Our two commentators on the political scene now offer a few observations on a man who spent big money trying to get Hillary elected as the next dictator, pardon me, I meant President. Just a slip of the fingers on the keyboard. It happens. Hillary's loss cost him big bucks, but not to worry--he plans on getting it back--one way or another. But it occurred to our commentators that lots of people might not be aware of this man's background, which the mainstream media has determined that you should know as little as possible about.
Al Benson Jr.
Pertinent Phraseology for a Prostitute Press
by Schwartz & Viscount
Let's look at some real history. The character herein to be described is not an actor, in the Hollywood sense, (except that he fits in with Hollywood's phony-baloney dudes). He's got more money than most of them have, but, like them, he seems to envision himself at the "conscience of the world." Here is a man who openly admits he has no belief in God, is not religious in any sense, yet he seems to feel he has the right to tell the rest of the world how they should live (preferably in ways that will make him and his friends lots of money). He doesn't even travel under his original name anymore.
The sterling individual we are referring to is Gyorgy Schwartz (no relation whatever to one of the authors of this article) and he was born in Hungary in 1930. According to an article on http://www.nowtheendbegins.com written by Geoffrey Grider on November 15, 2016, Gyorgy was Hungarian born and "His father, Tivador, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartz's (who) were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros in order to facilitate assimilation into the Gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s." Gyorgy (now George) has an interesting background, some of which he sometimes neglects to mention.
According to an article by William Jasper on http://www.thenewamerican.com for January 4, 2017: "...Soros neglects to mention some very important facts in his biological reflection, such as that he helped Hitler and the Nazis confiscate the wealth and belongings of his fellow Jews. What's more, he feels no guilt, regret, or remorse about being a Holocaust helper, because, as he put it, if he hadn't done it 'someone else would be taking it away anyhow.' However, he undoubtedly regrets being so candid about all of this during an interview with the CBS 60 Minutes program back in 1998. He must have realized afterward how ghoulishly cold-blooded and inhuman his words and demeanor appeared, and how violently that clashed with the philanthropic humanitarian image he was crafting for himself. For some reason the CBS video of the program disappeared, and that disappearance has been the subject of much speculation concerning possible legal threats and/or financial inducements by Soros to keep the damning footage buried." However, somehow, the old video has been popping up on You Tube videos recently. We watched one just today before we started working on this article. CBS has supposedly been trying to take all of these down, due to copyright challenges, but as fast as they get it down one place it turns up somewhere else. Inquiring minds really do want to know. This all gives George a rather bad name and the mainstream media has really been trying to tamp it down. Seems they have not been totally successful.
If you don't see what's happening "World Wide" and being aided by America's "Prostitute Press" (out and out liars to us from many aspects, then you have been "suckered, schmoozed, and simply taken in by our Presstitute Pimps, who learned their journalism in elite "Ivy-League" institutions of High-Jacked learning. And many of the professors who taught them (and who are supposed to be educators) turn out instead to be indoctrinators of Marxism (meaning anything subversive to a republican form of government. History seems to be no barrier to their (especially Soros') intention, which is the creation of some sort of New World Order that destroys any and everything upon which this country is founded and grounded upon--especially if it is Biblically based. If we continue to allow these influences to persist without exposing them, then, at best, we have bought into their warped belief system.
The current wave of internal terror now being demonstrated and expressed in the United States is fully intended to destroy our faith, way of life, culture, and our civilization.
If you are naive enough to think Black Lives Matter (Black Live Marxists) or any of these other groups have civilized intentions in what they are doing, then you have not been paying attention. They have not convinced we truly "civil" Americans that these groups have displayed anything more than UN-civilized behavior. Polite and courteous is NOT their intent. Helping bring down the government and our way of life is. These people are RUDE, CRUDE, AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE both in word and deed and many of them are actually being paid to work at cultural destruction. One might well ask the question--how many of these groups does George Soros fund? How many has he funded? How much has he spent doing this?
