"Beware the Ides of March"

The article below was posted on https://www.infowars.com on January 18th.

Political strategist Roger Stone says the deep state is planning to remove both President Trump and VP Mike Pence from office so that they can install Nancy Pelosi as President as part of a coup that will eventually see Hillary Clinton return as President.

"The deep state seeks to fabricate some misdeed by the Trump campaign that is sold as Russian collusion" said Stone.

"That way they can remove both Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, paving the way for Nancy Pelosi to become president."

Pelosi will then appoint Hillary Clinton  to the vacant Vice-Presidency after which Pelosi would resign as president allowing Hillary to take the White House which alluded her grasp in 2016."

Trump and Pelosi are currently locked in a stand off over the government shut down.

Yesterday, Trump pulled a power move by blocking Pelosi's trip to Brussels and Afghanistan by halting her use of military aircraft.

This followed Pelosi's demand that Trump postpone his State of the Union address--scheduled for January 29th--or simply put it in writing.

Posted by Al Benson Jr.

Comment--If they are able to pull this off and Mr. Trump fails to aggressively respond then they will have, to all intents and purposes, rendered the 2016 election null and void and if that happens then it remains to be seen what Mr. Trump's supporters across the country will do and how they will respond to having the deep state and its slimy operatives steal the last presidential election. If such does occur we will know for sure that the rule of law in this country is a cruel charade and that might makes right--no matter how totally corrupt and sleazy that "might" is. We need to really pray that the Lord will put a stop to this travesty, and, if for some reason He does not, then we will know that judgment has seriously begun and it will have begun at the House of God.

Why Do I Get The Feeling We're Getting Screwed Again?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

When Donald Trump got elected many of us felt it was possible, just possible, that the Deep State might have been on the way out. In retrospect I think we should have known better. The Deep State, in one form or another, has been around since the Lincoln administration and we should have realized that it ain't going away anytime soon. That doesn't mean we should quit fighting and just go fishin' rather it means that the struggle will be longer than we thought it would and, therefore, our perseverance needs to be greater. The Deep State is evil and needs to be resisted.

When Trump got to Washington he was surrounded by Trotskyite Neo-cons and left-over Obama supporters who stayed around in the hope of sabotaging his efforts, and mostly they did a fair job of that. He's gotten rid of a few but he's got far, far to go in decimating their ranks while they continue to try to cut his political throat.

He's made a handful of good appointments and a whole batch of lousy ones and he's gotten lots of bad advice from people that, quite frankly, have a vested political interest in taking him down. We should pray for Trump, and for his political discernment because this is an area he struggles in.

I have watched as he appointed various people to different sensitive posts and watched as they worked to undermine his efforts and he eventually had to remove them--only to reach out and appoint another one just like the one he just got rid of and the process starts all over again. CFR member H. R. McMaster and some of the generals he appointed after McMaster come to mind.

I was thoroughly disgusted with Jeff Sessions who, when appointed Attorney General, basically abdicated his authority to the members of the Deep State in the Justice Department so they could go after Trump. Sessions sat it out. It was almost like the Deep State operatives said to him "Just stay out of our way and we won't bother you." He stayed out of their way and Deep Stater Rod Rosenberg ran the Justice Department until Trump appointed Whitaker as interim Attorney General. Whitaker seemed like a good choice, but he was only an interim appointment. Now Trump has finally nominated his replacement, William Barr.

Most folks probably don't know too much about Mr. Barr, I didn't. But a little browsing on the internet turned up the following on https://needtoknow.news   It seems that, according to political analyst G. Edward Griffin: "Barr says he will not hinder or interfere with the Mueller investigation, despite the damage it has done to the President and despite its failure to produce proof of Russian collusion. Barr and Mueller--and their wives--are close friends.  Mueller attended the weddings  of Barr's children."

That briefly tells you pretty much what's going on. If confirmed as Attorney General, Mr. Barr is going to let Mueller continue with Deep State business as usual and nothing will change. Trump has nominated yet another probable Deep State operative that will do him and his agenda no good and possibly lots of harm. I'd be almost tempted to ask "Where does he get these people?" but unfortunately, I already know. You could almost wonder if Trump has a "death wish" because he keeps nominating or appointing people that will do him and his America First agenda no good whatever. And when one of them finally folds and shows his hand, he ends up appointing another one of the same stripe. So I ask the question that is the title of this article--why do I get the feeling we are about to be screwed again? Trump rails against the Deep State--but he appoints all their people to positions when they can work against his efforts. Folks, something is wrong here.

Who's Book Will Be Out This Month?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Well, I have just read that disgraced former FBI personality Andrew McCabe is now going to write a new  book about how bad life is in this country with Trump as President. It will be out sometime in early December (just in time for Christmas). Gag me with a spoon!

