Even In Lincoln's Day Some Folks Recognized A Communist

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

Awhile back I printed off an article from https://www.jacobinmag.com by an Andre Fleche called America's First Red Scare. The article seemed to me to be a mix of truth and error and Mr. Fleche's somewhat left of center bias seemed to show through.

But he did get some things right. He noted: "Advocates from both sides argued their case in print and in public. Conservative newspapers warned Missouri's citizens to beware of heeding the advice of 'scarlet red speakers.' Good advice, for there were quite a few of those around even then. Contrary to what we have been taught, communism and socialism were problems in this country starting at least in the early 1850s and not in the 1950s as we have been told in what passes for history books today. 

Fleche continued: "Slaveholders denounced abolitionists, immigrants, and activists as 'Pure red republicans! People rotten from the ground up, red all the way through to their kidneys'." That is true, but it was not only slaveholders that exposed them

Fleche observed that St. Louis Unionists armed themselves in order to prevent Missouri from seceding. He said: "Progressive Republicans, soldiers, and the German immigrant community took the lead. Revolutionary veterans from Europe, including such radicals as Heinrich Bornstein, editor of the St. Louis German language newspaper Anzeiger des Westens, played a prominent role in helping to organize the new Union volunteers." Notice Fleche's terminology here. "Progressive Republicans" Folks, that's just another term for socialist Republicans--the same kind of RINO's today that are willing to help the Democrats to try to defraud Trump of his legitimate vote count in the 2020 election.

Fleche's leftist bias bleeds through in his next comments. He tells us that "On May 10, 1861, the loyal regiments marched to the outskirts of town where they dispersed and disarmed a gathering of secessionist militias. As the victorious units marched their captives back through the city, radical journalists likened the scene to the revolution that had swept Europe in 1848."  One of them wrote: "It was one of those splendid moments when emotion glowing deep in the heart of the masses suddenly breaks into wild flame." The captured Confederates took a little different view. They said "These reds and forty-eighters are to blame for everything." This according to one conservative editor--and he was pretty close to the actual truth there.

Fleche contended that Southern secession  tried first and foremost to protect slavery in the South, which was a misnomer because Southerners could have stayed in the Union and still kept their slaves. Lincoln said as much. The second part of his contention was a little more accurate. He noted that "...by establishing a Southern nation, Confederates also sought to forestall progressive political and social change, which they believed threatened to transform the American republic."

Fleche observed, correctly, that "In the years before the Civil War, white Southern intellectuals grew increasingly worried about progressive Northern thinkers.  During the 1840s and 1850s, Northern reformers had advocated not only abolitionism, but also working-class trade unionism and utopian socialism. The Yankee editor, Horace Greeley  took the lead in popularizing radical politics. In the pages of his widely read newspaper, the New York Tribune, he exposed readers to the latest work of contemporary social theorists." One of those "contemporary social theorists" was Karl Marx, the supposed founder of present day communism. But, then,  Greeley was, himself, a socialist. I have on my shelf a book by Charles Sotheran called Horace Greeley  And Other Pioneers Of American Socialism. It was first published in 1915 and then again in 1971 by Haskell House Publishers in New York. I'm not sure if it's even still available. 

Greeley wasn't the only socialist around back in the day. There were lots of them around, lots earlier than we'd like to think.

And there were even some similarities with our situation today. In Missouri, many of the radical Unionists were in the city of St. Louis, while much the rest of Missouri was pretty conservative. How well does that pattern hold true today, not only in Missouri but in many of our other states as well. You have conservatives and patriots in the more rural areas of the state but the big cities are mostly, with some exceptions, socialistic politically. Same when it comes to elections. The big cities usually vote socialist while the rest of the state votes conservative. I know it works that way in Louisiana. And it did in Illinois and Indiana when we were there.

Years ago Dr. Clyde Wilson wrote an informative series of columns called The Yankee Problem in America. He was right. I don't recall if Dr. Wilson ever wrote a book by that title or not. He may have. Problem is, a lot of those Yankees that have been such a problem have also been socialists, and therein lies part of the problem.

Why Do I Get The Feeling We're Getting Screwed Again?

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

When Donald Trump got elected many of us felt it was possible, just possible, that the Deep State might have been on the way out. In retrospect I think we should have known better. The Deep State, in one form or another, has been around since the Lincoln administration and we should have realized that it ain't going away anytime soon. That doesn't mean we should quit fighting and just go fishin' rather it means that the struggle will be longer than we thought it would and, therefore, our perseverance needs to be greater. The Deep State is evil and needs to be resisted.

When Trump got to Washington he was surrounded by Trotskyite Neo-cons and left-over Obama supporters who stayed around in the hope of sabotaging his efforts, and mostly they did a fair job of that. He's gotten rid of a few but he's got far, far to go in decimating their ranks while they continue to try to cut his political throat.

He's made a handful of good appointments and a whole batch of lousy ones and he's gotten lots of bad advice from people that, quite frankly, have a vested political interest in taking him down. We should pray for Trump, and for his political discernment because this is an area he struggles in.

I have watched as he appointed various people to different sensitive posts and watched as they worked to undermine his efforts and he eventually had to remove them--only to reach out and appoint another one just like the one he just got rid of and the process starts all over again. CFR member H. R. McMaster and some of the generals he appointed after McMaster come to mind.

I was thoroughly disgusted with Jeff Sessions who, when appointed Attorney General, basically abdicated his authority to the members of the Deep State in the Justice Department so they could go after Trump. Sessions sat it out. It was almost like the Deep State operatives said to him "Just stay out of our way and we won't bother you." He stayed out of their way and Deep Stater Rod Rosenberg ran the Justice Department until Trump appointed Whitaker as interim Attorney General. Whitaker seemed like a good choice, but he was only an interim appointment. Now Trump has finally nominated his replacement, William Barr.

Most folks probably don't know too much about Mr. Barr, I didn't. But a little browsing on the internet turned up the following on https://needtoknow.news   It seems that, according to political analyst G. Edward Griffin: "Barr says he will not hinder or interfere with the Mueller investigation, despite the damage it has done to the President and despite its failure to produce proof of Russian collusion. Barr and Mueller--and their wives--are close friends.  Mueller attended the weddings  of Barr's children."

