Friday, January 19, 2018

A Government Shutdown Solves Lots of Problems for the Democrats

by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Well, looks like we may have another government shutdown, compliments of the socialist members of Congress who are still cheeky enough to refer to themselves as Democrats.  But then, I guess you can still fool some of the people some of the time, though it is getting a bit more difficult.

Seems to me I recall that "honest" Chucky Schumer moaned back in 2013 what a tragedy a government shutdown would be. But now he seems to be okay with it. All depends on whose ox is being gored doesn't it?

The reason for this potential shutdown seems to be the DACA program for letting lots of younger illegals stay in this country. The Republicans claim to want to get rid of some of them while the Demoncrats want to keep them all and import even more. After all, importing lots of folks that won't assimilate is a great culture changer and that's what this is really all about.

But I submit that, right now, the Demoncrats have an even bigger concern than the DACA program. They are concerned about the ongoing revelations starting to be brought out about the Uranium One sale to Russia and the Clinton Foundation and their ongoing (and probably illegal) efforts to undue the results of the 2016 election.

On January 19th an article by Kyle Becker appeared on http://www.bizpacreview.com the headline for which was 'Worse Than Watergate': Republicans uncover FISA memo they say changes everything on Trump investigation.

Becker writes: "If a FISA document uncovered by House investigators  proves to be as bad as all appearances, the prior administration will stand accused of abusing federal law enforcement and intelligence assets in order to sabotage Donald Trump's presidential campaign." According to Rep. Ron DeSantis: "The facts contained in this memo are jaw-dropping and demand full transparency There is no higher priority than the release of this information to preserve our democracy." Outside of this supposedly being a republic instead of a democracy, I would agree with DeSantis. Other congressmen have said the same thing. Rep. Jim Jordan says "It is so alarming the American people have to see this," And Rep. Matt Gaetz states" "I think this will not end just with firings. I believe there are people who will go to jail." After all the crap the Klintons and their cronies have pulled on America over the decades, let us fervently pray that will be the case. But I still won't believe it until I see it.

Right now, however, it would seem that this is one situation the Demoncrats would like to see go away. They are in deep do-do up to their necks and they'd rather the public not be aware of all this for any prolonged period of time. Might hurt their chances to steal the 2018 mid-term elections. So a government shutdown right now would do them a world of good--and if it lasted long enough they could work to distract the voting public with more of Trump's "Russian collusion-delusion." After all, they tried to steal the 2016 election, which is what some of this is all about, so why wouldn't they continue this year in their usual habits? Problem is, you have some Republicans that are more than willing to help them (collude with them) in such an effort. The Deep State in both parties, and beyond, wants to put Trump down. He won't play the game by their Establishment rules (helping to keep America and its people last) so he's got to go.

So in light of whatever new revelations the honest Republicans in Congress want to put out there for the public, it would be much better for the devious Demoncrats right now to have a government shutdown to give folks a chance to forget about what absolute scumbags they have been.

If you want to keep up on this situation go to Fox News and InfoWars.com because these are two places you will get the truth about this situation. Forget about the mainstream media. They have lied about so much to so many for so long that they would not recognize the truth if they met it in their soup at supper!

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

How "History" Professors View the "Civil War"

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Many who will read this are already aware of how our current crop of "historians"--so called, view the War of Northern Aggression. However, some who read it may not be all that aware, and so this is written for those unaware ones who still labor under the naive delusion that the War was fought over slavery and that communism did not rear its ugly head in America until at least the 1930s. Well, it did rear its ugly head in the 30s, but it was the 1830s, not the 1930s. By the 1930s communism was already well established here. It's just that no one bothered to inform the American public.

I spend considerable time on the internet scrounging around for information in those areas that concern me and one of those areas is the record of communist and socialist infiltration in this country, both in the  19th and 20 centuries.

I recently ran across an article by Andrew Zimmerman, a professor of history at George Washington University. The article was written back in July of 2013 and, at that time, Professor Zimmerman was working on an international history of the American War of Northern Aggression. Of course he didn't call it that.