It almost seems as if every member of the Deep State that has had a difficulty with Donald 

Trump either has been or is in the process of writing a book. Hillary was the first. What was the title of her book--What Happened? Maybe  I am wrong, but it seems that title sticks in my mind. So what happened? What happened, lady, is that you lost. That's what happened and maybe you need to get over it. Even if you weren't supposed to lose--you lost! I realize that in your current mental state you feel it was Trump's fault, Congresses fault, the Deplorables fault, everybody's fault but yours. So your book is out there and I understand it ain't becoming a big seller. What a pity!

So then Comey got bounced from the FBI and he wrote an anti-Trump book. So lets see, Hillary, Comey, and now McCabe will all have anti-Trump screeds out there explaining how all the ills of the world since the Dark Ages are Trump's fault.

I can hardly wait for who's next. Will it be Muslim convert John Brennan who voted for the Communist Party ticket in the 1976 presidential election? So why did he vote that way back then? Well, it was probably Trump's fault. Trump. not the devil, made him do it.

Or will it be the two FBI lovers Strzk and Page. No doubt their illicit "love" affair was Trump's fault. And if they conspire to put out a book, probably early next year they will no doubt explain why their whole affair should be blamed on Trump.

It seems as if half the Deep State characters in Washington that have been responsible for the thorough socialization (as in socialism) of our government agencies have been, are, or will be in the  process of writing their anti-Trump books within the next several months. You have to wonder if part of the Deep State agenda to get rid if Trump is to drive him out of office with their literary content. Although, personally, I think they have something much worse in store for him.

So keep an eye out for whose book is due out next. One thing, I wouldn't recommend spending any money on any of this literary fertilizer. the human spirit can only take so much garbage.

Life Among the “Russian Agents” or Mueller’s Revenge

By Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

It seems as though, in one final, desperate attempt to keep his foundering “Russian Collusion” investigation alive, Robert Mueller wants to investigate Alex Jones and Infowars, Breitbart, Roger Stone and a whole batch of those who have had the temerity to dare to disagree with what he is doing.

If he is not able to come up with more on them than he has on all the other potential Russian colluders then they don’t have much to worry about. However, Mueller seems to be one of those “you can indict a ham sandwich if you want” types, which means he will try to find something, no matter how inconsequential or trivial,  to try to sink his opponents with.

Mueller doesn’t like opposition.  He doesn’t like those who point out where he has slipped the traces and gone and done his own thing. He needs to silence those folks, lest too many start to listen to them and doubt his omnipotence—and after all—he has a Deep State agenda to fulfill—the de- legitimization of Donald Trump’s presidency—by any means necessary, fair or foul!

Mr. Mueller is an interesting personality with an interesting background. According to https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com for May 18^th 2017: “It is a huge surprise that former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III has been chosen to lead the FBI Russia investigation, because there seem to be direct ties between him and the Deep State.” The writer may not realize it, but that’s exactly why Mueller was chosen. The writer continues “This is a remarkable decision since Mueller holds financial investments in twelve (12) investors/donors to Bill & Hillary Clinton and eight (8) members of Barack Obama’s technology inner circle who supported Hillary for President…”

The writer then notes a bit about Rod Rosenstein. Among other things he says: “Rosenstein has worked closely with Mueller at the Justice Department since 1990. Both Rosenstein and Mueller worked with then Assistant Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. during the Bush presidency.” Now there is an unholy trinity of radicals if ever I saw one!

The writer observes:”Given Rosenstein’s decades of ties to the Deep State, one wonders why President Donald Trump appointed him. The Deep State is now engaged in brazen acts of treason apparently to bring down Donald Trump’s duly-elected administration.  For example, GQ news commentator Keith Olbermann just called for foreign intelligence agencies to  help the Deep State bring down Mr. Trump’s administration—the definition of sedition…How can Mueller be impartial? In conclusion, the facts are unavoidable. Robert S. Mueller has substantial conflicts of interest and should recuse himself as Special Counsel before the public demands he be fired.” Problem is, Mueller is where he is because of those “conflicts of interest.” His first loyalty is to the Deep State that has made him one of its bastard sons and he has no intention of doing anything except participating in the deep sixing of the Trump Administration. That’s his assignment!

And in conclusion, the writer asks: “Why is the President of the United States being investigated when the Clintons, Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner are still at large and most certainly should have had a special prosecutor investigating them?” The President is being investigated so Clinton and the rest won’t have to be and can be ignored in favor of dealing with Trump’s ludicrous “Russian collusion.” The Deep State never,  and I repeat, never   intends to prosecute Hillary and Company. They are too big to  pay for their crimes in our current two-tiered justice system, so they will be allowed to go free while Trump is prosecuted for nonentities. That’s the way the Deep State plays the game and shafts the American people.  “Justice” (really, Just Us), is what we say it is. Besides, if Hillary had just been allowed to steal the election as planned, we wouldn’t have to be messing around with all this anyway!

