When Knockouts Became a Hate Crime

by Al Benson Jr.

For some months now I have been reading articles on the Internet about how black teens and some older have been playing this "knockdown" game on white folks.

The way it works is that a group of black young people walk by a lone white man or woman and one of them punches or hits the white person hard enough that they fall down and are knocked unconscious. Several white people have been severely injured by this but the blacks claim "it's just a game." Some game! A black young person knocks down an elderly white person so he or she is injured, in some cases severely, and it's "just a game." And it's interesting that most of these gangs of blacks do seem to go after older white folks. I guess, maybe, that proves they are cowards at heart. They seldom pick on someone in their 20s or 30s but seem to prefer older folks. I suppose the rationale is that the older folks can't fight back and so that makes them easier pickings. Kind of like these people that kill others with weapons in "gun free" zones where there is small chance anyone will shoot back. They're cowards, too, even the ones that are part of false flag events.

In a couple instances I read about the older person that got knocked down had a weapon and they shot at their assailants. One lady shot and killed one and wounded another. That sort of activity tends to put a bit of a damper on the "game atmosphere" of the knockdown. If the perpetrator of the knockdown doesn't know if he might get shot for his efforts then it gets to where it's not quite so much fun anymore.

In all of these that I read about the possibility of this being a hate crime because the black youths always picked on white people was never mentioned. That was ignored. "Nothing to see here, folks, just move along." Besides, a few years ago, some hair-brained college professor back east said that blacks couldn't be racist anyway because they didn't have the "power" to be racists--only white folks had that. I don't know where he got his information or what he had been smoking, but whatever it was it must have been pretty potent stuff for him to come out with an idiotic statement like that. However, such inane rationale is probably enough to insure his tenure at the school he supposedly teaches at for life.

I just read today, though, that finally, the knockdown game is going to be considered a hate crime--because a white man did it to a black person. Now it's a hate crime of major proportions and it made the "news" media sit up and take notice because now its white on black crime rather than black on white crime--which is usually way beneath notice. I expect our famous "Department of Justice" in Washington will try to find some way to prosecute this white guy. This is the same Department of Justice that ignores Black Panthers standing with billy clubs at polling places in Philadelphia in order to "encourage" white voters not to bother voting. But, hey, that's okay, just like its okay when blacks commit crimes against whites. It's just not okay when white do the same against blacks. Our Department of Justice seems to operate on the "heads I win, tails you lose" premise" or better yet, on the Animal Farm premise--all the animals in the barnyard are equal but some are more equal than others.

So, folks, if you want to make sure the knockout game gets to the status of a hate crime you have to make sure that a white guy does it. Otherwise it will never reach that status--in fact, in most cases, it will be almost totally ignored. The Obama administration promised Amerika "transparency" folks, so lots of "useful idiots" voted for Obama so they could experience the new transparency. How do you like it?

Mandela Is Dead--Long Live the Propaganda

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, Nelson Mandela, Communist thug par excellence has finally come to his eternal reward. For anyone with a strong enough stomach to have endured all the bovine fertilizer spread around by the (pardon me if I laugh) "news" media, if the whole episode has caused you to view what passes for news with a jaundiced eye, then you will have learned something.

Mandela, according to many sources, participated in over 150 acts of terrorism during his rather checkered career. An article appeared on http://www.lewrockwell.com a couple days ago which dealt with where Mandela was really coming from. It was written by Alex Newman for The New American. Newman said: "Shortly after the death of South African revolutionary Nelson Mandela, the South African Communist Party and the African National Congress both released official statements acknowledging what was already well-known among experts: 'Comrade' Mandela was indeed a Communist Party Leader who served on the Soviet-backed organization's Central Committee...not only was the confessed terror leader a senior official on the South African Communist Party's highest decision-making body, he was actually close to the outfit until his death."

