They Want To Steal Our History

 by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

The Deep State and the radical left, globalists all, are trying to steal our history. They do not want us to know our history or understand where we came from and why. They realize, more than we do, that those that have no grasp of their history, culture, and heritage have no real future. They seek to control our history so they can control our future. If they control our future then they control  our destiny and then, like all idolaters, they can shape us in their own leftist image.

One way they do this is with false history, like this horrible 1619 Project that is currently used in many public schools now. Donald Trump became aware of this program and sought to deny funding to public schools that used it. I don't know how he made out with that and the recent election that was stolen from him will deny him and opportunity to pursue it further.

Interestingly enough, a writer of Western fiction seems to have had more of a grasp of the importance of real history than most people in our day do. I am referring to the late Elmer Kelton. He wrote mostly about West Texas. He grew up on a ranch in West Texas where his father was a ranch foreman so Kelton knew the history of his area. He was well acquainted with the kind of people and places he wrote about. He was part of it and it was part of him, which is as it should be.

His comments about history were insightful. In his autobiography Sandhills Boy he wrote: "South of the ranch headquarters, in the middle of an open pasture, was  the grave of a cowboy killed by horse thieves many years before. Riding by that solemn place, I was reminded of the old song, 'Bury Me Not On The Lone Prairie.'  It certainly was lone and lonely.  That grave, and the stories the cowboys told, awakened a wonder that stayed with me. They made history come alive. They provided a living connection between past and present, a realization that events of a hundred years ago and more still affect our daily lives, our beliefs and attitudes.  They are part of who and what we are. The more we know about them, the better we know ourselves."

Whether we realize it or not, our history affects us because we are all a part of it. I remember, years ago now being told about a man in the South who said "the past is not dead. It is not even past." There is a certain sense in which he was right. The only time history is boring is when it is taught in school and is limited to dates and personalities whose history we do not know. General so and so fought a battle at such and such a place in 1864--period! That is boring history. To make history come alive we need to ask why he fought the battle and what did he believe. 

More and more as I have studied history, I have found that Elmer Kelton's view of it is accurate. Our history is part of all of us. I had a Confederate ancestor from North Carolina who was a captain in a North Carolina infantry regiment. Why did he fight? Did he go to war just so he could keep his slaves? I never read about him having any. Or did he go to war because his state was invaded? He lost part of one leg at Spotsylvania. Did he go through that particular hell so he could preserve slavery? I rather doubt that. The majority of the men that fought for the Confederacy did not own slaves and who in his right mind would be willing to endure four years of battle and death so his neighbor up the road apiece could keep his twenty slaves?  Yet this is the false narrative we are asked to believe because leftist "historians" so called continue to throw it in our faces and teach it to our children. It's balderdash, which is a nice way of saying it's bovine fertilizer, not history.

And this false narrative has shaped generations of our kids, both North and South. This fake history is used as an excuse to tear down our monuments and desecrate our flags and the Marxists among us love to have it so. As long as they can foist this claptrap on us we do not learn our real history or why our ancestors really fought. When we are taught accurate history that is reflected in how we think today. When we are lied to about our history and truth is denigrated, that affects us also, and not in a positive way.

So those closet leftists that crawl around among us teach us false history and that affects how we view our ancestors and our past and the culture they bequeathed to us. If the leftists can teach us skewed history then that affects how we view our past then they get to decide for us what our future will be because we will not understand our past.

History is not some dead thing that has no effect on us in our lives. History affects how we think and how we view life and what we will teach our kids about their past. If we let the Marxist element control our future via false history then neither we or our kids have any real future. Our future is really their future--a Marxist future.

Years ago when I was in a shop getting some printing done I inadvertently ended up in a conversation with a man that said to me "Communism liberates people." My reply to his foolishness was "May my children never live under the 'liberty' you promote." Now, with a Harris/Biden duo waiting in the political wings my children may yet end up living under some sort of communist "liberty"--something I have fought against most of my life. I sought to teach my kids accurate history. I guess we will have to wait and see who tries to teach their children history.

Preface For A Southern Blockbuster

 by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

I received a Christmas present yesterday that I deeply appreciate. It was a copy of Ron and Donnie Kennedy's third and updated edition of their blockbuster book The South Was Right!  It had previously been published in 1991 and in 1994. The 1994 edition sold well over 100,000 copies. This new 2020 edition will hopefully do as well. It has been updated so that it reflects exactly where we are, both in the Southern Heritage Movement and in the country at large.

My comments today will deal only with the preface to the new 2020 edition. A full book review will come later as I get into the real meat of the book. But as I sat on Christmas morning and read the preface I felt that it, by itself, deserved some comments as it shows how our leftist adversaries have changed their tactics against us since 1994 and many of us, myself sometimes included, have opposed them still using the same tactics we used over twenty five years ago. Is it any wonder we are losing?

