by Al Benson Jr.
After yesterday's post showing that InfoWars.com had demonstrated that most of the money to finance Jillary's vote recount was coming from one source and not an outraged American public, I thought this little update might be appropriate.
According to an article in the Washington Times for 11/27/16, Wisconsin elections officials can see no proof of a hack. They said they: "...can't find evidence that any of its voting machines were hacked." And the article I took this from, http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com asked the question "Do you have a plan B or are you going to let it go finally?"
I'll answer that one myself. If they don't yet have a plan B in the backroom you can bet the farm they are working on it as I write this. These are cultural Marxists we are talking about here and they never quit. They may fail with plans A, B, C, D, and E but not to worry. They will be back with plan F as soon as they tear it off the drawing board and they will keep trying until they find some round peg they can jam into a square hole hard enough that they will get at least some of what they want. I am reminded of how many times the cultural Marxists came back to Congress with their petitions for a holiday for their good buddy Martin Luther King Jr. Most people forget, but they came back every year for fourteen years until they finally got what they wanted and we've been stuck with that "holiday" and the opportunities for the leftist propaganda that goes with it ever since. I loathe what the cultural Marxists stand for. It is anti-Christian to the core, but you have to give them credit--they possess a tenacity that most Christians can only daydream about!
The Washington Times asked commission spokesman Reid Magney in Wisconsin if any evidence or indication of hacking had put in an appearance. He replied in an email "No evidence of hacking."
This was confirmed by yet another article from the same source listed above. I will quote: "CNN's New Day interviewed Jill Stein about her recount effort on Friday. 'Do you think this election was stolen' CNN's host John Berman asked Stein point-blank. Um, we don't know...And I think the forensic computer experts have raised serious questions. What we do know is that this was a hack-riddled election...Wait! It gets better. Remember that Hillary was found to alter polls? Well, Stein blamed her suspicions in part on the fake polls! Those are Hillary's, Jill, not Trump's... And when Berman asked if she has evidence that a hack took place. No,. We do not have a smoking gun."
So after all this fuss and all the millions of dollars raised, most of it seemingly from one central source, we have to ask ourselves what the deuce is going on here? We're going to do all these vote recounts with no evidence of any wrongdoing--or it is now the plan to manufacture "evidence" as we go along? Will they find someone, somewhere down the line in this process that will be willing to "help" them out with revised vote totals or what?
And why did Ms. Stein end up doing something here that could not possibly benefit her or her party? Did someone make her an offer she couldn't (or didn't dare) to refuse? And was her doing this initially nothing more than a ploy to allow Hillary to get back into the game to "help her out?"
The great Christian statesman, Patrick Henry, when invited to take part in the Constitutional Convention back in 1787, refused to be a part of it. Mr. Henry said "I smell a rat." Mr. Henry was a wise man. I wonder how many "rats" he'd be able to smell in this current game were we fortunate enough to still have him around.
Update: An article that appeared on http://www.thegatewaypundit.com at 8:19 this evening stated: "As reported earlier the election steal was put into motion when a group of 'experts' reviewed the election results and reported that there appeared to be election fraud. However, a member of the group of 'experts' happens to be voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz. Bonifaz also happens to be connected with George Soros when he launched the National Voting Rights Institute in 1994. Bonifaz was the Institute's President. This is certainly shocking but no surprise. Hillary and Soros are in this for the steal."
So Bonifaz helped Soros back in 1994 and now he represents Jill Stein. My what an amazing coincidence!
Gateway Pundit also pointed out that Stein cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania. She has to go through the courts to do this and she has to present evidence that shows voter fraud. Seeing that Trump won Pennsylvania by around 70,000 votes, Ms. Stein would have to be able to prove that fraud was "probable." Of course knowing Soros and the Clintons, that thorny little problem may already be in the process of being "worked on."
Sunday, November 27, 2016
Saturday, November 26, 2016
Where Is Jill Stein's Money Coming From For Vote Recount?
by Al Benson Jr.
On my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com I posted an article earlier this afternoon (11/26) that dealt with Jill Stein's raising of millions of dollars to have votes recounted in 3 states where Hillary lost in an effort to shift the electoral vote just enough so that Hillary could, indeed, be enthroned in the White House, in the position she feels she so richly deserves, but which that mean old Donald Trump deprived her of when he had the audacity to win the election. Nasty man that he is--but not to worry, she has found a way to get back at him and give herself the presidency at the same time.
We read that Jill Stein's great concern for an accurate vote count led her to file petitions in 3 states to have the votes recounted.For those who may not know who Ms. Stein is, she was the Green Party candidate for president in this past election. She claims she is not doing this to benefit Hillary in any way--she just wants to see truth, justice, and the American way prevail. Believe that and I have a bridge built with golden bricks in Tucson, Arizona I will sell you at bargain basement rates! Doing this is an expensive proposition. You don't get it done for peanuts, so Ms. Stein started fundraising online on November 24th with a goal of $2.5 million. According to Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars.com "Overnight on the hour, her fund received $160,000 every hour. These were not random people donating at 3 am to her campaign but rather some 'bot' that increased her amount by this amount on the hour."
If you are wondering what a "bot" is, so did I. I'd not heard this term before so I looked it up and found that it's kind of an Internet robot that performs an automated task every hour or every how-often-you-set-it-up to do this particular task. Up until this point Stein has raised more than $4.5 million, more than enough to take care of the recounts in those critical states Hillary needs to shift the electoral vote.