Mr. Trump has been a mighty big inconvenience to the Deep State on their march toward anti-Christian One World Government and they aim to make sure he (and us) pay the price for that—and don’t you forget it!!!

Our Double Standard

by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America


Does anyone honestly doubt that we labor with a monstrous double standard in this country--one set of rules for the Statist Elite and a totally different set for us ordinary folks, us "deplorables,"--"we the peons."

All the time I hear these windy politicians get up and spout "We are a nation of laws, not of men." C'mon guys, you know better, and so do most of us that pay attention. It's hogwash--100% pure dee bovine fertilizer and I am surprised they can keep a straight face when they peddle such drivel to us. I guess some of them, like Ronald Reagan,  have gotten to be pretty good actors. That may be the way it was supposed to be, but if so, it ain't been that way for a long, long time, for most of us not in our lifetimes. I will be 80 next year if the Lord gives me another year and I never remember it being that way except in the political verbiage.

So let us not kid ourselves. Our Double Standard is alive and well--cultural Marxism in living color. Should you doubt it all you have to do is look at the way Donald Trump is treated by the Establishment versus the way Hillary Clinton (known to some as Hitlery) is treated.

The Statist Aristocracy has sought to have Trump removed from his elected office, supposedly because of his "Russian collusion" (but really because he is destroying their agenda) and they have been working at that for almost a year now.So far they have zilch for results, zip. zero, nada. They have not come up with  a scintilla of evidence in almost a year, but they keep plowing ahead anyway--at the cost of millions of dollars to us taxpayers who, unfortunately, have to pay for their Leftist political agenda, as fruitless as it is. If they get lucky they may come up with some Russian Trump had dinner with 50 years ago and they fondly hope that will be enough to indict him.

Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio is on one of the committees looking into all this, and on www.theeconomiccollapse.com he is quoted as saying: "You can't make this stuff up. It gets worse each and every day...What deep down scares me, if this actually happened the FBI had a concerted effort with the people at the top to go after one party's nominee to help the other party's nominee. If that actually happened in the United States of America and everything each and every day points to more and more likely that this is what took place, it is sad for our country if that took place. And I think it did based on everything I am seeing. All the evidence points to that." In other words, the FBI  and certain people in it, one of them being FBI agent Peter Stztok, actively worked for Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump during the last election. I was not aware that the FBI was supposed to be involved in partisan politics, but I guess,during the reign of socialist Obama, everything was up for grabs and the absolute last thing those people wanted was a 
Trump victory, so whatever they could do to prevent that was permissible by cultural Marxist standards.

This all goes to show you that we have a certain Elite in this country, whether their names be Clinton, Ohama, Bush, or whatever, that are able to govern their lives by a different standard, a different set of rules, than us ordinary mortals are bound by. They can basically do whatever they want and they can get by with actions the rest of us would be thrown in the slammer for. Wrong for us, but perfectly okay for them, even when it comes to outright political chicanery. Hillary Clinton and her auxiliaries did enough in the last election that you can't even begin to list it all in an article like this--but that's okay.Hillary automatically gets a pass for all of it, sort of a "get out of jail free" card that exempts her, her husband, and their associates from what you and I would go to jail for 99 years for.

So, when I read all these articles on the internet, even by so-called "conservative" writers about "Hillary getting busted for this or that" or whatever,  they are not even worth a laugh. These people are dreaming! When I see Hillary on her way to jail in an orange suit and handcuffs, only then will I believe it. Up to that point. "I'm from Missouri." You've got to show me. Up to that point it all sounds good, but it's all talk!

And until Hillary and Company go to jail for the same things you and I would have, as far as I am concerned, there is still a double standard--one for the Statist Elites and a totally different one for us. If you want to convince me differently, then Show Me!

Obama May Be the Last President You Ever Have Unless They Give You Hillary

by Al Benson Jr.

If you thought Donald Trump would be the next president you might be in for a surprise. You might just end up with Obama as perpetual ruler and potentate--or they might give us a little change from Obama and decide to install Hillary instead--and if her health is just not up to it, we may get whatever Left-wing comrade they think we deserve, thanks to Homeland Security and the people that really direct its agenda.

An article on http://www.zerohedge.com  by Tyler Durden for January 6th, 2017 states the following: "In a stunning last-minute power grab by the Obama administration with just 14 days left in his Presidency, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement this evening officially declaring state election systems to be "critical infrastructure." The statement from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson defines 'election infrastructure' as storage facilities, polling places, centralized vote tabulations, voter registration databases, voting machines and all other systems to manage the election process...so pretty much everything."

An article on http://www.infowars.com  for January 6th also noted the same thing. It said: "In a letter to the Associated Press, Johnson revealed the US government would monitor and intervene in future elections, a process previously handled on a state-by-state basis." Johnson continued in his justification for this federal over-reach when he said: "Particularly in these times, this designation is simply the right and obvious thing to do.'  The designation 'allows for information to be withheld from the public when state, local and private partners meet to discuss election infrastructure security--potentially injecting secrecy into an election process that's traditionally and expressly a transparent process, according to the AP."