I will quote the Kennedy Brothers here because what they have to say is so relevant. They observe: "Since the 1994 publication of the second edition of The South Was Right an evil, neo-Marxist shadow government has taken control of the United States. The evil, shadow government consists of leftist ideologues in the media, academia, political establishment, and their donor-class supporters both in the North and the South. With the fall of the old Communist world, Marxism changed its form but not its objectives. Neo-Marxists, composed of liberals, progressives, socialists, and other social justice warriors, replaced the older form of Marxism. Today, 2020, they dominate diverse  organizations such as the mainline media, digital media, Black  Lives Matter, ANTIFA, and other left-of-center organizations." So Marxism has taken on a whole new complexion at this point in time. The question for us is--have we kept pace with them? I'm afraid, at this point, that's doubtful.

The Kennedys continue: "Everything associated with the traditional, conservative, Bible-Belt South has been demonized by the evil, leftist shadow government that now controls America's social and political thinking. Evidence of the effectiveness of this evil, neo-Marxist shadow government can be seen in a 2020 opinion poll. The poll documented that most (77%) conservatives are afraid to openly express their political opinions.  The America where freedom of speech and freedom of expression is a Constitutionally protected right no longer exists!  This evil, leftist shadow government serves as the propaganda center that supports the Yankee Empire's genocidal policy toward its captive nation--the Confederate States of America. The old North/South bargain or detente where the South agreed to remain passive and patriotic and not attempt to secede again in exchange for nominal control of our local, puppet governments--that agreement has been broken.  We did not break the agreement,  they broke it!  This third edition explains how it happened, but more importantly it explains what the people of the occupied South can do about it."

They tell us: "National Republican politicians cower before the demands of this evil, neo-Marxist shadow government, while national Democrats provide political cover for the left-of-center shadow government's riotous storm troopers. America's once 'free press' is now controlled by postmodern, neo-Marxists who maintain monopolistic control of public information. The mainline and digital media serve as the evil shadow government's ministry of propaganda. These people are ideologically driven, they detest traditional Western Christian civilizations definition of truth, civility, and due process under the law...The cultural genocide directed against all things Southern that we warned was coming in 1994 has now arrived. Today Southerners are the only minority who are forced to allow our enemies to define our culture....We are in the same position as people of all other captive nations. The people of the South, Dixie, or the Bible-Belt are in a struggle for our very survival as a unique people The following questions remain--'Do Southerners still posses the courage to take their stand in Dixie? Do Southerners have the backbone necessary to establish their own provisional government in each state to bring pressure on 'our' wobbly  weak-kneed politicians?" 

There will be more about provisional and shadow governments in the book and for those who might not have a copy of it you can try to get a copy of Ron Kennedy's book Dixie Rising--Rules for Rebels. Ron deals with shadow governments in the South in that book also. It is time we updated our response to those Marxist types that seek to destroy us as a distinct people and who seek to destroy this country as a whole. 

The leftists label us a "reactionaries" because we mostly react to what they try to do to us. It's time we started being proactive rather than reactive and this new edition of The South Was Right! should help us to begin to do that. More on this as I get into the book.

White Privilege--Is it really Red?

 by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Recently I saw an article dealing with how the University of Minnesota plans to deal with what they consider is the main problem in the country today, "white privilege." Seeing that most university's  and colleges in our day are dominated by Marxists of one stripe or another this should not be all that surprising. 

The university is offering a 12-step program for Recovery from whiteness.  Some of the steps are rather "interesting."  Step one is We admitted that we have been socially conditioned by the ideology of white supremacy. Step 9 is We develop strategies to counteract our racial biases, and step 11 is We engage in daily practices of self-reflection.  Sounds like something straight out of Mao's cultural revolution, and that's not really too far off base. You have to realize that as with many Marxist programs it is only a matter of time before they make it to our college campuses.

Self-criticism programs have been a hallmark of Marxist ideology for decades. Kyle Shideler has written on https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org that "After 9/11, American citizens were encouraged by leftists to ask 'Why do they hate us?' Today the same people, trained by years of victim-blaming to hold themselves accountable for terrorism both foreign and domestic are asking a similar question.  'What flaws in ourselves makes these nice mobs so angry?'  The approved answer seems to be 'because of our white privilege, which must be dismantled.'"

So roving Marxist groups of Antifa and Black Lives Matter pillage and burn our cities and, somehow, that is our fault because of our "white privilege." The folks that really believe this have to be soft in the head. The people that fund and promote this Marxist terrorism don't believe this croc. They know better and part of their agenda is to make sure, via our managed media, that you don't find out the truth. Get over the fable that there is such a thing as the "news" media out there anymore. Most of what we still call journalists are little more than comrades for the Marxists. There are some exceptions but they are fewer and more hard to find as time goes on.

Shideler notes an organization called The National Museum of African American History and Culture, which is funded by American tax dollars. This outfit basically says that whites have most of the political power and economic power in this country and that all this is basically known as white privilege. Apparently if you are a white American it has all been easy street for you. So for all those black folks I know that drive newer cars then mine  and live in fancier homes than I do, they are all victims of my white privilege. Right? Honestly, folks, do you really believe this tripe? If you do then the Marxists have penetrated your thinking. You've been watching too much of CNN or MSNBC.

