by Al Benson Jr.
Mr. Trump tweeted sometime today about being all alone on Christmas Eve tweeting messages to promote his America first agenda. He was being humorous when he did it, but as you watch the Swamp Creatures in that gigantic, corrupt ooze that we refer to as Washington, I really wonder if Mr. Trump realizes just how alone he really is in that bucket of political slime.
There is almost no one in Washington that wants to see his agenda, work out, even though it will benefit the average American. Most of the Washington slime balls hate Trump so much they would gladly trash the country and its people just to take Trump down--and this includes lots of our "elected" representatives--which fact amply demonstrates that they don't really care about their constituents back home. We only exist to pay their fat salaries and make sure, with those fat-cat salaries, they have enough time to work at subverting the country.
The Demoncrats have already shown us that they will do anything to promote open borders and deep six real border security. Their total allegiance is to the Deep State--the CFR/Trilateral/Bilderberg cabal and the military/industrial warmongers. These are their gods and these are who they serve and worship, along with lots of lying Republicans.
The real friends Trump has in Washington consist of a couple senators, a handful of House members and maybe some in the military that can't say or do much of anything without fear of being punished. Mr. Trump has people in his own family circle that support the agenda of his adversaries--like the Bible says--"A man's foes shall be they of his own house."
I hope Mr. Trump, at this point, realizes just how alone with his agenda he really is. If he does, I pray that he will seriously ask for and seek Divine Guidance as to just what he needs to do to defeat those that are trying to take him down.
Mr. Trump, like all of us, is a flawed human being and needs the Lord's help to do what he needs to do. I can understand Rand Paul's statement, made several months ago, where he said he wakes up every morning and thanks God we got Trump instead of St. Hillary for president. Had we gotten her, the country, for all intents and purposes, would be gone by now.
Maybe we should all do the same--thank God we got Trump when we really, for our sins, deserved Hillary! And maybe we should start praying that the Lord will guide and help Mr. Trump to know how he ought to proceed and that the Lord will give him some patriotic people who will help him promote his agenda instead of these leftist neo-cons who get into important positions and then use them to destroy the country.
I just read an article on Breitbart this afternoon where James (the truthful one) Comey made the statement that "There's no deep state." Here's a worthy individual who has been caught lying under oath how many times, and he sits there with a smug smirk on his puss and blithely informs us that the deep state does not exist! Does he really think we are all that stupid? Or is he so used to prevarication that he doesn't give a tinker's damn? Anyone believing this guy or any of his buddies that are all part of the Deep State, deserves to be fooled! He's about as honest as Honest Abe was.
Let's face it, the American people have been getting lied to for over 150 years now. Maybe its time we woke up, got our kids out of those brain laundries we call public schools and quit believing the fake news media and started finding our for ourselves what's really going on. I guarantee, if you are willing to do that you won't like what you find.
Showing posts with label Bilderberg Group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bilderberg Group. Show all posts
Monday, December 24, 2018
Sunday, November 04, 2018
Scumbags of the World Unite!
by Al Benson Jr.
I suppose, in sort of a left-handed way, all of us white folks are supposed to be thankful to Michael Moore, Hitlery Clinton, Obama and all the rest of the Leftist coterie that is part and parcel of the Deep State for them telling us what scumbags all white folks are. I mean, after all, where else would we have ever found out how deplorable all white folks are if those on the Far, Far Left hadn't been so concerned with our "welfare" that they just had to let us know how horrible we all really are?
Of course I find it interesting that some of these folks that have taken great paints to inform us of how terrible we are also happen to be white. Does that make them as horrendous as the rest of us? Logical thought would dictate that it should, just because of their skin color you would think. But, no, somehow, as white as they are, they plead that they are not as bad as all the rest of us. We are bad, but, somehow, in their omniscience, they have managed to rise above all that. After all, how would they know how terrible we all really are if they had not reached that elevated status that reveals to them how bad we are and how good they are?
You see, if you really delve into it all, it tends to get complicated. It seems that "white" is really sort of virtuous if it is on the Left politically. It only becomes horrible if you happen to be on the Right politically. Got that? In other words "white is really right, if it's on the Left. It's only when it's Right that it's wrong!
To those on the Left it all makes perfect sense, but to normal people, it reeks of bovine fertilizer--you're just not supposed to notice the smell. Just pretend it ain't there and it will go away, so they tell us.
You see you have these folks over on the political Left that are cultural Marxists. A cultural Marxist is someone who doesn't want you to know he or she is a Marxist, so instead they refer to themselves as being politically correct, or "progressive." They use the latter term because they think it actually fools people into thinking they are way ahead of the curve. The English have a term for one who is crazy. They say he's "right round the bend." I wonder if that's what the progressives mean by being ahead of the curve. Does that mean they have reached the state of insanity quicker than the rest of us? Based on some of what they've tried to pull lately it could well mean that, as some Leftist actions of late do seem a bit unhinged--but then, I have to remember that I am only a lowly white scumbag and so may be totally incapable of discerning the convoluted progressions of the high and mighty Leftists among us. They may have attained a plane of existence that I am unable to contemplate.
Years ago Johnny Cash did a song that said "The one on the left is in the middle and the one on the right is on the left" or something to that effect. Confusing I admit, but often something like that may well sum up where the Left really is, or thinks it is, or possibly is--or whatever!
The paragons of virtue on the Left have been noted for decades now for not making sense to rational people--but then rational people are probably all scumbags along with us miserable white folks. I recall, during World War 2 or just before it, the Soviet Communists really hated the German fascists (who were really their political second cousins) and all the Communist literature parroted that fact. Then one day Hitler and Stalin sat down and made a pact to divide Poland up between then and voila, overnight, the Soviets and the Germans commenced a gigantic European socialist lovefest that even threw their staunchest devotees for a loop--especially in this country! What had been reprehensible yesterday became totally acceptable today. Such is Leftist, what shall we say--paranoia?
Don't try to figure out the Leftist lovebirds by any normal means. You will be doomed to failure. You do need to discern what they are all about but, in the long run you can only do that with prayer and Divine Guidance.
Once we white scumbags (and other scumbags not on the Left) have prayed and sought Divine Guidance, then what we must do is to unite together as concerned scumbags and resist the Left and those who continue to finance it. As the man says "Scumbags of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but the chains the Deep State would bind you down with."
I suppose, in sort of a left-handed way, all of us white folks are supposed to be thankful to Michael Moore, Hitlery Clinton, Obama and all the rest of the Leftist coterie that is part and parcel of the Deep State for them telling us what scumbags all white folks are. I mean, after all, where else would we have ever found out how deplorable all white folks are if those on the Far, Far Left hadn't been so concerned with our "welfare" that they just had to let us know how horrible we all really are?
Of course I find it interesting that some of these folks that have taken great paints to inform us of how terrible we are also happen to be white. Does that make them as horrendous as the rest of us? Logical thought would dictate that it should, just because of their skin color you would think. But, no, somehow, as white as they are, they plead that they are not as bad as all the rest of us. We are bad, but, somehow, in their omniscience, they have managed to rise above all that. After all, how would they know how terrible we all really are if they had not reached that elevated status that reveals to them how bad we are and how good they are?
You see, if you really delve into it all, it tends to get complicated. It seems that "white" is really sort of virtuous if it is on the Left politically. It only becomes horrible if you happen to be on the Right politically. Got that? In other words "white is really right, if it's on the Left. It's only when it's Right that it's wrong!
To those on the Left it all makes perfect sense, but to normal people, it reeks of bovine fertilizer--you're just not supposed to notice the smell. Just pretend it ain't there and it will go away, so they tell us.
You see you have these folks over on the political Left that are cultural Marxists. A cultural Marxist is someone who doesn't want you to know he or she is a Marxist, so instead they refer to themselves as being politically correct, or "progressive." They use the latter term because they think it actually fools people into thinking they are way ahead of the curve. The English have a term for one who is crazy. They say he's "right round the bend." I wonder if that's what the progressives mean by being ahead of the curve. Does that mean they have reached the state of insanity quicker than the rest of us? Based on some of what they've tried to pull lately it could well mean that, as some Leftist actions of late do seem a bit unhinged--but then, I have to remember that I am only a lowly white scumbag and so may be totally incapable of discerning the convoluted progressions of the high and mighty Leftists among us. They may have attained a plane of existence that I am unable to contemplate.
Years ago Johnny Cash did a song that said "The one on the left is in the middle and the one on the right is on the left" or something to that effect. Confusing I admit, but often something like that may well sum up where the Left really is, or thinks it is, or possibly is--or whatever!
The paragons of virtue on the Left have been noted for decades now for not making sense to rational people--but then rational people are probably all scumbags along with us miserable white folks. I recall, during World War 2 or just before it, the Soviet Communists really hated the German fascists (who were really their political second cousins) and all the Communist literature parroted that fact. Then one day Hitler and Stalin sat down and made a pact to divide Poland up between then and voila, overnight, the Soviets and the Germans commenced a gigantic European socialist lovefest that even threw their staunchest devotees for a loop--especially in this country! What had been reprehensible yesterday became totally acceptable today. Such is Leftist, what shall we say--paranoia?
Don't try to figure out the Leftist lovebirds by any normal means. You will be doomed to failure. You do need to discern what they are all about but, in the long run you can only do that with prayer and Divine Guidance.
Once we white scumbags (and other scumbags not on the Left) have prayed and sought Divine Guidance, then what we must do is to unite together as concerned scumbags and resist the Left and those who continue to finance it. As the man says "Scumbags of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but the chains the Deep State would bind you down with."
Friday, November 24, 2017
"Journalists" Here and Abroad, Yesterday and Today
by Al Benson Jr.
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America
Thoughts about journalists in our day tend to be somewhat tainted and jaded--and for that you have to blame the journalists themselves. Let's face it, bastions of truth and accuracy the journalists have not been. I, with others, have labeled them as "the prostitute press" and in the main, I don't think that's too far off.
In my library I have some books for enjoyable reading. One of those is one called The Red Fox, written by Anthony Hyde. It's fiction, but in it Mr. Hyde makes several observations that are worth some reflection. For instance, on page 53, one of the characters in the story asks the question "Who rules the rulers?" That's something many of us have asked for a long time, and in some instances where we could, tried to answer it. It's a question worth considering, although most people won't.
On page 233 he discusses Soviet "journalists" and seeks to compare them to western journalists to point out the differences. I don't doubt, when he got this book published (1985) he thought it was an honest question. Today I'm not so sure. The Red Fox is an excellent story and it does hold your interest. You can tell that Mr. Hyde did a lot of research to come up with all the detail in the book. I have heard that this is the way he usually writes, though I have not ever been able to come up with any of his other books, and I have looked. To me that means that people hang onto them like I do and they seldom make their way into used book stores. This is the mark of an entertaining and engaging writer. I've read my copy of The Red Fox fully half a dozen times over the years.
Having said that, I'm not sure Mr. Hyde recognized how similar Soviet and American "journalists" really are. In the Soviet Union the "journalists" were expected to hew the Party line, and if they didn't, in short order, they were no longer journalists. Sad to say it has not been much different here. Many of the journalists or reporters I have run across in this country do exactly the same thing. I did an article before the last election about how the media was nothing more than Hillary's water carrier. And everything I have seen since the last election has only reinforced that view, except they don't only carry water for Hillary, they also carry it for what we call "The Deep State" or the Establishment, or whatever you want to call those that really "rule the rulers."
The idea that the "news media" exists to give the public the unbiased, objective truth about what really goes on has long since gone by the boards. It disappeared with the Tooth Fairy and the Man in the Moon, at least for most normal people. Nowadays the media gives us what "those who rule the rulers" think is pertinent for their well-being, not ours. True, there are exceptions. The alternative media, The Drudge Report, InfoWars, LewRockwell, World Net Daily and a handful of others out there are able to give concerned people enough truth that they are beginning to have some idea of what really goes down. That hasn't always been the case. If you want real news, these are the sources you have to turn to turn to because what we refer to as the "Main Stream Media" has dissolved into nothing more than "fake news" and pure propaganda--Soviet style! If you follow only them you will have a completely skewed view of world events, and particularly what goes on in the White House during the Trump administration. The regular media gets it wrong so much of the time that you have to realize they are doing it on purpose. Were it only accidental, they would err on the side of accuracy now and again, but this never happens.
Sadly, this is not an especially new development. It has gone on for many years, though sometimes a little less spectacularly than at present. Back before the War of Northern Aggression the "journalists" in the North were making such an icon out of John Brown, the abolitionist/terrorist, that he was literally being compared to Jesus Christ and the gallows he hung on was being compared to Jesus' cross. Talk about an exercise in blasphemy! This, and the propaganda being dished out by writers of the ilk of Harriet Beecher Stowe, helped to fuel the fires of war in the late 1850s and painted the entire South with a wholly unrealistic brush.
So let us not kid ourselves--"journalists" in America, at least in the last 150 years, have not stood for "truth, justice, and the American way." They have stood for pushing the agenda, whatever it may have been at the time, of those that "rule the rulers" and the real truth be hanged!
If you want to find out who "rules the rulers" than I suggest you do a little homework. (About 7% of those that read this will follow through). Get on the internet and check out the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, and while you are at it check out the Clinton Foundation. If you are willing to do at least this much then you will come away with a whole different concept of who really runs things in this country and the world. And then you can ask the other question one of Mr. Hyde's characters in his book puts forth; "What the hell will they do to us next?"
Member, Board of Directors, Confederate Society of America
Thoughts about journalists in our day tend to be somewhat tainted and jaded--and for that you have to blame the journalists themselves. Let's face it, bastions of truth and accuracy the journalists have not been. I, with others, have labeled them as "the prostitute press" and in the main, I don't think that's too far off.
In my library I have some books for enjoyable reading. One of those is one called The Red Fox, written by Anthony Hyde. It's fiction, but in it Mr. Hyde makes several observations that are worth some reflection. For instance, on page 53, one of the characters in the story asks the question "Who rules the rulers?" That's something many of us have asked for a long time, and in some instances where we could, tried to answer it. It's a question worth considering, although most people won't.
On page 233 he discusses Soviet "journalists" and seeks to compare them to western journalists to point out the differences. I don't doubt, when he got this book published (1985) he thought it was an honest question. Today I'm not so sure. The Red Fox is an excellent story and it does hold your interest. You can tell that Mr. Hyde did a lot of research to come up with all the detail in the book. I have heard that this is the way he usually writes, though I have not ever been able to come up with any of his other books, and I have looked. To me that means that people hang onto them like I do and they seldom make their way into used book stores. This is the mark of an entertaining and engaging writer. I've read my copy of The Red Fox fully half a dozen times over the years.
