks. This is one issue that will never completely go away, as the possibilities for redistributing the wealth with something like this are so strong that the socialists and other Marxists among us just can't bear to turn loose of it.
I noticed an article on LewRockwell.com for February 26th by Pat Buchanan about this. Pat observed: "Having embraced 'Medicare-for-all' free college tuition and a Green New Deal that would mandate an early end of all oil, gas and coal-fired power plants, the Democratic Party's lurch to the left rolls on. Presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren both called last week for race-based reparations for slavery.
Should you wonder what "race-based" reparations for slavery means, it means that only white folks will get taken to the cleaners for this scam and no one else has to worry. This makes it a patently dishonest scheme right from the git-go as anyone with a brain should be able to figure out.
The slavery situation in this country has always been a complex issue. It was never a situation where all white folks held all black folks in perpetual bondage, regardless of what your "history" professors (what a laugh) have told you.
You had a situation in this country with slavery, which existed in all the original 13 colonies, both north and south and in states in both areas after the War for Independence was over. Slavery in the North didn't disappear until the early decades of the 19th century--1810-1840 and even later in some Northern states.
Then you had a problem with who owned the slaves, and all the slaveowners were not white folks. Some were, but there were also blacks that owned slaves, and American Indians that owned slaves.
So the question arises, at least to me, and I hope to a bunch of other folks too, as to just how these "race-based" reparations are supposed to be paid. Are descendants of black slave owners going to be forced to pay reparations to the descendants of black slaves they owned? Will descendants of American Indian slave owners be forced to do the same? Or, as I suggested earlier, will this con game be only for fleecing white folks?
And what about all the white folks that never owned any slaves? Do their descendants get to pay too? I'd be willing to bet they do.
I mentioned that Kamala Harris was one of those pushing this foolishness. I ran across a short article on https://ussanews.com that stated: "Presidential Candidate, Senator Kamala Harris claimed she supports Reparations for African-Americans but forgot to mention that her ancestors owned slaves...The thing is, Kamala's ancestors used to own slaves--according to her own father...According to Kamala Harris' father, the Democratic presidential hopeful's great-grandmom was a Jamaican slave plantation owner who founded the city of Brown's Town."
That raises some interesting questions. Would Harris, who is a least partly black, be entitled to reparations, or would she have to pay reparations, seeing that her ancestors owned a slave plantation? Of course that was in Jamaica, so it might not apply here, but there might be people here that would find themselves in that boat. So who would end up paying who?
I'd like to see someone address the issue of whether black descendants of black slave owners would have to pay reparations. And how do we go about determining which blacks were here since slave days as opposed to some that have come here from other places since slavery ended. What about all the blacks up in Minnesota from Somalia that have come here in the last three decades from Africa? Are you going to tell me they are entitled to reparations too, even though their ancestors were never slaves here? I surely hope not because if you do, you will not be enamored of my response.
I can't get over the sneaky feeling that this scam is directed at white folks to con them into feeling guilty enough over slavery that they'd be willing to fork over something to expiate their supposed guilt. Let me be blunt here. Since no one alive today has ever lived under slavery in this country and since there have not been any slave owners in this country since the passage of the second 13th Amendment, then no one owes anyone else a thin dime for "slavery reparations." It's that simple, and I honestly believe that all these Demoncrat political fakers who push this drivel fully realize that fact. I think they are trying to build themselves giant voting blocs for the upcoming 2020 elections.
They want to appear sympathetic to the great toiling masses in this country that are not white so they can howl about how they are trying to help out minority voters. It's all a croc, or as they say in West Texas, a pile of cow chips! They don't care about minorities anymore than they care about us deplorable white folks. What they care about are money and power and they are willing to prostitute themselves to those ends.
To say they are pathetic would be to pay them a complement.
Showing posts with label Bernie Sanders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bernie Sanders. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 26, 2019
Sunday, November 04, 2018
Scumbags of the World Unite!
by Al Benson Jr.
I suppose, in sort of a left-handed way, all of us white folks are supposed to be thankful to Michael Moore, Hitlery Clinton, Obama and all the rest of the Leftist coterie that is part and parcel of the Deep State for them telling us what scumbags all white folks are. I mean, after all, where else would we have ever found out how deplorable all white folks are if those on the Far, Far Left hadn't been so concerned with our "welfare" that they just had to let us know how horrible we all really are?
Of course I find it interesting that some of these folks that have taken great paints to inform us of how terrible we are also happen to be white. Does that make them as horrendous as the rest of us? Logical thought would dictate that it should, just because of their skin color you would think. But, no, somehow, as white as they are, they plead that they are not as bad as all the rest of us. We are bad, but, somehow, in their omniscience, they have managed to rise above all that. After all, how would they know how terrible we all really are if they had not reached that elevated status that reveals to them how bad we are and how good they are?