Shideler noted that the various socialist groups that had agitated for decades in this country had failed to procure the revolution they desired. Some of them finally came up with the theory that "their problem was a lack of racial rather than class, consciousness which held back Marxist organizing in America."

He observed that "From his experience working to educate the working class about Communism, and drawing from the work of W.E.B. DuBois, Theodore Allen, a Communist Party member, finally hit on something. "He became convinced that the 'white working class' would never be compelled to rebel so long as they accepted 'white-skin privilege, which the capitalist system had evolved as an artificial but deeply-rooted method of control to divide the white working class from the black working class, preventing a united proletariat."

Also observed by Shideler was that: "Allen's partner in this effort and another leading theorist on 'White skin privilege was another former Communist Party member Noel Ignatiev..." I have written about both of these sterling individuals in the past, not recently, but a few years back. I knew Allen was a Communist. I wasn't sure about Ignatiev at that time. I should have known. He was writing about how horrible it was to be white over a decade ago that I remember.

These abbreviated comments should give you some idea of where the current craze over white privilege really comes from. It did not originate on the college campus. It was transported there  by those Marxist personalities who seek to subvert the thinking of your kids.

Democrats Really Don't Want Info On Gang Members With Illegal Guns

by Al Benson Jr.

Do you think Democrats are really concerned about gun violence in this country? If you do then you have to be kidding, right? If the truth be known, Democrats couldn't care less about national gun violence but they care everything about confiscating guns from law abiding citizens. Their true concern is that honest folks be disarmed so they are defenseless. As for disarming the gang-bangers, they have no interest whatever in doing that. What does that tell you? It tells me that the Democrats have more in common with the gangbangers than they do with honest people.

But, then, that should come as no surprise.

I just this week read an article on G. Edward Griffin's Need To Know website that dealt with this subject. The article stated: "Democrats advanced a new measure this week to encourage states to pass "red flag" laws authorizing the removal of guns and ammunition from individuals deemed as dangerous by any anonymous, unaccountable person, but it would not include the already existing lists of violent gang members. Republicans tried to add an amendment to include known gang members, but the Democrats will not permit it, despite the fact that gangs are causing most of the gun violence. The amendment failed. (This is further evidence that Congress has no interest in reducing violence in America but, instead, wants law-abiding citizens disarmed.)

I couldn't agree with Mr. Griffin more. Gun confiscation of the weapons of honest citizens is really what it is all about.

The gun-owning American public had better start waking up and realizing that the feds are really after your guns, Trump's support for the Second Amendment notwithstanding.

You watch, if push really comes to shove, Trump will probably cave and give the gun grabbers at least some of what they want--the camel's nose inside the gun owners' tent! I think Trump has, whether he even realizes it or not, some sort of desire to be loved by even his enemies and he seems to think that caving in to them will, somehow, make them "like" him more. If that is how he really feels then he does not begin to understand his cultural Marxist adversaries.

After all, he defeated their candidate in 2016. They will never forget that and they will never forgive Trump for that. Not if he lived to be a  thousand would they forget!

There is no forgiveness among the cultural Marxists, ever, there is only an insatiable desire to get even with their enemies, to stomp, crush, and tear down anyone that dares to see the world in a different light than they do. Their penchant for cultural destruction is never ending. And if they ever, God forbid, get to where they have rubbed out all their enemies then they will turn on each other. The Revolution truly eats its own if given long enough.

So, when it comes to protecting your Second Amendment rights, I would not put much faith in Congress, because most of "those people" seek to remove your God-given rights. Oh, there are a handful of good folks in Washington, but I am afraid just not enough.

Organizations like the Gun Owners of America have done yeoman duty in working to protect our Second Amendment rights, and they can use all the help and support you can give them. But unless more gun owners wake up and realize that, in the long run, Trump is not going to help them, then we are going to have a real confiscation problem.

I don't know how I can say it any plainer than that!

More Internet and Email Censorship???

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Those who follow my blogs know that my stuff on both blogs has been shadow banned recently. Neither of my blogs has been popular--I guess because I don't talk about all the warm, fuzzy stuff the Leftists want talked about--rather I talk about what frauds and sham artists they all are, and that's a no-no, especially in an election season.

As I said, recently I had problems and then, all of a sudden, they ceased and everything went back to normal. I sort of concluded that my blogs (and probably those of others like me) had been put through sort of a dry run to show the Deep State media control freaks what it was possible for them to get away with regarding us. I thought they might have concluded that we were not all that big a threat numbers-wise and so they could probably ignore us.

Foolishness on my part! They're back!

From time to time on aol, when I would reply to someone's email I would get a notice that said "there was an error sending the message" and so it would not go through. I didn't mind this once in awhile, because after all, things happen, but I guess aol has decided that it worked so well they will use it to shut down any communication I have with folks that send me email.

Now, every message I try to reply to from someone gets this same error message. That means I can't reply to anyone that sends me a message on aol and I can't forward anything I receive from others on aol because anything I try to send out gets an error message tacked onto it and won't go anywhere.