Having said that, I'm not sure Mr. Hyde recognized how similar Soviet and American "journalists" really are. In the Soviet Union the "journalists" were expected to hew the Party line, and if they didn't, in short order, they were no longer journalists. Sad to say it has not been much different here. Many of the journalists or reporters I have run across in this country do exactly the same thing. I did an article before the last election about how the media was nothing more than Hillary's water carrier. And everything I have seen since the last election has only reinforced that view, except they don't only carry water for Hillary, they also carry it for what we call "The Deep State" or the Establishment, or whatever you want to call those that really "rule the rulers."
The idea that the "news media" exists to give the public the unbiased, objective truth about what really goes on has long since gone by the boards. It disappeared with the Tooth Fairy and the Man in the Moon, at least for most normal people. Nowadays the media gives us what "those who rule the rulers" think is pertinent for their well-being, not ours. True, there are exceptions. The alternative media, The Drudge Report, InfoWars, LewRockwell, World Net Daily and a handful of others out there are able to give concerned people enough truth that they are beginning to have some idea of what really goes down. That hasn't always been the case. If you want real news, these are the sources you have to turn to turn to because what we refer to as the "Main Stream Media" has dissolved into nothing more than "fake news" and pure propaganda--Soviet style! If you follow only them you will have a completely skewed view of world events, and particularly what goes on in the White House during the Trump administration. The regular media gets it wrong so much of the time that you have to realize they are doing it on purpose. Were it only accidental, they would err on the side of accuracy now and again, but this never happens.
Sadly, this is not an especially new development. It has gone on for many years, though sometimes a little less spectacularly than at present. Back before the War of Northern Aggression the "journalists" in the North were making such an icon out of John Brown, the abolitionist/terrorist, that he was literally being compared to Jesus Christ and the gallows he hung on was being compared to Jesus' cross. Talk about an exercise in blasphemy! This, and the propaganda being dished out by writers of the ilk of Harriet Beecher Stowe, helped to fuel the fires of war in the late 1850s and painted the entire South with a wholly unrealistic brush.
So let us not kid ourselves--"journalists" in America, at least in the last 150 years, have not stood for "truth, justice, and the American way." They have stood for pushing the agenda, whatever it may have been at the time, of those that "rule the rulers" and the real truth be hanged!
If you want to find out who "rules the rulers" than I suggest you do a little homework. (About 7% of those that read this will follow through). Get on the internet and check out the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, and while you are at it check out the Clinton Foundation. If you are willing to do at least this much then you will come away with a whole different concept of who really runs things in this country and the world. And then you can ask the other question one of Mr. Hyde's characters in his book puts forth; "What the hell will they do to us next?"
Friday, May 05, 2017
Is The Deep State About to Try to Overthrow Trump?
by Al Benson Jr.
All day today 5/5/17 on the Internet there have been news clips about how the Deep State is in the process of removing Donald Trump from the office of President. There has been commentary about "secret meetings" among some in Congress and there was an article in New Yorker magazine about just exactly to legally go about doing this. So it's on the minds of Establishment thinkers.
It's no secret that the Ruling Establishment does not like Trump's agenda to return power back to the American people, and so they must find a way to thwart that effort so they can continue to hang onto the control over us they have had for decades now. No tyrant willingly surrenders his control over others--he, or they will do whatever is necessary to retain total control. This seems to be where we are at this point.
If I have it right, this is the way it works. Under the 25th Amendment, in order to preserve what they refer to as the Continuity of Government if a majority of the President's cabinet, for some reason, think he is unfit to continue in office, they can remove him.
The President can challenge this, but then the proceeding would have to go to the House, where at this point, Paul Ryan is the Speaker, and he is not exactly Mr. Trump's most enthusiastic supporter. I have always had my doubts about Mr. Ryan, even since he was Mitt Romney's vice-presidential running mate.
It's also worth noting that some members of Trump's cabinet have Establishment backgrounds. How some of them got their posts is a mystery. They are not who I would have picked to support my agenda if I were Trump. So I wonder, if Trump picked them on his own, or did he have "advice" from someone with ulterior motive?
If for some reason this plan goes awry, then the Deep State denizens can fall back on some kind of impeachment process. You have to know the Ruling Establishment (Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission/Bilderbergers, George Soros, etc. are behind all this.
These people have been dogging Trump's trail ever since he got elected. They have never stopped trying to destabilize his administration, never backed off, except to plot new strategy to take him down when their current effort failed and they had to regroup and try again. You have to admit, if you are honest, that you have never seen a presidency dogged by such intense bad publicity and outright lies by what passes for the "news" media. You must admit that today's "news" media has taken prevarication and delusion to even greater levels than heretofore they had. What's going on now makes Watergate almost seem like child's play.
So keep your eyes open. You may be about to witness the overthrow of your duly elected President and his replacement with some Deep State stooge that will pander to the Establishment and do whatever they want him/her/it to do as they seek to roll back Trump's agenda and take us all back to Square One--the first stages of Modern Feudalism!
One thing you can do about all this is to pray. Ask the Lord to throw a spiritual monkey wrench into this scheme. For more background, check out www.infowars.com and www.stonecoldtruth.com and for a chaser, try www.brietbart.com on the Internet for more detail than I can give here. If this does happen, your only hope, humanly speaking, might well be to do what the Southern States did in 1861. Better that than to live in bondage!
All day today 5/5/17 on the Internet there have been news clips about how the Deep State is in the process of removing Donald Trump from the office of President. There has been commentary about "secret meetings" among some in Congress and there was an article in New Yorker magazine about just exactly to legally go about doing this. So it's on the minds of Establishment thinkers.
It's no secret that the Ruling Establishment does not like Trump's agenda to return power back to the American people, and so they must find a way to thwart that effort so they can continue to hang onto the control over us they have had for decades now. No tyrant willingly surrenders his control over others--he, or they will do whatever is necessary to retain total control. This seems to be where we are at this point.
If I have it right, this is the way it works. Under the 25th Amendment, in order to preserve what they refer to as the Continuity of Government if a majority of the President's cabinet, for some reason, think he is unfit to continue in office, they can remove him.
The President can challenge this, but then the proceeding would have to go to the House, where at this point, Paul Ryan is the Speaker, and he is not exactly Mr. Trump's most enthusiastic supporter. I have always had my doubts about Mr. Ryan, even since he was Mitt Romney's vice-presidential running mate.
It's also worth noting that some members of Trump's cabinet have Establishment backgrounds. How some of them got their posts is a mystery. They are not who I would have picked to support my agenda if I were Trump. So I wonder, if Trump picked them on his own, or did he have "advice" from someone with ulterior motive?
If for some reason this plan goes awry, then the Deep State denizens can fall back on some kind of impeachment process. You have to know the Ruling Establishment (Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission/Bilderbergers, George Soros, etc. are behind all this.
These people have been dogging Trump's trail ever since he got elected. They have never stopped trying to destabilize his administration, never backed off, except to plot new strategy to take him down when their current effort failed and they had to regroup and try again. You have to admit, if you are honest, that you have never seen a presidency dogged by such intense bad publicity and outright lies by what passes for the "news" media. You must admit that today's "news" media has taken prevarication and delusion to even greater levels than heretofore they had. What's going on now makes Watergate almost seem like child's play.
So keep your eyes open. You may be about to witness the overthrow of your duly elected President and his replacement with some Deep State stooge that will pander to the Establishment and do whatever they want him/her/it to do as they seek to roll back Trump's agenda and take us all back to Square One--the first stages of Modern Feudalism!
One thing you can do about all this is to pray. Ask the Lord to throw a spiritual monkey wrench into this scheme. For more background, check out www.infowars.com and www.stonecoldtruth.com and for a chaser, try www.brietbart.com on the Internet for more detail than I can give here. If this does happen, your only hope, humanly speaking, might well be to do what the Southern States did in 1861. Better that than to live in bondage!
Monday, March 27, 2017
Hillary and the Russian Uranium Deal--this question will not be answered!
by Al Benson Jr.
The Deep State, the Democrats, some Republicans, George Soros and the entire political and religious Left continues unabated with their brazen attempt to remove Donald Trump from the presidency. And, as good cultural Marxists, they will do it any way they have to--no matter how crooked or underhanded. Also, as true cultural Marxists, they are busily accusing their opposition of doing the exact same things they have been doing. But this is par for the course--standard operating procedure for them.
The House Intelligence Committee has been focusing on Mr. Trump's supposed involvement with Russia and the Democrats even want the committee chairman, Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from any part in that because he visited the White House. In their opinion this is enough to render him unfit to chair the committee. One wonders why Loretta Lynch, recent head of the "Just Us" Department wasn't asked to recuse herself after she met with Slick Willie at the airport in Phoenix during the brouhaha over Hillary's emails. But you have to realize, that was "different."
Mr. Trump is finally beginning to publicly ask the questions he should have been asking right at the beginning. I don't know why he has waited so long, but, for whatever reason, it was too long!
Today he said: Why isn't the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill and Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech money to Bill, the Hillary Russian 'resets, praise of Russia by Hillary, or Podesta Russian company...?
These are all important questions and all should be addressed--but none ever will! No investigative body in Washington will ever bother with these questions. What the President needs to do is to keep asking them over and over and over, just like the fake scumbag "news" media does while continuing to harp on Trump's fake Russian scenario. It appears that there is nothing there, but that doesn't keep the minions of the Deep State from continuing to regurgitate their nonentities. Repeat something long enough and people believe it even if it is totally false. Trump needs to keep asking the questions, get others to ask the questions, and fill the alternative media with these questions--and then keep asking why he isn't getting any answers--over and over and over again. To some extent he has got to use their tactics against them.
And they are good questions--Why hasn't anyone bothered to talk about Hillary's deal that gave Russia 20% of our Uranium? Inquiring minds would really like to know, so the question needs to be asked again and again until we can at least get some political hack in Washington to lie to us about it. At that point his lie can be discussed, debated, and called out for what it really is.
The Deep State will never, ever, answer this question if they can avoid it--so we need to keep asking it until they get sick of hearing it--and then ask it some more!
For a longer version of this article please check out the latest on
http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
The Deep State, the Democrats, some Republicans, George Soros and the entire political and religious Left continues unabated with their brazen attempt to remove Donald Trump from the presidency. And, as good cultural Marxists, they will do it any way they have to--no matter how crooked or underhanded. Also, as true cultural Marxists, they are busily accusing their opposition of doing the exact same things they have been doing. But this is par for the course--standard operating procedure for them.
The House Intelligence Committee has been focusing on Mr. Trump's supposed involvement with Russia and the Democrats even want the committee chairman, Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from any part in that because he visited the White House. In their opinion this is enough to render him unfit to chair the committee. One wonders why Loretta Lynch, recent head of the "Just Us" Department wasn't asked to recuse herself after she met with Slick Willie at the airport in Phoenix during the brouhaha over Hillary's emails. But you have to realize, that was "different."
Mr. Trump is finally beginning to publicly ask the questions he should have been asking right at the beginning. I don't know why he has waited so long, but, for whatever reason, it was too long!
Today he said: Why isn't the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill and Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech money to Bill, the Hillary Russian 'resets, praise of Russia by Hillary, or Podesta Russian company...?
These are all important questions and all should be addressed--but none ever will! No investigative body in Washington will ever bother with these questions. What the President needs to do is to keep asking them over and over and over, just like the fake scumbag "news" media does while continuing to harp on Trump's fake Russian scenario. It appears that there is nothing there, but that doesn't keep the minions of the Deep State from continuing to regurgitate their nonentities. Repeat something long enough and people believe it even if it is totally false. Trump needs to keep asking the questions, get others to ask the questions, and fill the alternative media with these questions--and then keep asking why he isn't getting any answers--over and over and over again. To some extent he has got to use their tactics against them.
And they are good questions--Why hasn't anyone bothered to talk about Hillary's deal that gave Russia 20% of our Uranium? Inquiring minds would really like to know, so the question needs to be asked again and again until we can at least get some political hack in Washington to lie to us about it. At that point his lie can be discussed, debated, and called out for what it really is.
The Deep State will never, ever, answer this question if they can avoid it--so we need to keep asking it until they get sick of hearing it--and then ask it some more!
For a longer version of this article please check out the latest on
http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
Friday, February 10, 2017
Pertinent Phraseology for a Prostitute Press
Our two commentators on the political scene now offer a few observations on a man who spent big money trying to get Hillary elected as the next dictator, pardon me, I meant President. Just a slip of the fingers on the keyboard. It happens. Hillary's loss cost him big bucks, but not to worry--he plans on getting it back--one way or another. But it occurred to our commentators that lots of people might not be aware of this man's background, which the mainstream media has determined that you should know as little as possible about.
Al Benson Jr.
Pertinent Phraseology for a Prostitute Press
by Schwartz & Viscount
Let's look at some real history. The character herein to be described is not an actor, in the Hollywood sense, (except that he fits in with Hollywood's phony-baloney dudes). He's got more money than most of them have, but, like them, he seems to envision himself at the "conscience of the world." Here is a man who openly admits he has no belief in God, is not religious in any sense, yet he seems to feel he has the right to tell the rest of the world how they should live (preferably in ways that will make him and his friends lots of money). He doesn't even travel under his original name anymore.
The sterling individual we are referring to is Gyorgy Schwartz (no relation whatever to one of the authors of this article) and he was born in Hungary in 1930. According to an article on http://www.nowtheendbegins.com written by Geoffrey Grider on November 15, 2016, Gyorgy was Hungarian born and "His father, Tivador, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartz's (who) were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros in order to facilitate assimilation into the Gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s." Gyorgy (now George) has an interesting background, some of which he sometimes neglects to mention.
According to an article by William Jasper on http://www.thenewamerican.com for January 4, 2017: "...Soros neglects to mention some very important facts in his biological reflection, such as that he helped Hitler and the Nazis confiscate the wealth and belongings of his fellow Jews. What's more, he feels no guilt, regret, or remorse about being a Holocaust helper, because, as he put it, if he hadn't done it 'someone else would be taking it away anyhow.' However, he undoubtedly regrets being so candid about all of this during an interview with the CBS 60 Minutes program back in 1998. He must have realized afterward how ghoulishly cold-blooded and inhuman his words and demeanor appeared, and how violently that clashed with the philanthropic humanitarian image he was crafting for himself. For some reason the CBS video of the program disappeared, and that disappearance has been the subject of much speculation concerning possible legal threats and/or financial inducements by Soros to keep the damning footage buried." However, somehow, the old video has been popping up on You Tube videos recently. We watched one just today before we started working on this article. CBS has supposedly been trying to take all of these down, due to copyright challenges, but as fast as they get it down one place it turns up somewhere else. Inquiring minds really do want to know. This all gives George a rather bad name and the mainstream media has really been trying to tamp it down. Seems they have not been totally successful.
If you don't see what's happening "World Wide" and being aided by America's "Prostitute Press" (out and out liars to us from many aspects, then you have been "suckered, schmoozed, and simply taken in by our Presstitute Pimps, who learned their journalism in elite "Ivy-League" institutions of High-Jacked learning. And many of the professors who taught them (and who are supposed to be educators) turn out instead to be indoctrinators of Marxism (meaning anything subversive to a republican form of government. History seems to be no barrier to their (especially Soros') intention, which is the creation of some sort of New World Order that destroys any and everything upon which this country is founded and grounded upon--especially if it is Biblically based. If we continue to allow these influences to persist without exposing them, then, at best, we have bought into their warped belief system.