That briefly tells you pretty much what's going on. If confirmed as Attorney General, Mr. Barr is going to let Mueller continue with Deep State business as usual and nothing will change. Trump has nominated yet another probable Deep State operative that will do him and his agenda no good and possibly lots of harm. I'd be almost tempted to ask "Where does he get these people?" but unfortunately, I already know. You could almost wonder if Trump has a "death wish" because he keeps nominating or appointing people that will do him and his America First agenda no good whatever. And when one of them finally folds and shows his hand, he ends up appointing another one of the same stripe. So I ask the question that is the title of this article--why do I get the feeling we are about to be screwed again? Trump rails against the Deep State--but he appoints all their people to positions when they can work against his efforts. Folks, something is wrong here.

U N Open Borders Agenda--1984 Is Here!

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America


For weeks now many have been watching these so-called "caravans" working their way up to our Southern border from Central America, across Mexico, and now many of them are at our Southern border, holding up a handful of children in front of them while they throw rocks and other things at our Border Patrol people. Let's be honest here. These people are not oppressed aliens looking for a better life--They are an invasion force. They forced their way into Mexico and they plan on forcing their way into the United States. They are part of the United Nations scheme to inundate us with third world immigrants and water down our cultural distinctives until we are nothing more than a bigger edition of a third world country.

It's all part of the United Nations "Open Borders" agenda and they are doing the same thing in Europe as well.

There is a very informative article on https://newspunch.com/un-global-pact-borders-migration  which explains all this, but it is 12 pages long and I cannot reproduce it all here. All I can do is give some of the high spots and hope people will be concerned enough  to check it out on their own. If you are not willing to do a little something then you might not like the version of 1984 we end up with. The article was written by Baxter Dmitry on November 19th.

The article states, in part: "A new UN agreement, which almost all member states plan to sign in December, propagates the radical idea that borders must be opened and a 'new world' created, where mass migration--for any reason-is something that must be promoted, enabled and enshrined as a 'human right.' The agreement also directs national governments to defund and suppress all forms of counter-expression to mass migration within their countries. Critics who oppose open borders should undergo 'sensitization training' according to the text of the agreement. Free speech will die." That's the idea! No free speech allowed so that no one can criticize the United Nations agenda.

Naturally enough, none of the countries that are on board with this UN scheme have bothered to check in to see what their citizens think about all this. Why should they bother? The citizens are only sheep to be shorn by the Grand UN Deity so why should they be consulted about anything? The countries that are signing onto this Orwellian nightmare are doing it without any public debate because they realize that public debate and any sort of public forum will seriously jeopardize this scheme.

The technical name for this monstrosity is the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Doesn't that sound cozy? This is not about refugees running from persecution, religious or political. It is all about the radical Leftist idea that migration, for whatever reason, needs to be promoted and protected. After all, says the UN, migration is an enshrined "right."  And you should be able to migrate wherever you want, whenever you want, and no country should have the right or ability to refuse you and millions of your brethren entrance. You should be able to go where you want when you want, as many of you as want and to be able to adulterate any culture you disagree with and the people of that culture should not be able to prevent your efforts at cultural genocide. Thus saith the mighty UN.

So far, most member countries are expected to sign up for this, with, so far, the exception of the United States, Australia, Austria, Croatia, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland. Seems like some of the former Iron Curtain countries have more common sense than some of the so-called Western European countries.

Anyway, this is the One World game that is currently under way and I have no doubt whatever that all this foolishness with these "caravans" may be an integral part of it. Our leadership, from Trump on down needs to realize that we don't want any part of this internationalist insanity. The idea the John Birch Society had years ago about getting the US out of the UN is looking better with each passing week.

There is a bill in the House now, HR 193 to get the US out of the UN. Why not contact your congress critters and tell them to support this bill and they need to do it now because once the demoncrats take over the House in January it will get buried forever.

Update: This morning 12/1/18 on the Zero Hedge website there was an article noting that, in Europe "criticism of migration" is set to become a criminal offense.

The article noted: "Europeans concerned about borders, language and culture may soon find themselves in the hot seat after Dutch politician  and European Parliament member Marcel de Graaff issued a dire warning over the 'definition of hate speech' which will criminalize speech opposing mass migration, as was first reported by Joe Schaeffer of LibertyNation.

So there you have it, folks, to be critical of any mass migration, if you live in Europe may soon be characterized as "hate speech." We can only wonder how long it will be before some "useful idiot" Congress critter in this country will introduce a similar bill in Congress, especially with the Demoncrats having "influenced" the House in the recent elections. Keep your eyes peeled because you have not seen the last of this.

If You Think Problems With Government Schools Are New You Better Think Again

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America


Many seem to think that problems with the content of what passes for education in public schools is, somehow, a recent development, maybe a problem for the last twenty years or so, but certainly no longer. If you are one of those folks you need to rethink your position and gain a little perspective in this area. Public schools have been a major problem for longer than any of you have been alive. That statement may shock some, but the evidence is out there if you are willing to pursue it.

I have been collecting info about what goes on in public schools for close to five decades now. What has gone on in public schools for the past 50 years is, believe it or not, not the real problem--but it is a very dramatic symptom of the real problem. The real problem goes all the way back to the early 1800s. More on that in the future as the Lord allows.

For this article I want to deal with some of the symptoms so you can begin to see what the real problem (anti-Christian "education") produces, and how it works itself out through the symptoms.

I have an article in my files from the Providence (Sunday) Journal from Providence, Rhode Island for Sunday, 3/19/72, the headline for which is: Cranston's Controversial 'Prostitute Case'. It was written by a M. William Salganik. I know nothing about him.

Mr. Salganik wrote, in part, "The uproar in Cranston, (Rhode Island) over a prostitute who spoke to a high school social studies class is the latest in a series of schoolroom crises. Those who were horrified by the appearance of a prostitute in a public school classroom say it is the latest instance of teachers overstepping the bounds of good taste or good judgment." Some, however, defended having the prostitute there and accused those opposed to it of an "attempt to suppress creative teachers and trample on academic freedom." How often have you all heard that line over the years? To those who spout it "academic freedom" means their unfettered ability to shove whatever propaganda they deem relevant down your kids' throats and you will have nothing to say about it--so just shut up and sit down. After all, the job of brainwashing your kids belongs to the state doesn't it?