You see, if you really delve into it all, it tends to get complicated. It seems that "white" is really sort of virtuous if it is on the Left politically. It only becomes horrible if you happen to be on the Right politically. Got that? In other words "white is really right, if it's on the Left. It's only when it's Right that it's wrong!
To those on the Left it all makes perfect sense, but to normal people, it reeks of bovine fertilizer--you're just not supposed to notice the smell. Just pretend it ain't there and it will go away, so they tell us.
You see you have these folks over on the political Left that are cultural Marxists. A cultural Marxist is someone who doesn't want you to know he or she is a Marxist, so instead they refer to themselves as being politically correct, or "progressive." They use the latter term because they think it actually fools people into thinking they are way ahead of the curve. The English have a term for one who is crazy. They say he's "right round the bend." I wonder if that's what the progressives mean by being ahead of the curve. Does that mean they have reached the state of insanity quicker than the rest of us? Based on some of what they've tried to pull lately it could well mean that, as some Leftist actions of late do seem a bit unhinged--but then, I have to remember that I am only a lowly white scumbag and so may be totally incapable of discerning the convoluted progressions of the high and mighty Leftists among us. They may have attained a plane of existence that I am unable to contemplate.
Years ago Johnny Cash did a song that said "The one on the left is in the middle and the one on the right is on the left" or something to that effect. Confusing I admit, but often something like that may well sum up where the Left really is, or thinks it is, or possibly is--or whatever!
The paragons of virtue on the Left have been noted for decades now for not making sense to rational people--but then rational people are probably all scumbags along with us miserable white folks. I recall, during World War 2 or just before it, the Soviet Communists really hated the German fascists (who were really their political second cousins) and all the Communist literature parroted that fact. Then one day Hitler and Stalin sat down and made a pact to divide Poland up between then and voila, overnight, the Soviets and the Germans commenced a gigantic European socialist lovefest that even threw their staunchest devotees for a loop--especially in this country! What had been reprehensible yesterday became totally acceptable today. Such is Leftist, what shall we say--paranoia?
Don't try to figure out the Leftist lovebirds by any normal means. You will be doomed to failure. You do need to discern what they are all about but, in the long run you can only do that with prayer and Divine Guidance.
Once we white scumbags (and other scumbags not on the Left) have prayed and sought Divine Guidance, then what we must do is to unite together as concerned scumbags and resist the Left and those who continue to finance it. As the man says "Scumbags of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but the chains the Deep State would bind you down with."
I suppose, in sort of a left-handed way, all of us white folks are supposed to be thankful to Michael Moore, Hitlery Clinton, Obama and all the rest of the Leftist coterie that is part and parcel of the Deep State for them telling us what scumbags all white folks are. I mean, after all, where else would we have ever found out how deplorable all white folks are if those on the Far, Far Left hadn't been so concerned with our "welfare" that they just had to let us know how horrible we all really are?
Of course I find it interesting that some of these folks that have taken great paints to inform us of how terrible we are also happen to be white. Does that make them as horrendous as the rest of us? Logical thought would dictate that it should, just because of their skin color you would think. But, no, somehow, as white as they are, they plead that they are not as bad as all the rest of us. We are bad, but, somehow, in their omniscience, they have managed to rise above all that. After all, how would they know how terrible we all really are if they had not reached that elevated status that reveals to them how bad we are and how good they are?
You see, if you really delve into it all, it tends to get complicated. It seems that "white" is really sort of virtuous if it is on the Left politically. It only becomes horrible if you happen to be on the Right politically. Got that? In other words "white is really right, if it's on the Left. It's only when it's Right that it's wrong!
To those on the Left it all makes perfect sense, but to normal people, it reeks of bovine fertilizer--you're just not supposed to notice the smell. Just pretend it ain't there and it will go away, so they tell us.
You see you have these folks over on the political Left that are cultural Marxists. A cultural Marxist is someone who doesn't want you to know he or she is a Marxist, so instead they refer to themselves as being politically correct, or "progressive." They use the latter term because they think it actually fools people into thinking they are way ahead of the curve. The English have a term for one who is crazy. They say he's "right round the bend." I wonder if that's what the progressives mean by being ahead of the curve. Does that mean they have reached the state of insanity quicker than the rest of us? Based on some of what they've tried to pull lately it could well mean that, as some Leftist actions of late do seem a bit unhinged--but then, I have to remember that I am only a lowly white scumbag and so may be totally incapable of discerning the convoluted progressions of the high and mighty Leftists among us. They may have attained a plane of existence that I am unable to contemplate.
Years ago Johnny Cash did a song that said "The one on the left is in the middle and the one on the right is on the left" or something to that effect. Confusing I admit, but often something like that may well sum up where the Left really is, or thinks it is, or possibly is--or whatever!