Watson has noted that: "Go to Jill Stein's fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a perfectly consistent 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully.and noted that at night when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, the donations for this came in like clockwork with no deviation from the steady pace whatever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America and practically everyone is asleep at 3 am. Last night it should have slowed down. It did not. It just marched toward the finish line like an obedient soldier...Don't be fooled by the slick language on the donation page. If these donations did not virtually stop at night THEY ARE NOT COMING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Yes, folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens..."
What Mr. Watson is saying is that all this so-called "contribution" money from concerned Americans who are supposedly worried about Trump being president IS COMING FROM ONE SOURCE! Now stop and think about that for a minute. If it all comes from one source that means it is being used by that one source to change the election results. Supposedly this was Ms. Stein's project in her crusade for truth in the voting booth but, surprise of all surprises, now the Clinton Campaign had decided to enter the fray and help Ms. Stein out with her noteworthy project. Kinds of really makes you wonder whose project it really was to begin with doesn't it. Seems like Stein was a willing foil to get Hillary into the game to me.
So folks, if this scam works you will see the American people's will again thwarted by the Establishment and we will be expected to be stupid enough to go along with this--only some of us won't, so there will be problems. So watch the elections being stolen from you unless you all are willing to make a big fuss!
On my other blog spot http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com I posted an article earlier this afternoon (11/26) that dealt with Jill Stein's raising of millions of dollars to have votes recounted in 3 states where Hillary lost in an effort to shift the electoral vote just enough so that Hillary could, indeed, be enthroned in the White House, in the position she feels she so richly deserves, but which that mean old Donald Trump deprived her of when he had the audacity to win the election. Nasty man that he is--but not to worry, she has found a way to get back at him and give herself the presidency at the same time.
We read that Jill Stein's great concern for an accurate vote count led her to file petitions in 3 states to have the votes recounted.For those who may not know who Ms. Stein is, she was the Green Party candidate for president in this past election. She claims she is not doing this to benefit Hillary in any way--she just wants to see truth, justice, and the American way prevail. Believe that and I have a bridge built with golden bricks in Tucson, Arizona I will sell you at bargain basement rates! Doing this is an expensive proposition. You don't get it done for peanuts, so Ms. Stein started fundraising online on November 24th with a goal of $2.5 million. According to Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars.com "Overnight on the hour, her fund received $160,000 every hour. These were not random people donating at 3 am to her campaign but rather some 'bot' that increased her amount by this amount on the hour."
If you are wondering what a "bot" is, so did I. I'd not heard this term before so I looked it up and found that it's kind of an Internet robot that performs an automated task every hour or every how-often-you-set-it-up to do this particular task. Up until this point Stein has raised more than $4.5 million, more than enough to take care of the recounts in those critical states Hillary needs to shift the electoral vote.
Watson has noted that: "Go to Jill Stein's fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a perfectly consistent 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully.and noted that at night when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, the donations for this came in like clockwork with no deviation from the steady pace whatever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America and practically everyone is asleep at 3 am. Last night it should have slowed down. It did not. It just marched toward the finish line like an obedient soldier...Don't be fooled by the slick language on the donation page. If these donations did not virtually stop at night THEY ARE NOT COMING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Yes, folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens..."
What Mr. Watson is saying is that all this so-called "contribution" money from concerned Americans who are supposedly worried about Trump being president IS COMING FROM ONE SOURCE! Now stop and think about that for a minute. If it all comes from one source that means it is being used by that one source to change the election results. Supposedly this was Ms. Stein's project in her crusade for truth in the voting booth but, surprise of all surprises, now the Clinton Campaign had decided to enter the fray and help Ms. Stein out with her noteworthy project. Kinds of really makes you wonder whose project it really was to begin with doesn't it. Seems like Stein was a willing foil to get Hillary into the game to me.
So folks, if this scam works you will see the American people's will again thwarted by the Establishment and we will be expected to be stupid enough to go along with this--only some of us won't, so there will be problems. So watch the elections being stolen from you unless you all are willing to make a big fuss!
Wednesday, November 23, 2016
So Who Is Advising Trump To Soften Up?
by Al Benson Jr.
I have to admit, that unless Mr. Trump changes the direction he is starting to go in it is going to look to a lot of his supporters as if he is in the process of selling out to the Ruling Establishment he told us all he despised. I have to wonder who is working to move him in this direction. I also have to wonder who is giving him the advice he seems to be taking, whereby he is being "nice" to those that tried to stab him in the back and, in the process, forgetting his pledge to "drain the swamp." It seems he is hanging around with a whole bunch of the folks that filled up the swamp to begin with and his association with them will be a major preventative factor in the swamp being drained. I'd hate to think that all that talk was just talk. I thought better of him than that.
He is touting Mitt Romney, one of the instigators of the "Never Trump" movement for his Secretary of State. If ever anyone had "One World Government" credentials it is Mitt Romney. The only other hanger on in the Trump camp that could outdo Romney there is Newt Gingrich and now I am beginning to what what political plus Mr. Gingrich is waiting to be awarded. Pastor Chuck Baldwin recently stated in an article on http://www.lewrockwell.com that Newt Gingrich "...is the quintessential insider, globalist, and establishment hack."