Reading Salganik's article, you are confronted with the unpleasant truth that "change agents" were using public schools in Rhode Island as a seedbed for revolution. Salganik noted several other schools in Rhode Island that had problems of this nature--one is Scituate, Rhode Island  where students were fed a "black history" course larded with four-letter words and one in Warwick, Rhode Island where students had an "art project" in which students painted "peace symbols." Folks who don't know better, even today, think the "peace symbol" is really all about peace. It isn't! It has a very interesting history--and an anti-Christian one!

There was quite a fuss over some of this in Rhode Island, particularly the prostitute in the social studies class. I recall having had social studies in school. By the time I came along social studies had replaced American history in most schools, at least in the North, and it was a poor substitute for history. But, then, if the kids aren't taught real history they can't speak up in its behalf or ask penetrating questions about it now, can they?

And while I can appreciate the folks who felt teachers were stepping over the bounds of good judgment, they really didn't understand the problem. The problem really wasn't teachers with bad judgment--the problem was--and still is--an "education" system that seeks to indoctrinate your kids in a world view totally alien to what you want them to embrace. It has nothing whatever to do with real education or true academic freedom and everything to do with socialist indoctrination.  The object is to desensitize your kids along the lines advocated by those in the Frankfurt School have laid out for them. If, by now, you don't know what the Frankfurt School is, look it up on the internet and do a little homework. If you are a Christian parent you won't like what you find.

Bear in mind that what I am noting here in Rhode Island took place a short two years before the Textbook Protest in Kanawha County, West Virginia, so there was a big push for this stuff in public schools in this country in the 1970s. In West Virginia the parents revolted over this kind of trash passing for education. In Rhode Island they just complained and didn't revolt. Mores the pity!

Even with my brief comments you should be able to see how bad some of this stuff was. You also should be able to see that, with all that has gone on for so long, chatter about "reforming" the public schools is just that--idle chatter! Real reformation for public schools will never happen and you need to realize that somber fact. The public schools are doing what they were really intended to do--indoctrinate your kids with an anti-Christian worldview. When you begin to realize that, you will begin to see that it is a waste of time and effort trying to reform them. What you really need to do is to separate from them and find Christian alternatives. There are some out there, Exodus Mandate being one of the most notable.

Some Unwelcome U N Guests

by Al Benson Jr.

Well, the Soros-sponsored invasion of the southern united States has officially begun, with the United Nations giving a large helping hand.

This invasion was supposed to have been stopped at Mexico's southern border. The Mexican police, or army or whatever, was there and they lobbed a little tear gas at the invaders and then basically got out of the way to let them pass.

I noted one video on https:''InfoWars.com that showed a whole batch of the invaders tearing down the gates at one place so they could get through and many of them were wearing blue United Nations hats with UN printed boldly on the front. Now where do you suppose they got those? At the local costume store no doubt. You don't actually think the UN would sanction any of this now do you? Of course not. Needless to say, with their One World Government worldview the UN is all for open borders except where it might be inconvenient to them.

And in Texas the socialist demoncrats are busily getting ballots ready for the non-citizens and illegals so they can vote in the next election and culturally dilute the American South even more. I would hope the current Texas government wouldn't put up with this, but we will see.

Trump has been talking about sending the army to our Southern border to stop this illegal invasion. I pray that it's not just talk and that he will stand up and DO it. If he caves in on this issue his base will have sufficient reason to question just what he is doing, as this is one issue he campaigned heavily on--keeping the illegals out--and this invasion from Central America is comprised of people who will be illegals if they can just manage somehow to cross our southern border.

One of the activist groups promoting this invasion is funded by one of George Soros' groups so you have to realize who is behind all this. Even Mike Pompeo has had to admit that this invasion is not "organic" but is sponsored by outside groups. So it's an invasion pure and simple.

So what do we do? Pray and ask the Lord to stem this invasion and ask Him to give our leadership the moral backbone to stop it in its tracks at our southern border.

Life Among the “Russian Agents” or Mueller’s Revenge

By Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

It seems as though, in one final, desperate attempt to keep his foundering “Russian Collusion” investigation alive, Robert Mueller wants to investigate Alex Jones and Infowars, Breitbart, Roger Stone and a whole batch of those who have had the temerity to dare to disagree with what he is doing.

If he is not able to come up with more on them than he has on all the other potential Russian colluders then they don’t have much to worry about. However, Mueller seems to be one of those “you can indict a ham sandwich if you want” types, which means he will try to find something, no matter how inconsequential or trivial,  to try to sink his opponents with.

Mueller doesn’t like opposition.  He doesn’t like those who point out where he has slipped the traces and gone and done his own thing. He needs to silence those folks, lest too many start to listen to them and doubt his omnipotence—and after all—he has a Deep State agenda to fulfill—the de- legitimization of Donald Trump’s presidency—by any means necessary, fair or foul!

Mr. Mueller is an interesting personality with an interesting background. According to https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com for May 18^th 2017: “It is a huge surprise that former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III has been chosen to lead the FBI Russia investigation, because there seem to be direct ties between him and the Deep State.” The writer may not realize it, but that’s exactly why Mueller was chosen. The writer continues “This is a remarkable decision since Mueller holds financial investments in twelve (12) investors/donors to Bill & Hillary Clinton and eight (8) members of Barack Obama’s technology inner circle who supported Hillary for President…”

The writer then notes a bit about Rod Rosenstein. Among other things he says: “Rosenstein has worked closely with Mueller at the Justice Department since 1990. Both Rosenstein and Mueller worked with then Assistant Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. during the Bush presidency.” Now there is an unholy trinity of radicals if ever I saw one!

The writer observes:”Given Rosenstein’s decades of ties to the Deep State, one wonders why President Donald Trump appointed him. The Deep State is now engaged in brazen acts of treason apparently to bring down Donald Trump’s duly-elected administration.  For example, GQ news commentator Keith Olbermann just called for foreign intelligence agencies to  help the Deep State bring down Mr. Trump’s administration—the definition of sedition…How can Mueller be impartial? In conclusion, the facts are unavoidable. Robert S. Mueller has substantial conflicts of interest and should recuse himself as Special Counsel before the public demands he be fired.” Problem is, Mueller is where he is because of those “conflicts of interest.” His first loyalty is to the Deep State that has made him one of its bastard sons and he has no intention of doing anything except participating in the deep sixing of the Trump Administration. That’s his assignment!