So the feds have taken over the election process. And if that means they now control it for all future elections what do you think they might have in mind for this recent election? There have  been lots of reports about Russian hacking in this last election and lots of claims from Washington that say that the Russians helped Trump into office. You don't just suppose they might have in mind rescinding the results of this last election due to all this "Russian hacking" do you? In spite of all the twaddle in the mainstream media about how severe this Russian hacking was, we have yet to see any real evidence concerning it. Lots of allegations and "such and such a source said so and so" but no concrete evidence. But, hey, this is the federal government we are talking about here--they don't need evidence--all they need is cleverly framed allegations and they figure that's enough to fool all us deplorables out here in flyover country.

Why are they suddenly deciding to do this right now unless they are planning to change the results of the last election and give us either more unlimited Obama or a golden chance to embrace  Hillary when we were just too stupid to appreciate the tremendous opportunity we had to vote for here the first time around. Or maybe they will do what Obama's Muslim buddies do in their countries--proclaim either Obama or Hillary to assume the role of  First Dictator for Life (oh excuse me, I really meant to say President and that other accurate term just slipped out by mistake).

It's painfully obvious that our Ruling (Deep State) Establishment has tried literally to move heaven and earth to deny Trump the presidency. I mean, have you ever seen an election like this one before, or its aftermath? The Establishment cannot let Trump assume the presidency unless they can manage to thoroughly co-opt his administration and render him as useless as the sixteen characters he defeated in the primaries. They would have settled for any of them with the possible exception of Rand Paul and he doesn't seem to have presented them with much of a problem on this go-round. Trump ain't "one of the good ol' boys" and so they can't have him in there. What does that possibility tell you about our presidents for the last 75 years or so? Think about it while you are wondering what creative plan Obama and Homeland Security are devising to make sure Trump is denied the office he legitimately won.

This is one where we will literally need to depend on Divine Guidance to prevent these evil people from doing what they plan to do. So, folks, we need to get on our knees and pray and ask the Lord to prevent all this because only He can. And then we need to ask Him what He wants us to do about all this.

Make sure you check out the latest article on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com for January 10, 2017  --"Getting Tired of the "fake news" scenario Yet?"

Justice at Last--or Yet Another Federal Distraction From WikiLeaks?

by Al Benson Jr.

According to http://constitution.com the FBI has found "Tens of Thousands of new emails" and the Department of Defense has found at least  1K more. All this plus rumors of revolt over this issue in the FBI itself has caused that august agency to reopen the case with Hillary's emails that the director prematurely closed down last July, asserting that he saw nothing there they could prosecute Hillary for. He may not have looked too hard, especially in light of Slick Willy's "visit" to Loretta Lynch previous to that at the airport in Phoenix so they could talk about their grandchildren. We can only assume Slick Willy's visit to her on the tarmac was to ensure that she didn't press Mr. Comey to look real hard, but now he seems to be getting flack from the folks in his own organization that don't like some of what they see. There may be a handful of honest folks in there yet.

Even http://www.bloomberg.com was forced to comment on this when it noted, on October 28th that: "The FBI is reopening its inquiry into Hillary Clinton's use of private e-mail while secretary of state, after investigators unearthed new e-mails through a separate probe of Clinton aide Huma Abedin's estranged husband, former Representative Anthony Weiner...The bureau is investigating illicit messages Weinter allegedly sent to a 15-year old girl in North Carolina,an inquiry that gave it access to devices used by Weiner and Abedin, according to the New York Times." Of course Hillary has pretended to want the FBI to clear this all up quickly and let the American people know what is going on. Sounds good, but the American people are absolutely the LAST people she wants to be aware of what really goes on. Especially this close to election day!

I think Info Wars,  http://www.inforwars.com has got it pretty well figured out as to what really goes on here. In a brief article on their website on October 30th they noted the following: "The FBI has reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton after discovering new information on the electronic devices of Anthony Weiner. Could this be the end of Hillary's campaign or is it a distraction to draw attention away from more serious crimes and corruption within our government?  On Monday thousands of new emails from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta were published by WikiLeaks.  Within that new data dump was smoking gun proof that the White House was colluding with Hillary to cover up the fact that Obama had lied to Congress and the American people when he said he'd learned about the email scandal from the news..."

So Info Wars is wondering if this new rabbit trail to Weiner's computer is a diversion away from the material WikiLeaks has brought out. And while the stuff on Weiner's computer is probably worth checking out, this should not be done to the exclusion of the material WikiLeaks continues to bring out. Those that are able to check out the WikiLeaks material should not get off that target and baited and switched over to only what's on Weiner's computer.