They are being paid, (by Soros and others) to destroy, disrupt, and devastate. And who even knows how to contact them in order to employ their "talents" better than those who are part of the Community Organizer community? We had one of that type as president recently. Remember him???
Do you think these paid thugs are picked randomly? If so, then you have your head in the sand.
If you feel so led, please comment on what we have said here--as long as your commentary is civil and not what we have seen displayed by the type of groups discussed here. And pass this information along to your friends. More people need to be aware.
Showing posts with label amnesty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label amnesty. Show all posts
Friday, February 10, 2017
Sunday, November 06, 2016
Comey Puppet Continues To Howl "Not Guilty, Not Guilty, Not Guilty!
by Al Benson Jr.
Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.
So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.
On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.
Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.
I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous! An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ noted that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."
So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.
So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?
So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be.
Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.
So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.
On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.
Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.
I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous! An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ noted that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."
So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.
So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?
So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be.
Thursday, October 20, 2016
The Republican Establishment Is Still Marxist
by Al Benson Jr.
The Republican Establishment people are still Marxists, just like they were back in 1856. The only difference is that, today, they have found a more devious way of doing it, one that makes them look like conservatives and makes the Democrats look like the only Marxist game in town. Not true! Oh, the Democrats are Marxists alright, but hardly the only ones in the national game--they are just the ones that come closest to admitting it. After all, the Communist Party endorsed Hillary so that fact has to tell you something.
Understand, when I use the term "Marxist" I am not saying that one has to be a card carrying member of some Marxist group. Rather, I am describing their worldview, what, as Hillary would say, is in "the darkness of their heart."
That the Republican Party had leftist origins is something that has been well documented. Donnie Kennedy and I, in our book Lincoln's Marxists, dealt with the Republican Party and its leftist origins and agenda on pages 125-27 and pages 142-43, as well as other places. We wrote about John Charles Fremont, the so-called "pathfinder" who was the first presidential candidate for the new Republican Party in 1856. Fremont had an affinity for socialism and socialists and had many in his command during the War of Northern Aggression. If you want something more than our book, then read Arthur R. Thompson's book To The Victor Go The Myths & Monuments. It's a long book, around 460 pages, but you will learn about the Republican Party and other conspiratorial groups as well. It's good background if you want to understand what is going on in the country today. Check out what Thompson has to say about Alvan E. Bovay and the Republican Party on pages 221 and 422.
The Republican Establishment has one goal, furthering the agenda of those who promote One World Government. And believe it or not, in order to do this without being detected, they often have to appear to be bumbling idiots. And they are really good at it. I can recall that Sam Francis, whose insightful articles many of you have read over the years, called the Democrats "the evil party" and the Republicans "the stupid party." And while I loved some of the stuff Sam wrote, I had to disagree with him on this one point. The Republican Party was not stupid--it was as evil as he thought the Democrats were, only it hid it better. And it's still doing it.
Just yesterday I read an article by Sally Zelikovsky on http://www.americanthinker.com for October 18th. She said, in part, "While imbecilic Republicans bicker and snicker about Trump, Democrats will, once again, gather around Hillary despite their competing coalitions. Republicans are stuck in the quagmire of who killed the GOP and who is a more principled conservative, while the Democrats work with their media comrades and perfect their ground game. How do they do it? By dangling distractions with the one hand that Republicans fall for every time, while working their election magic with the other." And let me say here that Republican Establishment people that really want Hillary to win have to be pretty intelligent to appear that stupid. So why do they do it? Because it fools their conservative core constituency into thinking they have merely blundered with good intentions, when, in reality, they have been working to make sure the agenda of the Democrats slides on through without their being blamed for it.
And about now, I can hear some irate person asking the question: "Why would they do that?" They would do it because, at heart, they have the same worldview and agenda that the Democrats have, but they have to create the illusion of us having two "competing" parties so we don't ever catch on to the fact, as Donald Trump has so often stated, that "the system is rigged."