The current wave of internal terror now being demonstrated and expressed in the United States is fully intended to destroy our faith, way of life, culture, and our civilization.
If you are naive enough to think Black Lives Matter (Black Live Marxists) or any of these other groups have civilized intentions in what they are doing, then you have not been paying attention. They have not convinced we truly "civil" Americans that these groups have displayed anything more than UN-civilized behavior. Polite and courteous is NOT their intent. Helping bring down the government and our way of life is. These people are RUDE, CRUDE, AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE both in word and deed and many of them are actually being paid to work at cultural destruction. One might well ask the question--how many of these groups does George Soros fund? How many has he funded? How much has he spent doing this?
They are being paid, (by Soros and others) to destroy, disrupt, and devastate. And who even knows how to contact them in order to employ their "talents" better than those who are part of the Community Organizer community? We had one of that type as president recently. Remember him???
Do you think these paid thugs are picked randomly? If so, then you have your head in the sand.
If you feel so led, please comment on what we have said here--as long as your commentary is civil and not what we have seen displayed by the type of groups discussed here. And pass this information along to your friends. More people need to be aware.
Al Benson Jr.
Pertinent Phraseology for a Prostitute Press
by Schwartz & Viscount
Let's look at some real history. The character herein to be described is not an actor, in the Hollywood sense, (except that he fits in with Hollywood's phony-baloney dudes). He's got more money than most of them have, but, like them, he seems to envision himself at the "conscience of the world." Here is a man who openly admits he has no belief in God, is not religious in any sense, yet he seems to feel he has the right to tell the rest of the world how they should live (preferably in ways that will make him and his friends lots of money). He doesn't even travel under his original name anymore.
The sterling individual we are referring to is Gyorgy Schwartz (no relation whatever to one of the authors of this article) and he was born in Hungary in 1930. According to an article on http://www.nowtheendbegins.com written by Geoffrey Grider on November 15, 2016, Gyorgy was Hungarian born and "His father, Tivador, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartz's (who) were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros in order to facilitate assimilation into the Gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s." Gyorgy (now George) has an interesting background, some of which he sometimes neglects to mention.
According to an article by William Jasper on http://www.thenewamerican.com for January 4, 2017: "...Soros neglects to mention some very important facts in his biological reflection, such as that he helped Hitler and the Nazis confiscate the wealth and belongings of his fellow Jews. What's more, he feels no guilt, regret, or remorse about being a Holocaust helper, because, as he put it, if he hadn't done it 'someone else would be taking it away anyhow.' However, he undoubtedly regrets being so candid about all of this during an interview with the CBS 60 Minutes program back in 1998. He must have realized afterward how ghoulishly cold-blooded and inhuman his words and demeanor appeared, and how violently that clashed with the philanthropic humanitarian image he was crafting for himself. For some reason the CBS video of the program disappeared, and that disappearance has been the subject of much speculation concerning possible legal threats and/or financial inducements by Soros to keep the damning footage buried." However, somehow, the old video has been popping up on You Tube videos recently. We watched one just today before we started working on this article. CBS has supposedly been trying to take all of these down, due to copyright challenges, but as fast as they get it down one place it turns up somewhere else. Inquiring minds really do want to know. This all gives George a rather bad name and the mainstream media has really been trying to tamp it down. Seems they have not been totally successful.
If you don't see what's happening "World Wide" and being aided by America's "Prostitute Press" (out and out liars to us from many aspects, then you have been "suckered, schmoozed, and simply taken in by our Presstitute Pimps, who learned their journalism in elite "Ivy-League" institutions of High-Jacked learning. And many of the professors who taught them (and who are supposed to be educators) turn out instead to be indoctrinators of Marxism (meaning anything subversive to a republican form of government. History seems to be no barrier to their (especially Soros') intention, which is the creation of some sort of New World Order that destroys any and everything upon which this country is founded and grounded upon--especially if it is Biblically based. If we continue to allow these influences to persist without exposing them, then, at best, we have bought into their warped belief system.
The current wave of internal terror now being demonstrated and expressed in the United States is fully intended to destroy our faith, way of life, culture, and our civilization.
If you are naive enough to think Black Lives Matter (Black Live Marxists) or any of these other groups have civilized intentions in what they are doing, then you have not been paying attention. They have not convinced we truly "civil" Americans that these groups have displayed anything more than UN-civilized behavior. Polite and courteous is NOT their intent. Helping bring down the government and our way of life is. These people are RUDE, CRUDE, AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE both in word and deed and many of them are actually being paid to work at cultural destruction. One might well ask the question--how many of these groups does George Soros fund? How many has he funded? How much has he spent doing this?
They are being paid, (by Soros and others) to destroy, disrupt, and devastate. And who even knows how to contact them in order to employ their "talents" better than those who are part of the Community Organizer community? We had one of that type as president recently. Remember him???
Do you think these paid thugs are picked randomly? If so, then you have your head in the sand.
If you feel so led, please comment on what we have said here--as long as your commentary is civil and not what we have seen displayed by the type of groups discussed here. And pass this information along to your friends. More people need to be aware.
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Our Un-elected Rulers Don't Plan on Letting Trump Be President
by Al Benson Jr.
You can check out the Internet today, January 19, 2017, and pretty well figure that our un-elected rulers, the people who really run things in this country are not about to let Donald Trump become president. Whatever can be done to stop the inauguration and his swearing in will be done and then some flunky from the Obama Regime will be chosen to "fill in" until the Deep State can select a ruler for us that meets their desires (not ours) for us. Their flunkies have been sitting in the White House for decades now and they are not about to surrender that lucrative post to someone who is not one of the boys!
I saw an interesting article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk for today. The article started off with this: The man arrested by Miami Beach police Tuesday for allegedly threatening President-elect Donald Trump online is a member of a prominent northeast family close to Bill and Hillary Clinton. He once gave $20,000 to the Democratic National Committee DailyMail.com has learned...
This man, Dominic Puopolo is being held without bail and is supposedly a computer wizard. According to the Daily Mail article: Puopolo reportedly admitted to posting a video to Twitter, saying: This is the 16th of January 2017, I will be at the review/inauguration and I will kill President Trump, President-elect Trump today... This sterling individual, on various media platforms has posted as JesusChrist1701. That may be a good example of someone taking the Lord's name in vain. Jesus Christ is hardly a potential assassin as this man seems to be claiming he was. Shows you the sort of friends that Bill and Hillary have doesn't it?
Then we have had all manner of veiled warnings/threats from various individuals from professional politician Chuck Schumer on down to some people on CNN (Communist News Network) making statements that, should something happen to Trump during the inauguration ceremony that someone from the Obama Regime will have to be appointed to fill in until they can decide what they will do. So, if something happens then you will, in effect, have dictatorship by fiat, or maybe we should just call it a coup d' etat and be done with it.
Then you have a whole batch of Democratic "congresspersons" to use the term charitably that plan not to show up for the inauguration because they claim Trump is not a "legitimate" president. I guess for them the only "legitimate " president would have been some socialist. This guy, John Lewis, from Georgia is one of them and he is beyond laughable--maybe pitiable would be a better word. But then you have to wonder, with all the Democrats planning on not showing up--do they know something other folks don't? Do some of them think the inauguration will be a good place not to be for "other reasons?"
Then you have the head of the CIA, a Muslim named John Brennan, who has also warned Trump about what he can and cannot say. There are lots of folks around that feel that the CIA had more than a little to do with JFK's death in Dallas in 1963. How big a leap is it from that to something that might happen during Trump's inauguration? Hint: it doesn't take a "leap of faith" to get there.
Ever since the election that have been all manner of obstacles put in Trump's way as he moves toward the White House; vote recounts, threats, fake computer hacks (all by Russia, naturally) and other things. The Ruling Establishment is telling Trump, in ways the public is not supposed to surmise, that they don't want him there and, what's more, they plan to make sure he doesn't get there. If he continues to ignore their "charitable advice" then that leaves them two options--work to co-opt his administration and make it ineffective, but that might take awhile and as time passes, the public is beginning to wake up to what goes on. Their journalistic organ, the mainstream media, has already lost almost total credibility. I mean, who really believe the "news" media anymore? Some of what they have put out there for public consumption of late has been ludicrous. The evening "newspaper" might be good for the sports scores and to put in your kitty litter box as liner but its usefulness beyond that is severally limited.
Their other option is one they'd rather not discuss publicly but is one they have used before. I will give you three guesses as to what that is and the first two don't count.
For a little update on this article please check out the article on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com for January 23, 2017.
You can check out the Internet today, January 19, 2017, and pretty well figure that our un-elected rulers, the people who really run things in this country are not about to let Donald Trump become president. Whatever can be done to stop the inauguration and his swearing in will be done and then some flunky from the Obama Regime will be chosen to "fill in" until the Deep State can select a ruler for us that meets their desires (not ours) for us. Their flunkies have been sitting in the White House for decades now and they are not about to surrender that lucrative post to someone who is not one of the boys!
I saw an interesting article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk for today. The article started off with this: The man arrested by Miami Beach police Tuesday for allegedly threatening President-elect Donald Trump online is a member of a prominent northeast family close to Bill and Hillary Clinton. He once gave $20,000 to the Democratic National Committee DailyMail.com has learned...
This man, Dominic Puopolo is being held without bail and is supposedly a computer wizard. According to the Daily Mail article: Puopolo reportedly admitted to posting a video to Twitter, saying: This is the 16th of January 2017, I will be at the review/inauguration and I will kill President Trump, President-elect Trump today... This sterling individual, on various media platforms has posted as JesusChrist1701. That may be a good example of someone taking the Lord's name in vain. Jesus Christ is hardly a potential assassin as this man seems to be claiming he was. Shows you the sort of friends that Bill and Hillary have doesn't it?
Then we have had all manner of veiled warnings/threats from various individuals from professional politician Chuck Schumer on down to some people on CNN (Communist News Network) making statements that, should something happen to Trump during the inauguration ceremony that someone from the Obama Regime will have to be appointed to fill in until they can decide what they will do. So, if something happens then you will, in effect, have dictatorship by fiat, or maybe we should just call it a coup d' etat and be done with it.
Then you have a whole batch of Democratic "congresspersons" to use the term charitably that plan not to show up for the inauguration because they claim Trump is not a "legitimate" president. I guess for them the only "legitimate " president would have been some socialist. This guy, John Lewis, from Georgia is one of them and he is beyond laughable--maybe pitiable would be a better word. But then you have to wonder, with all the Democrats planning on not showing up--do they know something other folks don't? Do some of them think the inauguration will be a good place not to be for "other reasons?"
Then you have the head of the CIA, a Muslim named John Brennan, who has also warned Trump about what he can and cannot say. There are lots of folks around that feel that the CIA had more than a little to do with JFK's death in Dallas in 1963. How big a leap is it from that to something that might happen during Trump's inauguration? Hint: it doesn't take a "leap of faith" to get there.
Ever since the election that have been all manner of obstacles put in Trump's way as he moves toward the White House; vote recounts, threats, fake computer hacks (all by Russia, naturally) and other things. The Ruling Establishment is telling Trump, in ways the public is not supposed to surmise, that they don't want him there and, what's more, they plan to make sure he doesn't get there. If he continues to ignore their "charitable advice" then that leaves them two options--work to co-opt his administration and make it ineffective, but that might take awhile and as time passes, the public is beginning to wake up to what goes on. Their journalistic organ, the mainstream media, has already lost almost total credibility. I mean, who really believe the "news" media anymore? Some of what they have put out there for public consumption of late has been ludicrous. The evening "newspaper" might be good for the sports scores and to put in your kitty litter box as liner but its usefulness beyond that is severally limited.
Their other option is one they'd rather not discuss publicly but is one they have used before. I will give you three guesses as to what that is and the first two don't count.
For a little update on this article please check out the article on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com for January 23, 2017.
Sunday, January 08, 2017
Obama May Be the Last President You Ever Have Unless They Give You Hillary
by Al Benson Jr.
If you thought Donald Trump would be the next president you might be in for a surprise. You might just end up with Obama as perpetual ruler and potentate--or they might give us a little change from Obama and decide to install Hillary instead--and if her health is just not up to it, we may get whatever Left-wing comrade they think we deserve, thanks to Homeland Security and the people that really direct its agenda.
An article on http://www.zerohedge.com by Tyler Durden for January 6th, 2017 states the following: "In a stunning last-minute power grab by the Obama administration with just 14 days left in his Presidency, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement this evening officially declaring state election systems to be "critical infrastructure." The statement from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson defines 'election infrastructure' as storage facilities, polling places, centralized vote tabulations, voter registration databases, voting machines and all other systems to manage the election process...so pretty much everything."
An article on http://www.infowars.com for January 6th also noted the same thing. It said: "In a letter to the Associated Press, Johnson revealed the US government would monitor and intervene in future elections, a process previously handled on a state-by-state basis." Johnson continued in his justification for this federal over-reach when he said: "Particularly in these times, this designation is simply the right and obvious thing to do.' The designation 'allows for information to be withheld from the public when state, local and private partners meet to discuss election infrastructure security--potentially injecting secrecy into an election process that's traditionally and expressly a transparent process, according to the AP."
So the feds have taken over the election process. And if that means they now control it for all future elections what do you think they might have in mind for this recent election? There have been lots of reports about Russian hacking in this last election and lots of claims from Washington that say that the Russians helped Trump into office. You don't just suppose they might have in mind rescinding the results of this last election due to all this "Russian hacking" do you? In spite of all the twaddle in the mainstream media about how severe this Russian hacking was, we have yet to see any real evidence concerning it. Lots of allegations and "such and such a source said so and so" but no concrete evidence. But, hey, this is the federal government we are talking about here--they don't need evidence--all they need is cleverly framed allegations and they figure that's enough to fool all us deplorables out here in flyover country.
Why are they suddenly deciding to do this right now unless they are planning to change the results of the last election and give us either more unlimited Obama or a golden chance to embrace Hillary when we were just too stupid to appreciate the tremendous opportunity we had to vote for here the first time around. Or maybe they will do what Obama's Muslim buddies do in their countries--proclaim either Obama or Hillary to assume the role of First Dictator for Life (oh excuse me, I really meant to say President and that other accurate term just slipped out by mistake).
It's painfully obvious that our Ruling (Deep State) Establishment has tried literally to move heaven and earth to deny Trump the presidency. I mean, have you ever seen an election like this one before, or its aftermath? The Establishment cannot let Trump assume the presidency unless they can manage to thoroughly co-opt his administration and render him as useless as the sixteen characters he defeated in the primaries. They would have settled for any of them with the possible exception of Rand Paul and he doesn't seem to have presented them with much of a problem on this go-round. Trump ain't "one of the good ol' boys" and so they can't have him in there. What does that possibility tell you about our presidents for the last 75 years or so? Think about it while you are wondering what creative plan Obama and Homeland Security are devising to make sure Trump is denied the office he legitimately won.