If Hillary's campaign is to be sunk it will come from what WikiLeaks puts out there, not from what's on Weiner's computer for the most part. So those that can check this stuff out should not let their priorities be changed.

The Republican Establishment Is Still Marxist

by Al Benson Jr.

The Republican Establishment people are still Marxists, just like they were back in 1856. The only difference is that, today, they have found a more devious way of doing it, one that makes them look like conservatives and makes the Democrats look like the only Marxist game in town. Not true! Oh, the Democrats are Marxists alright, but hardly the only ones in the national game--they are just the ones that come closest to admitting it. After all, the Communist Party endorsed Hillary so that fact has to tell you something.

Understand, when I use the term "Marxist" I am not saying that one has to be a card carrying member of some Marxist group. Rather, I am describing their worldview, what, as Hillary would say, is in "the darkness of their heart."

That the Republican Party had leftist origins is something that has been well documented. Donnie Kennedy and I, in our book Lincoln's Marxists, dealt with the Republican Party and its leftist origins and agenda on pages 125-27 and pages 142-43, as well as other places. We wrote about John Charles Fremont, the so-called "pathfinder" who was the first presidential candidate for the new Republican Party in 1856. Fremont had an affinity for socialism and socialists and had many in his command during the War of Northern Aggression. If you want something more than our book, then read Arthur R. Thompson's book To The Victor Go The Myths & Monuments. It's a long book, around 460 pages, but you will learn about the Republican Party and other conspiratorial groups as well. It's good background if you want to understand what is going on in the country today. Check out what Thompson has to say about Alvan E. Bovay and the Republican Party on pages 221 and 422.

The Republican Establishment has one goal, furthering the agenda of those who promote One World Government. And believe it or not, in order to do this without being detected, they often have to appear to be bumbling idiots. And they are really good at it. I can recall that Sam Francis, whose insightful articles many of you have read over the years, called the Democrats "the evil party" and the Republicans "the stupid party." And while I loved some of the stuff Sam wrote, I had to disagree with him on this one point. The Republican Party was not stupid--it was as evil as he thought the Democrats were, only it hid it better. And it's still doing it.

Just yesterday I read an article by Sally Zelikovsky on http://www.americanthinker.com for October 18th. She said, in part, "While imbecilic Republicans bicker and snicker about Trump, Democrats will, once again, gather around Hillary despite their competing coalitions. Republicans are stuck in the quagmire of who killed the GOP and who is a more principled conservative, while the Democrats work with their media comrades and perfect their ground game. How do they do it? By dangling distractions with the one hand that Republicans fall for every time, while working their election magic with the other." And let me say here that Republican Establishment people that really want Hillary to win have to be pretty intelligent to appear that stupid. So why do they do it?  Because it fools their conservative core constituency  into thinking they have merely blundered with good intentions, when, in reality, they have been working to make sure the agenda of the Democrats slides on through without their being blamed for it.

And about now, I can hear some irate person asking the question: "Why would they do that?" They would do it because, at heart, they have the same worldview and agenda that the Democrats have, but they have to create the illusion of us having two "competing" parties so we don't ever catch on to the fact, as Donald Trump has so often stated, that "the system is rigged."

Pat Buchanan had an informative article on http://www.lewrockwell.com for October 19th, the title of which was: Is the System Rigged? You Betcha. And then Pat went on to explain how the system is rigged. He mentioned "Big Media--the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer's lifetime has there been such a blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party...Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down." While I have known for decades now, after watching and listening to them, that our "news" (what a laugh) media were Far Left in their thinking, I have watched them go after Trump with what could be labeled a blood lust. And Pat made a comment we should all stop and think about when he said: "Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism." Look at what he is saying there--and then burn your subscription blank to the New York Times or the Washington Post.

He mentioned several other things in the article, most of which I cannot cover here. He mentioned the Supreme Court, the 11 million illegal immigrants we now have here with the current rogue Regime, and Hillary, wanting to bring in many more. He noted Hillary's now famous speech to the Brazilian bankers in which she touted open borders for this country, essentially doing away with national sovereignty. How much have you heard about that from Big Media? They won't tell you about that because you are not supposed to know that Hillary, for all intents and purposes, wants to do away with the United States as a separate country. The moderator had the courage to bring up that question in the presidential debate last evening and Hillary tried to sluff it off by giving a lame answer about how she was really talking about electronic open borders. Bull! She was talking about doing away with our borders--because that's part of the One World Government agenda and she has been primed to push that.  And if she manages, with the help of Big Media, to worm her way into office there will be Republicans in Congress that will be more than willing to help her remove our borders and contribute their part toward the creation of an inter-continental mega-state in the Americas.  I realize I sound dubious as to her intentions. You'll have to pardon me if I don't quite trust her. Eight years of Slick Willy and her in the White House already have really tarnished their halos.