Pat Buchanan had an informative article on http://www.lewrockwell.com for October 19th, the title of which was: Is the System Rigged? You Betcha. And then Pat went on to explain how the system is rigged. He mentioned "Big Media--the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer's lifetime has there been such a blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party...Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down." While I have known for decades now, after watching and listening to them, that our "news" (what a laugh) media were Far Left in their thinking, I have watched them go after Trump with what could be labeled a blood lust. And Pat made a comment we should all stop and think about when he said: "Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism." Look at what he is saying there--and then burn your subscription blank to the New York Times or the Washington Post.
He mentioned several other things in the article, most of which I cannot cover here. He mentioned the Supreme Court, the 11 million illegal immigrants we now have here with the current rogue Regime, and Hillary, wanting to bring in many more. He noted Hillary's now famous speech to the Brazilian bankers in which she touted open borders for this country, essentially doing away with national sovereignty. How much have you heard about that from Big Media? They won't tell you about that because you are not supposed to know that Hillary, for all intents and purposes, wants to do away with the United States as a separate country. The moderator had the courage to bring up that question in the presidential debate last evening and Hillary tried to sluff it off by giving a lame answer about how she was really talking about electronic open borders. Bull! She was talking about doing away with our borders--because that's part of the One World Government agenda and she has been primed to push that. And if she manages, with the help of Big Media, to worm her way into office there will be Republicans in Congress that will be more than willing to help her remove our borders and contribute their part toward the creation of an inter-continental mega-state in the Americas. I realize I sound dubious as to her intentions. You'll have to pardon me if I don't quite trust her. Eight years of Slick Willy and her in the White House already have really tarnished their halos.
Pat looks at the real possibility that we may get St. Hillary, one way or another, in this upcoming election when he says "Big Money and media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail." And he asked the question: "Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?" And he noted that Hillary's "opposition" (again, what a laugh) would be headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.
So look for these "stupid" and "distracted" Republicans to fully cooperate with Hillary in everything they can that won't get them tossed out of office in the next upcoming election--if there is one. No, the Republican Establishment is not stupid, bumbling or inept--it is treacherous--because it has the same agenda as the One World Government crowd but conceals that fact under a cloak of pseudo-conservatism.
We better start waking up and realizing what a total sham the rigged system has become.
The Republican Establishment people are still Marxists, just like they were back in 1856. The only difference is that, today, they have found a more devious way of doing it, one that makes them look like conservatives and makes the Democrats look like the only Marxist game in town. Not true! Oh, the Democrats are Marxists alright, but hardly the only ones in the national game--they are just the ones that come closest to admitting it. After all, the Communist Party endorsed Hillary so that fact has to tell you something.
Understand, when I use the term "Marxist" I am not saying that one has to be a card carrying member of some Marxist group. Rather, I am describing their worldview, what, as Hillary would say, is in "the darkness of their heart."
That the Republican Party had leftist origins is something that has been well documented. Donnie Kennedy and I, in our book Lincoln's Marxists, dealt with the Republican Party and its leftist origins and agenda on pages 125-27 and pages 142-43, as well as other places. We wrote about John Charles Fremont, the so-called "pathfinder" who was the first presidential candidate for the new Republican Party in 1856. Fremont had an affinity for socialism and socialists and had many in his command during the War of Northern Aggression. If you want something more than our book, then read Arthur R. Thompson's book To The Victor Go The Myths & Monuments. It's a long book, around 460 pages, but you will learn about the Republican Party and other conspiratorial groups as well. It's good background if you want to understand what is going on in the country today. Check out what Thompson has to say about Alvan E. Bovay and the Republican Party on pages 221 and 422.
The Republican Establishment has one goal, furthering the agenda of those who promote One World Government. And believe it or not, in order to do this without being detected, they often have to appear to be bumbling idiots. And they are really good at it. I can recall that Sam Francis, whose insightful articles many of you have read over the years, called the Democrats "the evil party" and the Republicans "the stupid party." And while I loved some of the stuff Sam wrote, I had to disagree with him on this one point. The Republican Party was not stupid--it was as evil as he thought the Democrats were, only it hid it better. And it's still doing it.