For the remainder of this article please go to my other blogspot
https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com

The above link probably will not work for you so you will have to type it in to get it. I am having problems with my email server and so cannot connect with everyone on my email lists. Of late I have been going to the local library and using their computers but we had a little over an inch of snow here in North Louisiana yesterday morning and that was enough to shut everything down--schools, banks, the library, the whole nine yards--and the library is still not open today so I can't get in to send this to my list from my Revised History blog. There are a handful of folks following this blog that also follow my Revised History blog and I am asking them  to please forward this or the link to my Revised History blog along to folks on their email lists so I can get it out there because, at this point, I do not know when my email server problems will be straightened out--or for that matter, when the local library will reopen. I hope it will be sometime in this decade but I have no guarantees. So if folks on this list who can will pass the link to my Revised History blog along to others I will be very grateful. Many thanks in advance.
Al Benson Jr.

Friday, December 29, 2017

The Desire For Total Control

The latest commentary by our two political commentators as they take a long view on history.
Al Benson Jr.

The Desire For Total Control

by Schwartz & Viscount

It goes way, way back. Check out the Tower of Babel in the Book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Man wanted to reach to Heaven by his own efforts, to be God, as it were. If you read the Genesis account you see that he didn't quite make it. However, that has not stopped his efforts in that direction for centuries and they continue to this day.

The Caesars controlled the Roman Empire, which was all of southern Europe, the eastern Mediterranean area, and much of North Africa; the known world at that time. Caesar (depending on which one) was a benevolent dictator. You could have whatever religious beliefs you wanted to--as long as you recognized Caesar as Lord. The Christians wouldn't, couldn't, do that, hence Caesar would not have total control--and that was where their problems began. For them, Jesus the Christ was Lord, not Caesar. When Caesar tried to force the issue, and a lot of Christians died, it was the beginning of the end for Rome.

For us in this country, it goes back to the British Empire. King Henry started the Church of England, a.k.a. the Anglican, or, in this country, the Episcopal Church. Henry wanted everyone to worship the way he thought was right, although there was more to it than that. This resulted in the Pilgrims, separatists by belief, leaving England and coming to America so they would not be under the king's control in their worship.

And, as time passed, the children of the Pilgrims and Puritans had major problems with King George over taxes on tea and other things, and finally, at Lexington and Concord, King George discovered that he did not have the total control he craved. The "Divine Right of Kings" was, in the final analysis, only their desire to control all in their realms. In the end, it did not work out. Not that some of what replaced them has been much better in many instances!

But the quest for control continued on (as it still does in our day)! Our ULN-civil war was really not about freeing the slaves; it was, in the end, about controlling the whole country. Lincoln didn't want a country "half slave and half free"--he wanted it, politically, ALL slave. And he accomplished this--more than 80 years after our Declaration of Independence and the victory over King George. One way he sought to control it was with a heavy tariff, beneficial only to the North, which the South ended up paying most of. But that is another story.

Fact is, Lincoln sought (to commend and promote Union troops) many openly socialistic men as officers; men who had failed in their 1848 efforts to coerce the German populace and others into swallowing their Marxist/socialist ideas in Europe. Having failed in Europe they naturally matriculated to the US, where they could then force their brand of total control on an unsuspecting American populace--starting in the South.

You have to ask the question; did some of these guys induce some of the atrocities committed by Sherman and Sheridan  in their wanton destruction of many of the wonderful homes/plantations in the South, along with all the other property they destroyed. One author called Sherman's men in South Carolina "A legion of devils." An apt description! But these were the same tactics used by Hitler and Stalin.

Friends, that is Communism (Marxism)--control by force and destruction. In your minds it may seem far fetched or absurd, but think about this: Is taking over the Communications Commission what the Marxists are doing by forcing local radio and television stations to be controlled by the "already fake news" outlets? Is this one more way to control what is supposed to be an entity for the expression of our free speech (First Amendment Rights)? The FCC has out-stepped its bounds by allowing this to happen.

In fact, you might ask the question--"Who owns the airwaves--the FCC or God?" If the answer is God, then possibly the FCC should think about shutting its doors and sending its people home.We don't expect that to happen, though, because for the bureaucrats the agenda is always control. Little by little, so no one notices, their intention is always control! 

Update 1/15/17
In regard to total control, please read the most recent article on 
https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
dealing with driverless cars and the United Nations' Agenda 21 program which would shut us all up in sardine can apartments in megacities, unable to go anywhere except where these new driverless cars are willing to take us. All for our own "good" of course.