And in conclusion, the writer asks: “Why is the President of the United States being investigated when the Clintons, Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner are still at large and most certainly should have had a special prosecutor investigating them?” The President is being investigated so Clinton and the rest won’t have to be and can be ignored in favor of dealing with Trump’s ludicrous “Russian collusion.” The Deep State never,  and I repeat, never   intends to prosecute Hillary and Company. They are too big to  pay for their crimes in our current two-tiered justice system, so they will be allowed to go free while Trump is prosecuted for nonentities. That’s the way the Deep State plays the game and shafts the American people.  “Justice” (really, Just Us), is what we say it is. Besides, if Hillary had just been allowed to steal the election as planned, we wouldn’t have to be messing around with all this anyway!

Mr. Trump has been a mighty big inconvenience to the Deep State on their march toward anti-Christian One World Government and they aim to make sure he (and us) pay the price for that—and don’t you forget it!!!

Florida--Another False Flag? Probably!

by Al Benson Jr.

Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America

During the reign of Comrade Obama there were several school shootings and others that were labeled by those who follow this kind of thing as "false flags." False Flag events are designed to elicit a certain response from the general public and are usually conducted with some help from some government agency or part of one.

For instance, one of the big agendas during the Obama Regime was the dismantling of the Second Amendment and our God-given right to defend ourselves and our families. This is definitely a no-no, because if some rogue group in the government, or the government itself, plans FEMA extended vacations for those who oppose it they can't have lots of folks out there with firearms, nor can they have a public atmosphere that is favorable to private ownership of firearms.

Therefore, those in government who want our guns have to create an environment amongst the public that will allow them to seize our weapons with little opposition, physical or otherwise from the general public. One way to create such an environment is to have a series of school shootings where children are either harmed or appear to be harmed and such an event is then heralded by the prostitute press and many in Congress as a reason to "regulate" (eventually confiscate) firearms. They will never admit this--that would give away their agenda.

Obama and his Marxist cronies in government (many of whom still remain in the new Trump administration) were especially good at acting out this scenario. If I recall, I can remember one congressman getting on television and weeping huge crocodile tears for "the children" as he worked tirelessly to eradicate our Second Amendment protection. This scenario has been repeated so often that after awhile you get so you recognize all the various parts of it as the Establishment weaves it all together into a package that it can sell the public to promote its gun control agenda.

There is usually (supposedly) only one shooter, and he ends up dead in most cases so we never get to hear anything he might have said about what really went down. In this most recent case in Florida they caught the patsy (supposed perpetrator) alive. I have heard, from some sources, that the Sheriff in Broward County is an honest man so that may be why the alleged shooter was taken alive. I also heard that the Sheriff, not the FBI, is handling this case, as of now. That may well have saved the alleged shooter's life. After noting such incidents as the Ruby Ridge killing of Randy Weaver's wife and the murder of Lavoy Finicum in Oregon a year ago, you can't blame most folks for figuring that the FBI's intended victims don't often get out alive, to testify or to do much else.

The school shootings during the Obama reign just about all followed the same pattern--a bunch of kids killed in gun free zones and the Obama and other Soros flunkies paraded before the public to plead for them to contact their congress critters and beg  them to enact "sensible" (eventual confiscation) gun control laws to prevent this from ever happening again. You've heard it all before. I call it "the shootings will continue until the public has the right attitude" scenario. Obama, the Marxist president who claimed he was not after our guns was one of the biggest anti-Second Amendment people around. He might only have been exceeded by "Madame President" had she managed to steal the election.

Thankfully, organizations like the Gun Owners of America (not the NRA) managed to put enough pressure on Congress that, while Obama was in office, they didn't dare vote to confiscate our guns. But, just think of the coup the political left could claim now if they managed to get a gun control (confiscation) bill enacted while Trump is in office.  Trump has been a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. Just think of the hay they could make if they managed to get a gun control bill enacted while Trump is in office and he ended up vetoing it. They could scream to the universe that Trump is a callous monster and that he doesn't care about "the children." You all know where that line of bull would go.

Mitt Romney, who is no doubt positioning himself with the Establishment for a presidential run in 2020, has started whimpering that "we have to do something." You're right, Mitt, we do. So how about we start by doing away with gun free zones and by allowing qualified teachers to start carrying during school hours? That would be a big step in the right direction, don't you think?

But that wouldn't fit the agenda of the gun grabbers because, at root, they don't give a tinker's damn about school safety. What they want is gun confiscation, maybe not all at once, but gradually. They will take the Fabian approach if it gives them what they want eventually. Just remember one thing "Gun Control is People Control" and once you surrender your Second Amendment rights you ain't about to get them back before the Second Coming. A  good reason to write your congress critters and tell them to vote NO for any new gun control bill, no matter how innocent it may sound.

The Big Picture? Or Just the Cartoons?

In light of all the fake news coming out of late, our two seasoned political commentators offer their take on all this.
Al Benson Jr.

The Big Picture? Or Just the Cartoons?

by Schwartz & Viscount

As we view what the Establishment Media is trying to peddle to us today (they think we are too stupid to figure out what they are doing) we are forced to ask ourselves--are they really trying to give us the 'big picture" regarding national and world events? Or are they just feeding us the cartoon version of it all in the hope that we never progress beyond the point where we think Bugs Bunny and the Roadrunner are real? The answer should be obvious.

They are seeking to distract us with piddling little side issues, many of them of their own creation. A shining example: Trump's "Russian collusion theory" which just recently one of their own people was caught on video admitting  was "mostly b------t."  They have been howling about this for months now, but evidence? Hey, who needs evidence. We are supposed to take their word for it. After all, they are the "news" media aren't they? Well, aren't they? All their little mind games are supposed to keep us occupied while the Deep State boys work behind the scenes to destroy the Trump presidency with skillful innuendo made to sound factual (as long as you don't look too close). We must learn not to focus on their improvised rabbit trails and keep our eye on what really goes on. To do that you need to keep up with the alternative media.

Most Americans, when the learn the truth, do not want t focus on the Communist News Network's fables prevarications. Most Americans do not want to be part of a World Government-controlled agenda. That's why they voted for Trump. They would much rather have America remain sovereign, the way it was originally created (Original intent).