Just yesterday I read an article by Sally Zelikovsky on http://www.americanthinker.com for October 18th. She said, in part, "While imbecilic Republicans bicker and snicker about Trump, Democrats will, once again, gather around Hillary despite their competing coalitions. Republicans are stuck in the quagmire of who killed the GOP and who is a more principled conservative, while the Democrats work with their media comrades and perfect their ground game. How do they do it? By dangling distractions with the one hand that Republicans fall for every time, while working their election magic with the other." And let me say here that Republican Establishment people that really want Hillary to win have to be pretty intelligent to appear that stupid. So why do they do it? Because it fools their conservative core constituency into thinking they have merely blundered with good intentions, when, in reality, they have been working to make sure the agenda of the Democrats slides on through without their being blamed for it.
And about now, I can hear some irate person asking the question: "Why would they do that?" They would do it because, at heart, they have the same worldview and agenda that the Democrats have, but they have to create the illusion of us having two "competing" parties so we don't ever catch on to the fact, as Donald Trump has so often stated, that "the system is rigged."
Pat Buchanan had an informative article on http://www.lewrockwell.com for October 19th, the title of which was: Is the System Rigged? You Betcha. And then Pat went on to explain how the system is rigged. He mentioned "Big Media--the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer's lifetime has there been such a blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party...Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down." While I have known for decades now, after watching and listening to them, that our "news" (what a laugh) media were Far Left in their thinking, I have watched them go after Trump with what could be labeled a blood lust. And Pat made a comment we should all stop and think about when he said: "Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism." Look at what he is saying there--and then burn your subscription blank to the New York Times or the Washington Post.
He mentioned several other things in the article, most of which I cannot cover here. He mentioned the Supreme Court, the 11 million illegal immigrants we now have here with the current rogue Regime, and Hillary, wanting to bring in many more. He noted Hillary's now famous speech to the Brazilian bankers in which she touted open borders for this country, essentially doing away with national sovereignty. How much have you heard about that from Big Media? They won't tell you about that because you are not supposed to know that Hillary, for all intents and purposes, wants to do away with the United States as a separate country. The moderator had the courage to bring up that question in the presidential debate last evening and Hillary tried to sluff it off by giving a lame answer about how she was really talking about electronic open borders. Bull! She was talking about doing away with our borders--because that's part of the One World Government agenda and she has been primed to push that. And if she manages, with the help of Big Media, to worm her way into office there will be Republicans in Congress that will be more than willing to help her remove our borders and contribute their part toward the creation of an inter-continental mega-state in the Americas. I realize I sound dubious as to her intentions. You'll have to pardon me if I don't quite trust her. Eight years of Slick Willy and her in the White House already have really tarnished their halos.
Pat looks at the real possibility that we may get St. Hillary, one way or another, in this upcoming election when he says "Big Money and media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail." And he asked the question: "Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?" And he noted that Hillary's "opposition" (again, what a laugh) would be headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.
So look for these "stupid" and "distracted" Republicans to fully cooperate with Hillary in everything they can that won't get them tossed out of office in the next upcoming election--if there is one. No, the Republican Establishment is not stupid, bumbling or inept--it is treacherous--because it has the same agenda as the One World Government crowd but conceals that fact under a cloak of pseudo-conservatism.
We better start waking up and realizing what a total sham the rigged system has become.
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
If Boehner Was Obama-Lite then McCarthy is Boehner-Lite
by Al Benson Jr.
Earlier this week I did an article for my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com about the resignation of John Boehner as Speaker of the House. This was something many conservatives had been working for and I am sure many viewed it as a significant conservative victory.
You might want to rethink that.