New post on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
from a history professor about some of the folks that really won the Civil War.
Hint: They were not right-wingers!  1/16/18

Saturday, December 16, 2017

Our Double Standard

by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America


Does anyone honestly doubt that we labor with a monstrous double standard in this country--one set of rules for the Statist Elite and a totally different set for us ordinary folks, us "deplorables,"--"we the peons."

All the time I hear these windy politicians get up and spout "We are a nation of laws, not of men." C'mon guys, you know better, and so do most of us that pay attention. It's hogwash--100% pure dee bovine fertilizer and I am surprised they can keep a straight face when they peddle such drivel to us. I guess some of them, like Ronald Reagan,  have gotten to be pretty good actors. That may be the way it was supposed to be, but if so, it ain't been that way for a long, long time, for most of us not in our lifetimes. I will be 80 next year if the Lord gives me another year and I never remember it being that way except in the political verbiage.

So let us not kid ourselves. Our Double Standard is alive and well--cultural Marxism in living color. Should you doubt it all you have to do is look at the way Donald Trump is treated by the Establishment versus the way Hillary Clinton (known to some as Hitlery) is treated.

The Statist Aristocracy has sought to have Trump removed from his elected office, supposedly because of his "Russian collusion" (but really because he is destroying their agenda) and they have been working at that for almost a year now.So far they have zilch for results, zip. zero, nada. They have not come up with  a scintilla of evidence in almost a year, but they keep plowing ahead anyway--at the cost of millions of dollars to us taxpayers who, unfortunately, have to pay for their Leftist political agenda, as fruitless as it is. If they get lucky they may come up with some Russian Trump had dinner with 50 years ago and they fondly hope that will be enough to indict him.

Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio is on one of the committees looking into all this, and on www.theeconomiccollapse.com he is quoted as saying: "You can't make this stuff up. It gets worse each and every day...What deep down scares me, if this actually happened the FBI had a concerted effort with the people at the top to go after one party's nominee to help the other party's nominee. If that actually happened in the United States of America and everything each and every day points to more and more likely that this is what took place, it is sad for our country if that took place. And I think it did based on everything I am seeing. All the evidence points to that." In other words, the FBI  and certain people in it, one of them being FBI agent Peter Stztok, actively worked for Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump during the last election. I was not aware that the FBI was supposed to be involved in partisan politics, but I guess,during the reign of socialist Obama, everything was up for grabs and the absolute last thing those people wanted was a 
Trump victory, so whatever they could do to prevent that was permissible by cultural Marxist standards.

This all goes to show you that we have a certain Elite in this country, whether their names be Clinton, Ohama, Bush, or whatever, that are able to govern their lives by a different standard, a different set of rules, than us ordinary mortals are bound by. They can basically do whatever they want and they can get by with actions the rest of us would be thrown in the slammer for. Wrong for us, but perfectly okay for them, even when it comes to outright political chicanery. Hillary Clinton and her auxiliaries did enough in the last election that you can't even begin to list it all in an article like this--but that's okay.Hillary automatically gets a pass for all of it, sort of a "get out of jail free" card that exempts her, her husband, and their associates from what you and I would go to jail for 99 years for.

So, when I read all these articles on the internet, even by so-called "conservative" writers about "Hillary getting busted for this or that" or whatever,  they are not even worth a laugh. These people are dreaming! When I see Hillary on her way to jail in an orange suit and handcuffs, only then will I believe it. Up to that point. "I'm from Missouri." You've got to show me. Up to that point it all sounds good, but it's all talk!

And until Hillary and Company go to jail for the same things you and I would have, as far as I am concerned, there is still a double standard--one for the Statist Elites and a totally different one for us. If you want to convince me differently, then Show Me!

Friday, November 24, 2017

"Journalists" Here and Abroad, Yesterday and Today

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Thoughts about journalists in our day tend to be somewhat tainted and jaded--and for that you have to blame the journalists themselves. Let's face it, bastions of truth and accuracy the journalists have not been. I, with others, have labeled them as "the prostitute press" and in the main, I don't think that's  too far off.