We are becoming rather fatigued listening to the "squeaky wheels" (thinking they are the big wheels) getting way too much of the oil (money, etc.) simply because of their big mouths. We read a story just yesterday that noted that one of the big "reporters" for a major "news" network was complaining because too many conservative groups are now getting into White House press conferences. He didn't like that because it changes the whole agenda away from what he and his prostitute press buddies like to be able to do--control the news that comes out of these conferences. If there are too many conservative voices in there asking the wrong questions then the socialist "newscasters" can't do that and it just grates on their fragile egos. Isn't that a pity? Don't you just "feel the pain" of this poor socialist pretending he is a real journalist? Why it's almost enough to ruin your whole day! Almost, but not quite!

These Leftist "whineocrats don't want their agendas in news conferences changed because that makes it much more difficult for them to do what they are being paid to do--spin the news in the direction their Deep State employers want it to go in. And if they can't continue to do their required quota of spinning, they might find themselves out of a job. Wouldn't that be horrendous? That situation might leave some room for honest journalists who would try to give the public the truth. Horror of horrors!

So they have a vested (self) interest in making sure the American public never gets the "big picture" (the truth). If such ever happens and a large enough segment of the public found out how these spinmeisters  have been lying to them over the decades, why some might be tempted to hunt for ropes and tall trees. Mind you, we are not advocating that sort of thing, just pointing out the possibilities.

What we would really like to see instead is that these willful purveyors of fake news end up being thoroughly exposed and discredited and have to live with the fact that most people have finally realized what intellectual and journalistic frauds and paupers they really are.

That would be the ultimate humiliation for them, plus the fact that once this happened, their Deep State employers would have no more use for them and so they would be dropped like hot potatoes. They might even have to go and find  honest work--and that would be the greatest humiliation of all!

Who Is John DeStefano?

by Al Benson Jr.

Never heard of John DeStefano? Well, until tonight, neither had I, but as the saying goes, you learn something new every day and I guess today was my day to learn about John DeStefano. I'm not quite sure I like what I learned, but then, I guess you take the bad with the good.

I read an article by Mike Cernovich on www.Infowars.com for May 17th which told me what I needed to know about Mr. DeStefano. Here is some of it. Read it and weep!

Mr. Cernovich says: "Johnny DeStefano, a GOP elite loyalist who never vocally supported Trump, was somehow given the most important job in a presidential transition. As director of presidential personnel, DeStefano decides who will work in the Trump administration. DeStefano has been using his power to undermine Trump in several ways."

"Johnny DeStefano, head of personnel and policy for President Donald Trump, has blocked Trump supporters from the White House, twenty-three people with direct knowledge of hiring and personnel have reported to me. Over 800 Trump supporters hold positions as Schedule C Federal Employees. These positions are temporary and expire after 120 days." Those positions will be up at the end of this week--and who will those people be replaced with?

Cernovich said: "Fewer than 15% of Trump's temporary appointees (Schedule C) have been given permanent positions. Their terms are coming up and they are being sent home...Even pro-Trump interns are being blocked, as another source told me."

"DeStefano has brought in rabid Never Trumpers like Brian Hook...Alex Pfeiffer of the Daily Caller exclusively reported back in March: Brian Hook, a Trump critic and former 
Bush administration official, is currently serving as the State Department's director of policy planning, the Daily Caller has learned..."

"Since taking over at State, Brian Hook has pulled the security clearances of several of Trump's most loyal supporters, putting America's national security at risk. DeStefano has also been coordinating with H. R.  McMaster to 'Make the NSC Democrat Again'." If you want to know who H. R. McMaster is, read the article posted on May 16th on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com entitled False Prophets in the White House?

We have, in effect, a civil war going on in this country at this point--the Trump administration vs. the Deep State, shadown government, or whatever you want to call it. These people are attempting to illegitimately overthrow the legitimate Trump administration and replace it with a horrendous collectivist nightmare of their own concoction.

Mr. Cernovich says: " Tweet this (the Infowars article) to: @RealDonaldTrump." I am not on Twitter so I can't do that  but maybe some of you all can.

Hillary and the Russian Uranium Deal--this question will not be answered!

by Al Benson Jr.

The Deep State, the Democrats, some Republicans, George Soros and the entire political and religious Left continues unabated with their brazen attempt to remove Donald Trump from the presidency. And, as good cultural Marxists, they will do it any way they have to--no matter how crooked or underhanded. Also, as true cultural Marxists, they are busily accusing their opposition of doing the exact same things they have been doing. But this is par for the course--standard operating procedure for them.

The House Intelligence Committee has been focusing on Mr. Trump's supposed involvement with Russia and the Democrats even want the committee chairman, Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from any part in that because he visited the White House. In their opinion this is enough to render him unfit to chair the committee. One wonders why Loretta Lynch, recent head of the "Just Us" Department wasn't asked to recuse herself after she met with Slick Willie at the airport in Phoenix  during the brouhaha over Hillary's emails. But you have to realize, that was "different."

Mr. Trump is finally beginning to publicly ask the questions he should have been asking right at the beginning. I don't know why he has waited so long, but, for whatever reason, it was too long!

Today he said: Why isn't the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill and Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech money to Bill, the Hillary Russian 'resets, praise of Russia by Hillary, or Podesta Russian company...? 

These are all important questions and all should be addressed--but none ever will! No investigative body in Washington will ever bother with these questions. What the President needs to do is to keep asking them over and over and over, just like the fake scumbag "news" media does while continuing to harp on Trump's fake Russian scenario. It appears that there is nothing there, but that doesn't keep the minions of the Deep State from continuing to regurgitate their nonentities. Repeat something long enough and people believe it even if it is totally false. Trump needs to keep asking the questions, get others to ask the questions, and fill the alternative media with these questions--and then keep asking why he isn't getting any answers--over and over and over again. To some extent he has got to use their tactics against them.

And they are good questions--Why hasn't anyone bothered to talk about Hillary's deal that gave Russia 20% of our Uranium? Inquiring minds would really like to know, so the question needs to be asked again and again until we can at least get some political hack in Washington to lie to us about it. At that point his lie can be discussed, debated, and called out for what it really is.

The Deep State will never, ever, answer this question if they can avoid it--so we need to keep asking it until they get sick of hearing it--and then ask it some more!

For a longer version of this article please check out the latest on
http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com 

Our Un-elected Rulers Don't Plan on Letting Trump Be President

by Al Benson Jr.