Mr. Trump just nominated Nikki Haley, the South Carolina turncoat governor as his UN ambassador. That move ain't going over real well in the deep South where Ms. Haley was responsible for starting last year's cultural genocide campaign against all things Confederate. I wouldn't appoint this lady as dog catcher. I'm afraid she's try to "Yankeeize" my dog.
Trump made a good appointment with Jess Sessions and I have no problem with Stephen Bannon. His former association with Breitbart would indicate that he has knowledge of the world situation. I don't know enough about this lady he just tapped for the Education Department except that she is supposed to be in favor of charter schools and education vouchers to let parents send their kids to whatever schools they want, religious or otherwise. But I do question that if Christian parents go that route, how long will it be before the feds start telling them what they can teach their kids because, after all, the feds are helping to fund their education? Better if Christian parents would just reject the vouchers.
When we home schooled our kids it was a sacrifice and we were always short of money and we did get scholarship help on several occasions, but never from the feds! The idea of taking federal money did not occur to us at any point. Having seen what the feds did, indirectly, to textbook protesters in West Virginia, the thought of tainted, controlling federal bucks to help educate our kids was anathema to us.
And as long as I am analyzing what Mr. Trump is doing, I might as well put my two cents in regarding his new position on the Clintons. He told us in one of the presidential debates that if he were president Hillary would be in jail. So what happened to change his mind? Now he's telling us that he doesn't want to hurt the Clintons because "they are good people." He's got to be kidding, right? The Clintons would cut his throat for a quarter any day of the week and hand him the change and if he lives in the real world he has to know that. So what's all this "they are good people" stuff? He's starting to sound like a politician--God forbid!
The people that voted for Trump voted for him because they were sick and tired of the corruption and the public getting shafted by the Establishment and Trump sounded like that's what he was all about. What happens if the public finds out they've been shafted yet again?
It's beginning to sound like if Mr. Trump is going to "drain the swamp" he will probably end up doing it a thimble-full at a time--the same principle as someone dumping a cupful of water in the Gulf of Mexico to raise the water level.
Pastor Chuck Baldwin has urged Trump supporters that they cannot go to sleep, that they need to hold his feet to the fire on those promises he made. If his candidacy awakened the electorate, they need to stay awake and alert and watch what he does just like they would watch what any other candidate did. Pastor Baldwin said: "I tell you, again: this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change the course of a nation. Frankly, if this opportunity is squandered, there likely will not be another one in most of our lifetimes." This is sound advice and we better heed it because the lives and culture we help to preserve will be our grandchildren's.
Update! According to a World News Daily article I just read it seems that the Republican Establishment has conned Mr. Trump into taking the position that climate change may now be a "man-made" issue, therefore their agenda and that of the other socialists on this issue will be preserved in a Trump administration. Bit by bit we see Mr. Trump backing off the issues he campaigned on and going the route the Establishment wants him to. SOMEONE HAS GOTTEN TO HIM and is in the process of neutralizing what he claimed he wanted to do.
I have to admit, that unless Mr. Trump changes the direction he is starting to go in it is going to look to a lot of his supporters as if he is in the process of selling out to the Ruling Establishment he told us all he despised. I have to wonder who is working to move him in this direction. I also have to wonder who is giving him the advice he seems to be taking, whereby he is being "nice" to those that tried to stab him in the back and, in the process, forgetting his pledge to "drain the swamp." It seems he is hanging around with a whole bunch of the folks that filled up the swamp to begin with and his association with them will be a major preventative factor in the swamp being drained. I'd hate to think that all that talk was just talk. I thought better of him than that.
He is touting Mitt Romney, one of the instigators of the "Never Trump" movement for his Secretary of State. If ever anyone had "One World Government" credentials it is Mitt Romney. The only other hanger on in the Trump camp that could outdo Romney there is Newt Gingrich and now I am beginning to what what political plus Mr. Gingrich is waiting to be awarded. Pastor Chuck Baldwin recently stated in an article on http://www.lewrockwell.com that Newt Gingrich "...is the quintessential insider, globalist, and establishment hack."
Mr. Trump just nominated Nikki Haley, the South Carolina turncoat governor as his UN ambassador. That move ain't going over real well in the deep South where Ms. Haley was responsible for starting last year's cultural genocide campaign against all things Confederate. I wouldn't appoint this lady as dog catcher. I'm afraid she's try to "Yankeeize" my dog.
Trump made a good appointment with Jess Sessions and I have no problem with Stephen Bannon. His former association with Breitbart would indicate that he has knowledge of the world situation. I don't know enough about this lady he just tapped for the Education Department except that she is supposed to be in favor of charter schools and education vouchers to let parents send their kids to whatever schools they want, religious or otherwise. But I do question that if Christian parents go that route, how long will it be before the feds start telling them what they can teach their kids because, after all, the feds are helping to fund their education? Better if Christian parents would just reject the vouchers.
When we home schooled our kids it was a sacrifice and we were always short of money and we did get scholarship help on several occasions, but never from the feds! The idea of taking federal money did not occur to us at any point. Having seen what the feds did, indirectly, to textbook protesters in West Virginia, the thought of tainted, controlling federal bucks to help educate our kids was anathema to us.