This is one where we will literally need to depend on Divine Guidance to prevent these evil people from doing what they plan to do. So, folks, we need to get on our knees and pray and ask the Lord to prevent all this because only He can. And then we need to ask Him what He wants us to do about all this.
Make sure you check out the latest article on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com for January 10, 2017 --"Getting Tired of the "fake news" scenario Yet?"
If you thought Donald Trump would be the next president you might be in for a surprise. You might just end up with Obama as perpetual ruler and potentate--or they might give us a little change from Obama and decide to install Hillary instead--and if her health is just not up to it, we may get whatever Left-wing comrade they think we deserve, thanks to Homeland Security and the people that really direct its agenda.
An article on http://www.zerohedge.com by Tyler Durden for January 6th, 2017 states the following: "In a stunning last-minute power grab by the Obama administration with just 14 days left in his Presidency, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement this evening officially declaring state election systems to be "critical infrastructure." The statement from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson defines 'election infrastructure' as storage facilities, polling places, centralized vote tabulations, voter registration databases, voting machines and all other systems to manage the election process...so pretty much everything."
An article on http://www.infowars.com for January 6th also noted the same thing. It said: "In a letter to the Associated Press, Johnson revealed the US government would monitor and intervene in future elections, a process previously handled on a state-by-state basis." Johnson continued in his justification for this federal over-reach when he said: "Particularly in these times, this designation is simply the right and obvious thing to do.' The designation 'allows for information to be withheld from the public when state, local and private partners meet to discuss election infrastructure security--potentially injecting secrecy into an election process that's traditionally and expressly a transparent process, according to the AP."
So the feds have taken over the election process. And if that means they now control it for all future elections what do you think they might have in mind for this recent election? There have been lots of reports about Russian hacking in this last election and lots of claims from Washington that say that the Russians helped Trump into office. You don't just suppose they might have in mind rescinding the results of this last election due to all this "Russian hacking" do you? In spite of all the twaddle in the mainstream media about how severe this Russian hacking was, we have yet to see any real evidence concerning it. Lots of allegations and "such and such a source said so and so" but no concrete evidence. But, hey, this is the federal government we are talking about here--they don't need evidence--all they need is cleverly framed allegations and they figure that's enough to fool all us deplorables out here in flyover country.
Why are they suddenly deciding to do this right now unless they are planning to change the results of the last election and give us either more unlimited Obama or a golden chance to embrace Hillary when we were just too stupid to appreciate the tremendous opportunity we had to vote for here the first time around. Or maybe they will do what Obama's Muslim buddies do in their countries--proclaim either Obama or Hillary to assume the role of First Dictator for Life (oh excuse me, I really meant to say President and that other accurate term just slipped out by mistake).
It's painfully obvious that our Ruling (Deep State) Establishment has tried literally to move heaven and earth to deny Trump the presidency. I mean, have you ever seen an election like this one before, or its aftermath? The Establishment cannot let Trump assume the presidency unless they can manage to thoroughly co-opt his administration and render him as useless as the sixteen characters he defeated in the primaries. They would have settled for any of them with the possible exception of Rand Paul and he doesn't seem to have presented them with much of a problem on this go-round. Trump ain't "one of the good ol' boys" and so they can't have him in there. What does that possibility tell you about our presidents for the last 75 years or so? Think about it while you are wondering what creative plan Obama and Homeland Security are devising to make sure Trump is denied the office he legitimately won.
This is one where we will literally need to depend on Divine Guidance to prevent these evil people from doing what they plan to do. So, folks, we need to get on our knees and pray and ask the Lord to prevent all this because only He can. And then we need to ask Him what He wants us to do about all this.
Make sure you check out the latest article on http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com for January 10, 2017 --"Getting Tired of the "fake news" scenario Yet?"
Sunday, November 27, 2016
A Little Update on the Jillary and Jill Recount
by Al Benson Jr.
After yesterday's post showing that InfoWars.com had demonstrated that most of the money to finance Jillary's vote recount was coming from one source and not an outraged American public, I thought this little update might be appropriate.
According to an article in the Washington Times for 11/27/16, Wisconsin elections officials can see no proof of a hack. They said they: "...can't find evidence that any of its voting machines were hacked." And the article I took this from, http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com asked the question "Do you have a plan B or are you going to let it go finally?"
I'll answer that one myself. If they don't yet have a plan B in the backroom you can bet the farm they are working on it as I write this. These are cultural Marxists we are talking about here and they never quit. They may fail with plans A, B, C, D, and E but not to worry. They will be back with plan F as soon as they tear it off the drawing board and they will keep trying until they find some round peg they can jam into a square hole hard enough that they will get at least some of what they want. I am reminded of how many times the cultural Marxists came back to Congress with their petitions for a holiday for their good buddy Martin Luther King Jr. Most people forget, but they came back every year for fourteen years until they finally got what they wanted and we've been stuck with that "holiday" and the opportunities for the leftist propaganda that goes with it ever since. I loathe what the cultural Marxists stand for. It is anti-Christian to the core, but you have to give them credit--they possess a tenacity that most Christians can only daydream about!
The Washington Times asked commission spokesman Reid Magney in Wisconsin if any evidence or indication of hacking had put in an appearance. He replied in an email "No evidence of hacking."
This was confirmed by yet another article from the same source listed above. I will quote: "CNN's New Day interviewed Jill Stein about her recount effort on Friday. 'Do you think this election was stolen' CNN's host John Berman asked Stein point-blank. Um, we don't know...And I think the forensic computer experts have raised serious questions. What we do know is that this was a hack-riddled election...Wait! It gets better. Remember that Hillary was found to alter polls? Well, Stein blamed her suspicions in part on the fake polls! Those are Hillary's, Jill, not Trump's... And when Berman asked if she has evidence that a hack took place. No,. We do not have a smoking gun."
So after all this fuss and all the millions of dollars raised, most of it seemingly from one central source, we have to ask ourselves what the deuce is going on here? We're going to do all these vote recounts with no evidence of any wrongdoing--or it is now the plan to manufacture "evidence" as we go along? Will they find someone, somewhere down the line in this process that will be willing to "help" them out with revised vote totals or what?
And why did Ms. Stein end up doing something here that could not possibly benefit her or her party? Did someone make her an offer she couldn't (or didn't dare) to refuse? And was her doing this initially nothing more than a ploy to allow Hillary to get back into the game to "help her out?"
The great Christian statesman, Patrick Henry, when invited to take part in the Constitutional Convention back in 1787, refused to be a part of it. Mr. Henry said "I smell a rat." Mr. Henry was a wise man. I wonder how many "rats" he'd be able to smell in this current game were we fortunate enough to still have him around.
Update: An article that appeared on http://www.thegatewaypundit.com at 8:19 this evening stated: "As reported earlier the election steal was put into motion when a group of 'experts' reviewed the election results and reported that there appeared to be election fraud. However, a member of the group of 'experts' happens to be voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz. Bonifaz also happens to be connected with George Soros when he launched the National Voting Rights Institute in 1994. Bonifaz was the Institute's President. This is certainly shocking but no surprise. Hillary and Soros are in this for the steal."
So Bonifaz helped Soros back in 1994 and now he represents Jill Stein. My what an amazing coincidence!
Gateway Pundit also pointed out that Stein cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania. She has to go through the courts to do this and she has to present evidence that shows voter fraud. Seeing that Trump won Pennsylvania by around 70,000 votes, Ms. Stein would have to be able to prove that fraud was "probable." Of course knowing Soros and the Clintons, that thorny little problem may already be in the process of being "worked on."
After yesterday's post showing that InfoWars.com had demonstrated that most of the money to finance Jillary's vote recount was coming from one source and not an outraged American public, I thought this little update might be appropriate.
According to an article in the Washington Times for 11/27/16, Wisconsin elections officials can see no proof of a hack. They said they: "...can't find evidence that any of its voting machines were hacked." And the article I took this from, http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com asked the question "Do you have a plan B or are you going to let it go finally?"
I'll answer that one myself. If they don't yet have a plan B in the backroom you can bet the farm they are working on it as I write this. These are cultural Marxists we are talking about here and they never quit. They may fail with plans A, B, C, D, and E but not to worry. They will be back with plan F as soon as they tear it off the drawing board and they will keep trying until they find some round peg they can jam into a square hole hard enough that they will get at least some of what they want. I am reminded of how many times the cultural Marxists came back to Congress with their petitions for a holiday for their good buddy Martin Luther King Jr. Most people forget, but they came back every year for fourteen years until they finally got what they wanted and we've been stuck with that "holiday" and the opportunities for the leftist propaganda that goes with it ever since. I loathe what the cultural Marxists stand for. It is anti-Christian to the core, but you have to give them credit--they possess a tenacity that most Christians can only daydream about!
The Washington Times asked commission spokesman Reid Magney in Wisconsin if any evidence or indication of hacking had put in an appearance. He replied in an email "No evidence of hacking."
This was confirmed by yet another article from the same source listed above. I will quote: "CNN's New Day interviewed Jill Stein about her recount effort on Friday. 'Do you think this election was stolen' CNN's host John Berman asked Stein point-blank. Um, we don't know...And I think the forensic computer experts have raised serious questions. What we do know is that this was a hack-riddled election...Wait! It gets better. Remember that Hillary was found to alter polls? Well, Stein blamed her suspicions in part on the fake polls! Those are Hillary's, Jill, not Trump's... And when Berman asked if she has evidence that a hack took place. No,. We do not have a smoking gun."
So after all this fuss and all the millions of dollars raised, most of it seemingly from one central source, we have to ask ourselves what the deuce is going on here? We're going to do all these vote recounts with no evidence of any wrongdoing--or it is now the plan to manufacture "evidence" as we go along? Will they find someone, somewhere down the line in this process that will be willing to "help" them out with revised vote totals or what?
And why did Ms. Stein end up doing something here that could not possibly benefit her or her party? Did someone make her an offer she couldn't (or didn't dare) to refuse? And was her doing this initially nothing more than a ploy to allow Hillary to get back into the game to "help her out?"
The great Christian statesman, Patrick Henry, when invited to take part in the Constitutional Convention back in 1787, refused to be a part of it. Mr. Henry said "I smell a rat." Mr. Henry was a wise man. I wonder how many "rats" he'd be able to smell in this current game were we fortunate enough to still have him around.
Update: An article that appeared on http://www.thegatewaypundit.com at 8:19 this evening stated: "As reported earlier the election steal was put into motion when a group of 'experts' reviewed the election results and reported that there appeared to be election fraud. However, a member of the group of 'experts' happens to be voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz. Bonifaz also happens to be connected with George Soros when he launched the National Voting Rights Institute in 1994. Bonifaz was the Institute's President. This is certainly shocking but no surprise. Hillary and Soros are in this for the steal."
So Bonifaz helped Soros back in 1994 and now he represents Jill Stein. My what an amazing coincidence!
Gateway Pundit also pointed out that Stein cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania. She has to go through the courts to do this and she has to present evidence that shows voter fraud. Seeing that Trump won Pennsylvania by around 70,000 votes, Ms. Stein would have to be able to prove that fraud was "probable." Of course knowing Soros and the Clintons, that thorny little problem may already be in the process of being "worked on."
Saturday, November 26, 2016
Where Is Jill Stein's Money Coming From For Vote Recount?
by Al Benson Jr.
On my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com I posted an article earlier this afternoon (11/26) that dealt with Jill Stein's raising of millions of dollars to have votes recounted in 3 states where Hillary lost in an effort to shift the electoral vote just enough so that Hillary could, indeed, be enthroned in the White House, in the position she feels she so richly deserves, but which that mean old Donald Trump deprived her of when he had the audacity to win the election. Nasty man that he is--but not to worry, she has found a way to get back at him and give herself the presidency at the same time.
We read that Jill Stein's great concern for an accurate vote count led her to file petitions in 3 states to have the votes recounted.For those who may not know who Ms. Stein is, she was the Green Party candidate for president in this past election. She claims she is not doing this to benefit Hillary in any way--she just wants to see truth, justice, and the American way prevail. Believe that and I have a bridge built with golden bricks in Tucson, Arizona I will sell you at bargain basement rates! Doing this is an expensive proposition. You don't get it done for peanuts, so Ms. Stein started fundraising online on November 24th with a goal of $2.5 million. According to Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars.com "Overnight on the hour, her fund received $160,000 every hour. These were not random people donating at 3 am to her campaign but rather some 'bot' that increased her amount by this amount on the hour."
If you are wondering what a "bot" is, so did I. I'd not heard this term before so I looked it up and found that it's kind of an Internet robot that performs an automated task every hour or every how-often-you-set-it-up to do this particular task. Up until this point Stein has raised more than $4.5 million, more than enough to take care of the recounts in those critical states Hillary needs to shift the electoral vote.
Watson has noted that: "Go to Jill Stein's fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a perfectly consistent 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully.and noted that at night when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, the donations for this came in like clockwork with no deviation from the steady pace whatever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America and practically everyone is asleep at 3 am. Last night it should have slowed down. It did not. It just marched toward the finish line like an obedient soldier...Don't be fooled by the slick language on the donation page. If these donations did not virtually stop at night THEY ARE NOT COMING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Yes, folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens..."
What Mr. Watson is saying is that all this so-called "contribution" money from concerned Americans who are supposedly worried about Trump being president IS COMING FROM ONE SOURCE! Now stop and think about that for a minute. If it all comes from one source that means it is being used by that one source to change the election results. Supposedly this was Ms. Stein's project in her crusade for truth in the voting booth but, surprise of all surprises, now the Clinton Campaign had decided to enter the fray and help Ms. Stein out with her noteworthy project. Kinds of really makes you wonder whose project it really was to begin with doesn't it. Seems like Stein was a willing foil to get Hillary into the game to me.
So folks, if this scam works you will see the American people's will again thwarted by the Establishment and we will be expected to be stupid enough to go along with this--only some of us won't, so there will be problems. So watch the elections being stolen from you unless you all are willing to make a big fuss!
On my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com I posted an article earlier this afternoon (11/26) that dealt with Jill Stein's raising of millions of dollars to have votes recounted in 3 states where Hillary lost in an effort to shift the electoral vote just enough so that Hillary could, indeed, be enthroned in the White House, in the position she feels she so richly deserves, but which that mean old Donald Trump deprived her of when he had the audacity to win the election. Nasty man that he is--but not to worry, she has found a way to get back at him and give herself the presidency at the same time.