Pat looks at the real possibility that we may get St. Hillary, one way or another, in this upcoming election when he says "Big Money and media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail." And he asked the question: "Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?"  And he noted that Hillary's "opposition" (again, what a laugh) would be headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.

So look for these "stupid" and "distracted" Republicans to fully cooperate with Hillary in everything they can that won't get them tossed out of office in the next upcoming election--if there is one. No, the Republican Establishment is not stupid, bumbling or inept--it is treacherous--because it has the same agenda as the One World Government crowd but conceals that fact under a cloak of pseudo-conservatism.

We better start waking up and realizing what a total sham the rigged system has become.

Hillary's "Vision" For Amerika and "Republicans for Hillary"

by Al Benson Jr.

Pat Buchanan had an interesting article on www.lewrockwell.com for October 12th in which he discussed the recent second presidential debate and the "moderators" (read that surrogate debaters for Hillary) failure to ask the right questions. Of course, if the truth were known, they were questions they would shy away from dealing with because they would draw attention to Hillary's One World Government mindset and that is the last thing they want to bring to the public's attention. Why is that, the naive might ask? Because they share Hillary's worldview in that area, that's why.

Pat made some cogent observations when he asked: "How could the moderators have ignored that other leak of last week, of Clinton's speech to Brazilian bankers where she confessed she 'dreams' of a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders." He continued: "If the quote is accurate, and Clinton has not denied it, then she was saying she dreams of a future when the United States ceases to exist as a separate, sovereign  and independent nation.  She envisions not just a North American Union evolving out of NAFTA but a merger of all the nations, North, South and Central America, with all borders erased and people moving freely from one place to another within a hemispheric super-state." This is yet one more story the major media and the bosses that control it have deemed that the average American does not need to be aware of. So just ignore it.

All the moderators really wanted to deal with for the evening was Trump and that eleven year old tape and all other subjects were supposed to pale into insignificance. And Hillary would have been quite content to remain there also. This was supposed to be the evening that Trump was destroyed and his presidential possibilities probably handed over to one of the Council on Foreign Relations political hacks that he defeated in the primaries. Trump's bringing out for the audience four of the women that William Jefferson Clinton was accused of raping, one of which he paid a huge settlement to in order to keep it out of court, sort of put a little damper on that. But Trump's destruction was something the Republican Establishment really looked forward to because they never wanted Trump in the beginning. What they had really planned on was for one of the CFR-controlled hacks that he beat out to, somehow, be reinstated as a possible candidate again, didn't make any difference which one because they were all prepared to play the One World Government game, with the possible exception of Rand Paul. Albeit the rhetoric would have been a little different from one to the other, but the results for America would have been the same with any or all of them. But, then, I still think the initial plan was for Hillary to trounce whichever one was chosen to be the "loyal opposition."

After all the planned fuss over Trump's old tape broke, a whole bunch of gutless wonders calling themselves Republicans jumped ship and loudly asserted that for moral reasons they could not support Trump any longer--all the way from the Speaker of the House to the august (and I use the word loosely) Senator from Arizona. One thing folks, especially in the South and West need to start realizing--the Republican Party is utterly corrupt. It has been, like the Democratic Party, thoroughly co-opted by the CFR/Trilateralist cabal and those that run it are high in the echelons of the One World Government crowd. Their vision for "Amerika" is the same as Hillary's vision, and no matter how much they prattle about being "the party of small government" it is all a sham. I trust most of them about as far as I trust Bill Clinton and his presidentially-minded spouse.

The Republican Establishment never wanted Trump and they were almost to the point of choking when they had to pretend they did. They would have jumped at any possible means of scuttling Trump's candidacy so they could support Hillary (covertly of course). All I can say is that if this is the "best" the Republicans can do, who even needs the Democrats? There is no real difference between the two parties except the labels put there to confuse a slow-minded electorate.

As for that eleven year old Trump tape, the man he said all this stuff to, and who egged him on to say it, was Billy Bush. That surname ring any bells? It should. George Bush 1 is Billy's uncle and George Bush 2 and Jeb Bush are his cousins. The Bush Dynasty long ago stated up front that there was no way they could support Trump. He didn't have "New World Order" credentials.

Do you begin to see the possibility of connecting just a few dots here?

Interesting that one of the Bush Clan just happened to get this tape leaked at this critical time. Coincidence, just pure coincidence, right??? I notice that Billy has now been suspended from NBC for his part in this. Is he on the way out because his job there was done or has he been thrown under the bus after it was done?

I've said this before but it bears repeating. If most folks knew the real history of the Republican Party they would realize that its foundations are anything but conservative. To learn about the true history of the Republican Party read two books, Lincoln's Marxists, by Donnie Kennedy and myself, and To The Victor Go the Myths and Monuments by Arthur R. Thompson. These will give you a pretty good idea of the origins of the Republican Party. What goes on today is of the same caliber as what Lincoln and his friends did back in the 1860s. So please, stop looking at the Republican Party as our "national savior"--an office only Jesus Christ can fulfill.