In other words, anything I try to send out from aol is automatically an "error" message and, therefore, cannot be sent. It's not that aol is banning me, you understand. They wouldn't do that to me. They are just not letting me communicate with those I receive email from because all my replies are suddenly "error messages" that can't be sent.

So I am now starting to phase my email communications via aol out and my readers will henceforth be getting my messages from another provider and just think, that will save aol the trouble of having to label my outgoing mail as "error messages." It will probably make their whole day!

It's probably time I started movin' on anyway and as I am able to do that, soon I won't even be able to say to aol "I'll see you at sundown."

Our "Ever Truthful News Media"

by Daniel Benson

Today's news media might as well be witches. They have hunted (and haunted) the President since he was elected. Yet did they ever do this to Obama? No not once! The media is as far left as the old Soviet Union was--wait--maybe even further left. The Soviet Union might actually have been right of today's media. The "Doctor Feelgood" media can't tell a truth to save themselves. Local news people  might be decent, or even trying, yet the national news media is so biased toward the leftist agenda they would fall into the Grand Canyon trying to promote it. If they told you the Atlantic Ocean had dried up and the water there was an illusion  they would believe it and call you a liar from pointing out their error.

Most "newspapers" are rubbish now. A handful of people own all the newspapers in the country so you can't get a straight answer from those either. Again, the media is so biased you couldn't swim through it. Even the local paper here is controlled by them, though there is one local weekly here that is not (it's the only paper in the area worth reading). These few people want you to follow their lead blindly until you cease to exist. They tell you every lie you can imagine, and sometimes they fool themselves and actually put some truth out there (not much). How rare it is to see something politically incorrect in their papers. What you and I call politically correct (the truth) is completely taboo for these guys. They are so far left they probably couldn't see the left rearview mirror on  a car.

How many times a day are things misrepresented to you? The internet is slowly getting to be more and more controlled now and the reins are tightening because they don't intend to let you hear any view but theirs.

Take a leftist rally vs. a rally on the right. They will report throngs of people at the leftist rally and a smattering of people at the one on the right, when the left didn't have one quarter of the 150k they said was there, and the rally on the right had three times more than the 25k they said was there. In sports events, attendance is announced by the ticket counts. Too bad you couldn't make the media use that method to tell us how many were really there. Google is slowly becoming the search engine of the left, taking down right-leaning things everywhere. Twitter and Facebook are tools for the anti-Trump and pro-left agenda as well, while anything someone might deem even slightly right of Stalin is removed.

Soon you won't be able to watch tv without them knowing exactly what you are doing and watching--oh wait--they already know! Your internet traffic is watched, your tv is monitored, your telephones, cell or landlines, are listened to. Ever hear of smart phones? Big Brother, Trump notwithstanding, has his nose into everything you see, hear, or think. And the media can't be bothered to even try to say "hey, we see what's going on" because they are part of it all. They will vilify anyone not following their plan, fire anyone who speaks out against them, and make sure they never work again. But, as for you low-level "useful idiots" they just want you to be a good stooge and do exactly what they say because, after all, they can't lie can they?

"They KNOW NOT What They Do"

"They know not what they do" the words of Jesus the Christ from the cross.

Or do they?
First Christ said: "Forgive them, Father (God)!
Do the PONS/ACTIVISTS actually know which subversive leaders are putting them up to it?

Blind? Stupid? Are the not so blind leading the truly blind? That's probably the question we should be asking first, and the second question--who are the not so blind???

Subversive forces in this country are hell-bent on destroying what God (and our forefathers) helped to create with much blood, sweat and tears, over many years...(1776-2018)--242 years.

We shouldn't let them get away with it. "Them" are the cruel leaders of the blind and ignorant (wet behind the ears) individuals who have never learned their history (thanks to their public school "educations" nor do they even care. Anything before the Beatles is totally irrelevant to them.

"They" are ignorant like sheep led to the slaughter, young people, ages 16-25, who have NO IN-vested interest in our country...just what their subversive leaders are counting on...people who are young, excitable, and with NO sound foundation of history or any kind of patriotism. Most of them have no clue about our real history--and they don't care to learn! Many are just the drop-outs of life, the ones who have tuned out and dropped out--the impressionable and the gullible--who seem to think they are all brilliant! However, ignorance is what the purveyors of subversion are depending on to enable them to carry out their subversive and covert activities. And it's happening now--right before our eyes. Democrats (and some Republicans) are desperate and are taking desperate measures..i.e. Desperados!

With the influx of illegal immigrants, the intent is to destroy our culture by FLOODING our country with many NON-Christian attitudes and UN-controlled individuals who have NO intent to assimilate into our culture, or learn our language, which is for legal immigrants imperative.

This Movement is not just a fun game for the power brokers behind the insurrection in the streets. They are in it for keeps. For them the USA is something to be torn down!!!

The Socialist/Marxist/Communist Movement did NOT just happen by accident; it has been ongoing since before our UN"Civil War". Control of our educational system has been THE MAJOR PART  of our problem since then.

By NOT re-enforcing REAL history in the public schools, the National Education Association is intentionally allowing Negligence to exist.