The paragons of virtue on the Left have been noted for decades now for not making sense to rational people--but then rational people are probably all scumbags along with us miserable white folks. I recall, during World War 2 or just before it, the Soviet Communists really hated the German fascists (who were really their political second cousins) and all the Communist literature parroted that fact. Then one day Hitler and Stalin sat down and made a pact to divide Poland up between then and voila, overnight, the Soviets and the Germans commenced a gigantic European socialist lovefest that even threw their staunchest devotees for a loop--especially in this country! What had been reprehensible yesterday became totally acceptable today. Such is Leftist, what shall we say--paranoia?
Don't try to figure out the Leftist lovebirds by any normal means. You will be doomed to failure. You do need to discern what they are all about but, in the long run you can only do that with prayer and Divine Guidance.
Once we white scumbags (and other scumbags not on the Left) have prayed and sought Divine Guidance, then what we must do is to unite together as concerned scumbags and resist the Left and those who continue to finance it. As the man says "Scumbags of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but the chains the Deep State would bind you down with."
Thursday, December 15, 2016
So Who Is Prompting "Faithless Electors" To Dump Trump?
by Al Benson Jr.
Back during the presidential debates someone asked Donald Trump if he would accept the results of the election. It wasn't the first time he'd been asked that but I think he must have been getting tired of the question because he said "I think I'll keep you in suspense." To which Hillary Clinton replied in her most appropriately shocked voice, that if Trump was not willing to accept the results of the election, why that would be "a threat to our democracy." All these slimy politicians love that word "democracy" when referring to our form of government. They know it's a republic, not a democracy, but they don't want you to realize that, or to realize the vast difference between the two.
Well, now that the election is history and Trump won it by a landslide, guess who isn't accepting the results of the election? Hillary and her surrogates have decided that the election did not turn out as they had expected and so they have not only decided to not accept the results but their minions are eagerly working to change the results. You see, to Hillary, the saying "be reasonable and do it MY way" is not a mere suggestion--it is a command! And she's going to make sure the country does it HER WAY no matter what! If us peons were all too stupid to vote for Hillary then she plans to make sure our vote is nullified. Of course she has lots of leftist assistance here.
Part of her leftist assistance (and I mean far left, really far left) is an outfit called Megaphone Strategies. This is a public relations firm working behind the scenes with the faithless electors to enable them to not cast their electoral votes for Trump as they are pledged to do. In other words, Megaphone Strategies is helping them weasel out of their electoral pledge--and if it can help enough of them to weasel out then that will throw the decision of who gets to be president into Congress.
Do I even need to mention that Megaphone Strategies has ties to prominent Democrats like Clinton and Obama? I didn't think so.
There was an article on www.dailycaller.com on 12/13/16 by Peter Hasson that dealt with this. I would encourage folks to check that out if possible.
Seems like Megaphone Strategies was co-founded by Van Jones, former green jobs czar in the Obama administration, and Molly Haigh, who worked for Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. Sounds like a real middle-of-the-road outfit doesn't it? Megaphone's communications manager, Diane May, worked for Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign. Their website advertises that May worked on both of the Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012. In fact, only two of the employees of Megaphone Strategies that are listed have not worked for some Democratic politician, though both have worked for "liberal" causes.
Vieu Truong, one of the firm's four listed board members headlined a Hillary Clinton fundraiser last September by the pro-Clinton environmentalist organization CleanTech Party and serves as the director of another Van Jones project, Green For All. There was also an article on World Net Daily recently noting Jones and this group.
Megaphone Statistics has other clients, some of the most notable of which are Black Lives Matter, the National Center for Transgender Equality and Netroots Nation You also might want to check out the site www.conservapedia.com which mentions Van Jones as a "self-declared communist." I believe Jones is also a commentator on CNN, or at least he was at one point. Does that give you a subtle hint as to why many have labeled CNN as the Communist News Network?
These are the people that are trying to help Hillary Clinton destroy "our democracy" by helping her to find ways that the election results can be questioned. You see it's not alright for Trump to do that, but you must understand that a different standard prevails for Hillary--the untouchable and the unindicted.
Her surrogates are going to make sure that the American public does not have to put up with a day of a Trump presidency by overthrowing the legal results of the election by whatever means necessary, in true cultural Marxist fashion, and making sure that we will now learn to be truly thankful to the Establishment as they bestow Queen Hillary upon us. What was it that George Orwell said as the end of his prescient book 1984-- "He loved Big Brother." Or was that Big Sister???
Back during the presidential debates someone asked Donald Trump if he would accept the results of the election. It wasn't the first time he'd been asked that but I think he must have been getting tired of the question because he said "I think I'll keep you in suspense." To which Hillary Clinton replied in her most appropriately shocked voice, that if Trump was not willing to accept the results of the election, why that would be "a threat to our democracy." All these slimy politicians love that word "democracy" when referring to our form of government. They know it's a republic, not a democracy, but they don't want you to realize that, or to realize the vast difference between the two.