And as long as I am analyzing what Mr. Trump is doing, I might as well put my two cents in regarding his new position on the Clintons. He told us in one of the presidential debates that if he were president Hillary would be in jail. So what happened to change his mind? Now he's telling us that he doesn't want to hurt the Clintons because "they are good people." He's got to be kidding, right? The Clintons would cut his throat for a quarter any day of the week and hand him the change and if he lives in the real world he has to know that. So what's all this "they are good people" stuff? He's starting to sound like a politician--God forbid!
The people that voted for Trump voted for him because they were sick and tired of the corruption and the public getting shafted by the Establishment and Trump sounded like that's what he was all about. What happens if the public finds out they've been shafted yet again?
It's beginning to sound like if Mr. Trump is going to "drain the swamp" he will probably end up doing it a thimble-full at a time--the same principle as someone dumping a cupful of water in the Gulf of Mexico to raise the water level.
Pastor Chuck Baldwin has urged Trump supporters that they cannot go to sleep, that they need to hold his feet to the fire on those promises he made. If his candidacy awakened the electorate, they need to stay awake and alert and watch what he does just like they would watch what any other candidate did. Pastor Baldwin said: "I tell you, again: this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change the course of a nation. Frankly, if this opportunity is squandered, there likely will not be another one in most of our lifetimes." This is sound advice and we better heed it because the lives and culture we help to preserve will be our grandchildren's.
Update! According to a World News Daily article I just read it seems that the Republican Establishment has conned Mr. Trump into taking the position that climate change may now be a "man-made" issue, therefore their agenda and that of the other socialists on this issue will be preserved in a Trump administration. Bit by bit we see Mr. Trump backing off the issues he campaigned on and going the route the Establishment wants him to. SOMEONE HAS GOTTEN TO HIM and is in the process of neutralizing what he claimed he wanted to do.
Saturday, November 12, 2016
"Whitelash" And the Cultural Marxists
by Al Benson Jr.
Well, a representative of the cultural Marxist class has come up with a new word in a pathetic attempt to define the reasons Trump won the presidential election when he really knew, in his heart of hearts, that Hitlery should have won it. The new term he came up with is "Whitelash." This representative of the cultural Marxist class is presently a commentator for CNN. Some have labeled that "news" network the "Communist News Network" because the Communists seem to get a better shake in their "news" broadcasts than anyone else does.
This CNN commentator is a man named Van Jones. Anyone remember good ol' Van? He was a special adviser for "Green Jobs" in the outgoing Obama Regime. He was Obama's "Green Jobs Czar." You can find Van mentioned in various sites on the Internet. One site noted of him that "There's little question that Jones was an avowed communist." The site www.politifact.com noted that, in 1994 Mr. Jones was one of the founders o STORM, a Marxist-Leninist group whose hero was Chinese Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung. That's what Obama had for a "Green Jobs Czar." Anyone surprised? Jones made such a fuss in certain areas that he eventually had to resign. I don't know when CNN picked him up but they sure didn't get any bargain when they did.
The cultural Marxists had planned on Hitlery winning the election. They thought she was a shoo-in. They made the mistake of believing their own polls. Of course some even went so far as to try to implement her victory by "assisting" the vote totals in several states. If you doubt that then read some of the WikiLeaks material that has been posted on the Internet, or some of the other stuff captured on hidden cameras by the Veritas organization showing Democratic operatives talking about how they planned to "influence" the vote.
So Comrade Jones came up with the new culturally Marxist term to define why the evil Donald Trump won the election when the virtuous Hitlery should have. Remember the word "whitelash" because you will see more of it in days to come as other commentators in the prostitute mainstream media try to blame us evil white folks for the victory of that evil Donald Trump.
Everyone knows we should all have voted for Hitlery to show we have no prejudice against women, just like we all should have voted for Obama in the last two elections to show we had no prejudice against blacks. The fact that many of us didn't swallow that bit of race-baiting shows that we must all be prejudiced and must, therefore, assume our assigned places on "stools of everlasting repentance."
Had we not been guilty of "whitelash" we would all have voted for Hitlery so she could have been enthroned in the White House, have eviscerated the Second Amendment, have promoted her open borders scheme to end our national sovereignty and have promoted a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child when that child became "inconvenient." Just look at all the golden opportunities we missed by not electing her! The fact that us evil white folks couldn't find it in our hearts to do all this shows that we are not only "deplorable" but totally "irredeemable." Problem with this new cultural Marxist pet theory is that there were also black folks and Hispanic folks that voted the same way us evil whites did--against Hitlery. Of course all the blacks that voted for Trump must have been "Uncle Toms." That would explain why they failed in their bounden duty to elect Hitlery, the most compassionate candidate ever. As for the Hispanic folks that voted for Trump, I don't know what the Hispanic term for their "treason" might be. Maybe we could just call them people that displayed an unusual amount of common sense in this instance. But somehow I don't think that definition will appease those of a cultural Marxist persuasion.
But whatever happened, it was, as always, "whitey's fault." It always is. I also noted that a batch of Hollyweird people and various other "celebrities" all said that if Trump was elected they would leave the country. From what I can tell, most of them haven't gone anywhere and don't really plan on making the trip. More's the pity! If the thought of a Trump presidency is so horrendous, then what's keeping them here? They should be packing their bags by now and heading out for socialist gardens of Eden like Zimbabwe or Cuba--and making sure the door doesn't hit their backsides on the way out! As a prejudiced white guy, I won't shed any tears when you all are gone--and I don't care what color you are, or what your sexual preference is.