While Boehner was no loss, what ends up replacing him will probably not be any gain but only the preservation of the Establishment status quo with a different name. That's the plan. So they suckered the conservatives when they got rid of Boehner and they plan to replace him with someone that will do exactly what he would have done and many conservatives will think they won a tremendous victory with Boehner gone.
On her web site, www.debbieschlussel.com Debbie Schlussel stated on September 25th that: "Those applauding John Boehner's resignation beware. Replacement Kevin McCarthy is Boehner minus the fake tan and the real tears." She also stated: "Beware, John Boehner's replacement Kevin McCarthy is pro-amnesty pal of Facebook Zuckerberg, is a complete RINO just like Boehner."
Debbie also noted: "Last year, McCarthy's pro-amnesty statements were front and center in a Fwd. Us pro-amnesty video add...The cheers from the right about Boehner remind me of the cheers when the GOP retook both the House and the Senate a couple years ago. I told you then that nothing would change because the respective houses of Congress would be run by Boehner and Mitch McConman. And I was right. Well, I have news for you again. Kevin McCarthy will be a seamless transition from Boehner. He's the same guy minus the orange-y skin tint." Over his time in Congress he has only voted conservative 53% of the time. So how is this any better than Boehner? It isn't, but we are all supposed to be conned into thinking this is a major improvement.
It has been suggested by the Gun Owners of America that people contact their members of Congress and demand that they vote for a speaker that will "Defund any and all of Obama's anti-gun Executive Orders and refuse to allow any votes on any of Obama's anti-gun agenda." And while we are at it lets let them know that we do not want another Boehner clone to replace him. If that's what you end up with what have you gained? Yet I understand that's the game plan. If the Ruling Establishment can't stick it to us with Tweedle-dum then they will stick it to us with Tweedle dee. And they need to know we are wise to the game. And this is a two-party con game because both parties are controlled by the same people. Let us never forget that.
Earlier this week I did an article for my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com about the resignation of John Boehner as Speaker of the House. This was something many conservatives had been working for and I am sure many viewed it as a significant conservative victory.
You might want to rethink that.
While Boehner was no loss, what ends up replacing him will probably not be any gain but only the preservation of the Establishment status quo with a different name. That's the plan. So they suckered the conservatives when they got rid of Boehner and they plan to replace him with someone that will do exactly what he would have done and many conservatives will think they won a tremendous victory with Boehner gone.
On her web site, www.debbieschlussel.com Debbie Schlussel stated on September 25th that: "Those applauding John Boehner's resignation beware. Replacement Kevin McCarthy is Boehner minus the fake tan and the real tears." She also stated: "Beware, John Boehner's replacement Kevin McCarthy is pro-amnesty pal of Facebook Zuckerberg, is a complete RINO just like Boehner."
Debbie also noted: "Last year, McCarthy's pro-amnesty statements were front and center in a Fwd. Us pro-amnesty video add...The cheers from the right about Boehner remind me of the cheers when the GOP retook both the House and the Senate a couple years ago. I told you then that nothing would change because the respective houses of Congress would be run by Boehner and Mitch McConman. And I was right. Well, I have news for you again. Kevin McCarthy will be a seamless transition from Boehner. He's the same guy minus the orange-y skin tint." Over his time in Congress he has only voted conservative 53% of the time. So how is this any better than Boehner? It isn't, but we are all supposed to be conned into thinking this is a major improvement.
It has been suggested by the Gun Owners of America that people contact their members of Congress and demand that they vote for a speaker that will "Defund any and all of Obama's anti-gun Executive Orders and refuse to allow any votes on any of Obama's anti-gun agenda." And while we are at it lets let them know that we do not want another Boehner clone to replace him. If that's what you end up with what have you gained? Yet I understand that's the game plan. If the Ruling Establishment can't stick it to us with Tweedle-dum then they will stick it to us with Tweedle dee. And they need to know we are wise to the game. And this is a two-party con game because both parties are controlled by the same people. Let us never forget that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)