In my library I have some books for enjoyable reading. One of those is one called The Red Fox, written by Anthony Hyde. It's fiction, but in it Mr. Hyde makes several observations that are worth some reflection. For instance, on page 53, one of the characters in the story asks the question "Who rules the rulers?" That's something many of us have asked for a long time, and in some instances where we could, tried to answer it. It's a question worth considering, although most people won't.

On page 233 he discusses Soviet "journalists" and seeks to compare them to western journalists to point out the differences. I don't doubt, when he got this book published (1985) he thought it was an honest question. Today I'm not so sure. The Red Fox is an excellent story and it does hold your interest. You can tell that Mr. Hyde did a lot of research to come up with all the detail in the book. I have heard that this is the way he usually writes, though I have not ever been able to come up with any of his other books, and I have looked. To me that means that people hang onto them like I do and they seldom make their way into used book stores. This is the mark of an entertaining and engaging writer. I've read my copy of The Red Fox fully half a dozen times over the years.

Having said that, I'm not sure Mr. Hyde recognized how similar Soviet and American "journalists" really are. In the Soviet Union the "journalists" were expected to hew the Party line, and if they didn't, in short order, they were no longer journalists. Sad to say it has not been much different here. Many of the journalists or reporters I have run across in this country do exactly the same thing. I did an article before the last election about how the media was nothing more than Hillary's water carrier. And everything I have seen since the last election has only reinforced that view, except they don't only carry water for Hillary, they also carry it for what we call "The Deep State" or the Establishment, or whatever you want to call those that really "rule the rulers."

The idea that the "news media" exists to give the public the unbiased, objective truth about what really goes on has long since gone by the boards. It disappeared with the Tooth Fairy and the Man in the Moon, at least for most normal people. Nowadays the media gives us what "those who rule the rulers" think is pertinent for their well-being, not ours. True, there are exceptions. The alternative media, The Drudge Report, InfoWars, LewRockwell, World Net Daily and a handful of others out there are able to give concerned people enough truth that they are beginning to have some idea of what really goes down. That hasn't always been the case. If you want real news, these are the sources you have to turn to turn to because what we refer to as the "Main Stream Media" has dissolved into nothing more than "fake news" and pure  propaganda--Soviet style! If you follow only them you will have a completely skewed view of world events, and particularly what goes on in the White House during the Trump administration. The regular media gets it wrong so much of the time that you have to realize they are doing it on purpose. Were it only accidental, they would err on the side of accuracy now and again, but this never happens.

Sadly, this is not an especially new development. It has gone on for many years, though sometimes a little less spectacularly than at present. Back before the War of Northern Aggression the "journalists" in the North were making such an icon out of John Brown, the abolitionist/terrorist, that he was literally being compared to Jesus Christ and the gallows he hung on was being compared to Jesus' cross. Talk about an exercise in blasphemy!  This, and the propaganda being dished out by writers of the ilk of Harriet Beecher Stowe, helped to fuel the fires of war in the late 1850s and painted the entire South with a wholly unrealistic brush.

So let us not kid ourselves--"journalists" in America, at least in the last 150 years,  have not stood for "truth, justice, and the American way." They have stood for pushing the agenda, whatever it may have been at the time, of those that "rule the rulers" and the real truth be hanged!

If you want to find out who "rules the rulers" than I suggest you do a little homework. (About 7% of those that read this will follow through). Get on the internet and check out the Council on  Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, and while you are at it check out the Clinton Foundation. If you are willing to do at least this much then you will come away with a whole different concept of who really runs things in this country and the world. And then you can ask the other question one of Mr. Hyde's characters in his book puts forth; "What the hell will they do to us next?"

Monday, October 02, 2017

A "Civil War" To Commemorate 100 Years Of Communism?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

October of 2017 is now upon us, with a rather fiery beginning in Las Vegas, Nevada, which we will comment on below. This is a very special time for Communists around the world. It is the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution. It is often referred to as Red October. This was the Bolshevik Revolution led by Lenin. Wikipedia says it was "...instrumental in the large Russian Revolution of 1917. It took place with an armed insurrection in Petrograd on the 25th of October (7 November, New Style)  1917." I don't want to go into the whole bloody scenario except to note that the Communists have always been very "date conscious" when it came to big anniversaries such as this. If you all remember, we were treated to the first official celebration of Earth Day on the 100th anniversary of Lenin's birth. This was hardly a coincidence!