I guess all of us evil whites need to start attending sensitivity training class that will teach us to hate and loathe ourselves so we don't all fall prey to "whitelash." Blacklash is okay. That's politically correct--and besides, George Soros may fund some of that. Black prejudice is okay and the black "racists" that are prejudiced against us white folks are okay. It's just that we are not permitted to feel the same way toward them. The darker animals in this barnyard are always "more equal" than the lighter animals and us evil whites need to remember that.
What we really need to start doing is taking a good look behind the scenes at who is promoting and paying for this Marxist drivel--and then we need to start exposing them (Ephesians 5:11).
Well, a representative of the cultural Marxist class has come up with a new word in a pathetic attempt to define the reasons Trump won the presidential election when he really knew, in his heart of hearts, that Hitlery should have won it. The new term he came up with is "Whitelash." This representative of the cultural Marxist class is presently a commentator for CNN. Some have labeled that "news" network the "Communist News Network" because the Communists seem to get a better shake in their "news" broadcasts than anyone else does.
This CNN commentator is a man named Van Jones. Anyone remember good ol' Van? He was a special adviser for "Green Jobs" in the outgoing Obama Regime. He was Obama's "Green Jobs Czar." You can find Van mentioned in various sites on the Internet. One site noted of him that "There's little question that Jones was an avowed communist." The site www.politifact.com noted that, in 1994 Mr. Jones was one of the founders o STORM, a Marxist-Leninist group whose hero was Chinese Communist dictator Mao Tse Tung. That's what Obama had for a "Green Jobs Czar." Anyone surprised? Jones made such a fuss in certain areas that he eventually had to resign. I don't know when CNN picked him up but they sure didn't get any bargain when they did.
The cultural Marxists had planned on Hitlery winning the election. They thought she was a shoo-in. They made the mistake of believing their own polls. Of course some even went so far as to try to implement her victory by "assisting" the vote totals in several states. If you doubt that then read some of the WikiLeaks material that has been posted on the Internet, or some of the other stuff captured on hidden cameras by the Veritas organization showing Democratic operatives talking about how they planned to "influence" the vote.
So Comrade Jones came up with the new culturally Marxist term to define why the evil Donald Trump won the election when the virtuous Hitlery should have. Remember the word "whitelash" because you will see more of it in days to come as other commentators in the prostitute mainstream media try to blame us evil white folks for the victory of that evil Donald Trump.
Everyone knows we should all have voted for Hitlery to show we have no prejudice against women, just like we all should have voted for Obama in the last two elections to show we had no prejudice against blacks. The fact that many of us didn't swallow that bit of race-baiting shows that we must all be prejudiced and must, therefore, assume our assigned places on "stools of everlasting repentance."
Had we not been guilty of "whitelash" we would all have voted for Hitlery so she could have been enthroned in the White House, have eviscerated the Second Amendment, have promoted her open borders scheme to end our national sovereignty and have promoted a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child when that child became "inconvenient." Just look at all the golden opportunities we missed by not electing her! The fact that us evil white folks couldn't find it in our hearts to do all this shows that we are not only "deplorable" but totally "irredeemable." Problem with this new cultural Marxist pet theory is that there were also black folks and Hispanic folks that voted the same way us evil whites did--against Hitlery. Of course all the blacks that voted for Trump must have been "Uncle Toms." That would explain why they failed in their bounden duty to elect Hitlery, the most compassionate candidate ever. As for the Hispanic folks that voted for Trump, I don't know what the Hispanic term for their "treason" might be. Maybe we could just call them people that displayed an unusual amount of common sense in this instance. But somehow I don't think that definition will appease those of a cultural Marxist persuasion.
But whatever happened, it was, as always, "whitey's fault." It always is. I also noted that a batch of Hollyweird people and various other "celebrities" all said that if Trump was elected they would leave the country. From what I can tell, most of them haven't gone anywhere and don't really plan on making the trip. More's the pity! If the thought of a Trump presidency is so horrendous, then what's keeping them here? They should be packing their bags by now and heading out for socialist gardens of Eden like Zimbabwe or Cuba--and making sure the door doesn't hit their backsides on the way out! As a prejudiced white guy, I won't shed any tears when you all are gone--and I don't care what color you are, or what your sexual preference is.
I guess all of us evil whites need to start attending sensitivity training class that will teach us to hate and loathe ourselves so we don't all fall prey to "whitelash." Blacklash is okay. That's politically correct--and besides, George Soros may fund some of that. Black prejudice is okay and the black "racists" that are prejudiced against us white folks are okay. It's just that we are not permitted to feel the same way toward them. The darker animals in this barnyard are always "more equal" than the lighter animals and us evil whites need to remember that.
What we really need to start doing is taking a good look behind the scenes at who is promoting and paying for this Marxist drivel--and then we need to start exposing them (Ephesians 5:11).
Tuesday, November 08, 2016
The "News" Media Is Nothing But Hillary's Water Carrier
by Al Benson Jr.
Just yesterday I read an article on http://thehornnews.com which carried a headline that stated: "RIGGED! Email PROVES media totally corrupt" Now there's a headline I could agree with. After watching the news media (so called) cover events I have been a partaker of for over forty years, I have to totally agree with the headline on the Horn News article. I long ago came to the conclusion that the absolute last thing the "news" media was all about was real news. Lots of folks couldn't quite see that, but the media's performance in prostituting itself before the Alter of St. Hillary in this current election cycle has opened lots of eyes.