You can check out the Internet today, January 19, 2017, and pretty well figure that our un-elected rulers, the people who really run things in this country are not about to let Donald Trump become president. Whatever can be done to stop the inauguration and his swearing in will be done and then some flunky from the Obama Regime will be chosen to "fill in" until the Deep State can select a ruler for us that meets their desires (not ours) for us. Their flunkies have been sitting in the White House for decades now and they are not about to surrender that lucrative post to someone who is not one of the boys! 

I saw an interesting article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk  for today.  The article started off with this: The man arrested by Miami Beach police Tuesday for allegedly threatening President-elect Donald Trump online is a member of a prominent northeast family close to Bill and Hillary Clinton. He once gave $20,000 to the Democratic National Committee DailyMail.com has learned...

This man, Dominic Puopolo is being held without bail and is supposedly a computer wizard. According to the Daily Mail article: Puopolo reportedly admitted to posting a video to Twitter, saying: This is the 16th of January 2017, I will be at the review/inauguration and I will kill President Trump, President-elect Trump today...  This sterling individual, on various media platforms has posted as JesusChrist1701. That may be a good example of someone taking the Lord's name in vain. Jesus Christ is hardly a potential assassin as this man seems to be claiming he was. Shows you the sort of friends that Bill and Hillary have doesn't it?

Then we have had all manner of veiled warnings/threats from various individuals from professional politician Chuck Schumer on down to some people on CNN (Communist News Network) making statements that, should something happen to Trump during the inauguration ceremony that someone from the Obama Regime will have to be appointed to fill in until they can decide what they will do. So, if something happens then you will, in effect, have dictatorship by fiat, or maybe we should just call it a coup d' etat and be done with it. 

Then you have a whole batch of Democratic "congresspersons" to use the term charitably that plan not to show up for the inauguration because they claim Trump is not a "legitimate" president. I guess for them the only "legitimate " president would have been some socialist. This guy, John Lewis, from Georgia is one of them and he is beyond laughable--maybe pitiable would be a better word. But then you have to wonder, with all the Democrats planning on not showing up--do they know something other folks don't? Do some of them think the inauguration will be a good place not to be for "other reasons?"

Then you have the head of the CIA, a Muslim named John Brennan, who has also warned Trump about what he can and cannot say. There are lots of folks around that feel that the CIA had more than a little to do with JFK's death in Dallas in 1963. How big a leap is it from that to something that might happen during Trump's inauguration? Hint: it doesn't take a "leap of faith" to get there.

Ever since the election that have been all manner of obstacles put in Trump's way as he moves toward the White House; vote recounts, threats, fake computer hacks (all by Russia, naturally) and other things. The Ruling Establishment is telling Trump, in ways the public is not supposed to surmise, that they don't want him there and, what's more, they plan to make sure he doesn't get there. If he continues to ignore their "charitable advice" then that leaves them two options--work to co-opt his administration and make it ineffective, but that might take awhile and as time passes, the public is beginning to wake up to what goes on. Their journalistic organ, the mainstream media, has already lost almost total credibility. I mean, who really believe the "news" media anymore? Some of what they have put out there for public consumption of late has been ludicrous. The evening "newspaper" might be good for the sports scores and to put in your kitty litter box as liner but its usefulness beyond that is severally limited. 

Their other option is one they'd rather not discuss publicly but is one they have used before. I will give you three guesses as to what that is and the first two don't count.

For a little update on this article please check out the article on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com for January 23, 2017.
 

"Give Me Land, Lotsa Land"

by Al Benson Jr.

When I was a kid around  eight or nine years old, there was a popular song out called "Don't fence me in." The first line of that, or the chorus, I can't recall which, said "Give me land, lotsa land under starry skies above. Don't fence me in." At that point in my life I hadn't traveled all that much and so the idea of the song appealed to me. It still does except that, at my age, I've done most of the traveling I'm likely to do, but I still have the memories and a batch of old photos and I do enjoy both. As a kid I always wanted to go west. When I was 21 years old I finally got to go and once I started I kept going until I couldn't go anymore.

It's a good thing I got to go when I did, in those pre-Obama years when the West was still relatively open, because our soon-to-be-f0rmer Marxist president seems hell bent on shutting down as much Western land as he can so ordinary folks can't get to use it or even see it except from a distance. 

It would seem that he has eagerly embraced the old Marxist concept of  private property being some sort of sin and he'd like to redistribute as much of the property in the West to "the people" (meaning his kind of people and no one else) as he can before he is forced to leave the White House, even though his bosses will force him to remain in Washington as part of their agenda to destabilize a Trump presidency.

Earlier this week I read an article on http://www.mrctv.org written by Brittany M. Hughes and entitled: Obama Seized Enough Land and Water in 8 Years to Cover Texas Three Times. That headline caught my attention. Having been in Texas several times over the years I have come to realize just how big Texas really is and if Obama has taken all that much land in eight years then he has to be one of the greatest land confiscators this country has ever witnessed. 

Hughes' article noted: "Last week, in one of his final moves out of the Oval Office, Obama executively designated more than 1.5 million acres of land as national monuments, preserving their untouched facade while closing them to human expansion, development, energy use, ranching or state or local jurisdiction." And Hughes continued: "In a move ignored by the liberal media...last week, Obama unilaterally  seized more than 1.3 million acres from Utah to establish the Bears Ears Monument,  preserving it at the behest of conservationist groups and Native American tribes who claimed the land was sacred." Utah's state legislature was not overjoyed with this and they opposed it. Some have speculated this is One of Obama's moves to try to limit Trump's efforts to increase domestic energy production, which would not surprise me in the least. But like all good Marxists with an agenda, Obama kills two birds with one stone here. He not only limits a new administration's attempts at new energy production but he also locks up the property to keep ordinary folks off much of it.

He did the same thing in Clark County, Nevada when he took land for the Gold Butte National Monument. This just about shut the whole area down to any uranium mining, and oil drilling, as well as any future natural gas production. Can't have Obama's Muslim buddies in the Middle East losing out on their profits because the United States can take steps to be more energy independent now, can we. The utmost last thing Obama wants is any kind of independence for this country. He has spent two terms in office trying to shut down that kind of thing, whether it's offshore oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico or trying to stop that pipeline that's supposed to cross the country for north to south and provide lots of new jobs in the process. He has to stop that kind of stuff and he works mightily at it. Those that voted this person into office so he could spend eight years trashing our economy while crying alligator tears for the middle class (who he really hates) will at some point, have to answer for their votes--and I'm glad it's them and not me!