Ask yourself why so few of our young people (from the age of 10 and clear through 50) know any real history. Not even attorneys, most Congressmen...Senators and Representatives. Those who are supposed to represent our interests DON'T.

Fortunately Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Joe Pags and other people in the alternate media do. They know what's going on out here--all the stuff the mainstream media thinks we are better off not knowing about. So we are informed. But, we (the vast majority of us) are allowing this charade to continue.  People are being hurt in so many ways because NO leader (but Trump) is stepping up and Stopping the Out of control Left.  Leaders, where are you???

Political commentary by Sam Schwartz
 

It's Always the Leftists That Promote Wars--Civil or Otherwise

It's Always the Leftists That Promote Wars--Civil or Otherwise. That seems to be what most of the current internet conversation is saying nowadays. In spite of all their blather about "peace and love" the Leftists are really nothing but cultural Marxist war mongers.

They seek to promote candidates and ideas that will absolutely devastate this country and then they threaten "civil war" if the rest of us refuse to go along with their damnfoolishness.

So now we have this "individual" Maxine Waters out there trying to encourage people to "push back" against all Trump supporters or those that hold office in  his administration. Have any of you all ever listened to one of Ms. Waters' rants? To say that she sounds a bit unhinged would be charitable. You have to wonder who wound her up and stuck her in the middle of the action. She is obviously a pawn  in someone's game.

The question maybe we should all be asking is---who's best interest in served  if the rabid Left winds up instigating a civil war? Someone's interests are being served if the Loony Left manages to do this. Is it the Deep State, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Illuminati or who? But then I repeat myself, because all of these groups are part of the "good ol' boy" network that has a vested interest in sucking the life blood out of this country.

If you look back at our first "Civil War"  you will find out that the minions of the Left were pushing all the hot buttons to get us into that. They didn't have smarts enough to do it on their own so you know someone had to be writing the script for them.

Read Donnie Kennedy's and my book Lincoln's Marxists and that will give you some idea of the part the Left, both political and theological, played in getting that going. The real war mongers in the North had to get the South to fire the first shot because that gave them a "moral" reason to invade the South.

For instance, the Illuminati has always felt that if you want to change the society and culture of a country one of the best ways to do that is to get them into a war--on their own soil. In the 1850s they used pawns like terrorist John Brown to work the country up to where we were ready for a war and in 1861 they made sure we got it. It was the perfect vehicle to destroy the society and culture of the Old South, which, due to its Christian base, was an impediment to their agenda for the whole country.

It seems that today we are about to get a repeat performance. Trump's agenda and worldview are diametrically opposed to the Illuminist/CFR agenda and so they again drag out the Sorry Left to try to work us all up into yet another war.

You all know that as long as the Left badgers the rest of us nothing will happen, but let someone somewhere on our side fight back and see how fast the Deep State will try to institute martial law and make a grab for all the guns. You can see this scenario coming. Only problem is, I don't think they are going to get all the guns and there's lots of really fed up and ticked off folks on our side. I don't think they realize just how many. They would do well to think about that. 

And take a look at this latest offering via the One World government United Nations on
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/29424-us-promises-full-implementation-of-un-gun-control-agreement   

Life Among the “Russian Agents” or Mueller’s Revenge

By Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

It seems as though, in one final, desperate attempt to keep his foundering “Russian Collusion” investigation alive, Robert Mueller wants to investigate Alex Jones and Infowars, Breitbart, Roger Stone and a whole batch of those who have had the temerity to dare to disagree with what he is doing.

If he is not able to come up with more on them than he has on all the other potential Russian colluders then they don’t have much to worry about. However, Mueller seems to be one of those “you can indict a ham sandwich if you want” types, which means he will try to find something, no matter how inconsequential or trivial,  to try to sink his opponents with.

Mueller doesn’t like opposition.  He doesn’t like those who point out where he has slipped the traces and gone and done his own thing. He needs to silence those folks, lest too many start to listen to them and doubt his omnipotence—and after all—he has a Deep State agenda to fulfill—the de- legitimization of Donald Trump’s presidency—by any means necessary, fair or foul!

Mr. Mueller is an interesting personality with an interesting background. According to https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com for May 18^th 2017: “It is a huge surprise that former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III has been chosen to lead the FBI Russia investigation, because there seem to be direct ties between him and the Deep State.” The writer may not realize it, but that’s exactly why Mueller was chosen. The writer continues “This is a remarkable decision since Mueller holds financial investments in twelve (12) investors/donors to Bill & Hillary Clinton and eight (8) members of Barack Obama’s technology inner circle who supported Hillary for President…”

The writer then notes a bit about Rod Rosenstein. Among other things he says: “Rosenstein has worked closely with Mueller at the Justice Department since 1990. Both Rosenstein and Mueller worked with then Assistant Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. during the Bush presidency.” Now there is an unholy trinity of radicals if ever I saw one!