We read that Jill Stein's great concern for an accurate vote count led her to file petitions in 3 states to have the votes recounted.For those who may not know who Ms. Stein is, she was the Green Party candidate for president in this past election. She claims she is not doing this to benefit Hillary in any way--she just wants to see truth, justice, and the American way prevail. Believe that and I have a bridge built with golden bricks in Tucson, Arizona I will sell you at bargain basement rates! Doing this is an expensive proposition. You don't get it done for peanuts, so Ms. Stein started fundraising online on November 24th with a goal of $2.5 million. According to Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars.com "Overnight on the hour, her fund received $160,000 every hour. These were not random people donating at 3 am to her campaign but rather some 'bot' that increased her amount by this amount on the hour."
If you are wondering what a "bot" is, so did I. I'd not heard this term before so I looked it up and found that it's kind of an Internet robot that performs an automated task every hour or every how-often-you-set-it-up to do this particular task. Up until this point Stein has raised more than $4.5 million, more than enough to take care of the recounts in those critical states Hillary needs to shift the electoral vote.
Watson has noted that: "Go to Jill Stein's fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a perfectly consistent 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully.and noted that at night when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, the donations for this came in like clockwork with no deviation from the steady pace whatever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America and practically everyone is asleep at 3 am. Last night it should have slowed down. It did not. It just marched toward the finish line like an obedient soldier...Don't be fooled by the slick language on the donation page. If these donations did not virtually stop at night THEY ARE NOT COMING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Yes, folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens..."
What Mr. Watson is saying is that all this so-called "contribution" money from concerned Americans who are supposedly worried about Trump being president IS COMING FROM ONE SOURCE! Now stop and think about that for a minute. If it all comes from one source that means it is being used by that one source to change the election results. Supposedly this was Ms. Stein's project in her crusade for truth in the voting booth but, surprise of all surprises, now the Clinton Campaign had decided to enter the fray and help Ms. Stein out with her noteworthy project. Kinds of really makes you wonder whose project it really was to begin with doesn't it. Seems like Stein was a willing foil to get Hillary into the game to me.
So folks, if this scam works you will see the American people's will again thwarted by the Establishment and we will be expected to be stupid enough to go along with this--only some of us won't, so there will be problems. So watch the elections being stolen from you unless you all are willing to make a big fuss!
Saturday, November 12, 2016
"Whitelash" And the Cultural Marxists
by Al Benson Jr.
Well, a representative of the cultural Marxist class has come up with a new word in a pathetic attempt to define the reasons Trump won the presidential election when he really knew, in his heart of hearts, that Hitlery should have won it. The new term he came up with is "Whitelash." This representative of the cultural Marxist class is presently a commentator for CNN. Some have labeled that "news" network the "Communist News Network" because the Communists seem to get a better shake in their "news" broadcasts than anyone else does.
This CNN commentator is a man named Van Jones. Anyone remember good ol' Van? He was a special adviser for "Green Jobs" in the outgoing Obama Regime. He was Obama's "Green Jobs Czar." You can find Van mentioned in various sites on the Internet. One site noted of him that "There's little question that Jones was an avowed communist." The site www.politifact.com noted that, in 1994 Mr. Jones was one of the founders o STORM, a Marxist-Leninist group whose hero was Chinese Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung. That's what Obama had for a "Green Jobs Czar." Anyone surprised? Jones made such a fuss in certain areas that he eventually had to resign. I don't know when CNN picked him up but they sure didn't get any bargain when they did.
The cultural Marxists had planned on Hitlery winning the election. They thought she was a shoo-in. They made the mistake of believing their own polls. Of course some even went so far as to try to implement her victory by "assisting" the vote totals in several states. If you doubt that then read some of the WikiLeaks material that has been posted on the Internet, or some of the other stuff captured on hidden cameras by the Veritas organization showing Democratic operatives talking about how they planned to "influence" the vote.
So Comrade Jones came up with the new culturally Marxist term to define why the evil Donald Trump won the election when the virtuous Hitlery should have. Remember the word "whitelash" because you will see more of it in days to come as other commentators in the prostitute mainstream media try to blame us evil white folks for the victory of that evil Donald Trump.
Everyone knows we should all have voted for Hitlery to show we have no prejudice against women, just like we all should have voted for Obama in the last two elections to show we had no prejudice against blacks. The fact that many of us didn't swallow that bit of race-baiting shows that we must all be prejudiced and must, therefore, assume our assigned places on "stools of everlasting repentance."
Had we not been guilty of "whitelash" we would all have voted for Hitlery so she could have been enthroned in the White House, have eviscerated the Second Amendment, have promoted her open borders scheme to end our national sovereignty and have promoted a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child when that child became "inconvenient." Just look at all the golden opportunities we missed by not electing her! The fact that us evil white folks couldn't find it in our hearts to do all this shows that we are not only "deplorable" but totally "irredeemable." Problem with this new cultural Marxist pet theory is that there were also black folks and Hispanic folks that voted the same way us evil whites did--against Hitlery. Of course all the blacks that voted for Trump must have been "Uncle Toms." That would explain why they failed in their bounden duty to elect Hitlery, the most compassionate candidate ever. As for the Hispanic folks that voted for Trump, I don't know what the Hispanic term for their "treason" might be. Maybe we could just call them people that displayed an unusual amount of common sense in this instance. But somehow I don't think that definition will appease those of a cultural Marxist persuasion.
But whatever happened, it was, as always, "whitey's fault." It always is. I also noted that a batch of Hollyweird people and various other "celebrities" all said that if Trump was elected they would leave the country. From what I can tell, most of them haven't gone anywhere and don't really plan on making the trip. More's the pity! If the thought of a Trump presidency is so horrendous, then what's keeping them here? They should be packing their bags by now and heading out for socialist gardens of Eden like Zimbabwe or Cuba--and making sure the door doesn't hit their backsides on the way out! As a prejudiced white guy, I won't shed any tears when you all are gone--and I don't care what color you are, or what your sexual preference is.
I guess all of us evil whites need to start attending sensitivity training class that will teach us to hate and loathe ourselves so we don't all fall prey to "whitelash." Blacklash is okay. That's politically correct--and besides, George Soros may fund some of that. Black prejudice is okay and the black "racists" that are prejudiced against us white folks are okay. It's just that we are not permitted to feel the same way toward them. The darker animals in this barnyard are always "more equal" than the lighter animals and us evil whites need to remember that.
What we really need to start doing is taking a good look behind the scenes at who is promoting and paying for this Marxist drivel--and then we need to start exposing them (Ephesians 5:11).
Well, a representative of the cultural Marxist class has come up with a new word in a pathetic attempt to define the reasons Trump won the presidential election when he really knew, in his heart of hearts, that Hitlery should have won it. The new term he came up with is "Whitelash." This representative of the cultural Marxist class is presently a commentator for CNN. Some have labeled that "news" network the "Communist News Network" because the Communists seem to get a better shake in their "news" broadcasts than anyone else does.
This CNN commentator is a man named Van Jones. Anyone remember good ol' Van? He was a special adviser for "Green Jobs" in the outgoing Obama Regime. He was Obama's "Green Jobs Czar." You can find Van mentioned in various sites on the Internet. One site noted of him that "There's little question that Jones was an avowed communist." The site www.politifact.com noted that, in 1994 Mr. Jones was one of the founders o STORM, a Marxist-Leninist group whose hero was Chinese Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung. That's what Obama had for a "Green Jobs Czar." Anyone surprised? Jones made such a fuss in certain areas that he eventually had to resign. I don't know when CNN picked him up but they sure didn't get any bargain when they did.
The cultural Marxists had planned on Hitlery winning the election. They thought she was a shoo-in. They made the mistake of believing their own polls. Of course some even went so far as to try to implement her victory by "assisting" the vote totals in several states. If you doubt that then read some of the WikiLeaks material that has been posted on the Internet, or some of the other stuff captured on hidden cameras by the Veritas organization showing Democratic operatives talking about how they planned to "influence" the vote.
So Comrade Jones came up with the new culturally Marxist term to define why the evil Donald Trump won the election when the virtuous Hitlery should have. Remember the word "whitelash" because you will see more of it in days to come as other commentators in the prostitute mainstream media try to blame us evil white folks for the victory of that evil Donald Trump.
Everyone knows we should all have voted for Hitlery to show we have no prejudice against women, just like we all should have voted for Obama in the last two elections to show we had no prejudice against blacks. The fact that many of us didn't swallow that bit of race-baiting shows that we must all be prejudiced and must, therefore, assume our assigned places on "stools of everlasting repentance."
Had we not been guilty of "whitelash" we would all have voted for Hitlery so she could have been enthroned in the White House, have eviscerated the Second Amendment, have promoted her open borders scheme to end our national sovereignty and have promoted a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child when that child became "inconvenient." Just look at all the golden opportunities we missed by not electing her! The fact that us evil white folks couldn't find it in our hearts to do all this shows that we are not only "deplorable" but totally "irredeemable." Problem with this new cultural Marxist pet theory is that there were also black folks and Hispanic folks that voted the same way us evil whites did--against Hitlery. Of course all the blacks that voted for Trump must have been "Uncle Toms." That would explain why they failed in their bounden duty to elect Hitlery, the most compassionate candidate ever. As for the Hispanic folks that voted for Trump, I don't know what the Hispanic term for their "treason" might be. Maybe we could just call them people that displayed an unusual amount of common sense in this instance. But somehow I don't think that definition will appease those of a cultural Marxist persuasion.
But whatever happened, it was, as always, "whitey's fault." It always is. I also noted that a batch of Hollyweird people and various other "celebrities" all said that if Trump was elected they would leave the country. From what I can tell, most of them haven't gone anywhere and don't really plan on making the trip. More's the pity! If the thought of a Trump presidency is so horrendous, then what's keeping them here? They should be packing their bags by now and heading out for socialist gardens of Eden like Zimbabwe or Cuba--and making sure the door doesn't hit their backsides on the way out! As a prejudiced white guy, I won't shed any tears when you all are gone--and I don't care what color you are, or what your sexual preference is.
I guess all of us evil whites need to start attending sensitivity training class that will teach us to hate and loathe ourselves so we don't all fall prey to "whitelash." Blacklash is okay. That's politically correct--and besides, George Soros may fund some of that. Black prejudice is okay and the black "racists" that are prejudiced against us white folks are okay. It's just that we are not permitted to feel the same way toward them. The darker animals in this barnyard are always "more equal" than the lighter animals and us evil whites need to remember that.
What we really need to start doing is taking a good look behind the scenes at who is promoting and paying for this Marxist drivel--and then we need to start exposing them (Ephesians 5:11).
Tuesday, November 08, 2016
The "News" Media Is Nothing But Hillary's Water Carrier
by Al Benson Jr.
Just yesterday I read an article on http://thehornnews.com which carried a headline that stated: "RIGGED! Email PROVES media totally corrupt" Now there's a headline I could agree with. After watching the news media (so called) cover events I have been a partaker of for over forty years, I have to totally agree with the headline on the Horn News article. I long ago came to the conclusion that the absolute last thing the "news" media was all about was real news. Lots of folks couldn't quite see that, but the media's performance in prostituting itself before the Alter of St. Hillary in this current election cycle has opened lots of eyes.
The Horn News article continued: "The most recent batch of emails released by WikiLeaks reveals that CNN and The Washington Post were communicating with the Democratic National Convention during the election primaries, filtering them information to use in their reporting. In fact, Democrat insiders were actually writing the questions for interviews and doing newspaper reaearch! These allegedly non-partisan publications clearly had an alternative agenda outside from honest and respectable journalism." The article then shows part of one of the leaked emails that shows this.
And the article noted that: "It's clear the mainstream media has been working with the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and Clinton campaign to shape the political discourse throughout the entire election, focusing on Trump controversies." So, with the Democrats and the "lamestream media" working hand in glove to make Trump look bad, who can honestly say the system wasn't rigged?
What we have finally seen, right out in the open for those who have eyes to see, is "journalists' are are not really journalists at all, but rather are a group of people on a political mission to help elect Hillary--anyway they have to. They have proven themselves to be nothing more than culturally Marxist political shills--something many of us figured out decades ago. But now it's out in the open!
One commentator on a Fox News interview either yesterday or today accused the media of helping to "drag the old hag staggering across the finish line."
For anyone that doesn't have mush for brains it should be more than obvious that the mainstream media has lost all credibility with ordinary folks. The only ones they may remotely still have credibility with is ultra-liberals, socialists, and communists, and the only reason they have any standing yet, even in such sordid company, is that these groups realize the media can be useful to them in their efforts to destroy the culture of ordinary Americans.
Someone told me in the last couple days that the readership of mainstream propaganda sheets like the New York Times and the Washington Post are way, way down. No one is paying them any attention anymore. The alternative media seems to be where much of the action is because you can still get real news there without the constant leftist slant.
So we have finally reached election day--and the general consensus among many is that Trump will win the election by a landslide but Hillary will end up in the White House because she is the "candidate of choice" of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the other One World Government groups. If the Democrats manage to steal the election and enthrone Hillary it will be interesting to see how the mainstream media reports, or spins, that because, in the final analysis, spin is what they are really about, not news.
Just yesterday I read an article on http://thehornnews.com which carried a headline that stated: "RIGGED! Email PROVES media totally corrupt" Now there's a headline I could agree with. After watching the news media (so called) cover events I have been a partaker of for over forty years, I have to totally agree with the headline on the Horn News article. I long ago came to the conclusion that the absolute last thing the "news" media was all about was real news. Lots of folks couldn't quite see that, but the media's performance in prostituting itself before the Alter of St. Hillary in this current election cycle has opened lots of eyes.
The Horn News article continued: "The most recent batch of emails released by WikiLeaks reveals that CNN and The Washington Post were communicating with the Democratic National Convention during the election primaries, filtering them information to use in their reporting. In fact, Democrat insiders were actually writing the questions for interviews and doing newspaper reaearch! These allegedly non-partisan publications clearly had an alternative agenda outside from honest and respectable journalism." The article then shows part of one of the leaked emails that shows this.
And the article noted that: "It's clear the mainstream media has been working with the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and Clinton campaign to shape the political discourse throughout the entire election, focusing on Trump controversies." So, with the Democrats and the "lamestream media" working hand in glove to make Trump look bad, who can honestly say the system wasn't rigged?
What we have finally seen, right out in the open for those who have eyes to see, is "journalists' are are not really journalists at all, but rather are a group of people on a political mission to help elect Hillary--anyway they have to. They have proven themselves to be nothing more than culturally Marxist political shills--something many of us figured out decades ago. But now it's out in the open!
One commentator on a Fox News interview either yesterday or today accused the media of helping to "drag the old hag staggering across the finish line."
For anyone that doesn't have mush for brains it should be more than obvious that the mainstream media has lost all credibility with ordinary folks. The only ones they may remotely still have credibility with is ultra-liberals, socialists, and communists, and the only reason they have any standing yet, even in such sordid company, is that these groups realize the media can be useful to them in their efforts to destroy the culture of ordinary Americans.