The Horn News article continued: "The most recent batch of emails released by WikiLeaks reveals that CNN and The Washington Post were communicating with the Democratic National Convention during the election primaries, filtering them information to use in their reporting. In fact, Democrat insiders were actually writing the questions for interviews and doing newspaper reaearch! These allegedly non-partisan publications clearly had an alternative agenda outside from honest and respectable journalism." The article then shows part of one of the leaked emails that shows this.
And the article noted that: "It's clear the mainstream media has been working with the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and Clinton campaign to shape the political discourse throughout the entire election, focusing on Trump controversies." So, with the Democrats and the "lamestream media" working hand in glove to make Trump look bad, who can honestly say the system wasn't rigged?
What we have finally seen, right out in the open for those who have eyes to see, is "journalists' are are not really journalists at all, but rather are a group of people on a political mission to help elect Hillary--anyway they have to. They have proven themselves to be nothing more than culturally Marxist political shills--something many of us figured out decades ago. But now it's out in the open!
One commentator on a Fox News interview either yesterday or today accused the media of helping to "drag the old hag staggering across the finish line."
For anyone that doesn't have mush for brains it should be more than obvious that the mainstream media has lost all credibility with ordinary folks. The only ones they may remotely still have credibility with is ultra-liberals, socialists, and communists, and the only reason they have any standing yet, even in such sordid company, is that these groups realize the media can be useful to them in their efforts to destroy the culture of ordinary Americans.
Someone told me in the last couple days that the readership of mainstream propaganda sheets like the New York Times and the Washington Post are way, way down. No one is paying them any attention anymore. The alternative media seems to be where much of the action is because you can still get real news there without the constant leftist slant.
So we have finally reached election day--and the general consensus among many is that Trump will win the election by a landslide but Hillary will end up in the White House because she is the "candidate of choice" of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the other One World Government groups. If the Democrats manage to steal the election and enthrone Hillary it will be interesting to see how the mainstream media reports, or spins, that because, in the final analysis, spin is what they are really about, not news.
Just yesterday I read an article on http://thehornnews.com which carried a headline that stated: "RIGGED! Email PROVES media totally corrupt" Now there's a headline I could agree with. After watching the news media (so called) cover events I have been a partaker of for over forty years, I have to totally agree with the headline on the Horn News article. I long ago came to the conclusion that the absolute last thing the "news" media was all about was real news. Lots of folks couldn't quite see that, but the media's performance in prostituting itself before the Alter of St. Hillary in this current election cycle has opened lots of eyes.
The Horn News article continued: "The most recent batch of emails released by WikiLeaks reveals that CNN and The Washington Post were communicating with the Democratic National Convention during the election primaries, filtering them information to use in their reporting. In fact, Democrat insiders were actually writing the questions for interviews and doing newspaper reaearch! These allegedly non-partisan publications clearly had an alternative agenda outside from honest and respectable journalism." The article then shows part of one of the leaked emails that shows this.
And the article noted that: "It's clear the mainstream media has been working with the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and Clinton campaign to shape the political discourse throughout the entire election, focusing on Trump controversies." So, with the Democrats and the "lamestream media" working hand in glove to make Trump look bad, who can honestly say the system wasn't rigged?
What we have finally seen, right out in the open for those who have eyes to see, is "journalists' are are not really journalists at all, but rather are a group of people on a political mission to help elect Hillary--anyway they have to. They have proven themselves to be nothing more than culturally Marxist political shills--something many of us figured out decades ago. But now it's out in the open!
One commentator on a Fox News interview either yesterday or today accused the media of helping to "drag the old hag staggering across the finish line."
For anyone that doesn't have mush for brains it should be more than obvious that the mainstream media has lost all credibility with ordinary folks. The only ones they may remotely still have credibility with is ultra-liberals, socialists, and communists, and the only reason they have any standing yet, even in such sordid company, is that these groups realize the media can be useful to them in their efforts to destroy the culture of ordinary Americans.
Someone told me in the last couple days that the readership of mainstream propaganda sheets like the New York Times and the Washington Post are way, way down. No one is paying them any attention anymore. The alternative media seems to be where much of the action is because you can still get real news there without the constant leftist slant.
So we have finally reached election day--and the general consensus among many is that Trump will win the election by a landslide but Hillary will end up in the White House because she is the "candidate of choice" of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the other One World Government groups. If the Democrats manage to steal the election and enthrone Hillary it will be interesting to see how the mainstream media reports, or spins, that because, in the final analysis, spin is what they are really about, not news.
Sunday, November 06, 2016
Comey Puppet Continues To Howl "Not Guilty, Not Guilty, Not Guilty!
by Al Benson Jr.
Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.
So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.
On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.
Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.
I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous! An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ noted that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."
So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.
So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?
So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be.
Last week we heard that there was a significant revolution brewing in the FBI over Director James Comey's "get out of jail free" card that he delivered to Hillary Clinton back in July. We were told that Comey reopened the investigation regarding Hillary's emails on October 28th because of that revolution, which, we were told, was going to cost him a lot of good men if he didn't do something to reverse his July charade.