This is the man that our "news" media sought to portray as a virtual reincarnation of Jesus Christ, and to do that they simply had to bury as much of the truth as possible so that the gullible in this country would have no clue. So his years of terrorist activity were simply ignored and he was presented as one of the greatest "freedom fighters" of all time. This is the man that Comrade Obama wanted all the flags in this country lowered to half staff to commemorate. He was a Communist and Obama is a Marxist. Undoubtedly, for Obama, this Communist thug was the George Washington of all Africa.

His record of terrorism, as well as that of his wife, Winnie Mandela, will simply be swept under the rug, or shoved down the "memory hole." He will be portrayed as the "saviour" of South Africa--the deliverer of the poor and downtrodden, and by the time you wade through all this bilge you will need a barf bag of gigantic proportions. If you really want to find out what this man was all about look up his wife on the Internet. Do a Google search on "Winnie Mandela and necklacing in South Africa." Just don't read what you find before supper.

Problem is, how many will be willing to do a little homework to find out the truth?  Or will it just be easier to swallow the media hogwash and continue to be a compliant prole?


The Homeschool Mini-History series is still available. History may be written by the victors but the truth does not change. For information email copperhead102@juno.com or write to The Copperhead Chronicle, P O Box 55,  Sterlington, Louisiana  71280 

Things Are Looking Up In Selma, Alabama

by Al Benson Jr.

Back in September of 2012 I wrote two or three articles about a situation in Selma, Alabama where black domestic terrorists were trying to prevent a bust of Nathan Bedford Forrest from being put up in Live Oak Cemetery in an area called Confederate Circle. There was a big fuss over who owned the land in Confederate Circle. The United Daughters of the Confederacy noted the land had been deeded to them back in the 1880s, although there seemed to be a problem locating a copy of the deed. The local black civil rights terrorists refused to believe this and so trespassed on what would later, by court order, be deemed as the property of the UDC and they just flat out stopped the construction work, threatening to call in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, who would, naturally, conduct a big march and demonstration which would be geared to stop any future work on the Forrest monument--with the "news" media naturally playing right along with them as they usually do.

The local UDC folks, no doubt having been labeled with the favorite Trotskyite term "racist" were all supposed to silently submit to the racial blackmail and retreat in silence.

It didn't quite work that way. The company that was doing the work on the monument, KTK Mining and the UDC took it to court and sued the City of Selma for refusing to protect their rights. Even though it's been well over a year now (so much for speedy trials) the City of Selma must, somewhere along the line, have realized that if it went to trial they would not win, and so they accepted a settlement put forth by KTK Mining for $100,000.

According to http://www.selmatimesjournal.com for November 26, 2013 we are told: "In a 5-3 vote, the Selma City Council voted to approve a settlement in a lawsuit over a monument to Confederate general and former Ku Klux Klan leader Nathan Bedford Forrect, effectively ending the suit.The settlement terms include giving a deed to the one-acre tract of land containing the monument in Old Live Oak Cemetery to Chapter 53 of the United Daughters of the Confederacy." The council president voted in favor of this, along with four other members and said it was time for the city to move forward and focus on more important issues.

However, that decision was not enough for the local civil rights terrorists, one of which, Rose Sanders, also known as Faya Rose Toure, (interesting how these black radicals, like Obama, always seem to have more than one name) managed to get herself arrested for disorderly conduct at the city council meeting. But then, this is so typical of leftist radicals. If they can't get their way they attempt to disrupt everything so that nothing can be accomplished unless everyone is willing to give in to their radical agenda. This time it didn't work. That must have been a real blow to the fragile ego of Ms. Sanders/Toure. Shouting everyone down has always worked before--this time it didn't. How sad--for her, not for the rest of the folks there.

Even though KTK Mining has the right to go on with finishing construction of the Forrest Monument, I expect there will be all manner of nit-picky things the domestic terrorists will come up with to hamper the work and if nothing else works they will resort to outright vandalism. It wouldn't be the first time.

But, for now, things are looking up in Selma. The defenders of the Confederacy finally won one, which is welcome news, because, lets face it folks, between the government, the "news" media and the dedicated leftists of various hues, we don't win too many. Thank the Lord for this victory--and strive to remain vigilant because the battle is probably not over yet.