Interesting to note is the land he took in Nevada is in Clark County where the big fuss over the Bundy Ranch situation happened. Looks like the feds won't have any opposition in Clark County now--most of it is in jail. Protecting your God-given rights anymore can be costly.

In Nevada the feds already control over 80% of the land, leaving only 20% for private interests and the folks in the state. So what do they need another 300,000 acres on top of all that for? So private citizens can't use it to make a living that might render them somewhat independent that's why. The Ruling Elite wants no independent citizens, only subservient slaves, so any attempts at liberty have to be suppressed--any way they can, any way they have to because, after all, the end (total slavery) justifies the means according to Marxist dogma.

This is the sort of thing Trump was elected to prevent. Let's hope he gets the chance and that Comrade Obama doesn't end up confiscating it all (in the name of the people) before Trump even gets in office.

I've said it before and I will say it again, the folks in the South with their unique heritage and the folks in the West with their unique heritage (both of which are connected) have the same enemies--liberals, socialists, communists, and the ruling CFR/Trilateral Establishment. Both Southerners and Westerners need to realize this and try to help one another out wherever they can. The Ruling Elite, if it can, will willingly destroy both of our cultures. 

For another article along these same lines please check out http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
for January 6, 2017. The article is entitled  The Establishment Declares Guerilla Warfare Against Trump Administration. 

Is Obama's Last Chore To Start A War With Russia?

by Al Benson Jr.

A friend called me tonight after watching the TV "news" and told me that Comrade Obama was imposing more sanctions on Russia to their alleged plot to influence the US elections. Knowing Obama, such an action comes as no real surprise.

Having watched his actions in the past month I am convinced that he is in the process of trying to throw a monkey wrench into whatever gears of normal government may still remain in Washington. He wants, as do his bosses in the Ruling Establishment, to hand Trump the proverbial "hell in a hand basket" when he takes office. And part of that hell may be starting a war with the Russians. After all, it's what Hillary wanted to do and now that she seems to have been put aside, at least temporarily, Obama has got to do the whole chore on his own. Of course he will have plenty of guidance in the effort from those above him. A war with Russia that he could pass along to Trump would be his last great coup--sort of a "I'll spit in your eye" kind of departure. Somewhat akin to "dancing on your grave!"

He has ordered that thirty five Russian diplomats be ejected from this country and he has, according to reports, closed down two Russian compounds, one in New York and one in Maryland, supposedly in response to "Russian harassment of American diplomats in Moscow." Now I don't know if American diplomats in Moscow have been harassed or not, If so it would not be the first time.

Now I'm not in love with the Russian government, and Putin is an ex-KGB personality and I have never believed that the KGB just disappeared after the Berlin Wall came down as so many naive souls have stated. True, the name was changed but the apparatus to operate it remained. However, as much as I dislike Putin, I believe the US Establishment is using him as an excuse to attack the credibility of a new Trump administration by planting the rumors that all the "fake news" the "alt-right" supposedly planted out there has been coming from Russia. It's interesting that all those who now have a big problem with Russian seemed to have no problem with it when it was officially a part of the Soviet Union. Anti-Communists they were not and they still aren't.

According to an article from Business Insider by Pamela Engel: "The CIA has said the Russians had been working toward a specific goal when they hacked into the inboxes of Democratic National Committee staffers and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta: 'to help get (Donald) Trump elected'  president."

At first the FBI and the NSA, if I recall correctly, both disagreed with the CIA that the Russians had had anything to do with all the hacking that went on. They continued in their disagreement with the CIA until, at one point one day, we were treated to a media story about how, suddenly, the FBI and the NSA seemed to have a prophetic revelation and all of a sudden they totally agreed with the CIA that the Russians had been doing all this stuff. Both agencies suddenly caved in, I think per instruction from someone above them, and admitted that it was all the Russians' fault and that, without the Russians, somehow, Trump would not have made it to the White House and we would have been blessed with the autocratic rule of Queen Hillary instead. And don't think that, even at this late date, if they could find a way to pull such a stunt off they wouldn't do it in a New York heartbeat!

But if they can't accomplish that, then the least Obama can do is to start a war with the Russians before he leaves office and hand Trump a fait accompli when he gets sworn in. After all, if you had the bosses that Obama has, wouldn't you do it--or else???

There is an article on LewRockwell.com for December 30th by Daisy Luther dealing with this same situation that is worth reading.

Deplorable--and Beyond

This article has been submitted by two gentlemen who have been astute observers of the political scene for several decades. Their names may or may not be recognizable to many and because of this they have chosen to provide this article with pseudonyms rather than actual identities. Given that we seem to be entering an era where the truth is being condemned as "fake news" while baldfaced cultural Marxist fabrications are being  parroted as eternal verity they felt that might be the best policy. In a time when telling the truth has become a revolutionary act these two have chosen the path of journalistic revolution. I think many will agree with their assessment. Quite naturally the Left will call them liars, but then, in the movie Braveheart the narrator paints a similar situation when he says The English will call me a liar--but history is written by those who have hanged heroes."

Al Benson Jr.

Deplorable--and Beyond

by Sammy Schwartz, with Vance Viscount

It seems that Hillary thoroughly understands DEPLORABLE. It really does "take one to know one." Pointing the finger at any opposition is easy when she knows how to intimidate people. And there is an old Marxist trick she has learned to employ called "Condemn others (for what you yourself are doing) and elevate yourself." 

The fact is: The way she has treated people who have gotten in her & Bill's) way is, not just deplorable, but especially, despicable and inexcusable.  We've seen lists (50+) of those who have gotten in her and his way and have met their demise.

That goes back to the "Mena (AR) Connection" from where arms shipments were being delivered to Nicaragua for "the Contra Rebels" who were fighting a vile regime.

Each delivery of munitions too two full planes to complete a full order; however, upon each return trip, a third plane was being escorted back, delivering drugs to Arkansas. When the airport fuel supply attendant stayed to witness the reason for missing quantities of petrol is when he discovered an extra plane. He had security detain that pilot, who claimed his legal right to one phone call. Within 30 minutes this happened...

The governor of Arkansas came and said, "You cannot hold this man; you must release him to me." That governor was none other than: "Slick Willie" William Jefferson Clinton. And, many surrounding that particular incident met their demise to make sure it was 'covered up" as best possible...some of those other witnesses "permanently," including two boys who happened to be walking the railroad tracks nearby.