So he reopened the "investigation" due to 650,000 email found on a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abiden, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. There were all manner of rumors flying around about there being indictments of both Abiden and Hillary forthcoming.. It sounded good, until you started reading some of the articles and then most of it sounded almost like wishful thinking. I told someone a long time ago that I would believe she was indicted when I saw a copy of the indictment. I haven't seen one yet. Now it looks like I may never get to see it.
On the afternoon of November 6th, two days before the election, someone in the Shadow Government once again pulled puppet James Comey's strings so that he could walk out on the national stage and inform us that his bureau's study of these 650,000 new emails had produced nothing to make Clinton appear anymore guilty than he had found back in July. A new "get out of jail free" card had been issued to Hillary.
Did I really expect the Justice Department under the grand tutelage of Loretta Lynch to actually indict Hillary? Not hardly. The corruption in this administration is so deep-rooted that nothing less than Divine intervention will ever get rid of it. Our Republican-controlled Congress is about as useless as an icebox to an Eskimo--and some of them are part of the corruption also.
I found it interesting that the FBI was able to investigate 650,000 emails in only eight days and discover that Hillary was as pure as the driven snow. They must have worked 36 hours a day to do it. The overtime expenses for the Bureau must have been stupendous! An article on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ noted that "FBI chief James Comey told leaders in Congress hours earlier that a review of 650,000 emails discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner had reinforced his July 5 decision to let her off the hook."
So I have to conclude that Mr. Comey was a lot more afraid of whoever told him to reinforce his July 5th decision about Hillary's innocence than he was of losing a whole batch of dedicated agents who knew what he did on July 5th smelled like a rat. To put it bluntly, someone in our Shadow Government scared the hell out of him. It may have been that he felt it was a lot safer to do what he did than to end up as a suicide in a back alley after having shot himself in the back of the head as we have been told several others that were part of this administration had done. Interesting that there was a whole bunch of them that all shot themselves in the back of the head. Guess that must be the suicide method of choice this year.
So now we will proceed into the last day before the election and the managed media will dutifully inform us that the FBI found Hillary totally innocent of all things and therefore she is an acceptable candidate to run the country. Nothing will be said about her open borders policy and her desire to do away with our national sovereignty--and actually, there are really the policies of our Shadow Government--the One World Government people that she carries water for. Her planned destruction of the Second Amendment is also part of this agenda. After all, the American public can't fight back if they don't have firearms, can they?
So we will see if our prostitute press can con enough useful idiots into voting for Hillary on Tuesday, and if they can't the Democratic Establishment probably has a list of deceased people that can be counted on to vote early and often. It's not that I suspect those people of being dishonest, mind you, but I do suspect them of being totally and utterly corrupt--cultural Marxists, for whom the end always justifies the means, no matter how foul the means might be.
Thursday, November 03, 2016
test
See if you can get into http://revisedhistory.wordpress.com
I asked people to try to get into my blog because on the morning of November 3rd I had tried to open it via Firefox and it would not open. When I went to check, I found out that, on Firefox, my blog was not even listed anymore. Guess I must have offended someone somehow. Didn't think my material was THAT controversial!
When I went to Google and put up the same search pages I found that my blog was still listed on Google's search pages, so if you want to check out my articles you may have to get into them by some other source than Firefox.
In following the odd trends in the present election cycle I note that the Clinton Camp has indulged in all manner of claims against both Trump and Wikileaks, claiming that both are being heavily influenced by Putin and the Russians. Now I am no fan of Putin's by any stretch of the imagination, but let's don't start blaming him for things he probably had no hand in.
And speaking of Hillary's loathing for Putin, didn't she have some kind of deal with him awhile back whereby they managed to sell Putin 20% of the Uranium in this country? Wonder if any of that Uranium was on land that was anyplace close to the Bundy Ranch in Nevada?
Watched a video a couple nights ago that had been on stevepiecznik.com in which Mr. Piecznik noted that the material that came from Wikileaks was not passed to them by the Russians but, in reality, came from somewhere in the intelligence community, what Mr. Piecznik referred to as "deep state officials." Mr. Piecznik is a former assistant secretary of state and has been around the intelligence community for decades.
He warned of a "Clinton coup' etat" in which the Clintons had "co-opted" the FBI, CIA, and other groups but he said that there were those in these groups that were sincere patriots and they had initiated a counter-coup, part of which was the turning over to Julian Assange all these Clinton emails that he has been putting out there. The FBI's reopening of the Clinton email situation is part of this. So it will be interesting to see how all of this turns out. Whatever one may think of Trump, electing his opposite number in the Democratic Establishment is unthinkable for the future of this country. If such happens, we will, in fact, end up having no country at all. Trump seems to understand this and, for good reason, is opposed to Hillary's "open borders" approach to dismantling the country in favor of merging it into some kind of continental mega-state.
So stay alert to all this--and pray that the Lord will throw a monkey wrench into the gears of the One World Government boys' plans for us--and I mean pray seriously about this.
I asked people to try to get into my blog because on the morning of November 3rd I had tried to open it via Firefox and it would not open. When I went to check, I found out that, on Firefox, my blog was not even listed anymore. Guess I must have offended someone somehow. Didn't think my material was THAT controversial!
When I went to Google and put up the same search pages I found that my blog was still listed on Google's search pages, so if you want to check out my articles you may have to get into them by some other source than Firefox.