Well, now that the election is history and Trump won it by a landslide, guess who isn't accepting the results of the election? Hillary and her surrogates have decided that the election did not turn out as they had expected and so they have not only decided to not accept the results but their minions are eagerly working to change the results. You see, to Hillary, the saying "be reasonable and do it MY way" is not a mere suggestion--it is a command! And she's going to make sure the country does it HER WAY no matter what! If us peons were all too stupid to vote for Hillary then she plans to make sure our vote is nullified. Of course she has lots of leftist assistance here.
Part of her leftist assistance (and I mean far left, really far left) is an outfit called Megaphone Strategies. This is a public relations firm working behind the scenes with the faithless electors to enable them to not cast their electoral votes for Trump as they are pledged to do. In other words, Megaphone Strategies is helping them weasel out of their electoral pledge--and if it can help enough of them to weasel out then that will throw the decision of who gets to be president into Congress.
Do I even need to mention that Megaphone Strategies has ties to prominent Democrats like Clinton and Obama? I didn't think so.
There was an article on www.dailycaller.com on 12/13/16 by Peter Hasson that dealt with this. I would encourage folks to check that out if possible.
Seems like Megaphone Strategies was co-founded by Van Jones, former green jobs czar in the Obama administration, and Molly Haigh, who worked for Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. Sounds like a real middle-of-the-road outfit doesn't it? Megaphone's communications manager, Diane May, worked for Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign. Their website advertises that May worked on both of the Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012. In fact, only two of the employees of Megaphone Strategies that are listed have not worked for some Democratic politician, though both have worked for "liberal" causes.
Vieu Truong, one of the firm's four listed board members headlined a Hillary Clinton fundraiser last September by the pro-Clinton environmentalist organization CleanTech Party and serves as the director of another Van Jones project, Green For All. There was also an article on World Net Daily recently noting Jones and this group.
Megaphone Statistics has other clients, some of the most notable of which are Black Lives Matter, the National Center for Transgender Equality and Netroots Nation You also might want to check out the site www.conservapedia.com which mentions Van Jones as a "self-declared communist." I believe Jones is also a commentator on CNN, or at least he was at one point. Does that give you a subtle hint as to why many have labeled CNN as the Communist News Network?
These are the people that are trying to help Hillary Clinton destroy "our democracy" by helping her to find ways that the election results can be questioned. You see it's not alright for Trump to do that, but you must understand that a different standard prevails for Hillary--the untouchable and the unindicted.
Her surrogates are going to make sure that the American public does not have to put up with a day of a Trump presidency by overthrowing the legal results of the election by whatever means necessary, in true cultural Marxist fashion, and making sure that we will now learn to be truly thankful to the Establishment as they bestow Queen Hillary upon us. What was it that George Orwell said as the end of his prescient book 1984-- "He loved Big Brother." Or was that Big Sister???
Sunday, March 13, 2016
No Wonder the Left Usually Wins--the Right is Nothing But a Hollow Shell
by Al Benson Jr.
I have been watching, this weekend, all the fuss over the Communist groups that managed to break up Trump's rally in Chicago. From Communist groups you expect this sort of thing. Since they can't intelligently debate their corrupt points their only alternative is to shout down their adversaries and try to shut them down and them blame their adversaries for it. This is the standard bill of fare for the lefties, proving that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute and can get by with blaming the opposition for that fact.
What surprised me, though, was the people over on the right who spouted the exact same line the lefties did. Communist groups broke up Trump's rally and it was all Trump's fault according to many that are supposed to be "right-wingers." Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were among the headliners in this dog and pony show and when you begin to see "conservative" candidates pushing the same line at Hillary and Bernie you have to know something is wrong, dreadfully wrong.
I can come up with no other conclusion than this; that much of what we consider to be the conservative, patriotic movement is really nothing more than a hollow shell, geared to fool honest, patriotic Americans with its blather about "small government" when what they are really doing is providing cover for the left without appearing to do so. And they do fool lots of folks who lack the discernment to figure out what they are doing.
It's a given than both Republican and Democratic Parties are nothing more than two wings on the same socialist, One World vulture and anyone who really trusts the Republicans to deliver the country from the clutches of the "liberal Democrats" is whistling Yankee/Marxist Doodle because that's all the Republicans will ever give him--doodle!
I'm thinking of going through my email list and deleting a batch of those sites I have been getting mail from for years so because, as I watch what they say more and more, I find many of them seem to be nothing more than foils for the Marxists. Now I will admit that Donald Trump is far from the perfect candidate. He has issues I don't agree with, such as his position on eminent domain. But on the other hand, I can't disagree with him on the Second Amendment--as long as he sticks to what he's said so far. What amazes me is that he draws fire from both left and right and, on some reflection, that says to me that left and right really agree on many things when push comes to shove and they only let us know about it when someone like Trump comes along that they are forced to say something about because his positions attack the left/right coalition they are really part of.