The Republican Establishment will work to sell you out just as quick as Hillary will--because their loyalty to the New World Order is exactly the same as Hillary's

Presidential Debates Work Better If the Moderator Doesn't Help the Democrat

by Al Benson Jr.

Presidential debates are hardly my favorite source of entertainment or of information for that matter. Elections are often fraudulent and rigged and so are presidential debates. They are part of what has been dubbed "political theater" by Lew Rockwell. In fact he has a section on his web site www.lewrockwell.com called "political theater."

On our way into church last Sunday morning one of our church members asked me something to the effect of "Do you plan to watch the political mockery tomorrow night?" I can't disagree with his assessment. I've watched enough political debates over the years to know that they are hardly instruments of revealed truth.

If you have two candidates, one of which is supposed to be conservative and patriotic while the other one is a screaming cultural Marxist, you have to know going in, that the moderator and the cultural Marxist are going to work together and gang up on the conservative. It's standard operating procedure. They did it to Mitt Romney when he debated Comrade Obama before the 2012 election charade, not that Romney was any kind of real conservative, but, bad as he was, he made chopped liver out of Obama in their first debate. Obama didn't have his teleprompter and without that he was dead in the water. He had four or five stock lines and all he could do throughout the debate (not possessing an original thought of his own) was to find different ways of restating those stock lines. In their second debate you can be sure the teleprompter was there and the moderator helped Obama carry the debate load with his commentary. By this time Romney knew the game and just played along--the loyal "opposition" as it were.

I hadn't planned on watching this current charade but a friend living in the town I live in invited me over to his house to watch it. When he had lived in the North he had belonged to the Tea Party and so I figured he's pretty much be on the same page as I was, and he is.

And the debate between Trump and "Hillary the unindicted" was a carbon copy of most of the ones I have watched previously. The moderator, Lester Holt bent over backwards to give Hillary as much help as he could possibly give without totally giving himself away and he badgered Trump as much as he could get by with and gave Hillary as much extra time to present her points as he could while restricting Trump to his allotted time. Mr. Holt was in Hillary's corner and that was plain to see. Objective he was not and even his pretense of it was shallow.

Noted libertarian author Tom DiLorenzo had it figured out also and he noted in brief commentary on www.lewrockwell.com that Hillary's running mate had said that: "He hopes the moderator, Lester Holt, will expose Trump's 'lies' while at the same time giving Hitlery time to express her 'vision' for America."

He further said: "This is a warning to Lester Holt from the Clinton Crime Family: Don't do what Matt Lauer did and ask questions and then let the candidate respond to the questions. Badger him, challenge everything he says, insinuate that he is a liar or a buffoon (or better yet, both), interrupt him, while allowing Queen Hitlery to be her good old visionary self. Or else, Lester." I would say Lester responded to the prompting quite well. He was going to make sure he didn't end up being chopped liver.

And so "Queen Hitlery" made her points for her vision for America (no guns for Americans but lots of aliens (preferably illegal) for Americans, although she didn't quite say it that way. If you have learned to understand Marxist doublespeak you know what she was talking about. It was almost as if Mr. Trump had been cautioned not to fight back, a persona that is at odds with where he usually is. I hope this was just a learning experience for him and not something worse, because if it ends up being something worse then you can kiss the country goodbye, and your God-given liberties will be chopped liver.

The Black Panthers--no hate crime here folks, just move along

by Al Benson Jr.

Just read an "interesting" article on http://anongalactic.com  about comments made by the former header of the New Black Panther Party, Malik Shabazz, where he told a crowd in Charleston, South Carolina that it was time to "finish the mission of killing 'slave masters' and their families.'  He made these comments  at a Save the Black Church rally there. Shabazz was referring to an 1822 slave revolt started by Denmark Vessey where it was planned to kill all the whites in their beds, regardless of age or sex. Shabazz said, quite plainly that it was time to "finish" Vessey's crusade to kill whites.

I thought, as I read his inflammatory comments that, if some KKK leader in this country had advocated the killing of all blacks it would be portrayed in the media nationwide and worldwide as the hate crime of the century. Whether they actually got to do it or not would not have made any difference. The mere suggestion of it would constitute a hate crime that Washington and their prostitute press would never let us forget.

But here is this black Marxist advocating the killing of whites and the media hardly has a whimper about it. It would appear that, instead of being charged with a hate crime, Comrade Shabazz will end up getting a copy of Hillary's "Get out of jail free" card. With a Marxist administration in control of the White (Red) House does that really surprise anyone. It's all part of the Marxist class struggle program now being implemented in this country and when Hillary assumes the royal throne next year it will continue in spades!

If Sabazz said this at a Save the Black Church rally, one has to wonder exactly what kind of black churches he is endeavoring to "save." Black Liberation churches no doubt, churches that already preach Marxist dogma as Sunday morning sermons.