The writer observes:”Given Rosenstein’s decades of ties to the Deep State, one wonders why President Donald Trump appointed him. The Deep State is now engaged in brazen acts of treason apparently to bring down Donald Trump’s duly-elected administration.  For example, GQ news commentator Keith Olbermann just called for foreign intelligence agencies to  help the Deep State bring down Mr. Trump’s administration—the definition of sedition…How can Mueller be impartial? In conclusion, the facts are unavoidable. Robert S. Mueller has substantial conflicts of interest and should recuse himself as Special Counsel before the public demands he be fired.” Problem is, Mueller is where he is because of those “conflicts of interest.” His first loyalty is to the Deep State that has made him one of its bastard sons and he has no intention of doing anything except participating in the deep sixing of the Trump Administration. That’s his assignment!

And in conclusion, the writer asks: “Why is the President of the United States being investigated when the Clintons, Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner are still at large and most certainly should have had a special prosecutor investigating them?” The President is being investigated so Clinton and the rest won’t have to be and can be ignored in favor of dealing with Trump’s ludicrous “Russian collusion.” The Deep State never,  and I repeat, never   intends to prosecute Hillary and Company. They are too big to  pay for their crimes in our current two-tiered justice system, so they will be allowed to go free while Trump is prosecuted for nonentities. That’s the way the Deep State plays the game and shafts the American people.  “Justice” (really, Just Us), is what we say it is. Besides, if Hillary had just been allowed to steal the election as planned, we wouldn’t have to be messing around with all this anyway!

Mr. Trump has been a mighty big inconvenience to the Deep State on their march toward anti-Christian One World Government and they aim to make sure he (and us) pay the price for that—and don’t you forget it!!!

Monopoly Capitalists & Communists Are Second Cousins

By Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

The prevailing (and partly false) theory is that capitalism and communism are totally adverse one to another and that capitalists will always be opposed to communists and vice versa.

In most cases you will find that most free enterprise capitalists are opposed to communism and leftism in general. However, monopoly capitalists are a different animal and their worldview is much closer to that of communism than it is to true free enterprise. Your “history” books don’t much deal with this because you are not supposed to be aware of it and many of your teachers and professors will take great pains to make sure you do not become aware of it. It’s what they get paid for.

I don’t know if you can still get this book or not—the copy I have was printed  in 1974. It is by Antony C. Sutton (now deceased) who was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University from  1968-73. The book is Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution. 

Sutton noted, on page 17, that:”Consequently, one barrier to mature understanding of recent history  is the notion that all capitalists are the bitter and unswerving enemies of all Marxists and socialists. This erroneous idea originated with Karl Marx and was undoubtedly useful to his purposes. In fact, the idea is nonsense. There has been a continuing, albeit  concealed,  alliance between  international political capitalists and international revolutionary socialists—to their mutual benefit. This alliance has gone unobserved largely because historians—with a few notable exceptions—have an unconscious Marxian bias and are thus locked into the impossibility of any such alliance existing.  The open-minded reader should bear two clues in mind: monopoly capitalists are the bitter enemies of laissez-faire entrepreneurs; and, given the weakness of socialist central planning, the totalitarian socialist state is a perfect captive market for monopoly capitalists., if an alliance can be made with the socialist powerbrokers.”

Quoted by Sutton is oil magnate E. H. Doheny, in 1919, where he talks about what went on at college campuses, and mind you, this was in 1919, not during the Viet Nam War.

Doheny said, in part, “…you will see that a majority of the college professors in the United States are teaching socialism and Bolshevism…The worst Bolshevists in the United States are not only college professors, of whom President Wilson is one,  but capitalists and the wives of capitalists and neither seem to know what they are talking about.

Sutton sums all this up on page 19 where he says: “Our story postulates a partnership  between international monopoly capitalism and international revolutionary socialism for their mutual benefit. And on page 21 Sutton gives us a key quote from Leon Trotsky where Trotsky says, in 1938: “You will have a revolution, a terrible revolution. What course it takes will depend much on what Mr. Rockefeller tells Mr. Hague to do. Mr. Rockefeller is a symbol of the American Ruling class and Mr. Hague is a symbol of its political tools.” Sounds just like today, doesn’t it? You will discover, as you go along, that certain capitalists in this country continually fund and finance Leftist causes.

In his book The Naked Capitalist  W. Cleon Skousen noted a comment made by Dr. Bella Dodd, a former member of the National Committee of the U. S. Communist Party where Dodd said: “I think the Communist conspiracy is merely a branch of a much bigger conspiracy.” Dodd, as a Communist, had wondered where her orders came from. After World War 2 she had contacts that, basically, gave her marching orders. And Skousen noted that: “What  puzzled Dr. Dodd was the fact that not one of these three contacts was a Russian. Nor were any of them Communists. In fact, all three were extremely wealthy American capitalists!” Skousen’s book was privately printed in 1970. See if you can find it on Amazon. Skousen goes into an organization called The Council on Foreign Relations. Some of you have no doubt heard of this. Others may not have. You need to be aware of this group because they affect how this country is governed and who gets appointed or chosen to  specific positions that will, whether you believe it or not, will affect all of our lives.

Another one you should check out, and I believe it has been posted  on the internet, is  The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen. If you want to know how the Deep State operated in the late 1970s you need to read this one. Some things haven’t changed much.