Someone told me in the last couple days that the readership of mainstream propaganda sheets like the New York Times and the Washington Post are way, way down. No one is paying them any attention anymore. The alternative media seems to be where much of the action is because you can still get real news there without the constant leftist slant.
So we have finally reached election day--and the general consensus among many is that Trump will win the election by a landslide but Hillary will end up in the White House because she is the "candidate of choice" of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the other One World Government groups. If the Democrats manage to steal the election and enthrone Hillary it will be interesting to see how the mainstream media reports, or spins, that because, in the final analysis, spin is what they are really about, not news.
Sunday, November 06, 2016
Comey Puppet Continues To Howl "Not Guilty, Not Guilty, Not Guilty!
by Al Benson Jr.
Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.
So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.
On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.
Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.
I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous! An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ noted that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."
So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.
So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?
So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be.
Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.
So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.
On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.
Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.
I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous! An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ noted that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."
So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.
So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?
So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be.
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Presidential Debates Work Better If the Moderator Doesn't Help the Democrat
by Al Benson Jr.
Presidential debates are hardly my favorite source of entertainment or of information for that matter. Elections are often fraudulent and rigged and so are presidential debates. They are part of what has been dubbed "political theater" by Lew Rockwell. In fact he has a section on his web site www.lewrockwell.com called "political theater."
On our way into church last Sunday morning one of our church members asked me something to the effect of "Do you plan to watch the political mockery tomorrow night?" I can't disagree with his assessment. I've watched enough political debates over the years to know that they are hardly instruments of revealed truth.
If you have two candidates, one of which is supposed to be conservative and patriotic while the other one is a screaming cultural Marxist, you have to know going in, that the moderator and the cultural Marxist are going to work together and gang up on the conservative. It's standard operating procedure. They did it to Mitt Romney when he debated Comrade Obama before the 2012 election charade, not that Romney was any kind of real conservative, but, bad as he was, he made chopped liver out of Obama in their first debate. Obama didn't have his teleprompter and without that he was dead in the water. He had four or five stock lines and all he could do throughout the debate (not possessing an original thought of his own) was to find different ways of restating those stock lines. In their second debate you can be sure the teleprompter was there and the moderator helped Obama carry the debate load with his commentary. By this time Romney knew the game and just played along--the loyal "opposition" as it were.
I hadn't planned on watching this current charade but a friend living in the town I live in invited me over to his house to watch it. When he had lived in the North he had belonged to the Tea Party and so I figured he's pretty much be on the same page as I was, and he is.
And the debate between Trump and "Hillary the unindicted" was a carbon copy of most of the ones I have watched previously. The moderator, Lester Holt bent over backwards to give Hillary as much help as he could possibly give without totally giving himself away and he badgered Trump as much as he could get by with and gave Hillary as much extra time to present her points as he could while restricting Trump to his allotted time. Mr. Holt was in Hillary's corner and that was plain to see. Objective he was not and even his pretense of it was shallow.
Noted libertarian author Tom DiLorenzo had it figured out also and he noted in brief commentary on www.lewrockwell.com that Hillary's running mate had said that: "He hopes the moderator, Lester Holt, will expose Trump's 'lies' while at the same time giving Hitlery time to express her 'vision' for America."
He further said: "This is a warning to Lester Holt from the Clinton Crime Family: Don't do what Matt Lauer did and ask questions and then let the candidate respond to the questions. Badger him, challenge everything he says, insinuate that he is a liar or a buffoon (or better yet, both), interrupt him, while allowing Queen Hitlery to be her good old visionary self. Or else, Lester." I would say Lester responded to the prompting quite well. He was going to make sure he didn't end up being chopped liver.
And so "Queen Hitlery" made her points for her vision for America (no guns for Americans but lots of aliens (preferably illegal) for Americans, although she didn't quite say it that way. If you have learned to understand Marxist doublespeak you know what she was talking about. It was almost as if Mr. Trump had been cautioned not to fight back, a persona that is at odds with where he usually is. I hope this was just a learning experience for him and not something worse, because if it ends up being something worse then you can kiss the country goodbye, and your God-given liberties will be chopped liver.
Presidential debates are hardly my favorite source of entertainment or of information for that matter. Elections are often fraudulent and rigged and so are presidential debates. They are part of what has been dubbed "political theater" by Lew Rockwell. In fact he has a section on his web site www.lewrockwell.com called "political theater."
On our way into church last Sunday morning one of our church members asked me something to the effect of "Do you plan to watch the political mockery tomorrow night?" I can't disagree with his assessment. I've watched enough political debates over the years to know that they are hardly instruments of revealed truth.
If you have two candidates, one of which is supposed to be conservative and patriotic while the other one is a screaming cultural Marxist, you have to know going in, that the moderator and the cultural Marxist are going to work together and gang up on the conservative. It's standard operating procedure. They did it to Mitt Romney when he debated Comrade Obama before the 2012 election charade, not that Romney was any kind of real conservative, but, bad as he was, he made chopped liver out of Obama in their first debate. Obama didn't have his teleprompter and without that he was dead in the water. He had four or five stock lines and all he could do throughout the debate (not possessing an original thought of his own) was to find different ways of restating those stock lines. In their second debate you can be sure the teleprompter was there and the moderator helped Obama carry the debate load with his commentary. By this time Romney knew the game and just played along--the loyal "opposition" as it were.
I hadn't planned on watching this current charade but a friend living in the town I live in invited me over to his house to watch it. When he had lived in the North he had belonged to the Tea Party and so I figured he's pretty much be on the same page as I was, and he is.
And the debate between Trump and "Hillary the unindicted" was a carbon copy of most of the ones I have watched previously. The moderator, Lester Holt bent over backwards to give Hillary as much help as he could possibly give without totally giving himself away and he badgered Trump as much as he could get by with and gave Hillary as much extra time to present her points as he could while restricting Trump to his allotted time. Mr. Holt was in Hillary's corner and that was plain to see. Objective he was not and even his pretense of it was shallow.
Noted libertarian author Tom DiLorenzo had it figured out also and he noted in brief commentary on www.lewrockwell.com that Hillary's running mate had said that: "He hopes the moderator, Lester Holt, will expose Trump's 'lies' while at the same time giving Hitlery time to express her 'vision' for America."
He further said: "This is a warning to Lester Holt from the Clinton Crime Family: Don't do what Matt Lauer did and ask questions and then let the candidate respond to the questions. Badger him, challenge everything he says, insinuate that he is a liar or a buffoon (or better yet, both), interrupt him, while allowing Queen Hitlery to be her good old visionary self. Or else, Lester." I would say Lester responded to the prompting quite well. He was going to make sure he didn't end up being chopped liver.
And so "Queen Hitlery" made her points for her vision for America (no guns for Americans but lots of aliens (preferably illegal) for Americans, although she didn't quite say it that way. If you have learned to understand Marxist doublespeak you know what she was talking about. It was almost as if Mr. Trump had been cautioned not to fight back, a persona that is at odds with where he usually is. I hope this was just a learning experience for him and not something worse, because if it ends up being something worse then you can kiss the country goodbye, and your God-given liberties will be chopped liver.
Sunday, July 31, 2016
"The Fix Is In"
by Al Benson Jr.
Back in January of 2015 I did an article for my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com entitled "Has the Next President Already Been Chosen?" It went into the fact that the One World Government group, the Bilderbergers, had already chosen Hillary Clinton to be the next president of this country, no matter what the voters said. Their sentiments were/are not important and so the culturally Marxist agenda is for Hillary to be enthroned in the White House--no matter what. That article has gotten more viewership than any other article in the last year and a half so it must have resonated with somebody out there. If it turns out that I am wrong and Trump wins by some fluke no one will be happier than I am and in this one case I won't mind having been wrong, in fact I will be quite satisfied at having been wrong.
That's not to say that I think Mr. Trump is the perfect candidate. I am not really crazy about his vice-presidential choice, though I have to admit it's better than Newt Gingrich who was simply awful, but it's better only by degrees.
Today someone sent me a short message to the extent that Reuters had changed the numbers on a recent poll to indicate a loss of 17 points for Trump, and naturally the "news" ( I laugh whenever I use that term) media has shown a 7 point jump for Hillary. I can't verify the Reuters info at this point, so for me it's just a report, not fact yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out to be accurate. If Hillary is slated to win, no matter what, then us boobs out here in flyover country have to be psychologically prepared to accept that without too much fuss and what better way to do that than fudging on poll numbers?
At first I felt that I was almost the only one that considered that the upcoming election might be won with "creative voting" techniques. But then, it wouldn't be the first time, would it? How many voting precincts in Pennsylvania and Ohio in 2012 had their votes tallied and showed that Romney never got a single vote in their precincts? And the Republican establishment never once complained? You'd have thought in some of these precincts that there would have been at least one grumpy old man that would have voted for Romney, but, no, it didn't happen--so they tell us. Do I believe it? Do pigs fly? I wonder how many names on the voting rolls you could have found duplicated at local cemeteries. Obama was supposed to win, no matter what--and the Republican establishment went right along with it. They were, indeed, the "loyal"opposition!
Turns out, however, that I am not the only one with a suspicious mind. Today someone sent me an article from SHTFplan.com written by Mac Slavo and entitled No One Can Stop Her...And She Knows It: "This Election Won't Be Fair"
Mr. Slavo noted, quite accurately I think, that: "In a fair election, my best estimate is that Donald Trump would win in a landslide. But this election will not be fair, few of them are." Can't argue with him there, either. Slavo referred to the Democratic Convention and its results as "Hillary's coronation" and he said the entire dog and pony show had been "stage managed to downplay the overwhelming noise from Bernie supporters who are outraged and feel betrayed by Hillary. The entire convention has had a certain air to it, a quality that reveals the desperation for power,..." I guess that's as good a way of saying it as any--"a desperation for power." Hillary was told to stand down in 2008 so Obama could assume the mantle of "transparency" and now she feels it's her turn and she means to have it irregardless of anything else.
So Hillary must be allowed to win at all costs (and there will be costs). Slavo noted that even Americans who don't pay much attention to what goes on in Washington or much of anything else beyond the ball scores, have started to notice what GATT, the WTO, and NAFTA have done to their job situation and how these programs have created "...an entire shift into pseudo-governing structures of globalism that have eaten away at the sovereignty of the United States and devoured the prosperity of its people...And we have all been programmed to take it lying down."
And Slavo then askes: "Can anyone else see that the most rigged and stolen election of all time is shaping up? If the Democratic Party doesn't want Hillary, what makes anyone think the entire country wants anything to do with her. Before you answer that openly, make a strong educated guess about who the next president s going to be...and how many bodies she will have to climb over to get there."
Like I said, I would love to be wrong, but the Establishment has had control of all the presidential candidates since I have been alive, (and probably several before) and so they are not about to allow a maverick to get in there and upset the culturally Marxist agenda at this late point.
You have to know that, with a Hillary presidency, Christians and real patriots are going to face a time of persecution unlike anything this country has seen since the War of Northern Aggression. So get ready. And don't sit there and think that "the rapture" will get you out of this sticky mess, because I don't believe that will happen. Christians have way too much apathy and complacency to answer for to get off that easy.
Back in January of 2015 I did an article for my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com entitled "Has the Next President Already Been Chosen?" It went into the fact that the One World Government group, the Bilderbergers, had already chosen Hillary Clinton to be the next president of this country, no matter what the voters said. Their sentiments were/are not important and so the culturally Marxist agenda is for Hillary to be enthroned in the White House--no matter what. That article has gotten more viewership than any other article in the last year and a half so it must have resonated with somebody out there. If it turns out that I am wrong and Trump wins by some fluke no one will be happier than I am and in this one case I won't mind having been wrong, in fact I will be quite satisfied at having been wrong.
That's not to say that I think Mr. Trump is the perfect candidate. I am not really crazy about his vice-presidential choice, though I have to admit it's better than Newt Gingrich who was simply awful, but it's better only by degrees.
Today someone sent me a short message to the extent that Reuters had changed the numbers on a recent poll to indicate a loss of 17 points for Trump, and naturally the "news" ( I laugh whenever I use that term) media has shown a 7 point jump for Hillary. I can't verify the Reuters info at this point, so for me it's just a report, not fact yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out to be accurate. If Hillary is slated to win, no matter what, then us boobs out here in flyover country have to be psychologically prepared to accept that without too much fuss and what better way to do that than fudging on poll numbers?
At first I felt that I was almost the only one that considered that the upcoming election might be won with "creative voting" techniques. But then, it wouldn't be the first time, would it? How many voting precincts in Pennsylvania and Ohio in 2012 had their votes tallied and showed that Romney never got a single vote in their precincts? And the Republican establishment never once complained? You'd have thought in some of these precincts that there would have been at least one grumpy old man that would have voted for Romney, but, no, it didn't happen--so they tell us. Do I believe it? Do pigs fly? I wonder how many names on the voting rolls you could have found duplicated at local cemeteries. Obama was supposed to win, no matter what--and the Republican establishment went right along with it. They were, indeed, the "loyal"opposition!
Turns out, however, that I am not the only one with a suspicious mind. Today someone sent me an article from SHTFplan.com written by Mac Slavo and entitled No One Can Stop Her...And She Knows It: "This Election Won't Be Fair"
Mr. Slavo noted, quite accurately I think, that: "In a fair election, my best estimate is that Donald Trump would win in a landslide. But this election will not be fair, few of them are." Can't argue with him there, either. Slavo referred to the Democratic Convention and its results as "Hillary's coronation" and he said the entire dog and pony show had been "stage managed to downplay the overwhelming noise from Bernie supporters who are outraged and feel betrayed by Hillary. The entire convention has had a certain air to it, a quality that reveals the desperation for power,..." I guess that's as good a way of saying it as any--"a desperation for power." Hillary was told to stand down in 2008 so Obama could assume the mantle of "transparency" and now she feels it's her turn and she means to have it irregardless of anything else.
So Hillary must be allowed to win at all costs (and there will be costs). Slavo noted that even Americans who don't pay much attention to what goes on in Washington or much of anything else beyond the ball scores, have started to notice what GATT, the WTO, and NAFTA have done to their job situation and how these programs have created "...an entire shift into pseudo-governing structures of globalism that have eaten away at the sovereignty of the United States and devoured the prosperity of its people...And we have all been programmed to take it lying down."
And Slavo then askes: "Can anyone else see that the most rigged and stolen election of all time is shaping up? If the Democratic Party doesn't want Hillary, what makes anyone think the entire country wants anything to do with her. Before you answer that openly, make a strong educated guess about who the next president s going to be...and how many bodies she will have to climb over to get there."
Like I said, I would love to be wrong, but the Establishment has had control of all the presidential candidates since I have been alive, (and probably several before) and so they are not about to allow a maverick to get in there and upset the culturally Marxist agenda at this late point.