So, it seems to me that lots of folks who have claimed to be on the right and to be patriotic with their "America first" messages have really been lying to us, which probably siphons money and support away from those groups that are genuinely conservative and patriotic. That would be a Marxist goal too.
I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for us to start reassessing some of these "patriotic" groups to see what they really are doing for us, if anything, and how much of their supposed effort in our behalf amounts to little more than meaningless blather that directs real opposition away from the left. When Cruz and Rubio reach the point where they become indistinguishable from Hillary and Bernie then we better start realizing we have homework to do. A good start might be to check the Internet and find a membership list for the Council on Foreign Relations and check out any members of Congress who might be members or have family members who belong or have belonged. Then check out "news" media people who belong. Once you have done that you will know why you get the slanted media coverage so prevalent on the six o' clock news and in the daily fishwrapper you still refer to as a newspaper.
Unfortunately the advocates of One World Government are alive and well on both the left and the right. It should be our bounden duty to expose the ones on the right.
I have been watching, this weekend, all the fuss over the Communist groups that managed to break up Trump's rally in Chicago. From Communist groups you expect this sort of thing. Since they can't intelligently debate their corrupt points their only alternative is to shout down their adversaries and try to shut them down and them blame their adversaries for it. This is the standard bill of fare for the lefties, proving that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute and can get by with blaming the opposition for that fact.
What surprised me, though, was the people over on the right who spouted the exact same line the lefties did. Communist groups broke up Trump's rally and it was all Trump's fault according to many that are supposed to be "right-wingers." Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were among the headliners in this dog and pony show and when you begin to see "conservative" candidates pushing the same line at Hillary and Bernie you have to know something is wrong, dreadfully wrong.
I can come up with no other conclusion than this; that much of what we consider to be the conservative, patriotic movement is really nothing more than a hollow shell, geared to fool honest, patriotic Americans with its blather about "small government" when what they are really doing is providing cover for the left without appearing to do so. And they do fool lots of folks who lack the discernment to figure out what they are doing.
It's a given than both Republican and Democratic Parties are nothing more than two wings on the same socialist, One World vulture and anyone who really trusts the Republicans to deliver the country from the clutches of the "liberal Democrats" is whistling Yankee/Marxist Doodle because that's all the Republicans will ever give him--doodle!
I'm thinking of going through my email list and deleting a batch of those sites I have been getting mail from for years so because, as I watch what they say more and more, I find many of them seem to be nothing more than foils for the Marxists. Now I will admit that Donald Trump is far from the perfect candidate. He has issues I don't agree with, such as his position on eminent domain. But on the other hand, I can't disagree with him on the Second Amendment--as long as he sticks to what he's said so far. What amazes me is that he draws fire from both left and right and, on some reflection, that says to me that left and right really agree on many things when push comes to shove and they only let us know about it when someone like Trump comes along that they are forced to say something about because his positions attack the left/right coalition they are really part of.
So, it seems to me that lots of folks who have claimed to be on the right and to be patriotic with their "America first" messages have really been lying to us, which probably siphons money and support away from those groups that are genuinely conservative and patriotic. That would be a Marxist goal too.
I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for us to start reassessing some of these "patriotic" groups to see what they really are doing for us, if anything, and how much of their supposed effort in our behalf amounts to little more than meaningless blather that directs real opposition away from the left. When Cruz and Rubio reach the point where they become indistinguishable from Hillary and Bernie then we better start realizing we have homework to do. A good start might be to check the Internet and find a membership list for the Council on Foreign Relations and check out any members of Congress who might be members or have family members who belong or have belonged. Then check out "news" media people who belong. Once you have done that you will know why you get the slanted media coverage so prevalent on the six o' clock news and in the daily fishwrapper you still refer to as a newspaper.
Unfortunately the advocates of One World Government are alive and well on both the left and the right. It should be our bounden duty to expose the ones on the right.
Thursday, March 03, 2016
The Republican Establishment--Is It Really a Criminal Conspiracy?
by Al Benson Jr.
After having watched the political gyrations the Republican Party is going through in their efforts to reject the candidacy of Donald Trump I have to come to the conclusion that all that many have said about them over the years is correct. They really are no different than the Democrats. The Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission really does give them their marching orders and the only difference between them and the Democrats is that they have been directed to hide their socialist proclivities where the Democrats have been allowed to let them all hang out. The two political parties really are nothing more than two different wings on the same socialist turkey and, as usual, and by design, it is flying in the wrong direction.