In following the odd trends in the present election cycle I note that the Clinton Camp has indulged in all manner of claims against both Trump and Wikileaks, claiming that both are being heavily influenced by Putin and the Russians. Now I am no fan of Putin's by any stretch of the imagination, but let's don't start blaming him for things he probably had no hand in.
And speaking of Hillary's loathing for Putin, didn't she have some kind of deal with him awhile back whereby they managed to sell Putin 20% of the Uranium in this country? Wonder if any of that Uranium was on land that was anyplace close to the Bundy Ranch in Nevada?
Watched a video a couple nights ago that had been on stevepiecznik.com in which Mr. Piecznik noted that the material that came from Wikileaks was not passed to them by the Russians but, in reality, came from somewhere in the intelligence community, what Mr. Piecznik referred to as "deep state officials." Mr. Piecznik is a former assistant secretary of state and has been around the intelligence community for decades.
He warned of a "Clinton coup' etat" in which the Clintons had "co-opted" the FBI, CIA, and other groups but he said that there were those in these groups that were sincere patriots and they had initiated a counter-coup, part of which was the turning over to Julian Assange all these Clinton emails that he has been putting out there. The FBI's reopening of the Clinton email situation is part of this. So it will be interesting to see how all of this turns out. Whatever one may think of Trump, electing his opposite number in the Democratic Establishment is unthinkable for the future of this country. If such happens, we will, in fact, end up having no country at all. Trump seems to understand this and, for good reason, is opposed to Hillary's "open borders" approach to dismantling the country in favor of merging it into some kind of continental mega-state.
So stay alert to all this--and pray that the Lord will throw a monkey wrench into the gears of the One World Government boys' plans for us--and I mean pray seriously about this.
Wednesday, November 02, 2016
K. I. S. S.
This election is NOT about Hillary
or Donald
SO
Let Us All
Keep It Simple Stupid!
It Is About
THE SOVEREIGNTY
OF OUR
UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Sovereignty means: OUR INDEPENDENCE
(Declared in 1776)
We DO NOT want to be ruled by:
ONE-WORLD-controlled Government!
(That is what this election is all about)
The vision that
Hillary AND the MAIN-STREAM MEDIA
have for America
IS:
THAT of
An America Controlled by a WORLD
COURT, under the control of the
United Nations
which will tell us what we can & can NOT DO
as opposed to our sovereignty under God.
Below is an outline/list of what that means and how it is intended to affect us:
1. The Second Amendment--Our right to bear arms as guaranteed in the Constitution--no matter what government
says.
2. Illegal immigration--A country without borders is no country
at all. If you want a place in the United States come in legally
and earn the right to vote and participate.
3. The Supreme Court--We need a Supreme Court that will
interpret the Constitution according to its original intent
and not invent new interpretations as it goes along. We
need justices that will protect the human rights of the
unborn and not destroy them through "choice."
4. Sovereignty and dominion (under God)--as opposed to rule
by the United Nations or some other World Government
entity.
5. The income tax and employment--Our present income tax
was taken from the pages of The Communist Manifesto. We need a fairer method of taxation and a business climate that will guarantee that jobs will stay in this country and
not be relocated overseas.
6. Freedom of religion--Which means not only the freedom to worship according to the dictates of our consciences but also freedom to practice our faith in the marketplace of our
everyday lives. We do NOT need freedom FROM religion,
which is what is being forced on us nowadays.
7. We need family values as opposed to "community values."
It does not "take a village to raise a child"--it takes a caring
and loving parents and family--a family as defined in the
Holy Bible.
8. We need freedom and personal responsibility--as opposed
to Hollywood's values and attitudes.
or Donald
SO
Let Us All
Keep It Simple Stupid!
It Is About
THE SOVEREIGNTY
OF OUR
UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Sovereignty means: OUR INDEPENDENCE
(Declared in 1776)
We DO NOT want to be ruled by:
ONE-WORLD-controlled Government!
(That is what this election is all about)
The vision that
Hillary AND the MAIN-STREAM MEDIA
have for America
IS:
THAT of
An America Controlled by a WORLD
COURT, under the control of the
United Nations
which will tell us what we can & can NOT DO
as opposed to our sovereignty under God.
Below is an outline/list of what that means and how it is intended to affect us:
1. The Second Amendment--Our right to bear arms as guaranteed in the Constitution--no matter what government
says.
2. Illegal immigration--A country without borders is no country
at all. If you want a place in the United States come in legally
and earn the right to vote and participate.
3. The Supreme Court--We need a Supreme Court that will
interpret the Constitution according to its original intent
and not invent new interpretations as it goes along. We
need justices that will protect the human rights of the
unborn and not destroy them through "choice."
4. Sovereignty and dominion (under God)--as opposed to rule
by the United Nations or some other World Government
entity.
5. The income tax and employment--Our present income tax
was taken from the pages of The Communist Manifesto. We need a fairer method of taxation and a business climate that will guarantee that jobs will stay in this country and
not be relocated overseas.
6. Freedom of religion--Which means not only the freedom to worship according to the dictates of our consciences but also freedom to practice our faith in the marketplace of our
everyday lives. We do NOT need freedom FROM religion,
which is what is being forced on us nowadays.
7. We need family values as opposed to "community values."
It does not "take a village to raise a child"--it takes a caring
and loving parents and family--a family as defined in the
Holy Bible.
8. We need freedom and personal responsibility--as opposed
to Hollywood's values and attitudes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)