Better or Worse, it was Still a Pack of Lies!

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, President Obama has finally come out and apologized to the thousands of people that have had their current insurance cancelled. Big deal! I'm sure his "humble" apology will be of great help to them as they now sit with no insurance coverage.

Let's face facts. These folks were lied to by this current regime. Obama said that, in many cases, Obamacare would be better than their current policies. That statement begs the question and seeks to let him off the hook. Whether Obamacare is better or worse or equal to what these folks had is not what we are dealing with here. Regardless of the status of their current insurance policies, better, or worse, these people were lied to by this regime. There is no nice way to say it--and if they have lied to us about Obamacare, then what else have they lied about?

As we go along and keep tabs on the actions of the current Marxist regime, whether it's Benghazi or the Syrian situation or their new "educational" effort, Common Core (called by some "Commie Core") or whatever it is, the American people are not being told the truth. And what we laughingly refer to as the "news" media is complicit in all this.

Obama employed the classic Marxist tactic when he first ran for President in telling us if elected his administration would be the most transparent in our history. Actually it has been the exact opposite. The only time Obama has told us the truth is when he said he would fundamentally transform the United States--and he never told us how he planned to do that. Now we are finding out and his "transformation" scheme ain't all it was cracked up to be. but then, Marxism never is.

It has been reported that, if George Soros and the CFR people don't allow Obama to declare himself Dictator for life and he has to vacate Washington in 2016 then it is already planned that we will get Hitlery Clinton as his worthy successor. Doesn't that thought give you the warm fuzzies? Or maybe send chills up and down your back?

Either way, the totalitarianism will continue until all opposition has been suppressed.

When All Else Fails Just Blame the South

by Al Benson Jr.

A recent article on http://www.examiner.com displayed how totally asinine many of those on the theological and political left can really be.

That premier ambulance chaser, Je$$e Jack$on, claims that the continuing government shutdown has its roots in the Confederate States. Dear Je$$e tweeted: "Shutting down the US Govt. is the closest this Congress can get to seeing the Confederacy finally win." Another twitter noted that Jackson should "call out the Democratic Party for its racist past." How about doing the same thing for Abe Lincoln and the Republicans? Can't do that--Abe Lincoln is an untouchable icon and his "racist" views need to be shoved down the memory hole.

Another person labeled Jackson a "fraud" who makes money by exploiting his own people. That observation comes closer to the truth.

Folks, let's get real here. No one on either side of this entire shutdown charade has any use for the Confederacy or anything remotely Confederate. They all hate our guts, our flags, and symbols, and our history and heritage as well.

Blaming the Confederacy for this mess is just one more way of playing the race card. 

You might as well blame the Easter Bunny because all the hens quit laying Easter eggs the day before Easter. One makes as much sense as the other, but, then, the theological and political left has never been noted for their ability to make any real sense. It's a good thing the "news" media is there to cover for them.  

Follow The Money

by Al Benson Jr.

Recently some friends in Texas sent me a little booklet. It was a speech given by a General Smedley Butler and the title of it was "War Is A Racket." General Butler, who was a decorated Marine veteran, told, in his speech, originally given back in 1933, how much money there was to be made in a war and who made it.

Although many may regard his speech, 80 years old now, as a bit antiquated, nonetheless he raised some excellent points.

Now, 80 years after General Butler's speech someone else has sent me a few comments about the Rothschild banking empire. In their commentary they noted: "In the year 2000 there were 8 countries without a Rothschild-owned central bank. They were: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, Syria, and Iran."

"Now there are only 4 left; Cuba, North Korea, Syria and Iran." The Obama Regime is busily trying to get us into a war in Syria, which no one wants but the bankers and the Israel Lobby. They've worked the same game in Iran. Does anyone see a pattern here? How about following the money and connecting the dots.

Everyone gets something out of this but the American taxpayer and all he gets is the bill for it all--and his sons (and daughters, now) get to shed their blood so Israel can be rid of more of her enemies and the bankers can make big bucks. Such a deal, right?