More as the Lord allows, but this will give you a start. Check out The Rockefeller File and an earlier one by Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy  on the internet. That way you can read them for nothing and begin to learn about what you have been taught to believe doesn’t exist. It does exist and you need to wake  up to it, for your childrens’ sake.

Also of interest---Check out the latest article on https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com--Karl Marx--Deadbeat Daddy.  It noted that Marx was so busy fomenting revolution he couldn't even be bothered trying to support his own family.

"Okay, we will pry them from your cold dead hands"

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Needless to say, there are still lots of questions yet unresolved about the recent school shooting in Florida. It still smacks of a false flag operation and when you see how events have turned out since it happened, you have to wonder if the whole thing was a well-orchestrated false flag,everywhere from the emergence of a small dedicated cadre  of Leftist gun control freaks that are students, to the promotion of events like this recent "March for our lives" that went down last Saturday. Through all the continuing Left-wing hype you should be able to discern on thing--these people want to totally negate the Second Amendment and confiscate your guns. They can deny it all they want (and they don't do a very good job at that) but that's what this is really all about--total gun confiscation.

If you are naive enough to have difficulty believing that then you need to look at some of the signs that were displayed by some of the marchers last Saturday--signs like "Ban all guns" or "I wish Obama HAD taken all your guns" or "Yes, in fact, I am here to take your guns." 

An article on www.Infowars.com for March 26th noted that: "The gathering of around 200,000 people in Washington DC was reported as a 'call for tighter gun laws,'  but going by what was written on the placards of those attending, it was about the elimination of the right to bear arms entirely." That's an accurate observation. That's exactly what this whole fuss os all about.  The Infowars article also noted: "One of the current student speakers at the march also let slip the wider gun confiscation agenda when she said during a speech "When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile."

In another Infowars article it was noted that: "George Soros funded March for our Lives rally is an attempt for foreign actors to take control and steer our public education narrative toward total gun confiscation." You are supposed to think that the vast majority of public school students, all but about a dozen "deplorables" in this country  want Dad to turn over his hunting rifles and target pistols to the Feds immediatelly--if not sooner. I can't speak for other parts of the country,  but if you happen to live in the South or the West--excluding parts of Florida and California--you realize that this is hogwash of the highest grade. You should have observed in all this, that you almost never get to hear a peep out of any student who is not 100% in favor of gun control/confiscation. Normal kids, it seems, have been excluded from this debate. You are not supposed to be aware of them and you are not supposed to be bright enough to ask "Where are all the kids that are not in favor of gun control? Why have we not heard from them also?"

Almost the only one you hear anything from is this David Hogg,  as though, somehow, he has been appointed as "youth spokesman" on gun control for all the kids in America. And let's face it, he does speak for someone, but it is hardly the youth of America, no matter how many of them can be bused in for marches and demonstrations. What you really need to start doing is looking for who pays for all these demonstrations and who pays for ferrying all these anti-gun youths around the country so they can propagandize us all on gun control/confiscation. It takes people with big bucks to do that stuff.

Alex Newman on https://www.thenewamerican.com for March 26th noted: "One of the Astro Turf leaders paraded all over America's TV screens was David Hogg, whose father is a former official with the FBI and whose mother is a far-left activist." Hogg is talking about "starting a revolution." And undoubtedly those that write his scripts have that in mind.

The site https://www.dailywire.com  on March 24th had a picture of Hogg and the article along with the pic labeled him as a "Far-left activist..." If you can pick up this site take a good look at the picture. It portrays a grim-looking David Hogg with his hand up in the air, giving the typical Communist clenched fist salute. That's to let all those "in the know" on the political and theological Left  know that Comrade Hogg is "one of the boys" and anytime you can be useful in pushing whatever agenda this youthful "useful idiot" has been scripted with, you need to do it.

Alex Newman's above mentioned article on the New American goes into some of those who are funding this latest leftist gun control/confiscation push. In conjunction with all this, Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) have, just this past Monday introduced a piece of legislation that they call the Ammunition Background Check Act of 2018. This little goody would require a background check on everyone anywhere that wanted to buy ammunition. So, if you want to buy a couple boxes of 22 shorts to do a little plinking with on Saturday afternoon you would have to undergo a background check to be able to do that.

These youthful anti-gun comrades who promote gun control/confiscation are openly talking about threatening our elected representatives if they fail to enact gun control bills. One little thing here--most of these kids are not old enough to vote yet, but most of us are.

Maybe we better start contacting our congress people and letting them know we are watching what they do with this gun control madness--and what they decide to do will probably have a major bearing on how we vote in the next election they have to run in. If enough of us will take the trouble to do that, I think they will understand where we are coming from. Youthful Leftist activists should not be the only ones our elected representatives hear from!

How "History" Professors View the "Civil War"

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Many who will read this are already aware of how our current crop of "historians"--so called, view the War of Northern Aggression. However, some who read it may not be all that aware, and so this is written for those unaware ones who still labor under the naive delusion that the War was fought over slavery and that communism did not rear its ugly head in America until at least the 1930s. Well, it did rear its ugly head in the 30s, but it was the 1830s, not the 1930s. By the 1930s communism was already well established here. It's just that no one bothered to inform the American public.