The American people are being stiffed by the Internationalists and it is on purpose and with the consent of all three branches of the government. As I have said before, the Constitution is no protection whatever for the public when all three branches of government are in collusion to ignore it and are aided and abetted by a prostitute media.
If the Republicans were really "conservative" they would not be having the problem they are with Donald Trump. If the other Republican candidates were really as conservative as they claim they would not all be looking for ways to dump him. You have to come to the conclusion with Trump, that if the left and the so-called right both hate his guts then he must be doing something right! And the fact that both left and "right" are so anxious to deep six him tells you that, at root, they have the same socialist agenda. The left is left. The "right" is really left and the American public has no one in government to defend it. All they want to do is to make sure they get your guns before you start to realize this.
I think all this talk about "indicting" Hillary is a big joke. Does anyone honestly think the Loretta Lynch's "Just Us Department" of which the FBI is a part will ever have her indicted? Come on folks, you have to be kidding! The only way she will ever get indicted is if, for some reason, the CFR/Trilateralist/Bilderburger group decides she is too much of a liability to become president and they decide to throw her under the bus. Other than that, she's a shoo-in, no matter how many votes she does or doesn't get. After all, we all know it's who counts them, not who votes that makes the difference.
And the Republicans are heartily trying to resurrect that tired old retread, Mitt Romney so he can take support away from Trump. They are also looking for another weak Republican candidate that will not be able to beat Hillary and if Romney couldn't beat Obama then Hillary will have him for lunch--and it's all according to plan.
The Ruling Establishment knows the public is fed up. They couldn't care less! They figure whatever they shove down our throats we'll take it. We're too stupid to do anything else! One of these days they may be in for a rude awakening and when that happens it may get messy--but they don't realize that yet so they will keep on pushing.
If the Republican Party were going to stand up for conservative and patriotic values they would have done it when they got a majority in Congress. Instead they just continued to cave in to Obama. When conservatives arose in protest over John Boehner's caving in they finally, reluctantly, removed him and gave us Paul Ryan who is nothing more than Boehner-Lite, so nothing changed. And nothing will change no matter who we get for president either. They will find some way to sidetrack Trump and we will get the weakest possible Republican candidate to run against Hillary and it will be business as usual in the "District of Corruption."
After having watched the political gyrations the Republican Party is going through in their efforts to reject the candidacy of Donald Trump I have to come to the conclusion that all that many have said about them over the years is correct. They really are no different than the Democrats. The Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission really does give them their marching orders and the only difference between them and the Democrats is that they have been directed to hide their socialist proclivities where the Democrats have been allowed to let them all hang out. The two political parties really are nothing more than two different wings on the same socialist turkey and, as usual, and by design, it is flying in the wrong direction.
The American people are being stiffed by the Internationalists and it is on purpose and with the consent of all three branches of the government. As I have said before, the Constitution is no protection whatever for the public when all three branches of government are in collusion to ignore it and are aided and abetted by a prostitute media.
If the Republicans were really "conservative" they would not be having the problem they are with Donald Trump. If the other Republican candidates were really as conservative as they claim they would not all be looking for ways to dump him. You have to come to the conclusion with Trump, that if the left and the so-called right both hate his guts then he must be doing something right! And the fact that both left and "right" are so anxious to deep six him tells you that, at root, they have the same socialist agenda. The left is left. The "right" is really left and the American public has no one in government to defend it. All they want to do is to make sure they get your guns before you start to realize this.
I think all this talk about "indicting" Hillary is a big joke. Does anyone honestly think the Loretta Lynch's "Just Us Department" of which the FBI is a part will ever have her indicted? Come on folks, you have to be kidding! The only way she will ever get indicted is if, for some reason, the CFR/Trilateralist/Bilderburger group decides she is too much of a liability to become president and they decide to throw her under the bus. Other than that, she's a shoo-in, no matter how many votes she does or doesn't get. After all, we all know it's who counts them, not who votes that makes the difference.
And the Republicans are heartily trying to resurrect that tired old retread, Mitt Romney so he can take support away from Trump. They are also looking for another weak Republican candidate that will not be able to beat Hillary and if Romney couldn't beat Obama then Hillary will have him for lunch--and it's all according to plan.
The Ruling Establishment knows the public is fed up. They couldn't care less! They figure whatever they shove down our throats we'll take it. We're too stupid to do anything else! One of these days they may be in for a rude awakening and when that happens it may get messy--but they don't realize that yet so they will keep on pushing.
If the Republican Party were going to stand up for conservative and patriotic values they would have done it when they got a majority in Congress. Instead they just continued to cave in to Obama. When conservatives arose in protest over John Boehner's caving in they finally, reluctantly, removed him and gave us Paul Ryan who is nothing more than Boehner-Lite, so nothing changed. And nothing will change no matter who we get for president either. They will find some way to sidetrack Trump and we will get the weakest possible Republican candidate to run against Hillary and it will be business as usual in the "District of Corruption."