So what will we have for the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution? Las Vegas just may be a sneak preview.

How about Antifa giving us a "civil war" in the United States?

If you follow some of this stuff like I do, you have been getting all manner of reports about the Las Vegas shooting this morning. The shooter(s) opened fire on concert goers at a Country Music concert--folks who are probably pretty much traditional Americans, and therefore, automatically enemies to Antifa and the Communists both.

It was originally reported by the mainstream media that the shooter had committed suicide. I've seen other reports that say an FBI rescue team killed him after he opened fire on them. I have also seen sketchy reports of a possible second shooter. I'd be willing to bet that if there was one that will be the last you hear about him. There was one fairly good article on www.independent.co.uk  ISIS has also claimed responsibility for the shooting and it has also been claimed that the shooter "converted to Islam several months ago" and therefore, was "a soldier of the Islamic State." We will just have to keep our eye on this and be discerning enough to separate the wheat from the chaff, because with the mainstream media out there, you are guaranteed to get lots and lots of chaff--along with the calls for more gun control.

Doug Hagmann put out some commentary about a possible civil war in his Northeast Intelligence Network on August 31, 2017. He mentioned his first contact with a DHS "whistleblower"  on May 25th, 2012. It was documented on his site and others as well, including the Canada Free Press. Mr. Hagmann said: "On that occasion, this source stated that 'DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself, stating that a civil war is the more appropriate term. Certain elements of the government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it. That was several months before the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama, the man of questionable origins, dubious bona fides and an inherent, visceral hatred for everything that made America a once-great nation.Obama had to win re-election to complete his task of destroying our Representative Republic.  He was handily re-elected without much viable opposition, giving him additional time to complete his duties as the front man for his Globalist puppet masters." Do you begin to see now why they could not afford to let Ron Paul win in 2012? He noted that "plans, tactics and timetables change, but the objectives of the Globalists don't."

What threw the Globalist plot out of whack in 2016 was the election of Donald Trump. Hillary was supposed to win--and complete what Obama had started--the proverbial stake through the heart--which means that even the One World Government crowd isn't always able to get it right and so they have to go back and retrench. They have done that with their ongoing attacks on Trump.

But there is a lesson there for us--the Globalists are not God--although they would like to be. Ultimately God calls the shots, not them. That's not to say they will quit in their quest for god-hood. If plan A doesn't work out they just move on to plan B.

Mr. Hagmann has observed: "Obama's 'fundamental transformation' although momentarily interrupted by the victory of Donald Trump,  will be facilitated by an armed resistance aided by holdovers inside government loyal to Obama, Clinton and the Globalist cause." Do you begin to see now why Obama had to come back and live in Washington, two miles from the White House, after his lengthy "vacation?" The Obama holdovers in government plan on hanging around as long as possible and it is beginning to look more and more like Jeff Sessions has no intention or plans for getting rid of them? I wonder why? I won't venture an opinion here, but I've got one.

So, a couple more questions: Will Antifa begin a "civil war" in this country, possibly sometime in October, to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution? Have they already begun it in Las Vegas? Why would they do this? How about as a "response" to some kind of false flag attack, supposedly committed by "right-wing groups?" This could well be the rationale they present to the world, as they reach for "victim status" to justify what they are going to do.

This is nothing more than the next installment of the same old "pressure from above and pressure from below" scam that has been used on us so often in the past. Doug Hagmann has thought some of this might start around the middle of October, but in light of Las Vegas you have to wonder if Antifa and the Communists were just too impatient to wait that long. Keep your eyes open--and your powder dry. You are going to see lots more of Red October!

Monday, September 18, 2017

Real Life Slavery Today Not Nearly As Important As Taking Down Confederate Monuments

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Many of us have observed, with growing indignation, as the seemingly insane (but actually well-planned and coordinated) campaign to tear down Confederate monuments here in the South proceeds. In fact, it is proceeding so smoothly that you have to recognize none of this is "spontaneous" and it is working like a well-oiled machine--paid for by whose money? Anyone need three guesses? Didn't think so. This has now expanded to where the Hard Left wants to remove all manner of monuments to people, either because they were slave owners or because they were white, or because they treated  "indigenous" peoples badly, or for whatever cockamamie reason they can come up with. I wonder, through this planned insanity, how many statues of Ulysses S. Grant will come down, or maybe there's a monument somewhere to some black person that was a slave owner, and there were blacks that were slave owners you know.