I spend considerable time on the internet scrounging around for information in those areas that concern me and one of those areas is the record of communist and socialist infiltration in this country, both in the  19th and 20 centuries.

I recently ran across an article by Andrew Zimmerman, a professor of history at George Washington University. The article was written back in July of 2013 and, at that time, Professor Zimmerman was working on an international history of the American War of Northern Aggression. Of course he didn't call it that.

For the remainder of this article please go to my other blogspot
https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com

The above link probably will not work for you so you will have to type it in to get it. I am having problems with my email server and so cannot connect with everyone on my email lists. Of late I have been going to the local library and using their computers but we had a little over an inch of snow here in North Louisiana yesterday morning and that was enough to shut everything down--schools, banks, the library, the whole nine yards--and the library is still not open today so I can't get in to send this to my list from my Revised History blog. There are a handful of folks following this blog that also follow my Revised History blog and I am asking them  to please forward this or the link to my Revised History blog along to folks on their email lists so I can get it out there because, at this point, I do not know when my email server problems will be straightened out--or for that matter, when the local library will reopen. I hope it will be sometime in this decade but I have no guarantees. So if folks on this list who can will pass the link to my Revised History blog along to others I will be very grateful. Many thanks in advance.
Al Benson Jr.

The Desire For Total Control

The latest commentary by our two political commentators as they take a long view on history.
Al Benson Jr.

The Desire For Total Control

by Schwartz & Viscount

It goes way, way back. Check out the Tower of Babel in the Book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Man wanted to reach to Heaven by his own efforts, to be God, as it were. If you read the Genesis account you see that he didn't quite make it. However, that has not stopped his efforts in that direction for centuries and they continue to this day.

The Caesars controlled the Roman Empire, which was all of southern Europe, the eastern Mediterranean area, and much of North Africa; the known world at that time. Caesar (depending on which one) was a benevolent dictator. You could have whatever religious beliefs you wanted to--as long as you recognized Caesar as Lord. The Christians wouldn't, couldn't, do that, hence Caesar would not have total control--and that was where their problems began. For them, Jesus the Christ was Lord, not Caesar. When Caesar tried to force the issue, and a lot of Christians died, it was the beginning of the end for Rome.

For us in this country, it goes back to the British Empire. King Henry started the Church of England, a.k.a. the Anglican, or, in this country, the Episcopal Church. Henry wanted everyone to worship the way he thought was right, although there was more to it than that. This resulted in the Pilgrims, separatists by belief, leaving England and coming to America so they would not be under the king's control in their worship.

And, as time passed, the children of the Pilgrims and Puritans had major problems with King George over taxes on tea and other things, and finally, at Lexington and Concord, King George discovered that he did not have the total control he craved. The "Divine Right of Kings" was, in the final analysis, only their desire to control all in their realms. In the end, it did not work out. Not that some of what replaced them has been much better in many instances!

But the quest for control continued on (as it still does in our day)! Our ULN-civil war was really not about freeing the slaves; it was, in the end, about controlling the whole country. Lincoln didn't want a country "half slave and half free"--he wanted it, politically, ALL slave. And he accomplished this--more than 80 years after our Declaration of Independence and the victory over King George. One way he sought to control it was with a heavy tariff, beneficial only to the North, which the South ended up paying most of. But that is another story.

Fact is, Lincoln sought (to commend and promote Union troops) many openly socialistic men as officers; men who had failed in their 1848 efforts to coerce the German populace and others into swallowing their Marxist/socialist ideas in Europe. Having failed in Europe they naturally matriculated to the US, where they could then force their brand of total control on an unsuspecting American populace--starting in the South.

You have to ask the question; did some of these guys induce some of the atrocities committed by Sherman and Sheridan  in their wanton destruction of many of the wonderful homes/plantations in the South, along with all the other property they destroyed. One author called Sherman's men in South Carolina "A legion of devils." An apt description! But these were the same tactics used by Hitler and Stalin.

Friends, that is Communism (Marxism)--control by force and destruction. In your minds it may seem far fetched or absurd, but think about this: Is taking over the Communications Commission what the Marxists are doing by forcing local radio and television stations to be controlled by the "already fake news" outlets? Is this one more way to control what is supposed to be an entity for the expression of our free speech (First Amendment Rights)? The FCC has out-stepped its bounds by allowing this to happen.

In fact, you might ask the question--"Who owns the airwaves--the FCC or God?" If the answer is God, then possibly the FCC should think about shutting its doors and sending its people home.We don't expect that to happen, though, because for the bureaucrats the agenda is always control. Little by little, so no one notices, their intention is always control! 

Update 1/15/17
In regard to total control, please read the most recent article on 
https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
dealing with driverless cars and the United Nations' Agenda 21 program which would shut us all up in sardine can apartments in megacities, unable to go anywhere except where these new driverless cars are willing to take us. All for our own "good" of course.

New post on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
from a history professor about some of the folks that really won the Civil War.
Hint: They were not right-wingers!  1/16/18