Thursday, January 14, 2016
Hey Bernie--Don't Apologize For Me!
by Al Benson Jr.
Just read an interesting article earlier this week on www.godfatherpolitics.com that mentioned how that lovable old socialist Bernie Sanders wants all of us white folks to apologize for slavery in America. You have to wonder if he's looking to steal black votes from Hillary or exactly what his game is.
Seems like the blame whitey for everything game hasn't been doing real well lately so maybe he feels as though he has to help it along. Some white folks are beginning to get a little ticked off at seeing the flags and symbols of their culture and heritage being constantly attacked and smeared and they are responding with Confederate flags on their flag poles and on the backs of their trucks and with rallies where everyone carries a Confederate flag of some kind.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the vast majority of the politicians in both parties hate our guts but they can't come right out and say it. How it must agitate them to have to bite their tongues when they are forced to give speeches or attend town meetings where they actually have to talk to us rubes in flyover country because, even with some of the "creative voting" we now have they still need our votes to get back in so they can continue to feed at the trough that we pay to keep full for them.
So when they can't tell us what they really think, the only thing left for them to do is to get back at us by trying to lay a guilt trip on us. We haven't been "compassionate" enough to minorities or we haven't grovelled sufficiently at the foot of the gods of political correctness (cultural Marxists) and we haven't gladly volunteered to pay unending "reparations" for slavery, and on and on, the socialists and Marxists continue the litany of our shortcomings! It all gets a little tedious after awhile.
Now Bernie wants all of us white Americans to apologize for slavery (again). Bernie, if you'll humbly pardon my saying it, you are, as the British say "right 'round the bend." My ancestors came here, most of them, from North England and Scotland, in the 1880s so we never owned slaves during the War of Northern Aggression--not that it would have made any difference anyway. So, Bernie, you'll have to pardon me if I don't feel real guilty about the slavery issue. As long as you are spreading the guilt around, what about those black African chiefs that sold their own people to slave traders? Or what about free blacks in this country that owned slaves? Any guilt for them? I didn't think so, just for us white folks, right?
So now you want us to feel guilty because some black folks don't have as much as we do right? Tell you something, Bernie, my wife and I drive around in a 17 year old car because that's all we can afford. Most of the blacks I know here in North Louisiana have got much newer and better cars than the one we have. And the few that I run into that try to talk to me about "white privilege" are a little put off when I tell them how old our car is compared to what they are driving. At that point they don't have much more to say. They work at changing the subject, which, somehow, doesn't solve the problem.
So let's look briefly at some of these downtrodden black folks. What about Oprah? She's got to be one of the wealthiest people in the world. If we are going to abide by your old socialist credo about redistribution of the wealth then maybe she should give some of us poor white folks some of what she's got. We don't always have all we could use and she's got more than she needs by a long shot--so what about a little redistribution of the wealth there? Oh, I see, it doesn't work that way does it?
When you and your socialist and Marxist friends finish with your anti-white diatribes we are all contritely supposed to line up with silver in our palms right? Well, Bernie, you're white, at least from the photos I have seen you look white, and you've got more than most of us have got. So if we are going to play the "redistribution of the wealth" game it seems to me that you should get at the head of the line because you've got much more wealth to be redistributed than most of us have.
In fact, as a good socialist, you should be out there thinking about where you can give most of yours away, because if you want equal income redistribution for us, then you, as a good socialist, should lead by example shouldn't you? You and Hillary and most of the people in this current regime are all socialists and/or Marxists of one stripe or another and yet it seems to me that you all have lots more money than us poor folks. So why aren't you all spreading your wealth around to help the poor and needy--and I don't mean by passing another welfare bill in Congress that we, not you, will be paying for, I mean by reaching down into your own pockets and really digging deep to enable the poor and downtrodden to lift themselves up by your bootstraps. Isn't that what good socialists do?
You could start off by giving up those fat congressional pay raises that are always voted for at 1 a.m. in the morning, by voice votes, so that we don't know how many of you have "appropriated" money from us to keep your standard of living way, way above ours. How about passing up those big congressional vacations that we the people end up paying for? How about doing away with all those congressional perks that we pay for? If I didn't know better it would seem to me that your socialist "redistribution of the wealth" program is a one-way street. We pay and you "redistribute" to your friends and business colleagues.
Bernie, I don't know how to break it to you any gentler than this--I am not about to feel guilty over slavery I had nothing to do with. I am not about to be ashamed of the culture and heritage of the part of the country I live in. I won't play that game--and neither should anyone else. However, if you want to play it, let me ask you a question. Since you are from New England, and just about all the ships that carried slaves to this country originated in New England, do you feel guilty enough to be willing to take your fat bankroll out of your pocket and hand it to the race-baiters so you can assuage your personal guilt for the slave trade? I didn't think so!