You have to know that, with a Hillary presidency, Christians and real patriots are going to face a time of persecution unlike anything this country has seen since the War of Northern Aggression. So get ready. And don't sit there and think that "the rapture" will get you out of this sticky mess, because I don't believe that will happen. Christians have way too much apathy and complacency to answer for to get off that easy.
Friday, July 01, 2016
Reflections on the Looney Left and a Possible Sellout or Co-option
by Al Benson Jr.
Last week was a pretty fair country week. The Brits seceded from the EU and our beloved ruler in Sodom on the Potomac had a couple reversals he's rather not have had. This week has not been so good. Should have known we couldn't have two like that in a row.
The activity of those we refer to as leftists (socialists and communists and various other One World Government types) continues to defy common sense, but then they don't seem to care, as they realize our intrepid and valorous "news" media will continue to cover for them, making sure the public learns as little as possible of what they need to know.
We have been informed that, coincidentally of course, Slick Willie and Comrade Loretta Lynch met in the airport at Phoenix and sat and talked. Now folks with a little common sense might consider this as a conflict of interest, but the "news" media rushed in to assure a hopefully gullible public that all the two talked about were Clinton's grandchildren and his golf game while in Phoenix. Undoubtedly they also discussed current weather conditions in Zimbabwe and who might win the 2028 World Series, but absolutely nothing beyond that mind you! Believe that and you will look for purple cows to jump over the moon at least once a month!
I also ran across an article on http://www.teaparty.org informing us that 67% of Democrats would love to see Obama stick around for a third term--something he'd love to do if he could just find a way to get by with it--but then Hillary might squawk that "it's her turn to shaft the American people and get rich doing it now" and there might be a slight rift in the Democratic Party. I find it hard to believe that even a majority of Democrats would be willing to put up with another four years of what we've had for the past eight years. The thought boggles the mind. If that's really the case, then the public schools in this country have been successful beyond their wildest dreams. They have successfully propagandized a whole generation. The problem here is that, unfortunately, many in the Republican Establishment don't feel too much different. Oh they might not want Obama around, but they're willing to take Hillary in his place--and honestly folks, what's the difference? Same shell game with different players that's all.
But something that bothered me even worse was a couple articles I checked out just today (7/1) that noted that Trump has got his possible VP list down to just two names--Newt Gingrich and Chris Christie. Now Christie wouldn't be my all time favorite by any means but Gingrich is an absolute no-no. If Trump picks him (and I did an article on this previously if you want to check back) then Trump will be picking a man that is the total antithesis of everything Trump says he stands for. Newt Gingrich is the penultimate Internationalist and One World Government advocate and Trump has to know that. He's not stupid. So what goes here? Another sell out of the frustrated and angry public who is now beginning to wake up and realize how they have been shafted by corporate fascism and its friends in Washington? Sadly, it's beginning to look that way to me, and if that is so then after the election, no matter who wins, it will go back to "business as usual."
And another question--even if Trump is honest (and I always felt he was) what happens if something should happen to him once he gets into office that incapacitates him? Gingrich will end up being president and I honestly wonder if that has been the plan all along, whether Trump realizes it or not. We might be able to get by with Christie for VP though it would hardly be the best of all possible worlds, but with Gingrich you know you are going to get stiffed. It's not a matter of "if" but "when."
So if Gingrich ends up as Trump's VP choice then you can kiss all the rhetoric about making America great again goodbye because that's just what it was--but maybe Trump was right--it will be great again--for the corporate fascists, just not for the folks that deserve a break. Oh Lord, how long???
Last week was a pretty fair country week. The Brits seceded from the EU and our beloved ruler in Sodom on the Potomac had a couple reversals he's rather not have had. This week has not been so good. Should have known we couldn't have two like that in a row.
The activity of those we refer to as leftists (socialists and communists and various other One World Government types) continues to defy common sense, but then they don't seem to care, as they realize our intrepid and valorous "news" media will continue to cover for them, making sure the public learns as little as possible of what they need to know.
We have been informed that, coincidentally of course, Slick Willie and Comrade Loretta Lynch met in the airport at Phoenix and sat and talked. Now folks with a little common sense might consider this as a conflict of interest, but the "news" media rushed in to assure a hopefully gullible public that all the two talked about were Clinton's grandchildren and his golf game while in Phoenix. Undoubtedly they also discussed current weather conditions in Zimbabwe and who might win the 2028 World Series, but absolutely nothing beyond that mind you! Believe that and you will look for purple cows to jump over the moon at least once a month!
I also ran across an article on http://www.teaparty.org informing us that 67% of Democrats would love to see Obama stick around for a third term--something he'd love to do if he could just find a way to get by with it--but then Hillary might squawk that "it's her turn to shaft the American people and get rich doing it now" and there might be a slight rift in the Democratic Party. I find it hard to believe that even a majority of Democrats would be willing to put up with another four years of what we've had for the past eight years. The thought boggles the mind. If that's really the case, then the public schools in this country have been successful beyond their wildest dreams. They have successfully propagandized a whole generation. The problem here is that, unfortunately, many in the Republican Establishment don't feel too much different. Oh they might not want Obama around, but they're willing to take Hillary in his place--and honestly folks, what's the difference? Same shell game with different players that's all.
But something that bothered me even worse was a couple articles I checked out just today (7/1) that noted that Trump has got his possible VP list down to just two names--Newt Gingrich and Chris Christie. Now Christie wouldn't be my all time favorite by any means but Gingrich is an absolute no-no. If Trump picks him (and I did an article on this previously if you want to check back) then Trump will be picking a man that is the total antithesis of everything Trump says he stands for. Newt Gingrich is the penultimate Internationalist and One World Government advocate and Trump has to know that. He's not stupid. So what goes here? Another sell out of the frustrated and angry public who is now beginning to wake up and realize how they have been shafted by corporate fascism and its friends in Washington? Sadly, it's beginning to look that way to me, and if that is so then after the election, no matter who wins, it will go back to "business as usual."
And another question--even if Trump is honest (and I always felt he was) what happens if something should happen to him once he gets into office that incapacitates him? Gingrich will end up being president and I honestly wonder if that has been the plan all along, whether Trump realizes it or not. We might be able to get by with Christie for VP though it would hardly be the best of all possible worlds, but with Gingrich you know you are going to get stiffed. It's not a matter of "if" but "when."
So if Gingrich ends up as Trump's VP choice then you can kiss all the rhetoric about making America great again goodbye because that's just what it was--but maybe Trump was right--it will be great again--for the corporate fascists, just not for the folks that deserve a break. Oh Lord, how long???
Monday, May 16, 2016
Trump Doesn't Need Gingrich--He might as well have Hillary!
by Al Benson Jr.
Donald Trump has become hugely popular with ordinary folks because he has been saying things that they know need to be said and because he has proposed solutions to problems that they realize need solutions other than those given by the Ruling Establishment. Trump has positioned himself as an anti-Establishment candidate and the voting public is thoroughly fed up with the "business as usual" attitude of the Republican/Democratic Establishment because they realize those people are out to stiff them. In the final analysis what's the real difference between Hillary, Bernie, Jeb or Marco, or even Cruz for that matter?
The only difference is the rhetoric--they say different things but DO the same things!
It looked like Trump might actually be a breath of fresh air and try to do something other than pursue the Ruling Establishment's agenda. I say "looked like" because it now appears, after talking up a big anti-Establishment crusade, he is now about to pick one of the Establishment's major players as his vice-president--Newt Gingrich. For those folks desiring real change in the direction of government this is bad news.
A few years back I did a couple articles about Newt Gingrich for blog spots that are no longer on the Internet and so they are not readily available. However there is a very relevant article presently on the Internet on http://newswithviews.com written by Kelleigh Nelson on May 11th of this year. Mrs. Nelson presents several important facts about Gingrich that people should be aware of--and that Donald Trump should be aware of if he isn't. I will pass along a few of Mrs. Nelson's concerns here.
She noted that, in 1968 Gingrich campaigned for Nelson Rockefeller. She also observed that: "In 1990, he became a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. If you've never read Richard N. Gardner's April 1974 article in CFR's World Affairs, Gardner called for an end run around national sovereignty eroding it piece by piece. The CFR was founded in 1921 for world government and eliminating national independence. Henry Kissinger is also a CFR member and actually schooled Newt, and both claim they're conservatives..." So it seems that Kissinger tutored Mr. Gingrich and anyone who knows anything about anything knows that Kissinger is no more a conservative than was Mao Tse Tung! The CFR is diametrically opposed to what Mr. Trump says he stands for--America first.
While he was in the Senate Gingrich voted for the creation of the Department of Education and Mrs. Nelson also observed that "William Z. Foster called for a federal Department of Education in his book Towards Soviet America..." And Gingrich also voted to designate 68 million acres as Federal protected wilderness. Mrs. Nelson also noted that ":Federal land grabs today are huge percentages of the 13 western states that are not federally owned." If Mr. Trump really believes in property rights as he claims then this should be a major concern to him. Gingrich voted for $1.2 billion for UN "peacekeeping." That's a direct slap in the face to anyone advocating national sovereignty. And he wanted Most Favored Nation status for Red China and he was strongly pro-amnestly--right along with Jeb Bush. These are things Mr. Trump has claimed to be opposed to, yet here he is looking at a man for vice-president who is in favor of all the things Trump says he wants to straighten out.
I can't go into everything in Mrs. Nelson's article but suffice it to say that she points out key areas where Gingrich, over the years, has taken the exact opposite position from the one Trump advocates. So what goes on here??? Does Trump really not know where Gingrich is coming from on all these issues? If that's the case then Mr. Trump needs a fast education before he picks a running mate. If that's not the case, then does the public have a right, in view of all that has gone on, to question whether they are being lied to yet one more time?
If Mr. Trump is really sincere in his positions, and up to now I felt he was, and yet he picks Gingrich as his running mate, then I have one more question. If the Bilderbergers who have ordained that Hillary should be the next president decide, for some reason at this late date, to throw her under the bus and Trump ends up getting elected, then what happens if down the road a few months, something "happens" to Trump so that Gingrich ends up being president?
Why, folks, if that happens, then we are back to Square One and once again it will be "business as usual in Sodom on the Potomac" as the Ruling Elite tighten their control. They will get richer and more powerful and us ordinary folks will continue to get stiffed and who knows where it will all end? Another French Revolution? At some point the public will revolt and there will be a bloody mess. I think the Lord's people need to pray for guidance to know what they will need to do when it all hits the fan because it's not a questions of whether it will, but only a question of when.
Donald Trump has become hugely popular with ordinary folks because he has been saying things that they know need to be said and because he has proposed solutions to problems that they realize need solutions other than those given by the Ruling Establishment. Trump has positioned himself as an anti-Establishment candidate and the voting public is thoroughly fed up with the "business as usual" attitude of the Republican/Democratic Establishment because they realize those people are out to stiff them. In the final analysis what's the real difference between Hillary, Bernie, Jeb or Marco, or even Cruz for that matter?
The only difference is the rhetoric--they say different things but DO the same things!
It looked like Trump might actually be a breath of fresh air and try to do something other than pursue the Ruling Establishment's agenda. I say "looked like" because it now appears, after talking up a big anti-Establishment crusade, he is now about to pick one of the Establishment's major players as his vice-president--Newt Gingrich. For those folks desiring real change in the direction of government this is bad news.
A few years back I did a couple articles about Newt Gingrich for blog spots that are no longer on the Internet and so they are not readily available. However there is a very relevant article presently on the Internet on http://newswithviews.com written by Kelleigh Nelson on May 11th of this year. Mrs. Nelson presents several important facts about Gingrich that people should be aware of--and that Donald Trump should be aware of if he isn't. I will pass along a few of Mrs. Nelson's concerns here.
She noted that, in 1968 Gingrich campaigned for Nelson Rockefeller. She also observed that: "In 1990, he became a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. If you've never read Richard N. Gardner's April 1974 article in CFR's World Affairs, Gardner called for an end run around national sovereignty eroding it piece by piece. The CFR was founded in 1921 for world government and eliminating national independence. Henry Kissinger is also a CFR member and actually schooled Newt, and both claim they're conservatives..." So it seems that Kissinger tutored Mr. Gingrich and anyone who knows anything about anything knows that Kissinger is no more a conservative than was Mao Tse Tung! The CFR is diametrically opposed to what Mr. Trump says he stands for--America first.
While he was in the Senate Gingrich voted for the creation of the Department of Education and Mrs. Nelson also observed that "William Z. Foster called for a federal Department of Education in his book Towards Soviet America..." And Gingrich also voted to designate 68 million acres as Federal protected wilderness. Mrs. Nelson also noted that ":Federal land grabs today are huge percentages of the 13 western states that are not federally owned." If Mr. Trump really believes in property rights as he claims then this should be a major concern to him. Gingrich voted for $1.2 billion for UN "peacekeeping." That's a direct slap in the face to anyone advocating national sovereignty. And he wanted Most Favored Nation status for Red China and he was strongly pro-amnestly--right along with Jeb Bush. These are things Mr. Trump has claimed to be opposed to, yet here he is looking at a man for vice-president who is in favor of all the things Trump says he wants to straighten out.
I can't go into everything in Mrs. Nelson's article but suffice it to say that she points out key areas where Gingrich, over the years, has taken the exact opposite position from the one Trump advocates. So what goes on here??? Does Trump really not know where Gingrich is coming from on all these issues? If that's the case then Mr. Trump needs a fast education before he picks a running mate. If that's not the case, then does the public have a right, in view of all that has gone on, to question whether they are being lied to yet one more time?
If Mr. Trump is really sincere in his positions, and up to now I felt he was, and yet he picks Gingrich as his running mate, then I have one more question. If the Bilderbergers who have ordained that Hillary should be the next president decide, for some reason at this late date, to throw her under the bus and Trump ends up getting elected, then what happens if down the road a few months, something "happens" to Trump so that Gingrich ends up being president?
Why, folks, if that happens, then we are back to Square One and once again it will be "business as usual in Sodom on the Potomac" as the Ruling Elite tighten their control. They will get richer and more powerful and us ordinary folks will continue to get stiffed and who knows where it will all end? Another French Revolution? At some point the public will revolt and there will be a bloody mess. I think the Lord's people need to pray for guidance to know what they will need to do when it all hits the fan because it's not a questions of whether it will, but only a question of when.
Monday, April 11, 2016
The Republican Party--Can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit?
by Al Benson Jr.
By no stretch of the wildest imagination can the Republican Party be considered truly conservative and/or patriotic. I realize such a statement will shock some folks who grew up with the myth that the Republican Party was the "party of small government."
If you doubt, just go back and look at the history of the GOP. Who was its first presidential candidate back in 1856? Anyone know? It was John Charles (Pathfinder) Fremont. Actually Fremont didn't find too many of the paths--Kit Carson, his scout found most of them, but Fremont got the credit. Fremont was, by any accurate definition, a radical that leaned hard left in his political views. When the War of Northern Aggression broke out Fremont, who had a command in Missouri, ended up with a whole cadre of socialist Forty-eighters (Lincoln's Marxists) in his command.