Homeschool History Series:
A real teaching alternative for Christian, Pro-Southern parents

by Al Benson Jr.


Are you tired of politically correct "histories" of the War Between the States? Want to learn the facts about its true causes, the actual events, and the people involved?

Now there is an educational program available for high schoolers and Mom's and Dads too. Composed from carefully researched facts about the War Between the States it consists of five easy-to-read mini-histories, which provide accurate and key informaton regarding the War that changed America.

Each mini-history, which includes an accompanying test, is $10.00. This includes grading of the test and return to the student if desired, with appropriate comments. You can purchase individual booklets or the entire set by sending check or money order to The Copperhead Chronicle, P O Box 55, Sterlington, Louisiana 71280.

The mini-histories include:
1. Apostasy, Abolitionism, The Civil War and Reconstruction
This explains the root causes of the War Between the States and debunks the myth about slavery as the reason for the War. Describes how the War and "Reconstruction" afterwards were designed to change our system of government into something quite different from what was envisioned by the Founders. (28 pages)

2. The Abolitionists
Spells out the theological convictions of many in the Abolitionist Movement, showing the radical abolitionism was actually a religion; a religion that was a substitute for biblical Christianity. (14 pages)

3. The Socialist Supporters of Honest Abe
This was the foundation document for the book by Al Benson Jr. and Walter D. Kennedy Lincoln's Marxists, which is available on Amazon.com
It reveals the almost totally covered up fact that communists, socialists, and various other European radicals totally supported Lincoln and the Union cause during the War. Several well-known Union generals were actually socialists and some were communists who came here after the failed 1848 socialist revolts in Europe. The author names names. (13 pages)

4. A Theological and Political View of the Doctrine of Secession
Beginning with the Declaration of Independence it presents a history of secessionist sentiment in the United States. Shows that up until 1860 most of the country thought that secession was a legitimate option, and not just the South! (28 pages)

5.Emancipation As Propaganda
This booklet goes into detail about what a sham the Emancipation Proclamation really was and how it was viewed by many, both here and in Europe when it was issued. 

For a limited time, all 5 booklets and tests can be purchased at a discount when purchased together at one time. Purchase of all 5 together would be $45.00, a saving of $5.00, and there is no shipping charge. 

Gun Confiscation Has Always Been the Name of the Game


by Al Benson Jr.

A recent article from http://www.infowars.com has noted that: "The National Rifle Association has obtained a Department of Justice memo calling for national gun registration and confiscation...The DOJ memo states the administration 'believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation' according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks 'won't work without requiring national gun registration.' The memo stands in stark contrast to the administration's public stance on so-called gun control. White House spokesman Jay Carney said last month that the laws proposed by Obama would not take away a gun from a single law-abiding family."

Well, I supposed you might be tempted to say that, in a sort of convoluted way, he was telling the truth. He doesn't want the guns from a single law-abiding family--he wants to confiscate them ALL from ALL law-abiding families!

Gun registration has always been the prelude to gun confiscation and this administration fully intends to do away with the Second Amendment rights of all Americans--except for those Council on Foreign Relations fat cats and their banker friends who exist at the top of the political heap. We surrender our guns so they can all plunder us with impunity.

And those Republican congresspersons that think they can deal with this administration regarding "responsible" gun control measures either have mush for brains or they sincerely hope the electorate does.

We need to contact our Senators and tell them, under no circumstances should they vote for any bill that even has the word "gun" in it, nor for any amendment to any bill that has the word "gun" in it. If they ignore us and do it anyway, which many of them dearly want to do, then we should work to defeat them in the next election. Let's not be so shortsighted that we forget what they do now by election time if they do decide to sell us out.