Just read an interesting article earlier this week on www.godfatherpolitics.com that mentioned how that lovable old socialist Bernie Sanders wants all of us white folks to apologize for slavery in America. You have to wonder if he's looking to steal black votes from Hillary or exactly what his game is.
Seems like the blame whitey for everything game hasn't been doing real well lately so maybe he feels as though he has to help it along. Some white folks are beginning to get a little ticked off at seeing the flags and symbols of their culture and heritage being constantly attacked and smeared and they are responding with Confederate flags on their flag poles and on the backs of their trucks and with rallies where everyone carries a Confederate flag of some kind.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the vast majority of the politicians in both parties hate our guts but they can't come right out and say it. How it must agitate them to have to bite their tongues when they are forced to give speeches or attend town meetings where they actually have to talk to us rubes in flyover country because, even with some of the "creative voting" we now have they still need our votes to get back in so they can continue to feed at the trough that we pay to keep full for them.
So when they can't tell us what they really think, the only thing left for them to do is to get back at us by trying to lay a guilt trip on us. We haven't been "compassionate" enough to minorities or we haven't grovelled sufficiently at the foot of the gods of political correctness (cultural Marxists) and we haven't gladly volunteered to pay unending "reparations" for slavery, and on and on, the socialists and Marxists continue the litany of our shortcomings! It all gets a little tedious after awhile.
Now Bernie wants all of us white Americans to apologize for slavery (again). Bernie, if you'll humbly pardon my saying it, you are, as the British say "right 'round the bend." My ancestors came here, most of them, from North England and Scotland, in the 1880s so we never owned slaves during the War of Northern Aggression--not that it would have made any difference anyway. So, Bernie, you'll have to pardon me if I don't feel real guilty about the slavery issue. As long as you are spreading the guilt around, what about those black African chiefs that sold their own people to slave traders? Or what about free blacks in this country that owned slaves? Any guilt for them? I didn't think so, just for us white folks, right?
So now you want us to feel guilty because some black folks don't have as much as we do right? Tell you something, Bernie, my wife and I drive around in a 17 year old car because that's all we can afford. Most of the blacks I know here in North Louisiana have got much newer and better cars than the one we have. And the few that I run into that try to talk to me about "white privilege" are a little put off when I tell them how old our car is compared to what they are driving. At that point they don't have much more to say. They work at changing the subject, which, somehow, doesn't solve the problem.
So let's look briefly at some of these downtrodden black folks. What about Oprah? She's got to be one of the wealthiest people in the world. If we are going to abide by your old socialist credo about redistribution of the wealth then maybe she should give some of us poor white folks some of what she's got. We don't always have all we could use and she's got more than she needs by a long shot--so what about a little redistribution of the wealth there? Oh, I see, it doesn't work that way does it?
When you and your socialist and Marxist friends finish with your anti-white diatribes we are all contritely supposed to line up with silver in our palms right? Well, Bernie, you're white, at least from the photos I have seen you look white, and you've got more than most of us have got. So if we are going to play the "redistribution of the wealth" game it seems to me that you should get at the head of the line because you've got much more wealth to be redistributed than most of us have.
In fact, as a good socialist, you should be out there thinking about where you can give most of yours away, because if you want equal income redistribution for us, then you, as a good socialist, should lead by example shouldn't you? You and Hillary and most of the people in this current regime are all socialists and/or Marxists of one stripe or another and yet it seems to me that you all have lots more money than us poor folks. So why aren't you all spreading your wealth around to help the poor and needy--and I don't mean by passing another welfare bill in Congress that we, not you, will be paying for, I mean by reaching down into your own pockets and really digging deep to enable the poor and downtrodden to lift themselves up by your bootstraps. Isn't that what good socialists do?
You could start off by giving up those fat congressional pay raises that are always voted for at 1 a.m. in the morning, by voice votes, so that we don't know how many of you have "appropriated" money from us to keep your standard of living way, way above ours. How about passing up those big congressional vacations that we the people end up paying for? How about doing away with all those congressional perks that we pay for? If I didn't know better it would seem to me that your socialist "redistribution of the wealth" program is a one-way street. We pay and you "redistribute" to your friends and business colleagues.
Bernie, I don't know how to break it to you any gentler than this--I am not about to feel guilty over slavery I had nothing to do with. I am not about to be ashamed of the culture and heritage of the part of the country I live in. I won't play that game--and neither should anyone else. However, if you want to play it, let me ask you a question. Since you are from New England, and just about all the ships that carried slaves to this country originated in New England, do you feel guilty enough to be willing to take your fat bankroll out of your pocket and hand it to the race-baiters so you can assuage your personal guilt for the slave trade? I didn't think so!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)