When Fremont had run for president in 1856, Frederick Hassaurek, one of the socialist Forty-eighters campaigned all over the Midwest for him. That fact established a relationship between Fremont and the Forty-eighters. And when Fremont didn't make the cut in 1856 the Forty-eighters had to wait another four years until Abraham Lincoln came along and, as they had done for Fremont, so they did for Lincoln. They worked for his election and when the war started they thronged to serve in his armies, and some of them served in the early Republican Party. A couple of Forty-eighters even helped to write the Republican Party platform in 1860--hardly what you would call an auspicious "conservative" beginning for the party.
Real conservatism has seldom been part of the Republican Party agenda. Perceived conservatism has though. Perceived conservatism is great for getting conservative support from people who have not done the homework, and they serve as good window dressing to make others think conservatism thrives where it really doesn't. For some background material on the early Republican Party and the Forty-eighters, read the book Lincoln's Marxists.
So, over the years, the Republican Party has worked to fool the voting public into thinking it is something it is not--patriotic and conservative! You might be tempted to say "well that was then but this is now." Okay--show me the difference between what they did then and what they are doing now. In 2012 you had Ron Paul running for president, and he had won several states, one of them Louisiana where I live. I went to the party caucus in Monroe in 2012 and Ron Paul got 80% of the vote there. Romney got 20%. It was the same in most other Louisiana cities that we checked. However, when the state caucus was held in Shreveport shortly after, with Ron Paul having 80% of the delegates statewide, the state Republican Establishment decided it was not going to seat Ron Paul's 80%--it was going to seat and recognize Romney's 20%. When the 80% of legitimate delegates complained the Republican Establishment called the police in and they made sure the illegitimate 20% were the delegates that were recognized. Lots of folks have forgotten this. I haven't. The Republican Establishment in Louisiana (and several other states) stole their state from Ron Paul and handed it to Mitt Romney. Why? Because they realized that Romney was not going to beat Obama and Obama was supposed to get a second term. Romney was the weakest Republican they could have nominated--same as in 2008 when McCain got the nod. Everyone knew he wasn't going to beat Obama, wasn't supposed to beat Obama. If I had a suspicious mind I'd be tempted to say "the fix was in." But far be it from me to think such thoughts. The Republicans are noted for putting up weak candidates in years the Democrats are supposed to win.
And 2016 is no different. One of the stable of Establishment candidates was supposed to win and then lose to Hillary in the general election. So far it hasn't worked out that way, but it will eventually if the "conservative" Republicans can figure out a way to deep six Donald Trump. He was the real spoiler in their plan and he has hung on to the bitter end. If he gets enough delegates to take the nomination then the Republican Establishment will have to find a way to deny him the nomination--because he is not supposed to win--Hillary is! And you can tell the way the Republican Establishment is acting that this is the game plan. They are bending over backwards to smear Trump. Conservatives--so called--are stating openly that if Trump wins the nomination they will not support him. They are howling that Trump is not a real conservative. The question then arises--are they??? Not hardly.
One thing you have to realize--at the national level and most state levels, the Republican and Democratic parties share the same socialist worldview and so they scratch one another's backs because they promote identical socialist agendas and they don't want some rank outsider coming along to upset the apple cart they have worked at filling for the last several decades.. Both parties, working together, have moved this country a long way down the road to One World government. That's their real agenda.
Doug Parris wrote an interesting article that appeared on http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com on April 8th. Mr. Parris noted some of the less-than-conservative actions of the "party of small government" in recent years. He said: "...from 1988 to 2012 the Party elites successfully rebuffed the candidacies and enormous grassroots movements of Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan, and Ron Paul, all of whom were treated as hostile invaders and their millions of supporters as vermin, despised and rejected. And the odd candidates the Party occasionally elected in their stead loyally compromised away the principles that animated their supporters." In other words, they sold out!
So Mr. Parris feels that the Republican Party is on its last legs, that it's almost finished whether they end up stopping Trump or not. Parris describes the GOP bosses as "flexible." Is that a good description or what? So we end up with a Republican Party that tries to convince people it is conservative when all it is at this point is irrelevant. And as long as they can fool the voters they don't really care. It's all a game, a charade, a political scam if you will to make people think you have two different parties with two different worldviews when all you really have is one internationalist, socialist party with two names.
By no stretch of the wildest imagination can the Republican Party be considered truly conservative and/or patriotic. I realize such a statement will shock some folks who grew up with the myth that the Republican Party was the "party of small government."
If you doubt, just go back and look at the history of the GOP. Who was its first presidential candidate back in 1856? Anyone know? It was John Charles (Pathfinder) Fremont. Actually Fremont didn't find too many of the paths--Kit Carson, his scout found most of them, but Fremont got the credit. Fremont was, by any accurate definition, a radical that leaned hard left in his political views. When the War of Northern Aggression broke out Fremont, who had a command in Missouri, ended up with a whole cadre of socialist Forty-eighters (Lincoln's Marxists) in his command.
When Fremont had run for president in 1856, Frederick Hassaurek, one of the socialist Forty-eighters campaigned all over the Midwest for him. That fact established a relationship between Fremont and the Forty-eighters. And when Fremont didn't make the cut in 1856 the Forty-eighters had to wait another four years until Abraham Lincoln came along and, as they had done for Fremont, so they did for Lincoln. They worked for his election and when the war started they thronged to serve in his armies, and some of them served in the early Republican Party. A couple of Forty-eighters even helped to write the Republican Party platform in 1860--hardly what you would call an auspicious "conservative" beginning for the party.
Real conservatism has seldom been part of the Republican Party agenda. Perceived conservatism has though. Perceived conservatism is great for getting conservative support from people who have not done the homework, and they serve as good window dressing to make others think conservatism thrives where it really doesn't. For some background material on the early Republican Party and the Forty-eighters, read the book Lincoln's Marxists.
So, over the years, the Republican Party has worked to fool the voting public into thinking it is something it is not--patriotic and conservative! You might be tempted to say "well that was then but this is now." Okay--show me the difference between what they did then and what they are doing now. In 2012 you had Ron Paul running for president, and he had won several states, one of them Louisiana where I live. I went to the party caucus in Monroe in 2012 and Ron Paul got 80% of the vote there. Romney got 20%. It was the same in most other Louisiana cities that we checked. However, when the state caucus was held in Shreveport shortly after, with Ron Paul having 80% of the delegates statewide, the state Republican Establishment decided it was not going to seat Ron Paul's 80%--it was going to seat and recognize Romney's 20%. When the 80% of legitimate delegates complained the Republican Establishment called the police in and they made sure the illegitimate 20% were the delegates that were recognized. Lots of folks have forgotten this. I haven't. The Republican Establishment in Louisiana (and several other states) stole their state from Ron Paul and handed it to Mitt Romney. Why? Because they realized that Romney was not going to beat Obama and Obama was supposed to get a second term. Romney was the weakest Republican they could have nominated--same as in 2008 when McCain got the nod. Everyone knew he wasn't going to beat Obama, wasn't supposed to beat Obama. If I had a suspicious mind I'd be tempted to say "the fix was in." But far be it from me to think such thoughts. The Republicans are noted for putting up weak candidates in years the Democrats are supposed to win.
And 2016 is no different. One of the stable of Establishment candidates was supposed to win and then lose to Hillary in the general election. So far it hasn't worked out that way, but it will eventually if the "conservative" Republicans can figure out a way to deep six Donald Trump. He was the real spoiler in their plan and he has hung on to the bitter end. If he gets enough delegates to take the nomination then the Republican Establishment will have to find a way to deny him the nomination--because he is not supposed to win--Hillary is! And you can tell the way the Republican Establishment is acting that this is the game plan. They are bending over backwards to smear Trump. Conservatives--so called--are stating openly that if Trump wins the nomination they will not support him. They are howling that Trump is not a real conservative. The question then arises--are they??? Not hardly.
One thing you have to realize--at the national level and most state levels, the Republican and Democratic parties share the same socialist worldview and so they scratch one another's backs because they promote identical socialist agendas and they don't want some rank outsider coming along to upset the apple cart they have worked at filling for the last several decades.. Both parties, working together, have moved this country a long way down the road to One World government. That's their real agenda.
Doug Parris wrote an interesting article that appeared on http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com on April 8th. Mr. Parris noted some of the less-than-conservative actions of the "party of small government" in recent years. He said: "...from 1988 to 2012 the Party elites successfully rebuffed the candidacies and enormous grassroots movements of Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan, and Ron Paul, all of whom were treated as hostile invaders and their millions of supporters as vermin, despised and rejected. And the odd candidates the Party occasionally elected in their stead loyally compromised away the principles that animated their supporters." In other words, they sold out!
So Mr. Parris feels that the Republican Party is on its last legs, that it's almost finished whether they end up stopping Trump or not. Parris describes the GOP bosses as "flexible." Is that a good description or what? So we end up with a Republican Party that tries to convince people it is conservative when all it is at this point is irrelevant. And as long as they can fool the voters they don't really care. It's all a game, a charade, a political scam if you will to make people think you have two different parties with two different worldviews when all you really have is one internationalist, socialist party with two names.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
No Wonder the Left Usually Wins--the Right is Nothing But a Hollow Shell
by Al Benson Jr.
I have been watching, this weekend, all the fuss over the Communist groups that managed to break up Trump's rally in Chicago. From Communist groups you expect this sort of thing. Since they can't intelligently debate their corrupt points their only alternative is to shout down their adversaries and try to shut them down and them blame their adversaries for it. This is the standard bill of fare for the lefties, proving that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute and can get by with blaming the opposition for that fact.
What surprised me, though, was the people over on the right who spouted the exact same line the lefties did. Communist groups broke up Trump's rally and it was all Trump's fault according to many that are supposed to be "right-wingers." Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were among the headliners in this dog and pony show and when you begin to see "conservative" candidates pushing the same line at Hillary and Bernie you have to know something is wrong, dreadfully wrong.
I can come up with no other conclusion than this; that much of what we consider to be the conservative, patriotic movement is really nothing more than a hollow shell, geared to fool honest, patriotic Americans with its blather about "small government" when what they are really doing is providing cover for the left without appearing to do so. And they do fool lots of folks who lack the discernment to figure out what they are doing.
It's a given than both Republican and Democratic Parties are nothing more than two wings on the same socialist, One World vulture and anyone who really trusts the Republicans to deliver the country from the clutches of the "liberal Democrats" is whistling Yankee/Marxist Doodle because that's all the Republicans will ever give him--doodle!
I'm thinking of going through my email list and deleting a batch of those sites I have been getting mail from for years so because, as I watch what they say more and more, I find many of them seem to be nothing more than foils for the Marxists. Now I will admit that Donald Trump is far from the perfect candidate. He has issues I don't agree with, such as his position on eminent domain. But on the other hand, I can't disagree with him on the Second Amendment--as long as he sticks to what he's said so far. What amazes me is that he draws fire from both left and right and, on some reflection, that says to me that left and right really agree on many things when push comes to shove and they only let us know about it when someone like Trump comes along that they are forced to say something about because his positions attack the left/right coalition they are really part of.
So, it seems to me that lots of folks who have claimed to be on the right and to be patriotic with their "America first" messages have really been lying to us, which probably siphons money and support away from those groups that are genuinely conservative and patriotic. That would be a Marxist goal too.
I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for us to start reassessing some of these "patriotic" groups to see what they really are doing for us, if anything, and how much of their supposed effort in our behalf amounts to little more than meaningless blather that directs real opposition away from the left. When Cruz and Rubio reach the point where they become indistinguishable from Hillary and Bernie then we better start realizing we have homework to do. A good start might be to check the Internet and find a membership list for the Council on Foreign Relations and check out any members of Congress who might be members or have family members who belong or have belonged. Then check out "news" media people who belong. Once you have done that you will know why you get the slanted media coverage so prevalent on the six o' clock news and in the daily fishwrapper you still refer to as a newspaper.
Unfortunately the advocates of One World Government are alive and well on both the left and the right. It should be our bounden duty to expose the ones on the right.
I have been watching, this weekend, all the fuss over the Communist groups that managed to break up Trump's rally in Chicago. From Communist groups you expect this sort of thing. Since they can't intelligently debate their corrupt points their only alternative is to shout down their adversaries and try to shut them down and them blame their adversaries for it. This is the standard bill of fare for the lefties, proving that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute and can get by with blaming the opposition for that fact.
What surprised me, though, was the people over on the right who spouted the exact same line the lefties did. Communist groups broke up Trump's rally and it was all Trump's fault according to many that are supposed to be "right-wingers." Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were among the headliners in this dog and pony show and when you begin to see "conservative" candidates pushing the same line at Hillary and Bernie you have to know something is wrong, dreadfully wrong.
I can come up with no other conclusion than this; that much of what we consider to be the conservative, patriotic movement is really nothing more than a hollow shell, geared to fool honest, patriotic Americans with its blather about "small government" when what they are really doing is providing cover for the left without appearing to do so. And they do fool lots of folks who lack the discernment to figure out what they are doing.
It's a given than both Republican and Democratic Parties are nothing more than two wings on the same socialist, One World vulture and anyone who really trusts the Republicans to deliver the country from the clutches of the "liberal Democrats" is whistling Yankee/Marxist Doodle because that's all the Republicans will ever give him--doodle!
I'm thinking of going through my email list and deleting a batch of those sites I have been getting mail from for years so because, as I watch what they say more and more, I find many of them seem to be nothing more than foils for the Marxists. Now I will admit that Donald Trump is far from the perfect candidate. He has issues I don't agree with, such as his position on eminent domain. But on the other hand, I can't disagree with him on the Second Amendment--as long as he sticks to what he's said so far. What amazes me is that he draws fire from both left and right and, on some reflection, that says to me that left and right really agree on many things when push comes to shove and they only let us know about it when someone like Trump comes along that they are forced to say something about because his positions attack the left/right coalition they are really part of.
So, it seems to me that lots of folks who have claimed to be on the right and to be patriotic with their "America first" messages have really been lying to us, which probably siphons money and support away from those groups that are genuinely conservative and patriotic. That would be a Marxist goal too.
I'm thinking that it might be a good idea for us to start reassessing some of these "patriotic" groups to see what they really are doing for us, if anything, and how much of their supposed effort in our behalf amounts to little more than meaningless blather that directs real opposition away from the left. When Cruz and Rubio reach the point where they become indistinguishable from Hillary and Bernie then we better start realizing we have homework to do. A good start might be to check the Internet and find a membership list for the Council on Foreign Relations and check out any members of Congress who might be members or have family members who belong or have belonged. Then check out "news" media people who belong. Once you have done that you will know why you get the slanted media coverage so prevalent on the six o' clock news and in the daily fishwrapper you still refer to as a newspaper.
Unfortunately the advocates of One World Government are alive and well on both the left and the right. It should be our bounden duty to expose the ones on the right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)