These Hard-core Leftists profess a growing concern for a slavery that ended in this country 150 years ago.  And they want to display their growing concern over this slavery that ended a century and a half ago here by trashing our society, our history, and our culture. Actually what they are really doing is using this now extinct slavery issue as an excuse to practice their favorite form of cultural genocide against white Southerners, because the managed "news" media has let it be known that it's open season on white Southern folks, and you can do whatever you want to them and get by with it. Do this stuff to anyone else and you might wind up with jail time for a "hate" crime, but, hey, these are only white crackers, so you can do what you want to them--and then, if they fight back to defend themselves, they are committing a hate crime.

Those that know me know that I do more than a bit of scrounging around on the internet in search of historical material that the Establishment would just as soon not see spread too far and wide. They feel the less known the better--nothing to see here folks, just move along--while we enact our plans to cut your cultural throats!

Just a few days ago I found an interesting article from the LA Times, by a Robyn Dixon, originally printed back in October of 2013. The title of her article was Slavery Still Haunts Africa, where millions remain captive."  I'm surprised this got printed. Dixon noted that "African countries dominate a new global index on slavery, with 38 of the 50 nations where the scourge is at its worst found on the continent.  The Global Slavery Index, released Thursday, estimated that nearly 30 million people remain enslaved globally, millions of whom are in Africa. Mauritania has the poorest record, with some 150,000 in a population of 3.8 million held captive...Other African countries with particularly high prevalence of slavery are located in West Africa: Benin, Ivory Coast, Gambia and Senegal."

Dixon noted the several different categories that constitute some form of slavery, all the way from debt bondage to forced labor, to the sale or exploitation of children for "profit, sex, or the thrill of domination." An anti-slavery organization called the Walk Free Foundation provided some of this information. Dixon noted that "In Mauritania, as many as 20% of the population is enslaved...Slavery in Mauritania goes back generations and is deeply entrenched..." even though the country has banned it. Obviously there was lots more to Dixon's article, but you get the idea.

So my question is: if the Leftist crowd in this country is so very concerned about the slavery issue, why don't some of their groups get together and see what they can do to alleviate the current situation in Africa, where slavery is a real-life, everyday situation even today? Seems to me that if they were truly concerned they would act to deal with something still going on today and do what they could to alleviate the slavery situation that exists in their own lifetime. Surely they could find some way to help out couldn't they???

Well, if they bothered to check it out they probably could, but you see, the truth is, that in spite of all their pious rhetoric, the Leftists don't really give a tinker's damn about slavery in the world today. That issue is not part of their agenda. Trashing Southern culture and moaning about a slavery in this country that has been non-existent for the last 150 years, and which they can do nothing about, is their real agenda. 

How can I state this nicely?  These Leftist types are not even hypocrites--they are out and out frauds! Cultural Marxist frauds!  They are as phony as the Obama three dollar bill! And anyone that listens to them and is foolish enough to take them seriously is, at best, a "useful idiot" for the Marxists and for those that finance their cultural Marxism.  These "useful idiots" need to wake up and smell the coffee. But then, if they did that, they wouldn't be "useful idiots" anymore, would they?

And--If you have not read in your "history" books about the Marxists and socialists who fought on the side of the Union during the War for Southern Independence you can get some basic information about them that Establishment "historians" would rather that you did not have.

There is a new CD available called Lincoln's Marxists, a 37 minute lecture by Al Benson Jr. that tells you about these Marxists and socialists and their objectives for our country, and why they supported Lincoln and the Northern cause.

If you would like more information about this please contact Al Benson Jr. at copperhead102@juno.com   If you would like to purchase this CD, the cost is $8.00, which includes the cost of shipping. Please send your check or money order to: 
Lincoln CD c/o The Copperhead Chronicle   P O Box 55   Sterlington, Louisiana 71280