That may not have been the beginning of the long string of so-called "carpet-sweeping,"  but the killings went to and through the two terms of the Clinton Presidency, which also included military bodyguards, pilots, and on-and-on.

Deplorable is a minor term for what Hillary was definitely "a party to." As Rodney Dangerfield used to say. "I get NO respect!" That is exactly what the Clintons have displayed for human beings, including Bill's continual and constant string of women who, (may or may not have) received injections or ingestions of drugs and/or sperm for their willing, or unwilling, receptions of sexual play from "Slick Willie."

It is a fact that too many people who unluckily happened  to "get in the way" of both Bill and Hillary (and their agenda), didn't make it to see the light of another day. Can anyone spell VINCE FOSTER? For a little background information, read the book Hell To Pay by Barbara Olson, published by Regnery Publishing in 1999.

"Deplorable" is a minor term for those types of atrocities. Complicity, condoning and "Enabling" might be better words for what Hillary seems to have NO problem allowing. SO WHY in the world would she think that good people in the United States would be willing to tolerate even more of the same from her? 

We are not done with this subject.

And, in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, we have had "cry-ins" and all other sorts of denials, including what appears to be George Soros' funded vote recounts,  with mysterious overnight bank deposits at 3:00 a.m. (E.S.T.). It goes without saying that the majority of Americans in the millions have awakened and spoken greatly through efforts of honesty. The Alternative Media, the so-called "fake news" (which is really the truth) have played a major part in this. You see, Separation of "Church and State" as currently portrayed, never really existed. Thoroughly tired of "crooks and liars," Christians brought forth their voice to shout "Thy Will Be Done!" Pray it stands!

Liberals (socialists) have gotten away with "Fudging the Truth" for far too long! So, frankly, to correct their previously docile attitudes, the "no-longer" silent majority spoke loudly and clearly  at the ballot box. We "deplorable" (meaning 'sad") folks have arisen, and reacted strongly for what America stands for. And, we have gotten on our feet and used our truly God-Given "Freedom of Speech"  to pass the word through direct communications, the internet & "Face-book"  to express to liberals & the rest of the world, that the Heartland of America is "fed up" with the phony Political-INcorrectness  that has plagued our nation for far too long.

We are tired of being intimidated by the Network Media, who have continued to lie and who try to justify their bias and their most-unjust reporting. We are more than tired of those Hollywood moguls who use their stardom and "pseudo-prestigious"  positions trying to sway others to their liberal line of thinking. We heard that several of these people threatened to leave the country if Trump was elected? Are they still here, and if so, why? Well, we don't buy what they sell. We don't wish to follow "fads" like ignorant sheep, admiring those who should really be frowned upon for their many abominable behaviors. Many of those so-called "stars" (in their own minds) are just acting...parts that are not really themselves;  so, really, they are "phony-balonies" in many facets of their lives. There are some who have maintained their standards and principles. But many actors, trying to influence youth and young adults to act and misbehave like some do, have distorted what real moral foundations previous American Christian family generations have long conveyed.

Frankly, we are "fed up" with the cheating, lying to our faces, and hearing other liberal socialists condoning those lies; we are really tired of the crooked smiling and lying, straight to our faces. Living in lie-after-lie seems to be the liberal socialist way of existing. We are exhausted from being intimidated for valued truths. 

So you conservatives, QUIT allowing yourselves to feel that YOU are the ones who are wrong, when you know, deep down in your heart-of-hearts those esteemed truths are right.

No longer accept cheating and lying. Continue to stay "fighting mad." And do NOT allow yourselves to become "intimidated" by liberal socialists.  To describe what liberals really are, we must say that they are: bitter, beastly, depraved, despicable, dreadful, evil, hateful, heinous, hurtful, pitiful, sinister, venomous, wretched, wicked, ungodly, vile and yes: "deplorable" souls. i.e. (that is) means: sad and regrettable. 

Also, every liberal continues to be a P.I.T.A. to us. 
That means: 
    P= Pain
          I=In
               T=The
                    A=Ass   

Comey Puppet Continues To Howl "Not Guilty, Not Guilty, Not Guilty!

by Al Benson Jr.

Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.

So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.

On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.

Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.

I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails  in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as  pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous!  An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/  noted  that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."

So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration  had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.

So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?

So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be. 

test

See if you can get into http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com

I asked people to try to get into my blog because on the morning of November 3rd I had tried to open it via Firefox and it would not open. When I went to check, I found out that, on Firefox, my blog was not even listed anymore. Guess I must have offended someone somehow. Didn't think my material was THAT controversial!

When I went to Google and put up the same search pages I found that my blog was still listed on Google's search pages, so if you want to check out my articles you may have to get into them by some other source than Firefox.

In following the odd trends in the present election cycle I note that the Clinton Camp has indulged in all manner of claims against both Trump and Wikileaks, claiming that both are being heavily influenced by Putin and the Russians. Now I am no fan of Putin's by any stretch of the imagination, but let's don't start blaming him for things he probably had no hand in.

And speaking of Hillary's loathing for Putin, didn't she have some kind of deal with him awhile back whereby they managed to sell Putin 20% of the Uranium in this country? Wonder if any of that Uranium was on land that was anyplace close to the Bundy Ranch in Nevada?

Watched a video a couple nights ago that had been on stevepiecznik.com in which Mr. Piecznik noted that the material that came from Wikileaks was not passed to them by the Russians but, in reality, came from somewhere in the intelligence community, what Mr. Piecznik referred to as "deep state officials." Mr. Piecznik is a former assistant secretary of state and has been around the intelligence community for decades.

He warned of a "Clinton coup' etat" in which the Clintons had "co-opted" the FBI, CIA, and other groups but he said that there were those in these groups that were sincere patriots and they had initiated a counter-coup, part of which was the turning over to Julian Assange all these Clinton emails that he has been putting out there. The FBI's reopening of the Clinton email situation is part of this. So it will be interesting to see how all of this turns out. Whatever one may think of Trump, electing his opposite number in the Democratic Establishment is unthinkable for the future of this country. If such happens, we will, in fact, end up having no country at all. Trump seems to understand this and, for good reason, is opposed to Hillary's "open borders" approach to dismantling the country in favor of merging it into some kind of continental mega-state.

So stay alert to all this--and pray that the Lord will throw a monkey wrench into the gears of the One World Government boys' plans for us--and I mean pray seriously about this.