But the Marxists, cultural and otherwise, are nothing if not tenacious and consistent.  In Baton Rouge this past weekend New Black Panther Party leader Babu Omowale was busy urging blacks to all migrate south so they could "form their own country away from racist whitey." From the context of his remarks one would almost get the idea that "racism" existed in the North. Now wherever would he have come up with that idea? He'd better be careful he doesn't deviate from the approved script too far because we've been told for years that all the "racism" existed in the South and now here's Omowale telling his devoted followers to come south to escape from "racist whitey."

And Omowale said his followers should claim five states that should belong to the "black nation" which states are Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. He figures that if enough blacks move in then whites will start to move out. He says "the end game is land ownership." Only problem there is that when a country is Marxist, ordinary folks are not able to own private property, only the powers that be are allowed that, and they own their property in the name of "the people." He never said who would end up owning the land, but then he probably doesn't want to deal too much with that part of it. That conversation might get a bit sticky for him so just leave it a vague generality.

I said the Marxists were consistent, and they are. This idea of a black nation in our Deep South is one that was floated by the Marxists around forty or fifty years ago now. It didn't go anywhere then, but with national conditions seeming moving to the left maybe they figure it's a good time to try again. No doubt Hillary would love it! Keep your eyes open because in today's volatile situation you just never know what's going to happen. All you can be sure of at this point is that most of it won't be real good.

C'mon Joe, Wake Up and Smell the Coffee

by Al Benson Jr.

No wonder the American electorate is so dumbed down, between what they don't get in public school and what they do get from "conservative" political commentators, it's small wonder they don't have a clue. Years ago someone said that the conservatives really don't conserve anything and, unfortunately, that seems to be right. Often what they end up "conserving" is what the liberals threw out last week.

I read an article on the Newsmax web site just today which was a perfect illustration. The article started out: "Talk show host Joe Scarborough expressed exasperation with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her continued teasing about whether or not she's running for president in 2016...If you're going to run, run, and give us new ideas that help us face the next 25 years..." He's got to be really naive if he expects any "new" ideas from Hillary, but then he turned around and said the same thing to Jeb Bush, his "favorite politician." He said to Jeb Bush "Hey, Jeb, if you're going to run, run,...Come on Mr. Savior of the Republican Party. If you're the savior of the Republican Party, then get out there..."

This is the kind of electoral balderdash that is supposed to bamboozle the electorate. I don't pretend to know if Mr. Scarborough is genuinely naive or if he's part of the ongoing problem. Either way the electorate is ill served and that may be the name of the game.

Both Hillary and Jeb Bush are out there promoting the charade that this is really a genuine election and they they might really be running against each other and that they might actually have some independent ideas that would help the country--if only they'd get out there and spread them around. That's the absolute last thing that will happen. All of these potential "candidates" in both parties are nothing more than political shills and their handlers ultimately will decide which of them get "nominated" to get out there and fool the public. And fooling the public is what it's really all about. It's a great big electoral dog and pony show and the public is guaranteed to get stiffed no matter who wins because, at heart, both parties are controlled by the same Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission/Bilderberger triad and so you will be fed their agenda whether you get it with Republican rhetoric or socialist Democratic rhetoric.

Hillary and Jeb, or whoever ends up running, will not present "new, original" ideas--they will do what they are told to do to further the One World Government agenda and that's all they will do--same as the Marxist playboy you presently have in there. He's only doing what he's been told to do, as were Bush, Clinton, Carter, Ford, and Reagan before him, with few exceptions, all the way back to Woodrow Wilson. All of these presidents have had "alter-egos" behind the throne giving them their marching orders. I,m not sure some of these presidents we've had are capable of coming up with an original thought. But, then, they don't have to. All they have to do is exhibit enough chutzpah to fool the public and then follow the agenda that has been laid out for them.

And with a single One World Government consortium controlling both parties the agenda is always the same no matter which party gets into office. This election will be no different, and if Mr. Scarborough really expects independent and new ideas from either candidate then I have a bridge in the Arizona desert I'd love to sell him.

If you don't think one group control both political parties then you need to get online and read None Dare Call It Conspiracy and The Rockefeller File and see if you can find The Naked Capitalist or Dan Smoot's book The Invisible Government. All of these will give you an overview of who really controls both major political parties in this country, and it sure ain't "we the people." And it's long past time that "we the people" woke up and realized that. There are lots of "conservative" pundits out there that will willingly take us 30 miles when we need to go 100, but they're not willing to admit that the last 70 miles even exists. We need to start being able to discern these fakirs from the real thing.

As far as Jeb or Hillary running for president, they will run if they are told to, and they won't if they're not. It's as simple as that. And if they don't end up running then two other puppets will be put up to woo the public into participating in another electoral charade where the outcome is already determined no matter which party "sits" in the White House.