Abolish the Local Sheriff?

by Al Benson Jr.
For The Copperhead Chronicle Blog Spot

This afternoon, 1/26/13, I received an email from http://chasvoice.blogspot.com that dealt with a rather shocking story considering current national conditions. It started out: "A news report has quietly been making its way around the alternative media, under the radar screen, concerning a Delaware legal decision to strip county sheriffs of their arrest powers in the state." Quite naturally the prostitute press has not bothered to report this--better if the average citizen does not know this kind of thing--no embarrassing questions that way.

However, the son of Vice-President Joe Biden serves as Attorney General for the state of Delaware and he has issued a mandate to county commissioners  letting them know that the sheriffs in the three counties in Delaware no longer have arrest powers. You might think that this is not important, after all, Delaware is just a small state on the East Coast.

But--further checking reveals that there is a country-wide effort to strip county sheriffs of their enumerated powers which are mandated in the constitutions of the various states. This movement would have the net effect of abolishing county sheriff's departments and adding the power of federal law enforcement agencies. Well, gee, what a surprise!

You don't think any of this might have anything to do with some county sheriffs across the country telling the Obama administration that they will not infringe on the Second Amendment rights of the citizens in their counties do you?

Naw, couldn't be. I didn't think so either. It's just another one of those continuing coincidences that we are seeing more and more of as the Obama administration seeks to drag this country further and further into the Marxist orbit. Nothing to worry about, right? Right???

If you are one of those folks that think there might be a small problem here, make  copies of this and pass it along to your friends. Maybe even give your county sheriff a copy. Write to the editor of your local paper and tell him about it. He may not print your letter, but at least he will know that you know.      

Political Correctness Gone Crazy

by Al Benson Jr.

I debated about what I should use for a title for this brief article, but then I thought, after all, I am talking about the public school system so the title fits.

Recently I read an article on http://politicaloutcast.com which talked about 6-year olds playing cops and robbers with each other during recess at school. These kids are in the first grade, yet the school has suspended them for playing cops and robbers! Can you believe it? Well, again, it's a public school so, yes, you can. The article noted: "In the assistant principal's letter to the student's parents, she wrote that their son 'threatened to shoot another student." Come on folks, this is two 6-year olds playing cops and robbers. Of course they pretend to shoot one another. I shudder to think what could have happened if they had been playing cowboys and Indians. That would have been a racial problem of international importance. They might have had to call a representative from the United Nations in to counsel the white kid for perceived hostility toward someone of an indigenous race.

However, the parents of the youngster were not amused. They ended up getting a lawyer to appeal the decision of the school. The decision was appealed and the school ended up overturning the student's suspension, which was so idiotic it never should have happened in the first place. I can remember, as a kid, we often played cops and robbers or cowboys and Indians at school--sometimes whole bunches of us on one side or the other. Just think, had I grown up in more politically correct days, half my school could have been suspended for the unconscionable "sin" of pointing our fingers at each other and pretending they were guns. And for all the pretend shooting we did of one another, to my knowledge none of the kids I went to school with turned out to be cold-blooded killers. We were, for the most part, pretty normal kids who, when we grew up, got on with out lives and the pretend carnage we committed as 6-year olds or 9-year olds never really affected us all that much.

But in this enlightened day and age the sin of pointing your finger and someone and saying "bang" is second only to the sin of "white racism" which according to some government educrats, white kids can display by eating peanut butter sandwiches in front of kids from Somalia.

Some of this foolishness is part of the reason we never sent our kids to public schools anyplace we ever lived and why we encourage others to eschew those supposed institutions of "learning."

Public schooling has a very suspicious and checkered history going right back to its Unitarian/socialist inspired origins and things have only gotten worse since those dubious beginnings. Kids don't learn to read; they don't learn accurate history, and the literature they are given is horrendous and the older they get the worse it all gets. Public schools don't educate--they brainwash--which is their real reason for existence. They act as a buffer against Christian education, which they were founded to combat. The textbook protest in Kanawha County, West Virginia in the mid-1970s proved that.

The Internet abounds with sites you can do research about the public schools on, so sometime when you have an extra six or seven hours check it out. I can guarantee, if you use discernment, you will not like most of what you will find.